| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Haze Her
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
RB, we very rarely contact webmasters to tell them about posts here. When they create their account, webmasters have the option to be notified whenever something is posted to one of their sites. We encourage wm's to communicate with users and point out to them that it usually helps their site's image.
But beyond that, we only contact them on rare occasions. For example, VegasKen has contacted the WM of a certain (GGG) site several times trying to help users get accounts canceled or get refunds. It happens but not that often.
|
05-22-14 05:13am
|
Reply
277
|
Haze Her
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from rearadmiral:
You are lucky about one thing - at least when you clicked the join page you found out that it lacked encryption. I had an email about a new site called XXX Pawn a few weeks back that looked interesting so I clicked the join button to see what the price was. What I didn't know was that it was a Bang Bros site and they had retained my credit card information so I didn't get any price information - I was signed up. At $20 for a site with six or seven scenes. And true to Bang Bros form with all of their add-on sites, cancelling was not easy. Since Haze Her and Dancing Bear are Bang Bros sites, if you join make sure to start the cancellation process well in advance of a rebill because you may need that time to get the membership cancelled.
Bang Bros has some great porn but the have the business ethics of the mob.
|
05-21-14 04:28pm
|
Reply
278
|
Haze Her
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment from RagingBuddhist:
Hey Khan - Do you guys ever contact sites to point them to comments here? Like I said above, I wrote to these people and they never responded. Not a great first impression and maybe a harbinger of problems to come if I signed up, but I'm really curious about this lack of encryption.
|
05-21-14 02:59pm
|
Reply
279
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Capn:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yes, 'Few videos' seems to be more of a recurring 'con' listed by TBP reviewers rather than anyone else.
I have never seen them list 'Few Photosets' as a 'con'.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-10 09:54am
|
Reply
280
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Goldfish:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
The bit rate seems to be fairly consistent at 2700kbps. I did download a couple videos with the big blocky watermark but most of them had a smaller watermark. I'm not sure if that's because They reverted back to a smaller watermark due to popular demand or because I kept more of the pre-blocky watermark vids.
|
04-09-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
281
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Denner:
Good hint - that site has always had some decent/fine material - and maybe one of the best in handjobs. Look forward to the review....
|
12-06-09 05:16am
|
Reply
282
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from williamj:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks...I've been strictly a solo or lezzie fan but I've been thinking about adding a cock site. I'll put it on my short list.
|
03-07-08 09:28am
|
Reply
283
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Goldfish:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for the input RB. Maybe I'll give it a shot.
|
02-07-08 04:54am
|
Reply
284
|
Homegrown Video
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Khan:
I checked with an editor and there's really no standard.
They did say that if the watermark is clear (pic able to be seen through it) it tends toward the "medium" specification whereas a big solid watermark would be judged as large.
Hope that helps.
|
10-28-09 02:17pm
|
Reply
285
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Marcus:
Was there another swathe of biased reviews I missed? The last batch were extremely annoying.
|
03-23-13 07:59am
|
Reply
286
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from hodayathink:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I feel like it's just the nature of the people that join sites like these and like them. They want to "please their mistress" so much that they are more than eager to do things like this for them.
|
03-22-13 10:47am
|
Reply
287
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from hodayathink:
Is it just me, or does this seem to be more common with dominatrix sites than any other type of site?
|
03-21-13 09:38pm
|
Reply
288
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bibo:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Obvious faker. Joined today, first review, 100% score for a site that got three 100% scores on ONE day by first time posters.
Hopefully the admins will take care of that, because this is just fraud.
|
03-21-13 10:47am
|
Reply
289
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from thaavi:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
All the data here: https://www.thebestporn.com/review/idreamofjo/#review
|
06-03-13 03:37am
|
Reply
290
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
No doubt Abby Winters wanted some free advertising at the time but I was a willing participant and no, I never expected compensation nor did I get any. I was just glad to spread the Gospel of, what I thought was a great site at the time. I do agree, however, that a flood of extremely short, favourable reviews, might make one suspicious!
|
06-02-13 10:06pm
|
Reply
291
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from ChaseGC:
In the Viv Thomas forum, subscribers to IDreamOfJo were asked to write a review here, so I did. I've never heard of pornusers.com .
BTW, I've been a member of several of paysites listed by rating, and I would not give DDF Production any more than a 50 - you couldn't give me a membership to such trash- and you guys have them at #5. So much for the over-rating BS.
|
06-02-13 12:11pm
|
Reply
292
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
None of the reviews are of any value because the reviewers are either trolling for traffic or simply can't get a clue that this is not how you do a review. In any case. Maybe someone(other than TBP) who can do a decent review will join her site and then we will actually know what the site is about. For now I'm out of here. I won't post any other comments.
|
06-01-13 05:46pm
|
Reply
293
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from thaavi:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Why you people are so suspicious. Why you just canīt believe the site is that good? No, mistress really didnīt sent us. Admin told us about possibility to write our opinion here, so some of us did. Thatīs all.
|
06-01-13 05:00pm
|
Reply
294
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from pat362:
I don't know but the really sad part here is that her site looks decent. Of course you wouldn't know it based on the 3 recent reviews because there is nothing in them to excite a possible fan in joining.
I think the opposite is likely to happen because some people like me will feel that a site with such high scores and no hard data to support them is either a fraud or not a very good site at all.
|
06-01-13 10:44am
|
Reply
295
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Elmien:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Me and Thaavi came in on the same time due to communication... See there is a lot of communication on our "web mistress" site. Personally I didn't even wanted to post a review due to negative comments that will be given but as a member of that site I felt its necessary to inform the people how addictive this "webmistress" site is. Ife your a real follower of Jo/monica you would understand..
And to get to the review posting guide lines....
I've never been good at following it... How do you choose a certain amount of good qualities if there is so many? And the cons? What cons? I call it space to improve... Not cons... Sorry but by writing a review is not to follow guide line but to express your experience and knowledge of the site...
|
06-01-13 12:08am
|
Reply
296
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Elmien:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Commercials? Are you kidding me? I'm a member of this site and came across this misleading review... First of all there is no other site coming even close to this site. I have been to other sites and with big disappointment always returning to Idreamofjo.com. This is the only site I came across that shows so much passion and sensuality that its almost to good to be true. And for those wondering about the updates... Well rest assure that the site is being updated every week. As you enter the site there's a clock showing when the next update is due.. And its always been on time.
|
05-31-13 10:44pm
|
Reply
297
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from marcdc1:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Buddhist you don't mean what I think you mean do you?
:)
|
05-31-13 05:49pm
|
Reply
298
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from lk2fireone:
MAYBE THE EMAIL GOT LOST IN THE INTERNET, AND FINALLY FOUND ITS WAY TO YOU.
THAT MIGHT HELP EXPLAIN THE DELAY IN NOTIFYING YOU THAT YOU HAVE REACHED YOUR DOWNLOAD LIMIT.
COMPUTERS CAN BE TRICKY.
WATCH 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY OR THE ALIEN MOVIES (WHERE THE COMPUTER IS AN ANDROID) AND YOU BEGIN TO REALIZE THAT NOT ALL COMPUTERS ARE HUMAN-FRIENDLY.
|
07-05-17 05:10am
|
Reply
299
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from FeckAdmin:
Ourr bandwidth limit has now been increased to 10GB, which allows you to download hundreds of hi-def videos with a 30 day subscription. Compare that to a DVD where you might get 4 or 5 scenes for $30.
|
01-22-14 02:21am
|
Reply
300
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Marcus:
Really good feature, that. I try and cancel straight away if I know I'm not going to renew, but on some where I do stay for a while, it's always sod's law that by the time I cancel it's a day after the rebill, so this is a great feature.
Just reading through the comments and it's a shame that the webmaster is blindly defensive to the point they pick holes in largely positive reviews. I know if I ever join the site I won't be reviewing it on Porn Users.
|
03-23-13 05:17am
|
