| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Upskirt Jerk
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from tangub:
Funnily enough I came across this site the other week, thought it looked interesting and bookmarked it as a possible join so I was delighted to see that you had reviewed it and rated it highly. It looks like you can join the network of sites but it's $49.95 for a month as opposed to $24.95 for the single site access.
|
12-05-16 03:37pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from LPee23:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
http://vintagenudephotos.com/vpc.htm
It's Mark Rotenberg's site. Him and I emailed about some rare photos once. He could probably tell you if your mags are worth anything.
|
08-15-16 05:55pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LPee23:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Any of those vintage mags got pee scenes? Thought I'd ask because I know you're into pee scenes too. I'll buy them if you're looking to get rid of them. If you don't have any vintage peeing, I know a guy who buys and sells vintage mags full time, and you might be able to make some money with him too depending on what you have.
|
08-14-16 07:08am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from LPee23:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, I think if you crack open the case of an external and cool it with a fan, it will prolong their life on average. I remember how hot mine used to get. Now they stay cool in my 8-bay dual fan enclosure.
|
06-15-16 05:54pm
|
Reply
55
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Yanks:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Looking at this layed out like this you are correct. Billie is talking to our CMS manager about this now. Our current shooting schedule has not changed. We shoot 6 girls a month (2 masturbation videos with each girl) Any given two week period should than have 5-7 videos depending on the days. I apologize for this. We will figure out where these videos are and what the issue is. Thanks for highlighting in detail.
EDIT: We will also make sure they get added.
Todd
|
04-08-16 03:10am
|
Reply
56
|
Real Girls Play
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment from RagingBuddhist:
I just got an email from the site to tell me my subscription was done after today. What a generous offer it was to provide a link to resubscribe to a site that didn't update the entire month you were a member. Damn shame you can't get your money back when a site puts up false advertising - THAT might get their attention.
|
03-25-16 12:50pm
|
Reply
57
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Yanks:
Hello RagingBuddist As always, we sincerely appreciate your loyalty and your passion for the site. I would however like to clarify our update schedule so that it is more clear for everyone. Our goal is to do daily Yanks.com visual updates, we do this 99.9% of the time.
Biographies do come through as updates because we do want people to know when one has been posted, however they do not count as a "daily update" by our scheduling standards. The same goes for ATK and GOW updates, they also never count as "daily updates" to us. If you look through our update calendar you will see that whenever there is a ATK, BIO or GOW update there is also a Yanks video or Photo-set of some kind.
That being said there are some time anomalies that happen between when the content is released from our servers and content management system and what the local time is on your computer. Daylight savings time also happens at different times around the world which will also bump a set one day ahead or back. Once again if you refer to the calendar you will notice that when the schedule above is not accurate there is an extra Yanks update the day before or the day after that would be realign to our goal according to your time zone.
Our hope is to eventually add 7 high quality video and photo partners like GOW and ATK so that each day there will be a Yanks visual update, a video partner update (full video) and a photo partner update (full HQ set). This in addition to the bios that we release from time to time. That will be 3-4 updates per day with one Yanks visual update daily everyday.
I hope that clarifies the schedule. Thanks again for your loyalty and hope to see you back before a year, however it is not until then we will be more than happy to show you what we have next time we see you.
All the best!
Todd
|
03-22-16 10:47am
|
Reply
58
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from WebmasterX:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Well yes of course he is, no question about that. But I think we sometimes need to explain why we do the things the way we do them (and if you look over how things have changed over the years, you'll see a lot of ...adjustments". (New version of the site coming early Summer btw...)
The sites you mentioned came AFTER ExCoGi, with exception of Net Video Girls which is indeed one of the few true pioneers on the Web.
So it's not fair to say "ExCoGi isn't unique because those sites have a similar approach". Well, again, they got that from us and other long running sites. And they copied that approach because it WORKS, at least for the type of person that appreciates this style.
Anyway, not arguing with anyone, just looking to clarify that ExCoGi is NOT for everyone and we hope we make that clear on the free tour and the many free videos we offer. If not, we welcome any suggestions to showcase our different approach more. Maybe we're just too close to our own creation, you know?
BTW in regards to being repetitive - yes it is. Do we want to change things up? YES! But how? any time we try something new we get mostly hate mail from members. So we have to stick to a certain formula and slooooowly try new things until we find something that our members enjoy.
That's why over the years you actually DO notice a lot of changes, but they're usually pretty gradual. We changed
formats, behind the scenes, positions, camera positions and angles, interview styles, the split screen thing, replays, slo-mo, etc etc etc. It just doesn't seem that way because there's so much of it. If you just watch 5 or 6 videos then yeah, it all SEEMS the same.
Makes sense?
|
03-03-16 12:47pm
|
Reply
59
|
Real Girls Play
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from MargulisAZ:
I had forgot about this site lol. I joined it once and also thought it sucked - interesting because it has an FTVgirls feel to it as far as the shoots go but just totally lacking overall. I left never wanting to join again.
|
02-24-16 09:38pm
|
Reply
60
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bill20:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, I'd never agree to their terms. (owe them $25,000 plus %1.5/month late fee, plus collection fees if you cancel your card.)
A prepaid card might work, but not really worth the hassle and extra charges.
The thing that sounds good about these virtual credit cards is you can get a new one time credit card number for every charge for no extra fee using your existing account.
This might solve a lot of the problems that people have with BangBros or even the standard sneaky pre-checked cross sales that most of the sites have.
My current credit card doesn't offer this feature, but I plan to look for it the next time I get a new card.
|
02-24-16 09:02pm
|
Reply
61
|
Got 2 Pee
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from LPee23:
Great review! Sounds like they've grown since I joined, I only have the first 83 scenes.
|
02-24-16 01:26pm
|
Reply
62
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Yanks:
Thanks for noticing RagingBuddist. We have in fact sped up and increased our updates so that we are doing daily Yanks visual updates (pics and vids) along with other updates such as bios and friend site content. In other words there is always something to look at every day. ;)
I am looking forward to what you think of our next members area coming out in a month or two. It will be easy to use, visually appealing and a bit less linear which will make discovery of some of the gems of our past a bit easier. So whether or not you stay the whole time or swing back in, we would welcome your comments on the next layout. :) All the Best!!!
Todd
|
02-16-16 12:38pm
|
Reply
63
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from skippy:
The deal is really a buy-one, get one free. So there is no free access to either.
|
10-29-15 07:02am
|
Reply
64
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from greg909:
Yes, it's true that many of met-art's sets are not very sharp at all. More specifically, they often have low depth-of-field (one part of the body is in fairly good focus while everything else is not.)
Lack of sharpness is also more apparent on this site because they offer very large images (sometimes 7000 pixels), so the softness is very apparent. There are, however, a few photographers who offer better sharpness, like Matiss. I just wish it was more consistently good across other photographers' sets. Still, most viewers just wax poetic about every set that's posted there, which makes me laugh.
|
07-05-15 01:54pm
|
Reply
65
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Drooler:
I know what the RagingBuddhist talking about here, but I've seen the blurriness problem with HegreArt, MPL Studios, etc. etc. as well. I can't think of a site that hasn't disappointed me when there's a pic I really like and the model's face, on closer inspection, is in something of a blur.
Suffice to say that photographers and photo editors can't predict what I'm going to want, so I just try to take the good stuff and toss out the fuzzy-wuzzies that I don't want.
|
07-04-15 05:07am
|
Reply
66
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I'm not seeing it - I'm checking out the Loxie by Antonio Clemens set, posted the other day - viewing it in the High Res selection, and while there is some "softness" to the image in the face area frequently, which I see in every site except for ATK, which is all about glaringly direct photos, I don't see blurry and distorted. Mesoti by Antonio Clemens, posted yesterday, is even sharper.
I think it's a matter of taste. In the glamour area, you're pretty much always going to see treatment of photos. Hegre is sometimes an exception. You can often see every bit of facial hair on his models at the same time that they are undeniably presented in a very glam-art mode.
|
07-03-15 06:55am
|
Reply
67
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for the clear explanation.
I've read reports by some PU members that mention distortions in photos, and now I better understand what they were talking about. Because I always thought the photo quality was perfectly acceptable.
Using a smaller monitor, and almost never zooming in for fine details, explains the difference.
|
07-03-15 01:47am
|
Reply
68
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I agree that MetArt has tons of content and thousands of lovely models.
Maybe there is too much content, and the average viewer starts to get bored. A psychology thing.
Very few of the videos at MetArt are worth watching or saving.
That's my opinion, in spite of how lovely the models can be. The vidoes are boring, not erotic.
The value of MetArt is as a photo site.
Maybe I'm not sophisticated enough, but I don't have any problem with the technical quality of the photos. In the main.
What sites do you find that give you satisfaction with the technical quality of the photos?
MPL Studios, Femjoy and Hegre Art offer superior softcore photography.
And how do you view the photos? On a very large monitor, or wall screen TV, or what? What makes the photos at MetArt appear blurry or distorted?
I look at photos on a laptop, or a 22" computer monitor. So I'm guessing that's why I don't have a problem with blurry or distorted photos.
A very large monitor would show the imperfections more easily, I'm guessing.
|
07-02-15 10:34pm
|
Reply
69
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from skippy:
I took them up on the Nubile-films and Joymii 2-for-1 offer. It was a great deal. I also saw a Femjoy $14.95 for a month offer but apparently it was only valid for a few days and I missed it. Make sure to sign up to their newsletters so you don't get left out of the deals!
|
01-17-15 06:13pm
|
Reply
70
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from FE Publishing:
Both Nubiles and Femjoy rarely offer the site off at 50%, it might happen once a year and then it expires. What we do offer though is buy 1 site and get the second one for free, meaning paying the full price but we give you a second site for free. Let me know if you are interested in more combo deals!
|
01-12-15 01:46am
|
Reply
71
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I also got some "free offers" to join Femjoy by paying $30 to join Femjoy and Nubiles.
That's the beauty of advertising: Create words to describe things in the best, most attractive way. Forget logic and common sense... For $30, you get Femjoy and Nubiles, which is the the list price of Nubiles by itself, so you are getting Femjoy for "free".
Anyway, this morning, I got a Christmas special email offer to join Femjoy for $14.95 for 1 month.
That's not "free". But maybe it's half "free"?
LOL.
|
12-25-14 07:02am
|
Reply
72
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from exotics4me:
Yeah I got those too. It looks like it's their way of saying you get a site for free if you pay for another site or at least that's what the ones I'm getting are saying.
|
12-24-14 03:22pm
|
Reply
73
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
You raise an interesting point that I've never considered - that the site access as a bonus to the other sites is different than if you joined through NVG. I have nothing to go on but speculation, but I'm guessing that the site access is the same whether you get a membership as part of the ECG/BRCC/NVG or whether you join specifically through NVG and get access to the other two. Maybe someone else can weigh in on that point.
|
10-28-14 03:20pm
|
Reply
74
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I was a member there up until about three weeks ago. I have to say that of the three sites that come with that membership (Exploited College Girls and Back Room Casting Couch being the other two) I think NVG is the weakest. Some of that is subjective so I’ll try to explain.
My primary reason for joining when I do (I’ve joined maybe five or six times now) is to get access to ECG. BRCC is a great added bonus that adds value to the membership but NVG is a take-it-or-leave-it part of the deal. The scenes are all fairly well done and many of the models are attractive (though some aren’t) so on that scale the site does okay.
Where the site really falls flat is in site design and technical stuff. I’m a fan of simple site designs but NVG looks like it was designed in 1995 and not updated since then. I’ve never found a search mechanism though there may be one. The only way I’ve ever found to sort the videos is by a bar at the top of the screen that allows you to sort by year. I don’t know how that date would work with a remastered video. Once you’re on a specific year page you have some very small thumbnails that really don’t assist in deciding if you want to download the scene. I can’t recall if there is any better way to see the model before downloading.
Speaking of downloading, if there are downloading options I’ll choose MP4s and look for 1280x720 if it’s available. That depends on the bitrate too as I’m looking for the best compromise between video quality and file size. The files are MP$s but if there is an option for different resolutions I didn’t see it. Even the most recent uploads are only 656x368, 2500kb/s and 29fps. That resolution is very low by today’s standards. If I’m incorrect and there are better options for downloading I hope that someone else will weigh in and let us know.
There is a big element of subjectivity here, but if this were a stand-alone site I wouldn’t join unless the price was under $10. The site itself and the video quality are too far below industry standards. But (and this is subjective again) Exploited College Girls is a great site (though the attractiveness of the models is slipping a bit in the past eight months) and Back Room Casting Couch is a good site so if you have any interest in those I’d recommend joining and you get NVG as a bonus so you can explore that.
As I said, I don’t have an active membership there now but if you have any specific questions I can try to answer them. I hope this helped you a bit.
|
10-27-14 02:50pm
|
Reply
75
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jook:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I'm not sure what benefit to other users a review would serve. I literally spent under 45 minutes on the site and there's not much to add then what's in the comment. And I'm not going back there because there's not much else to see and I'm afraid I'll suffer sever psychological trauma if I have to look at it again, haha. Again, still feeling my way around, but doesn't the comment serve the same warning that a review would?
|
09-03-14 02:13am
|
