| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1051
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
The CC processor was Epoch who are usually much better when it comes to sticking to the original price, but a two dollar difference in an eight dollar order does seem excessive to say the least. That's why I am not quite sure if it wasn't the bank that sneaked that one in. Banks do have a habit of milking you dry with various add on charges.
|
12-22-12 10:20am
|
Reply
1052
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks, Pat and that DOES suck, indeed!!
|
12-22-12 10:00am
|
Reply
1053
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from mr3633:
Another very good, detailed review. Thank you for your reviews.
|
10-19-12 02:04pm
|
Reply
1054
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from marcdc1:
Great review Pat. I was also reading the comments and saw what you said about doing the review on a word processor 1st. What's a great idea. I've gotta add that to my workflow.
Thanks for all your support to the PU community.
|
10-18-12 08:09pm
|
Reply
1055
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
It is for the reasons you mentioned that I ignore NA's offers. If you've ever been a client and have collected the handful of MILFs with natural breasts then there are slim pickings.
|
10-16-12 10:03am
|
Reply
1056
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
In the case of this site I HOPE they are in trouble because they not only feature (but almost promote) "enhanced" breasts too much. I subscribed once and under my favorite subject MILFs hardly found a couple that featured natural breasts. Even five dollars is too much, at least to this very subjective person.
|
10-15-12 10:43am
|
Reply
1057
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from graymane:
Comprehensive and informative is the operative words when it comes to your reviews, my friend. You could teach the birth-mother of these sites a few things.
And I think that goes for a lot of others here who derive inspiration and knowledge from your work, prompting perhaps to get on board and emulate your success by following your examples.
This review? unpredictably an applaudable stand-out?
|
10-14-12 09:15pm
|
Reply
1058
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
I would agree with you except that they're making a huge deal out of the 5000th scene (there's a special intro on the scene [which is this week's India Summer scene, if you hadn't noticed] and they recorded and edited a separate video of a bunch of girls congratulating them for it) and they're doing this as a part of that. If this were a deal that just came out of the blue, then I'd be a lot more worried about it. And $10 dollars isn't their normal price. It's what they give to PU and probably a few other places, but if you were to go there off of just typing it in the browser or through Google, which is how most people probably get there, you're going to get charged the normal $24.95 a month.
|
10-13-12 11:15pm
|
Reply
1059
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from hodayathink:
The method to scroll through their library is on the front page of the site (technically, the second page you see since the first page is an ad). The tab that says "View Our Latest Fantasies" has numbers on it. Those numbers are page numbers, the arrow is one page back, and that's how you navigate the entire library chronologically. You can also do it for each sub-site.
|
10-13-12 10:02pm
|
Reply
1060
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from old perv5087:
(pat362's Reply)
You are right, I don't like most porn sites. The better ones are FTV, ALS, Nubiles or dozens of others. For really hardcore I like Pornstar Network. The sites you you tout are just not my style, but then that is why there are so many sites, to give us a choice.
|
07-08-12 07:54am
|
Reply
1061
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from old perv5087:
(pat362's Reply)
Sorry but I am a first time member and feel ripped off even more by this site. As bad as the porn is on this site why would anyone rip it off? Had I known that this is a bang bros look alike I would never have joined. I don't even look at the free stuff they put out there.
|
07-06-12 06:57pm
|
Reply
1062
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from old perv5087:
IMHO, if the site were free it would be a ripoff. Boring vanilla sex, bad tit jobs and fat asses are all that I found here. To top it off I found the interface to be really clumsy.
|
07-06-12 08:31am
|
Reply
1063
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from MountainMan:
(pat362's Reply)
Not sure I'd enjoy that. Just looked at the sub site page on Brazzers and it looks like 95% of the models have the massively fake boobs which I hate.
On NA, there was a huge backlash after Brooke Banner got her implants. They brought her back for one scene after and she's not been back since. I feel a bit bad for her, because she was my favorite model for along time, but that was just a huge bummer. It is a bit unfair, because many models who have massive fake boobs, but had them from the start of their NA career, don't get nearly the backlash.
Either way, my point being, at least from looking at the scenes they feature on the Brazzers page, it seems like a huge number of fake tits, which is not my cup of tea.
I think my next sites are going to be.
Massage Creep
Ultimate Surrender (this has intrigued me for awhile)
But I need a new HD first, or need to do some serious cleanup. Was a member of VideoBox a few months ago and need to do some serious pruning there.
|
04-21-11 07:28pm
|
Reply
1064
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MountainMan:
(pat362's Reply)
I'll give it a try. Thanks for the suggestion.
I've not been a member at either of those yet. Have done RK though before. Was not nearly as big of a fan.
|
04-21-11 10:53am
|
Reply
1065
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
They actually did the same exact thing last July for a couple weeks. I think there was even a comment about it here. The price drop, I think, is just something they do every couple months to stir up new members.
Added: Yeah, here's the comment, and it's literally a year ago yesterday.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=37418
|
07-15-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
1066
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from monty2222:
(pat362's Reply)
Well, both Brazzers and RK have several sites in their network dedicated to anal and big asses, while NA has only one ass site and it hasn't been updated in three years. NA always was less extreme and more "couples friendly" than most other, otherwise similar, sites.
|
07-15-10 07:59am
|
Reply
1067
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
"Anal unit of measure". I like that, and think I may have to use it sometime. And as far as that ratio, the ratio overall right now is about 250 anal scenes to about 3500 scenes, or 1 out of every 14 scenes. The last 19 weeks or so is about 1 out of every 17 to 19. It's a drop, but I don't know how significant that is, and they've never really been much of an anal site anyway.
|
07-13-10 09:00pm
|
Reply
1068
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
Actually, early to middle of last year is when the content was feeling the effects of the economy. Right now, it just is what it is. And as far as I know, the $10 deal is $10 recurring at $25, which is more expensive than the PU deal if you plan on sticking around for more than one month.
|
07-13-10 04:45pm
|
Reply
1069
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from Denner:
For what it's worth:
NA and Brazzers are on my 'Not Again' - list.
Primarily because of bad customer service.
|
07-13-10 01:50pm
|
Reply
1070
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from PinkPanther:
One thing to pay attention to - this offer is for the first month only - after that your subscription would continue for the full regular price.
I've got to say that NA burned me in my last subscription with them. I had an initial price deal and when I went to cancel I got one of those "would you like to continue at a reduced price?" offers. I accepted, never got a confirming e-mail - which is usual - then I was charged a higher price and they denied the offer had been made.
I told them "OK - you got me - and now I'm done subscribing to your site"
|
07-13-10 07:58am
|
Reply
1071
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from james4096:
thanks for pointing this out.
I only join when it's $10, even though $15 is also a good deal.
Hmmm....
It seems the joining from PU doesn't give me the sale price. Maybe the staff here can get in on the offer for people referred by PU and TBP.
|
07-13-10 01:42am
|
Reply
1072
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
I think we can pretty much agree on that.
|
02-25-10 09:01pm
|
Reply
1073
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't think it's an inherently bad idea. I think some girls can make it work, and some can't. I think some go overboard, and some don't. I take it all on a case-by-case basis. Some of my favorite girls have boob jobs (Eva Angelina), some don't (Tori Black). And I think that nowadays, the decision by some girls to get implants is as much a business decision as it is an aesthetic one. Because, from most of the things I've noticed, girls with big boobs (whether real or fake) get more shoots than girls with small ones, especially when it comes to porn made in California (Valley Porn, as it's called). And with companies shooting less because of the economy, you have to do what you can to get shoots.
|
02-24-10 07:19pm
|
Reply
1074
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
They're not going back on anything. It was a bug. They've always allowed negative comments, and unless they are abnormally mean, they pretty much always stay up.
And I completely disagree with your second statement, but that's neither here nor there, and a topic better left to another thread.
|
02-23-10 07:32pm
|
Reply
1075
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Well, the issue did resolve itself, Pat, and to its credit NA is big enough to allow negative comments to stand. Now I only wish that some of the new models would read those comments and decide to go with nature rather than bolt-ons.
|
02-23-10 08:57am
|
