Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mbaya (0)  

Feedback:   All (1686)  |   Reviews (308)  |   Comments (158)  |   Replies (1220)

Other:   Replies Received (1063)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 626-650 of 1063 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
626
Visit Meat Members

Meat Members
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from TrashMan: (mbaya's Reply)

It is controversial because she is wearing her old ASU cheerleading uniform. If you are unaware, she was once a student and cheerleader at ASU (Arizona State University). You can search Google and find some pictures of her doing her cheerleading duties. My guess is that ASU owns the rights to the ASU logo and all their crap, so Courtney wearing her uniform in that video was not licensed properly. As such, any picture you find from the scene shows the "ASU" letter blurred (even those available to members on the site). Other than that it is just another run-of-the-mill sex scene.

12-26-08  12:51pm

Reply
627
Visit Mega Site Pass

Mega Site Pass
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment from james4096:

Thanks for sharing that.

I wonder if they are having the same problem with all 600 of their clone sites.


11-27-09  02:26pm

Reply
628
Visit Mega Site Pass

Mega Site Pass
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment from Capn:

Now that isn't good! :0/

At least they took the trouble to explain the situation though.


11-27-09  10:19am

Reply
629
Visit Men In Pain

Men In Pain
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from nostromo: (mbaya's Reply)


Thanks mbaya. I'm lost when it comes to technological issues.


06-24-09  10:13am

Reply
630
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from calissa: (mbaya's Reply)

I suppose porn isn't so different from other aspects of our lives: when we get tired of the ordinary, we seek out different avenues for stimulation. Do you have a current favorite site?

01-08-17  06:28pm

Reply
631
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from calissa: (mbaya's Reply)

Hi mbaya - Thanks so much for the reply and the greeting! I don't subscribe to enough sites to offer lots of reviews, but I'll do my best to review those I have a good working knowledge of. I'm fairly open-minded, so I'll check out just about any site once. :-) And I'll leave just as quickly if it's not working for me. :-) Depending on my mood, I can be aroused by any number of genres. How about you? :-)

01-08-17  05:05pm

Reply
632
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from Monahan:

I can go along with a 99 because Met Art is very transparent about what they do and don't do; namely all natural young ladies displaying their lovely body parts to superb photo pros.

However the sameness becomes boring. Some days the updates look very familiar because the girls look very familiar and assume virtually the same poses.


12-19-15  11:23am

Reply
633
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from TheBrickster: (mbaya's Reply)

I agree. Met Art strikes that balance perfectly well; it's seductive and sensual, but just "dirty" enough with tight close-ups.

12-17-15  01:38pm

Reply
634
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from lk2fireone:

Excellent review.
I agree with almost everything you wrote.
Also, pleasantly surprised you gave Met-Art a score of 99.
Makes me feel that I am in good company. :)


12-13-15  02:53pm

Reply
635
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Monahan: (mbaya's Reply)

You said, "I also appreciated the videos by Goncharov, especially Ksucha C in a video called Lathin. She is not much to look at, but is great at teasing. She goes to a home in the forest wearing a short skirt. She teases us continually with pussy peeks up her dress, while not wearing panties. Very hot."

I am a member and cheked this one out. You are absolutely right. A true redhead with a plain face and a killer body, she is an expert at tease and Goncharov does a great job of capturing her deliciousness.

Check out her other stuff as well. Her innocent appearing face makes the whole batch just that more effective.


05-07-12  10:26am

Reply
636
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from Capn:

I'm very pleased to see you back, and with a comprehensive review too.

Cap'n. :0)


05-07-12  09:57am

Reply
637
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from mbaya:

Many videos here are boring. The reason I mentioned a few specifics was to make my point that there are a few gems to be found. Of course what is erotic is a matter of opinion and that is what writing reviews is about.

05-07-12  12:27am

Reply
638
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from lk2fireone:

I'm not currently a member. But I have been a member many times in the past. I agree with almost everything you wrote. The only thing I differ is that you found videos that were erotic. Maybe I just got tired looking, but almost all the metart videos that I have seen are boring, in spite of how lovely or attractive the models are.

But then again, maybe eroticism, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. And that might explain why videos I find boring might be attractive to others.


05-06-12  10:27pm

Reply
639
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from fredv: (mbaya's Reply)

Thanks !! I'll try to do other reviews, but that implies paying new memberships !! And i'm far from your 164 reviews :)
cheers


05-09-11  01:11am

Reply
640
Visit MetArtX

MetArtX
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Met369: (mbaya's Reply)

- subtitles would work for the two-girl-action of course
- currently there are more than 815 videos online


02-12-20  01:27pm

Reply
641
Visit Mexican Lust

Mexican Lust
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment from Khan:

quick FYI ...

The listing (price) has been updated and the TBP Editors have added those sites.


12-29-08  09:57am

Reply
642
Visit Milena Angel

Milena Angel
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from MrBison: (mbaya's Reply)

You're right, the review is mostly positive. I gave it 75 because the negative points I mentioned weigh heavily on my experience with the site. The positive points are all true, and I do think it is worth a look, but I found it hard to escape that 'directed' and "unnatural" feeling of the shoots/videos. Hard enough that I think it's not just a question of taste, but a real weak point. Sorry I didn't make that more clear.

07-09-19  07:26am

Reply
643
Visit Milf Seeker

Milf Seeker
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from ControllingMind: (mbaya's Reply)

This site isn't particularly download manager friendly anyway, but if you use a download manager, click on the attempting download. Then look in the time & info box section thats below the actual download que section.

scroll down, you can see - Server: Apache/1.3.41(unix)

straight underneath server name the mods are listed, one is - X-mod-choke: 0.6

X-mod-choke is a server name for this - http://packages.debian.org/etch/libapache-mod-choke

Notice it classes downloading clients as 'greedy'

Personally I hate any kind of download restrictions. A site would be quick to contact a member, if their payment was somehow resticted to a lesser amount of money. So why deploy sly server mods such as this.


09-25-09  06:35am

Reply
644
Visit Mili Jay.net

Mili Jay.net
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from roseman:

Nice review.

03-26-09  05:36pm

Reply
645
Visit Mili Jay.net

Mili Jay.net
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from atrapat:

Looks like the site has a decent amount of content, at least. I believe all sites in this network are as deceiving. I did a review for Simply Tory Lane some time ago.

Looks like they set up domain names with the models' names as mere bait. Seeing the "network" as a whole, there's some worth in it but, site by site, there's very little in any of them.


03-25-09  01:53pm

Reply
646
Visit Miss Hybrid

Miss Hybrid
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from 350Z: (mbaya's Reply)

Without download limits though some members will join sites on the cheapest option, then try to download all content non stop, slowing down the servers for other regular members, who just want to download the newer updates fast.

I guess even on a small site this stops members for downloading for hours at a time.

The only reason I dislike short limits if the site was large, is that I would be lagging behind if I only visited the site once, twice a week or so, instead of every day.

Limits are not realy a prob on Miss H's site though, because of the site being new, not a big network and not having thousands of vids.

What I would like to see on sites, is download limits removed for long term members.


04-09-10  08:07am

Reply
647
Visit Mobile Ruth Blackwell

Mobile Ruth Blackwell
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from marcdc1: (mbaya's Reply)

Thanks mbaya. Good point. And yet both desktop and mobile site is listed on PU 🤔

If Freddie wants to pull the review I’m ok with that. I’m not looking to be a jerk, normally when I review a network I do all the sites so I can comprehensible cover the nuances.

Again I think you raise a good point and I’m comfortable with any resolution.

All the best


11-22-19  04:41am

Reply
648
Visit Mobile Ruth Blackwell

Mobile Ruth Blackwell
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from tangub: (mbaya's Reply)

And 90% copy and paste same as most of the 30 other Dogfart Network reviews he's put up in the last year. This for me is a large part of the reason why PU is becoming tired and stale. A high percentage of the reviews these days are of sites within a few large networks (Adult Time, TMW, Dogfart, Team Skeet, Lets Doe It etc etc). I see very little of anything new or interesting here these days. Most new sites don't even get listed here anymore.

11-22-19  04:38am

Reply
649
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from badandy400: (mbaya's Reply)

This is a lesson well learned by many of us here. I could not image joining a site that had no download. I would make it a mission to get everything just for the feeling of victory.

Try a program like Internet Download Manager (IDM) and see if you can grab the streams. It is a pain but it works on many sites. Sometimes you need to be a bit creative to get what you paid for.


01-06-16  04:38pm

Reply
650
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from ControllingMind: (mbaya's Reply)

Ok thanks

The billers are their own company called manstermed. I did not even receive a email receipt from them. There is no DRM or download restrictions, but when you get logged out your downloads wil not resume even with a download manager. Some of the scenes were good but their wmv 640x480 quality seemed a little bit grainy.

In top notch pornstars I meant for looks and performance.

I believe The trial option does not allow you to download full scenes, only pics or trailers. At a guess I would say the site would now contain about 100 scenes with pic sets for each. Download options are MPG ,WMV,MP4 and smaller lower res MP4 for ipod etc.

The pics were decent but not high resolution. Large unsorted 100+MB pic sets with lots of virtually the same pictures.

The bonus network is a few sites of streaming flash scenes.


01-30-09  06:36am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 626-650 of 1063 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.59 seconds.