| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from pat362:
Hi fiou.
Did you email them because my membership ended yesterday and I did not have a single problem with surfing and download speeds.
They might have had some server issues.
|
12-04-09 05:25pm
|
Reply
52
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi fiou!
We've spoken to the sponsor and they say there isn't a download limit. Has anyone else run into this issue with the site?
|
10-20-15 10:13am
|
Reply
53
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi fiou!
Thanks for the head's up. We'll look into it.
|
10-20-15 05:14am
|
Reply
54
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from pat362:
This is a very small niche type of porn so variety may be a big problem for them. The fact that a lot of the content is older makes sense since the more popular types of porn started suffereing a few years ago so any kind of porn with a smaller fan base would have suffered faster and harder than the other types.
|
03-17-13 05:27pm
|
Reply
55
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(fiou's Reply)
Thank you for the follow-up and the explanation.
I guess you were caught by mistake in their security system for anti-fraud whatever-you-call-it.
|
03-14-13 05:54pm
|
Reply
56
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I don't understand why you are being refused service.
At least a few PU members in Canada have joined this network, without any problems.
|
03-14-13 09:58am
|
Reply
57
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from mr3633:
Thank you for posting your comments on the RodneyMoore site. I joined the site years ago and thought it was bad. I too remember feeling like I was cheated out of my money. I was hoping that the Webmaster would recognize that changes would need to be made and that the site would be brought up to par. I really enjoyed Rodney Moore's content (especially his scenes with Shanna McCullough), but I won't have this site on my list to check out.
|
12-13-12 01:36pm
|
Reply
58
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I like some of Rodney's work but given how old much of his stuff is I guessed that the site would still reflect a ten year old design. Thanks for confirming that. Surely they could put some effort into the site and improve it to make this classic porn better. JM Productions has the same problem.
|
09-24-12 06:17pm
|
Reply
59
|
Score Videos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from malikstarks:
(fiou's Reply)
Yeah you're right, although I don't think she made more than one or two from what I saw. She probably had a change of heart sometime back then right before she retired.
|
10-31-16 10:46pm
|
Reply
60
|
Score Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from malikstarks:
Via Paxton was a model from the late 90's that refused to do video. I remember reading about it in the magazine. Something about her thinking that posing in magazines were glamorous but appearing in a video, even soft core, made her a slut.
Makes no sense but it was also a slightly different time. Back then, Score was still mostly about the magazine with the website being secondary.
|
03-27-15 03:28pm
|
Reply
61
|
Sierra's Dark Desires
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(fiou's Reply)
As I have already said. The site has not been reviewed in years. A comment is not the same thing as a review. When I visit TBP then I always look to see if anyone at PU has done a review. I rarely look to see if there are comments. Add the fact that comments disapear failry quickly from the main page because there are more of them then there are actual reviews.
|
08-20-11 07:25pm
|
Reply
62
|
Sierra's Dark Desires
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from pat362:
You should definitely do a review instead of posting a comment. The site is 7yrs old and the only review was done in 2004 and updated in 2006. These are the type of site that have to be reviewed so that others like me won't make the mistake of joining.
|
08-20-11 08:21am
|
Reply
63
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from pat362:
I agree that the quality on a lot of their movies is not very good but this is one of the few sites that offers them for download. I'd also like to add that many of them are 20 years and older so it's no wonder that they haven't aged well.
|
06-07-13 06:15pm
|
Reply
64
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from NMC2008:
I will just say this about download limits, take it however you want to.
JSexNetwork - Well respected, all around fantastic site.
JSexNetwork - Has a download limit of about 15 GB now.
JSexNetwork - Charges you $33.00 for monthly membership.
JSexNetwork - Charges you $33.00 AND has a download limit.
That is all.
|
11-04-09 02:28pm
|
Reply
65
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Victor:
(fiou's Reply)
You were right. Sorry about that. I've increased the limit to 5 Gig a day for now.
|
09-25-09 01:20pm
|
Reply
66
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from Victor:
The download limit is 3 Gigs a day NOT 2, which is more than enough for 99% of my members. And yes, you do get what you pay for. I'll be very happy to lift the limit but then I'll have to charge you extra to cover the bandwidth that a small minority will abuse by sucking up the entire content with the use of download managers and essentially pay only for a generous $7 for 7 days trial to steal everything from the site. I think I'll keep it as it is, thank you:)
Victor
Owner
VelvetEcstasy.com
|
09-24-09 08:10pm
|
Reply
67
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from xxrrtt:
(fiou's Reply)
OK, tried an experiment last night and used a different DVD player. The VideosZ AVI files played fine, fast-forwarded and everything just perfectly.
But it's still weird, because every other AVI file I have plays on my other deck. That includes files from Videobox, and literally dozens of other pay sites. And also every bittorrent AVI file I've downloaded. On rare occasions, I'll get a bad file, but 99% play fine.
So, it's highly questionable whether I want to use a separate DVD player just to play VideosZ. What a pain.
Anyway, it's nice to have finally isolated the problem.
|
08-11-09 11:32am
|
Reply
68
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from xxrrtt:
(fiou's Reply)
You know, you're probably right. My dvd player is an expensive Oppo. It works great for all other AVI files, so it's really weird it doesn't work with Videosz, but I'll try a different deck tonight. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that Videosz files used to have DRM. I really like Videosz, I think it's better than Videobox in many ways, hope I can get it to work.
|
08-10-09 12:52pm
|
Reply
69
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from WeeWillyWinky:
I think Wifey is the most truly erotic woman on the net. If I had a wife like her I'd be one happy Willy.
|
09-24-09 09:16pm
|
Reply
70
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from Wittyguy:
Don't know exactly how big you like them but Brazzersnetwork is relatively inexpensive, has a ton of big chested gals, no DL limits and has reasonable quality. DDF Busty is more expensive but has better quality and no DL limits.
|
02-13-09 03:27pm
|
Reply
71
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(fiou's Reply)
If we were talking real life than you'd be correct that 80% is a high score but you have already done a review so you must know what each score means when it comes to the way TBP/PU scores things. If you didn't pay attention when you did your review than here it is. As you can see 80% is a borderline score because the reviewer would have relegated this site to a might recommend by removing one single point from his/her final score. As toy can see sites scored in the 70's a site that are 50/50 when it comes to the finish prodcut
100 Perfect Site is perfect, could do little to improve. Top recommendation.
90-99 Excellent Site is near perfect, best in it's class. Highly recommended.
80-89 Very Good Enjoyable site, but could improve in key areas. Recommended.
70-79 Average Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend.
60-69 Needs Work Does more things wrong than right. Low recommendation.
50-59 Poor Site Offers very little, needs serious work. Not recommended.
|
02-04-14 11:48am
|
Reply
72
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
from pat362:
I don't know why the reviewer gave the site an 80% score but you can always check out his review and see where what he wrote is incorrect.
I'd say that 80% is not a high score since it's really a borderline moderate score. Upper 80 or above is a high rating but as it stands this site was only one point away from being in the 70's and those sites must be joined knowing that it does quite a few things wrong.
TBP/PU offer quite a few sites with a higher score than this one so maybe you could look at those.
|
02-03-14 04:47pm
|
