| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from BubbaGump:
(pat362's Reply)
The most recent images are roughly 2000 x 1328. The most recent full HD vids are in the 2gig range for MPEG format. Not sure about bit rate. Don't know enough about videos to supply this. I can say, however, the videos are fluid and not choppy when viewed in the browser. Again, I am not much into videos. But even these are higher in quality than I have seen elsewhere. They just have a pop on the screen I have not seen from other videos. It is eye-popping.
But again, for me, it's all about the detail and quality. Regardless of what the specs are, I would rather see a high-quality image at 800x600 than a large 4000x2000 image that is sub-par and poorly taken ,with bad llighting. That is what I value the most.
|
01-12-13 09:17am
|
Reply
527
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BubbaGump:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi. I understand what you mean. I don't take it as trying to pick a fight. I just provide points I think the average person would be interested in. I could add more comments but it would just be for the sake of adding more comments. I don't think it would be of much use to anyone. Really, what my review is saying is that, in my humble opinion, for those interested in photography and professional-grade production, this is about as good as you will come across in terms of quality of content, etc...
The full HD videos also are as good as I have ever seen in terms of the eye-popping quality. I really haven't seen clearer and more detailed videos from an online service--whether it is netflex or bangbros. To me, the detail and professional quality of the material is outstanding.
The user interface is as good as others. very simple and easy to use. DL speeds are very high. I never had issues with timing out or locking up. Now, whether or not people enjoy the actual content is entirely subjective. Everyone has their own interests and tastes in erotic content.
I really am not thinking about drawing attention to the site or trying to sway opinion by scoring it a 99. The thought never crossed my mind. I am just calling it like I see it personally. To me, it is a near perfect site. Others may see it entirely differently, as some other review scores testify.
|
01-12-13 08:42am
|
Reply
528
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BubbaGump:
(pat362's Reply)
Well, I base my reviews on impressions. All I have to go by when forming the impressions is past experiences with other sites. Comparatively, it is the best site I have personally come across. I am not a real high powered user so my experiences are limited. I really find it to be as good as my score indicates. That doesn't mean it really is a 99 in an objective sense. That is just how I rate it. Others will see it different perhaps. Someone might not like the content or the camerawork isn't their style etc. but it is the closest to a perfect site as I have come across so far. My views may change if I come across something else in the future and I have a new baseline to judge things. As it exists now, though, this site is at the top of my current baseline. I honestly haven't seen anything better yet.
|
01-11-13 08:46pm
|
Reply
529
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from MiztaBlu:
Thnaks for the review.
I was actually considering joining, but the price compared to what I see that I want (or dont already have) doesnt make it a great deal for me.
Jules Jordan's stuff is very hit or miss for me. The action itself is usually great, but Im not big into anal and other stuff which they do alot of, so thats a down for me.
I dont know...I may give it a try sometime. If it were $10 cheaper I probably wouldve joined already. A $30 price tag for that site seems steep.
|
01-08-13 10:03pm
|
Reply
530
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from slutty:
Nice review, pat.
I have never really considered joining a Jules site, the stuff I have seen of his always seemed a bit too 'hard' for me, but perhaps I should consider it, as most of the recent places I have joined have been pretty disappointing...
|
01-08-13 12:07am
|
Reply
531
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bibo:
(pat362's Reply)
Thre trial memberships I tested gave me full access to the site in question. From the top of my mind, it was ladieskissladies, licksonic and ladiesfuckgents. However, I tried them about year ago, so don't sue me if they changed anything in the meantime.
Check the network breakdown for more trial sites....
https://www.thebestporn.com/review_inclu...html?id=ferronetwork
|
01-05-13 03:45pm
|
Reply
532
|
Hardcore Doorway
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the comments pat.
I agree that their reputation probably works against them. While several A-list models did work for them (like Amber Rayne) she wasn't subjected to the abuse that the amateurs were. I suspect that a new girl starting out in the business would be scared straight after working with these guys.
The same thing happened with Max Hardcore I suspect. He worked with several girls who did nothing after working with him. One that comes to mind is Missy Misfit who did a few titles with Max and disappeared. That was a tragedy since she could have been the new Gauge with her petite body, stunning face and willingness to do almost everything. If I hold one grudge against Max, possibly driving Missy Misfit from the business is it.
|
01-05-13 06:28am
|
Reply
533
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't think they would ever import 50plus/60plus into Score HD Pat. Both sites are too small and specialized. I think that was behind their decision to limit downloads to the last 7? updates or so. You could go through both sites in a couple of days with a fast connection. If their "older" scenes were transferred to ScoreHD then no one would subsribe to 50plus/60plus in the first place.
|
12-27-12 12:37pm
|
Reply
534
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from messmer:
Good review, Pat, because it makes it very clear that it is a streaming only site (except for the past few updates). I am shocked to see that the few downloads that are available are in 640x360 only. Everything I downloaded from the site before they changed their policy was 720p!
Even more of a reason not to join again, so thanks for the heads up.
And I agree with you, kissing would add a lot to any scene.
|
12-27-12 10:42am
|
Reply
535
|
Jim Slip
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from picdude:
Last time I went on seemed they were going for more European girls than British, is this right, is there a lot more Euro girls now?
|
12-24-12 04:52am
|
Reply
536
|
Jim Slip
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
I'd never heard of this site before. It looks interesting. A comment from 2010 complained of slow download speeds. Any issues with that?
Is there any anal?
Thanks!
|
12-23-12 07:37pm
|
Reply
537
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from benmar51:
(pat362's Reply)
You are, of course, correct. . . But, the point I was trying to make was, as a VB member, you can get access to their current list of Elegant Angel movies for a TOTAL cost of $2.00 (Simply wait until the last 3-4 days of your monthly VB subscription to "jump in", DL, and "jump out".. . .Also, since many of Elegant Angel`s scenes are close to an hour, the custom-clip feature at VB comes in real handy. . .Anyway, it was just a thought. . I enjoy your comments. . Have a Merry Christmas.
|
12-22-12 09:18pm
|
Reply
538
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
The CC processor was Epoch who are usually much better when it comes to sticking to the original price, but a two dollar difference in an eight dollar order does seem excessive to say the least. That's why I am not quite sure if it wasn't the bank that sneaked that one in. Banks do have a habit of milking you dry with various add on charges.
|
12-22-12 10:20am
|
Reply
539
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks, Pat and that DOES suck, indeed!!
|
12-22-12 10:00am
|
Reply
540
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
Totally agree. The info is useful for evaluating other sites, good and bad. Sometimes when I find a great site I have found other great sites that I might have missed.
|
12-19-12 11:21pm
|
Reply
541
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Serious Partner:
(pat362's Reply)
Thank you. Will be glad to see you. If you have more questions, feel free to ask.
|
12-18-12 06:01am
|
Reply
542
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RustyJ:
(pat362's Reply)
So they are actually removing old stuff and Brazzers did that too? That sucks! I'm afraid half of Kink.com is endangered if it gets to that...
|
12-13-12 04:18am
|
Reply
543
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(pat362's Reply)
I didn't know that, was it on the forums? I don't really follow them or read the comments that much.
It really makes no sense to me with credit card companies deciding to boycott this one site and not the others. The bondage was light anyway and to me the gangbangin seems much harder...
|
12-12-12 05:27am
|
Reply
544
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Trust me, my friend... I don't need you to warn me away from here! I know my preferences and while I can accept anyone's (legal) preferences I don't necessarily share them. But that's one of the many things that makes PU so unique.
|
12-10-12 06:42pm
|
Reply
545
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I like to think I have some broad interests too, but I really don't. Yes, I discovered than in some cases I can appreciate tattoos and piercings, but then I realized those tattoos and piercing are on petite young models. I guess I'll just have to live with my afflictions!
|
12-10-12 03:58pm
|
Reply
546
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from mr3633:
pat362 - Thank you for the review. I have had this site on my radar for about a year but haven't pulled the trigger. I was waiting to see some reviews and also let the site grow a bit. I agree most of the MILFS are true amatuers with a couple who have branched out to other sites. I have found most of the MILFS to be very sexy (for me anyways).
The site owner also seems fairly engaged with the site members and you can submit requests via the site or via Twitter.
|
12-10-12 06:14am
|
Reply
547
|
Mom POV
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review of an interesting site. You and I share so many interests that I will confess to being a bit surprised at your interest in mature women. It isn't something that I have, unless they're posing with the 18 year old daughters or granddaughters...
|
12-10-12 04:08am
|
Reply
548
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for that information. I used to be able to count on the Russian and Eastern European sites giving me my daily fix of anal scenes. It looks like that might be ending!
|
12-09-12 05:49pm
|
Reply
549
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
This was my first time at this network. To be honest, I wasn't really aware of it until recently.
Since September 1, 2012 there have been nine anal scenes uploaded but one of those is a solo scene with a dildo.
I suspect that I might put this in an annual rotation if there are new scenes of my favourite models - especially Anjelica. I see from her page at Indexxx that she's done a lot of work on other sites too so I may have to join a few of those too.
|
12-09-12 01:09pm
|
Reply
550
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Well said!
|
12-05-12 05:43pm
|
