| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
There's a vague maximum limit for me whenever I have to stop and ask myself "Is this even porn?" And this doesn't even mean something looks painful or abusive, just a simple case of what the fuck! But a lot of BDSM/Kink.com-style stuff is generally unappealing to me as well.
|
09-15-13 01:30am
|
Reply
102
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Addict:
Easy way to beat porn spam especially if you use webmail.
1. Never use your main email for subscription of porn services, it happen to me plenty of times when my subscription ends I get increase of spam.
2. Use an email account that allows use of alias, I only use alias to join sites when subscription ends I delete that alias.
3. Set rules to sent emails from certain alias to a new folder if the email service allows you to create custom folder that. So you can always just delete everything from that folder.
|
08-20-13 07:53am
|
Reply
103
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Marcus:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I know, I think you mis-understood what I said :)
I mean that I have a separate email account for using to join websites. That way, when I do inevitably get lots of spam (which I do...), it doesn't matter because the only important emails I'd get to that account are the membership confirmations which are the ones you can flag/star.
That way, apart from the principle of it, I don't really care I get spam because I never check that email account anyway.
|
07-29-13 10:48pm
|
Reply
104
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Peeper:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I have the same problem with an other site. I don't think they sell my address (hope so), but maybe the registration page is not safe. Maybe a third person can track/read the given personal informations (a cookie or something like that).
|
07-29-13 09:27pm
|
Reply
105
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Marcus:
Urgh, so annoying when this happens.
I have an email account just for site subscriptions because of sites like this. When I'm a member of a site I just flag/star the confirmation email so it stays up the top, then I don't have to sift through the junk emails.
|
07-28-13 11:57pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Randyman:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Throw a smart ass comment my way, expect to get bitch slapped back.
|
07-22-13 11:59pm
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Randyman:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Sounds like I'm down on the pier, listening to old men tell bullshit fishing stories.
|
07-22-13 11:32pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Randyman:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I'll still go with expert opinion, it's urine, women can't shoot ejaculate out of their vaginas like a freak in a circus side show.
|
07-22-13 11:19pm
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Randyman:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Used to date a squirter, we both got sick of it and made a consult with the gynecologist. She told us that it's quite common, and that the "squirting" is urine, coming straight out of the bladder, and it's an involuntary reflex. She informed us that some women squirt because the penis is poking the bladder, some women squirt when orgasming, and some women can do it at will. I'll take the opinion of an expert any day. Ever watch a chic squirt in a video? Notice how it's squirting right out of her pee hole? Women orgasm through their vagina, not their pee hole.
|
07-22-13 08:12pm
|
Reply
110
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
To their credit, it is mentioned clearly in the Terms of Service. But 15 downloads per month??? That's insane. It looks like another attempt to foil pirates that only hurts legitimate paying customers.
|
07-21-13 08:13am
|
Reply
111
|
MetArt Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from lk2fireone:
$60 is a great price. But like you say, there aren't enough hours in a day (or week, or month) to spend at these sites.
{I'm switching to capital letters, because it's easier for me to see and read. I know it not proper etiquette, but fuck that. I am tired of squinting and trying to read the tiny letters.)
A BETTER APPROACH IS TO SIGN UP FOR THE METART NEWSLETTER. YOU CAN SIGN UP AT METART DOT COM FOR FREE.
IN THE NETSLETTERS, THERE ARE SOMETIMES OFFERS TO JOIN ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK FOR A REDUCED PRICE. SOMETIMES AS LOW AS $10 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.
JOIN ONE OF THE SITES, THAT YOU THINK YOU MIGHT LIKE. FOR $10 OR WHATEVER.
ONCE YOU HAVE JOINED ONE ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, YOU CAN NOW JOIN ANY OTHER SITE IN THE NETWORK FOR $10/MONTH, RECURRING.
THAT WAY, YOU ARE TRULY GETTING YOUR MONEY'S WORTH, BECAUSE YOU NOW HAVE THE TIME TO EXPLORE EACH SITE, AT YOUR LEISURE.
BELONG TO ALL THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, OR 8 OF THEM AT ONCE, JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE BECAUSE YOU CAN ONLY DO SO MUCH IN A DAY. UNLESS MONEY IS NO CONSIDERATION.
METART IS MY FAVORITE PORN SITE. I'VE BEEN A MEMBER MANY TIMES. BUT NOT EVERYONE LIKES IT. IT'S TOO SOFTCORE FOR SOME.
THE VIDEOS AT METART ARE BORING. REECENTLY, SOME OF THE VIDEOS HAVE GOTTEN TO BE A LITTLE MORE EROTIC. BUT YOU CAN SPEND HUNDREDS OF HOURS LOOKING OVER THEIR VIDEOS, AND THE ONLY THING YOU WILL THINK IS: WHAT A WASTED OPPORTUNITY OF THESE LOVELY YOUNG MODELS.
LIKE PAT SAYS, A LOT OF THE SITES HAVE SIMILAR MATERIAL. SO IT'S PROBABLY BETTER TO IDENTIFY THE SITES YOU REALLY WANT TO JOIN, INSTEAD OF JOINING ALL OF THEM.
LIKE I SAID, METART IF MY FAVORITE. HIGH QUALITY PHOTOGRAPHY. MASSIVE CONTENT OF PHOTOSETS, NASSUVE NUMBER OF MODELS, YOUNG TEEN, MAINLY NATURAL, WHITE, ETC. BUT VERY SOFTCORE.
|
06-29-13 09:55pm
|
Reply
112
|
MetArt Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from pat362:
I agree with you that the cost is a little high but seeing as these are all top notch sites then that shouldn't be an issue for people looking for a good deal. The time needed to surf all these sites is a bigger hurtle and one that might make some hesitate joining.
Another problem and possibly the biggest one is that the although all the sites are top notch. Is there really a lot of variation from one of these erotic photography sites to the others in the network? If there isn't and most of the women appearing on one of the sites also appears on the others than all you are getting is more of the same. The only one that seems to distinguish itself from the others is sexart but that is because it's more midcore to hardcore than the others and may not appeal to fans of the other sites.
|
06-29-13 09:51am
|
Reply
113
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from thaavi:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
All the data here: https://www.thebestporn.com/review/idreamofjo/#review
|
06-03-13 03:37am
|
Reply
114
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
No doubt Abby Winters wanted some free advertising at the time but I was a willing participant and no, I never expected compensation nor did I get any. I was just glad to spread the Gospel of, what I thought was a great site at the time. I do agree, however, that a flood of extremely short, favourable reviews, might make one suspicious!
|
06-02-13 10:06pm
|
Reply
115
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from ChaseGC:
In the Viv Thomas forum, subscribers to IDreamOfJo were asked to write a review here, so I did. I've never heard of pornusers.com .
BTW, I've been a member of several of paysites listed by rating, and I would not give DDF Production any more than a 50 - you couldn't give me a membership to such trash- and you guys have them at #5. So much for the over-rating BS.
|
06-02-13 12:11pm
|
Reply
116
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Cybertoad:
On the site issues, I try Chrome and Maxthon both give good feed back to test a site I do find Firefox faster .
|
06-02-13 07:45am
|
Reply
117
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
None of the reviews are of any value because the reviewers are either trolling for traffic or simply can't get a clue that this is not how you do a review. In any case. Maybe someone(other than TBP) who can do a decent review will join her site and then we will actually know what the site is about. For now I'm out of here. I won't post any other comments.
|
06-01-13 05:46pm
|
Reply
118
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from thaavi:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Why you people are so suspicious. Why you just canīt believe the site is that good? No, mistress really didnīt sent us. Admin told us about possibility to write our opinion here, so some of us did. Thatīs all.
|
06-01-13 05:00pm
|
Reply
119
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from pat362:
I don't know but the really sad part here is that her site looks decent. Of course you wouldn't know it based on the 3 recent reviews because there is nothing in them to excite a possible fan in joining.
I think the opposite is likely to happen because some people like me will feel that a site with such high scores and no hard data to support them is either a fraud or not a very good site at all.
|
06-01-13 10:44am
|
Reply
120
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Elmien:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Me and Thaavi came in on the same time due to communication... See there is a lot of communication on our "web mistress" site. Personally I didn't even wanted to post a review due to negative comments that will be given but as a member of that site I felt its necessary to inform the people how addictive this "webmistress" site is. Ife your a real follower of Jo/monica you would understand..
And to get to the review posting guide lines....
I've never been good at following it... How do you choose a certain amount of good qualities if there is so many? And the cons? What cons? I call it space to improve... Not cons... Sorry but by writing a review is not to follow guide line but to express your experience and knowledge of the site...
|
06-01-13 12:08am
|
Reply
121
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Elmien:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Commercials? Are you kidding me? I'm a member of this site and came across this misleading review... First of all there is no other site coming even close to this site. I have been to other sites and with big disappointment always returning to Idreamofjo.com. This is the only site I came across that shows so much passion and sensuality that its almost to good to be true. And for those wondering about the updates... Well rest assure that the site is being updated every week. As you enter the site there's a clock showing when the next update is due.. And its always been on time.
|
05-31-13 10:44pm
|
Reply
122
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from marcdc1:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Buddhist you don't mean what I think you mean do you?
:)
|
05-31-13 05:49pm
|
Reply
123
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Mort:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Great review, and agree with just about everything you have said.
As a further update, about a month after the RagingBuddhist's last comment, there are still a fair few "updates" that are not really updates, and I have just discovered that they have some sort of software running to limit downloads and image viewing. I logged a job about it, and got a reply that says the limit on viewing images is 500 per hour. However, if I worked flat out on my relatively slow connection, there is no way I could hit 500 full size images in an hour. It also complains you are trying to open too many images at once if you pop up images in a tab, even when only one image at a time is downloading. So, beware of the undeclared limits, and the dodgy limit-checking software they are running.
|
05-19-13 12:57am
|
Reply
124
|
Nude In SF
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
According to your comment it was almost exactly four years ago, and I think you are 100% accurate in your assessment: nothing has changed since then. (Except that it is technically twice the price now because they shortened the membership from two weeks to one, but that really isn't a big deal because there is very little here and a determined member with a normal internet connection could download everything they wanted in a couple of hours.)
I really, really, really wish that there were more sites with good public nudity in American (or Canadian or Western European cities) but I realize that the current legal climate probably prevents this. Not to sound like a shill, but if you do like public nudity, the best I've seen is Teasers VOD.
|
04-30-13 05:54pm
|
Reply
125
|
Candy Christopher
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
It kills me 'cause I try to focus on the positive, and as I've mentioned in other posts, I think I'm too easy as a reviewer.
But this site is awfully dated. Which is a shame cause I think the passion across the network is there and would make great porn, if only they would invest in it.
Here's hoping to seeing a lightyear's worth of improvement :)
|
04-20-13 09:59am
|
