| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
801
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat sums it up neatly.
But I was curious to see the contents of Ex GF Box. And my previous membership in Teen Mega World did not include the Ex GF Box site.
|
04-03-12 07:29am
|
Reply
802
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(pat362's Reply)
Exactly...(I was reluctant to it like write that, LOL)
Bottom line: Always check out different sites/prices in any network.
|
04-03-12 06:50am
|
Reply
803
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from slategrey:
(pat362's Reply)
You havent seen it. Trust me you will notice if you run across that niche.
|
04-01-12 07:48pm
|
Reply
804
|
Stretched Out Snatch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Porn User:
(pat362's Reply)
I actually took the time to read some reviews on the web about stretchedoutsnatch but I think I was mislead. It is amongst the 2 worst sites I ever paid for, the other one being Trinity UK. I do agree that free porn is not a good thing for the industry, which is why I like 1 month subscribtions to paying porn sites. I didn't mean to bother you with that comment. I was just stating the site is so bad I'd rather watch 16 seconds long clips on free sites. =)
|
03-31-12 01:08pm
|
Reply
805
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from gyang79:
(pat362's Reply)
why did they stat doing this. they should atleast cut the price in half
|
03-30-12 01:12am
|
Reply
806
|
DogFart
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Porn User:
(pat362's Reply)
I totally recommend the site if you like girls getting stretched by black dudes. The cuckold site and the blacks on blondes was amazing. You can't be wrong with this one. The content is FAR from being boring, nor is it too soft. Enjoy =)
|
03-28-12 08:54pm
|
Reply
807
|
Brutal Fisting
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BadMrFrosty:
(pat362's Reply)
I have been a member of the network in the past so already have loads of their content. I think I was last a member just after this site launched, maybe a year or so ago. I was hoping to join back up and grab all the updates but as there doesnt seem to be much new I dont think I will bother. So thanks again for saving me some cash :)
|
03-28-12 09:15am
|
Reply
808
|
Brutal Fisting
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from BadMrFrosty:
Thanks for this. The site has moved down a few spots down on my to join list.
|
03-28-12 03:53am
|
Reply
809
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pornuserfb:
(pat362's Reply)
Ok, now I see the review section, and you made it clear how it works. Thanks for that.
I'll post asap, cause I'm also an ex-member of other sites, of which I also posted some comments, rather than a review. Ok, thanks again :)
|
03-22-12 02:38pm
|
Reply
810
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pornuserfb:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't understand what you're trying to say. What review rather than a comment, and what about 2008?
It doesn't matter if you're a paying member. According to my knowledge: if you pay for something, you expect to get something back, and some service. How difficult does it need to be?
I paid, and the website doesn't deliver what they advertise. Even worse: when asking for service, you get thrown out. Also according to my knowledge, is this not the definition of "exchange" and "payment". Maybe others like it this way, but I don't! I call this false advertisment, with its negative financial consequences to myself!
If the the site doesn't do anything anymore since 2008, than it is their choice. But does it mean that the site can treat people in this manner?
I only want the missing pics, only from 1 model (5 sets), the way the site is advertising. Once again: how difficult does it need to be?
Honnest exchange online with paying XXX-sites is (not) possible? Why (not)?
If so: a solution to this is asked too much?
If not: for what reason are these sites still online?
|
03-21-12 03:10pm
|
Reply
811
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(pat362's Reply)
It doesn't sound like there will be much to review considering the 'no access' situation.
Cap'n. :0(
|
03-21-12 11:48am
|
Reply
812
|
Tiny Becky
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
If I do join the site in the near future, I will give you a heads-up on my opinion.
|
03-20-12 07:15pm
|
Reply
813
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks again, pat. I know your don't rate these sites too highly, but I think I'll give them a try soon.
|
03-19-12 02:51pm
|
Reply
814
|
Watch Me Fucked
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
They still only have 19 videos at this site today, so no new videos added in the last 3 weeks. Maybe they will add updates sometime in the future, or just add recycled videos from their other sites.
But the network has a lot of really attractive models.
|
03-18-12 03:49pm
|
Reply
815
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah for sure that is a major annoyance having a crap angle or shaking cam zooming all over the place, needs a separate person to film it which for an amateur shoot isn't always a possibility I guess.
|
03-18-12 02:32pm
|
Reply
816
|
Tiny Becky
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the input, pat. I'll probably wait a while before joining this site/network. Unless I change my mind and find a few more models on this network that look as good as Tiny Becky. :)
|
03-18-12 11:15am
|
Reply
817
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from elephant:
Some decent looking girls here looking at the models list, I like sometimes a more amateur feel.
|
03-18-12 07:21am
|
Reply
818
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks pat. I see the price is listed as $35 at TBP but they don't say that includes an addition site. It makes sense that it does because otherwise that seems like a high price for ECG.
|
03-16-12 10:05am
|
Reply
819
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Capn:
No stills here either then?
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-16-12 09:01am
|
Reply
820
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Capn:
A great shame there are no stills here as it is a topic that is of interest to me.
That said, I have to commend a site for specialising either to video or still photography as they are 2 entirely different areas of skillsets.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-16-12 08:58am
|
Reply
821
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
Pat - I normally follow your advice and I'd probably avoid this site but it is a niche I'm interested in. You say that you got a deal through your membership at Exploited College Girls. What is the deal and does it look like it is something offered all the time?
Thanks
Excellent review!
|
03-16-12 08:30am
|
Reply
822
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
Nice review as always Pat, can not say I have ever heard of the site maybe good thing :-)
|
03-15-12 02:21pm
|
Reply
823
|
Saffron Taylor
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Latex Addict:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah I am new here and I simply left my personal thoughts on what I felt the site deserved. It is a high quality site, great navigation, images and video subject matter which I adore along with crystal clear quality.
If you want honest member reviews, then this is my personal opinion of this site.
I did not rate this site 100% simply because of the small minor comment about old standard def videos, but apart from that I can't find fault.
I noticed in the main review that there were comments on the amount of content, but I was kept quite busy for a few months here, and there was a new video and photos added each week, which kept me waiting for more. I love that... keeps me on my toes, never knowing what to expect in the next part.
I will be searching through for other sites I have joined and giving my feedback on those too!
|
03-15-12 11:22am
|
Reply
824
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm with you, so far. I've tooled around the site for a few hours and while the content is stunning as before, the new site format is not easy to navigate and worse, the download process is inefficient.
At a reasonable price, like, say, $19.95 or $24.95, I'd probably stay on board as a member. At $29.95 it's too expensive. The regional Euro price is really inappropriate.
In comparison, I am a long time member of 21Sextury, which I consider equal to DDF in content quality and better than DDF is variety and will stay a long term member with their very reasonable pricing structure.
DDF will eventually discover how much money they are leaving on the table by charging prices that are far higher than their competition and by not creating a basic loyalty to their product.
I'll probably cancel my membership before the auto-renewal kicks in in 29 days.
|
03-11-12 01:13pm
|
Reply
825
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from gaypornolover:
Now this sounds like a classic case of a site with a new, totally fresh idea with lots of great unknown models making a mess of things by being too amateur! Such a shame - I've come across a lot of sites like this. You need the fresh idea of a smaller site combined with the professionalism of a more established site really. I sometimes wonder if bigger sites could offer their services to start-up sites to get them more professional and then share the profits.
Excellent review - sounds like the kind of site I'd join for a month or so until the issues became too much for me and I regretfully have to leave!
|
03-09-12 07:50am
|
