| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
726
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from 2 Free K:
(pat362's Reply)
That's a very good point about their honesty with the remastered video. I overlooked that. It's always pitiful finding an newly-featured update that you downloaded two years prior! I respect Bangbros for not doing that sort of thing.
|
07-03-12 12:07am
|
Reply
727
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Accurate assessment. Of the sites I have joined in many respects this one is the most frustrating of all, simply because it should have scored in the high 90's, and would have done if not for the negatives. This is one of the most customer unfriendly networks out there. There is no customer service, and they seem completely oblivious to what is needed to generate, and then keep customers.
Tons of great pics with no zips so they have to be downloaded one by one, is a prime example of complete ignorance about what is needed. Superb videos, well shot, beautifully lit, stunning girls. Should have been better that 21 Sextury. It could have been the best network of all. Coulda woulda shoulda. What a waste.
|
07-01-12 03:59pm
|
Reply
728
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Capn:
HHmm...
No doubting that this is a video site then....
Single pic download...... :0(
Probably screen caps, I suppose?
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-01-12 01:13pm
|
Reply
729
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from dracken:
Good review and good points about the network as a whole going down in quality/ dying. I loved this site and hope it will stick around, but in recent years it's really started to have troubles updating.
Also did you by any chance notice a cap on downloads? Sometimes when I try to get a bunch of videos it limits me after a handful.
Anyhow, thanks for the info
|
07-01-12 12:19pm
|
Reply
730
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from 2 Free K:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah, I've wondered if it's me, but I still like a lot of other sites I discovered around the same time, such as Amateur Allure and MyXXXPass. I don't mind tats, but I hate silicone tits. But even the chicks with natural boobs bore me at BangBros. All the chicks look the same: long-ass hair, fat ass, big tits, cheesy sunglasses, and usually too tan. It's like a haven for Jersey Shore rejects. I see these girls and I instantly think "LETS DO BODY SHOTS - WOOOOO!!!"
The increased presence of 'BangBros Remastered' clips is suspicious, and I can't even keep up with their new sites. WTF is Chongas and Pawg all about? Why have all these sites, but rarely update them. These guys were once key players, but nowadays, they might as well be PornPros.com (no offense to PornPros).
I'm glad I'm not alone regarding the excess focus on the guys, though. That was the worst part about Bang Bus, especially. You'll be watching a hot chick getting f--ked, and then the camera guy will suddenly zoom to Ramon's ugly ass face grinning at you. Who f--- wants to see that when they're about to nut??
|
07-01-12 11:04am
|
Reply
731
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Keep it up:
(pat362's Reply)
Interesting analogy with the term BS. Yes I too have had many memberships with them over the years.
That is the very reason I started with the heading in my thread.
Your the one with the BS ideas as I still cannot login with any of my past user names or passwords.
My last email to them was this morning and still no reply.
Thanks to the other members helpful reply s in this thread though.
Cheers
|
06-30-12 03:52am
|
Reply
732
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
The state of the porn art in June of 2002 compared to today can be a guide.
In 2002 the major source of porn was magazines and VHS videotapes. Magazines were timidly entering the hard core business. Back then most of the major magazines were experimenting with mild insertions (dildoes, fingers, etc.) and men with woodies were showing up in some cases. The "good stuff" was available on VHS tapes available in rental stores and we horn dogs copied off the salient parts for our collections.The internet porn biz was just starting with what now are called low res photos and short, lousy quality videos.
Today the vast majority of porn is web based with most of the remaining video stores barely hanging on with copy protected DVD's and marginally popular non-mainstream stuff. Magazines are struggling for survival.
The delivery systems for porn in 2022 are most likely going to be exclusively web based with a very simple interfaces to large screen 3-D TV screens. Magazines will disappear as will many of the video stores.
While there have been some who have discussed the possibility of reality delivery to include olfactory elements (smell-o-vision) and even tactile capability (simulated touch capability).
I've heard ideas like virtual sex being available but my limited mental capacity can't imagine how that can be accomplished.
In any case it will be a fun ride to see how porn advances over the next decade.
|
06-29-12 10:42pm
|
Reply
733
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
I have a doctor's appointment this coming Wednesday.
But if you visit the doctor at this site, you will need an interpreter. He speaks, and the models speak, in a foreign language, possibly Russian. And there aren't any subtitles to help with the translation.
So if I review this site, I might have to take off 1/2 of one point for the foreign language difficulty.
The doctor also wears a white cap similar to what a baker might wear. The caps worn by U.S. doctors in the operating room look different from this doctor's cap.
|
06-23-12 12:15pm
|
Reply
734
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
Dirty Doctor is a new site.
They only have 13 videos so far. So it's very tiny.
|
06-23-12 11:54am
|
Reply
735
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
I joined the network through Ex GF Box. So I am getting access to most of the sites in the network. I just checked, and I have access to dirty-doctor.
So I would assume that if you join Teen Mega World directly, you will have access to dirty-doctor.
But that is an assumption. In the past, there was very little logic in which sites you got access to, depending on which specific site you joined through.
|
06-23-12 11:43am
|
Reply
736
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
At one time I tried to keep a list of model names. But I gave that up. Too much work. Thank God for the internet porn model indexes. And thank God that they are free.
|
06-22-12 04:55pm
|
Reply
737
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
I've started using indexxx.com to track models.
Not as much information, but easier to use.
|
06-22-12 10:15am
|
Reply
738
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
No, I no longer subscribe long term to 21Sextreme, Pat. I was a yearly member when the two sites were still one but at the end of that term was almost glad that it was up. I subscribe to 21Sextreme a couple of times a year now for one month only and grab the few updates of interest to me and that's about it. I really believe that this site is on its way out ... just not enough material out there to support "extreme" in a consistent manner so your guess that they might eventually combine again might be right!
|
06-21-12 07:54pm
|
Reply
739
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from RustyJ:
It's nice that they add new sites but until they get enough scenes to justify the price, maybe they should hold it or just give it for free temporarily for the subscribers of their other sites. These are rarely worth joining until many months have passed.
|
06-20-12 12:39pm
|
Reply
740
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from gaypornolover:
Sounds an unusual site - well reviewed too. It's good to see all niches catered for!
|
06-20-12 09:51am
|
Reply
741
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(pat362's Reply)
They could try something more creative, like reducing the price. Almost 50$ a month seems ridiculous today.
|
06-18-12 10:03pm
|
Reply
742
|
Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks Pat, yeah must of got it wrong then and these scenes he'd seen some place else where similar but not the same ones.
|
06-16-12 01:06am
|
Reply
743
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from hodayathink:
(pat362's Reply)
The quality part I can understand. You can't magically make content shot in 2004 HD when no one was shooting in HD at the time. And most of the stuff that old is probably just ripped from the DVD. I'd just like to see it there. But as I stated in the review, I looked again this week and they were uploading a movie they released in like 2001, so it looks like they might be starting to go a little further back.
|
06-14-12 09:46pm
|
Reply
744
|
Chaturbate
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from xexbot:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah, I know, it gets creepy sometimes.
|
06-11-12 12:07am
|
Reply
745
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from elephant:
Yeah nice review Pat of all the network, its certainly one I'll be going back to at that price, hope they start updating more though.
|
06-10-12 01:16am
|
Reply
746
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from slutty:
Nice review pat, good to know their price is much more attractive now. I'm not a fan of the quantity of filler in the videos, but they do get some attractive ladies.
|
06-09-12 09:42pm
|
Reply
747
|
Meat Members
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Gazette Risque:
(pat362's Reply)
Well, what I heard was that Khan gave the site an overhaul and removed the content which was (even after the first removals) still rather abusive.
Then either sold the website or hired people to create new content. Not sure.
Though I haven't been a member for years, so all I know I heard from others.
|
06-05-12 09:19am
|
Reply
748
|
Meat Members
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Gazette Risque:
(pat362's Reply)
I was under the impression they did a reboot not too long ago.
Seems my sources were wrong.
|
06-05-12 08:51am
|
Reply
749
|
Meat Members
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Stukowitz:
(pat362's Reply)
You're probably right; edited accordingly.
|
06-04-12 08:17pm
|
Reply
750
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Gazette Risque:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree, too much necessary info is missing to take this review into the equation when deciding to join the site.
|
06-03-12 08:26am
|
