| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1251
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(pat362's Reply)
Exactly - stop the filming and get hold of the scene before shooting again....
|
03-03-10 06:42am
|
Reply
1252
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
I think we can pretty much agree on that.
|
02-25-10 09:01pm
|
Reply
1253
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't think it's an inherently bad idea. I think some girls can make it work, and some can't. I think some go overboard, and some don't. I take it all on a case-by-case basis. Some of my favorite girls have boob jobs (Eva Angelina), some don't (Tori Black). And I think that nowadays, the decision by some girls to get implants is as much a business decision as it is an aesthetic one. Because, from most of the things I've noticed, girls with big boobs (whether real or fake) get more shoots than girls with small ones, especially when it comes to porn made in California (Valley Porn, as it's called). And with companies shooting less because of the economy, you have to do what you can to get shoots.
|
02-24-10 07:19pm
|
Reply
1254
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
They're not going back on anything. It was a bug. They've always allowed negative comments, and unless they are abnormally mean, they pretty much always stay up.
And I completely disagree with your second statement, but that's neither here nor there, and a topic better left to another thread.
|
02-23-10 07:32pm
|
Reply
1255
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Well, the issue did resolve itself, Pat, and to its credit NA is big enough to allow negative comments to stand. Now I only wish that some of the new models would read those comments and decide to go with nature rather than bolt-ons.
|
02-23-10 08:57am
|
Reply
1256
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from mbaya:
Hi Pat,
I am interested in this site but not the rest of the network. If I sign up directly do I get it or only as a loyalty site after one month?
|
02-23-10 07:26am
|
Reply
1257
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the extra info, Pat.
Appreciated.
I think I'll pass on this one.
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-18-10 11:28pm
|
Reply
1258
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from exotics4me:
(pat362's Reply)
Hey Pat,
I checked on this, the three newest updates showing up for me are, Breanna Benson, Melanie Jane and Misty Stone.
On those three you mentioned, the release dates in the membership section are:
Dakoda: 1-8-08
Bree: 1-22-07
Kinzie: 7-31-06
The Innocent High site itself seems to be very well maintained with a update list by date or alphabetical. The other sites in the network are pretty much listed in order of release, but none of those have that many updates to begin with. Also of note, if you like these models that are on Innocent High, most of them also have a set on Solo Interviews as well. Hope that helps
|
02-16-10 09:55pm
|
Reply
1259
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(pat362's Reply)
The updates on Innocent High are all dated. The other sites are not and that is why I had some trouble figuring out their update schedule. What it does show though are the sites that are still updating. It's kind of a strange way they do it, one minute clips on Monday, photos/screencaps on Tuesday and full scene on Wednesday. They do have a nice "update" section that shows each update as they are coming in. I'm still hesitant about anything more than a month. The archives are good enough for the 1 month deal though.
|
02-16-10 06:59pm
|
Reply
1260
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from slutty:
Man, this dude must be talented - I'm tempted to join just to see how he holds the camera in his nads.
Sorry, don't intend to poke fun at typos, but I was laughing at that one for a good bit and couldn't resist...
|
02-16-10 04:55pm
|
Reply
1261
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from mbaya:
I checked out the preview and it is impressive. These models look great!
|
02-14-10 11:06am
|
Reply
1262
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
Ditto to it. Kink.com sites are unusual and might be love-or-hate at least for some people, but they usually provide a VERY good idea about their sites in preview areas. And I can confirm that I had never seen DRM on any kink.com site (hope they still work that way).
|
02-12-10 10:59pm
|
Reply
1263
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Ryan901:
(pat362's Reply)
After joining sites on and off monthly for over ten years, I have yet to see a site come even close in the solo model arena to what Bryci offers. I'm sure I sound like a fanboy, but truth is she has not only raised the bar, she's shattered it. I'm one happy member.
|
02-11-10 08:17pm
|
Reply
1264
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Ryan901:
(pat362's Reply)
I guess we have a difference of the way we view websites Pat. Everything I told you, regarding how often she updates, when she updates, what she updates, that's all in her website tour. On the photos page it shows what she has so far, same with the videos page, same with the webcam stuff. Heck, that's why I joined, I saw the dates listed with the massive amount of updates and I was sold.
As for her playing or not playing, I guess that comes down to the way someone views the site. If i see a site that doesn't show a preview o the girl with toys, or touching herself, I am not going to make the assumption the site features that. I kind of figure if she is doing that, they'd showcase it somewhere in the tour, like other sites do that offer that. That's what I thought anyway, we all view things differently of course.
For me, the biggest thing has been that they've kept up with updates. I have been a member of websites that claim one or two updates per week and they'd be great for the first few months and then they'd disappear with no more updates. With Bryci, I don't know how but they keep cranking out shoot after shoot and they're usually top notch. I think bryci.org is their free site that promos some of their photos. It's still playboy style though.
|
02-10-10 07:09pm
|
Reply
1265
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Ryan901:
(pat362's Reply)
Her site costs $24.95 to join or you can join the bellapass.com for 34.95 and that gives you access to her and avadawn.com and all future sites they create I guess. Ava isn't really my thing so I just signed up for Bryci.
I'm not sure what you're expecting from a website, I was expecting fresh photos, fresh videos, webcam shows and maybe some candids. Her site offers all that plus it also gives you access to a webcam network they are part of called Babe Chat. So you get access to 2-4 other webcam shows every night, free of charge from other girls, like Nikki Sims, Janessa Brazil, and about 20 others.
They do 2 fresh photo set updates weekly, 2 fresh videos. The photo sets are usually 55-100 in size, 4000 pixels in size. Videos are usually 5-20 minutes, 1920-1080 in size as well. She has candids, she does this video series called ask bryci. Kind of cool, I sent in am email with three questions and true to her word, within a week she had them answered on video.
The girl is all work, she just goes goes goes goes. She doesn't play with toys, she explains it's not her thing. I respect that, it's not for everyone I guess. This is why I am with Brazzers mind you. heh
Not sure if that answers your questions but if not, drop me another msg. Love to help!
|
02-09-10 09:04pm
|
Reply
1266
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
It's not called the 'girlfriend experience' for nothing; people want as much 'service' as their money can get them, though I am not sure what Ashley Dupree-type rates get you beyond a job resignation.
I wonder if girls can demand higher rates in porn when the guy is wearing a condom? Probably not though as condom-ed sex in porn would risk a smaller audience than the typical bareback-and-free style.
|
02-08-10 11:30pm
|
Reply
1267
|
Private.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat, I'll try to write a more thorough review later in the week if I have time. The catalog of downloadable dvds is about 470 titles, so the size of the site is pretty decent. The "High" movies are 640x480 1500 kbps typcially, wmv only.
Like I said, my main problem is navagation and inability to use download managers, I'm sure they have some great scenes - but they are pretty much impossible to find unless you know the name of the dvd you are looking for (can't search by star of films)
In response to Rome, the download speeds were excellent whenever I logged in (1.4 MB/sec), however I was unable to get any download managers to work.
|
02-08-10 07:46pm
|
Reply
1268
|
Tori Black
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(pat362's Reply)
If you like Lexi, I would recommend Naughty America - she does frequent live shows there, many of which are archived to be watched anytime, and she's a whole lotta fun. They have 9 scenes with her too.
There was a lot of potential with this network and for a while there was a lot of good stuff being posted, but not lately and I can't recommend it, since I didn't find it worth extending my own membership.
|
02-04-10 09:19pm
|
Reply
1269
|
Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from moonbyrd:
Hmm... I would expect the title of the site to clue you in about the male talent. This seems to be a somewhat popular niche although this is the only site of this kind I have been a member of (as part of the network). What surprised me is how nice and tender the scenes are in many cases. This site is kind of hit and miss for me, but the "hits" are very good.
Has anyone noticed that new updates seem to come up empty (on the whole 21 Sextury network). The content is not there when the updates are posted, but may come up after a few days. Maybe they have server problems.
And the new flashy navigation is not that good. For instance, if you are browsing many pages worth of scenes and visit one of the scenes, the "back" button sends you back to the first page of the list. Or if you were browsing a certain model's scenes, you are thrown out of the scene list entirely. This is not very intuitive.
|
01-30-10 11:41pm
|
Reply
1270
|
Porngantic
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from MrMac:
I'd agree that it's not a recommended one to go for. Each mini-site contains 15 medium to low quality DRM protected clips covering a specific niche.
I'd cancelled within half an hour of joining (fortunately at the lowest price option).
|
01-30-10 06:05am
|
Reply
1271
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from popazap:
(pat362's Reply)
My problems persisted - any attempt to download anything yielding 'session failure'/suspected stealing of session etc. Customer service at 21sextury were not helpful, suggesting that I was trying to do something illicit. After 4 days I contacted billing service (epoch in this case) and after 1 minute of chat they returned my money. I do not recommend this site.
|
01-19-10 10:57am
|
Reply
1272
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from 21Sextury:
Hello pat362
This is Zoltan from 21Sextury Cash. Please write an email to me so we could talk about your problem!
My email address is zoltan@21sexturycash.com
Thanks in advance!
Zoltan
|
01-18-10 07:29am
|
Reply
1273
|
Chanta's Bitches
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
I've belonged to both Chanta's and Whipped Ass and liked the intensity of Chanta. She seemed so much more really into it than many other doms.
|
01-17-10 01:56pm
|
Reply
1274
|
Chanta's Bitches
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the information! Too bad the site "retired" also; it was like a cool supplement to Kink.com.
|
01-17-10 06:56am
|
Reply
1275
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from David19:
(pat362's Reply)
And yet 18 year olds are asked to make long term career decisions regarding other careers when they go away to college and must choose a major--careers where the decision could actually be more easily postponed.
|
01-13-10 08:13pm
|
