| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
Fuck The Geek
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from CowboyDave:
(mbaya's Reply)
I've seen Lavender Rayne and Alisha Adams on other sites, can't recall which at the moment but the other two I've never seen anywhere.
So probably a mix of low scale professionals and amateurs.
Great review!
|
07-29-19 02:32pm
|
Reply
402
|
Fuck The Geek
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from CowboyDave:
Great review, thanks! I've seen a few of these videos as they add some of them onto the Real Sex Pass network. Must admit to having a thing for Lavender Rayne, Stevie Rae, Ava Little and Alisha Adams. I might have to test this site out at some point!
|
07-26-19 03:44pm
|
Reply
403
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review from mbaya:
After being a member for several weeks, I see that each week they add an old video that has been upgraded. I see videos being added that I already have from my membership three years ago, but now in better quality. They keep the total at 100 videos, so they are deleting a scene a week as well. I don't mind upgrades, but when will we see new videos?
|
08-26-09 04:01am
|
Reply
404
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Maines Own:
Solid review - thank you very much, this has helped me with my decision to give the site a try
|
04-05-11 07:11pm
|
Reply
405
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from ace of aces:
(mbaya's Reply)
which one did you use? i used Download Accelerator Plus (DAP)and it didn`t worked.
|
09-16-10 07:28am
|
Reply
406
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ace of aces:
(mbaya's Reply)
the download oppertunity is a good one, even if i had to recognize that 1. the chosen dl oppertunity isn`t saved for the next session and 2. that the use of a dl manager isn`t possible :(
|
09-08-10 07:54am
|
Reply
407
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(mbaya's Reply)
I missed that exotics review - but, your're right about more reviews on the same site from different PUs.
Still, I think it's also swell - reason: Most of us have different preferences.
- and to other PUs - reading two, three or even more reviews of the same site can give different aspects - it does to me, anyway..
But again: you rely on some fellow PUs more than others - it's only natural.
Thanks again!
|
06-07-10 06:42am
|
Reply
408
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Denner:
This is ALSO what this PU is about.
Not really my choice at first hand - BUT after going through mbayas review - I start thinking: why not - something new, something different.
Thanks to mbaya for another thorough review which adds a lot of help to any PU who have not been at this site (this user included) - or not knowns about it - certainly serious thumbs up here!!!
|
06-06-10 07:57am
|
Reply
409
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from FuckingGambler:
Thank you very much for your report. I also want to thank you for the reporting of the minor glitches to us, it helps us to make our site better and we really appreciate it.
A few answers to the questions you have raised. About simulator - to make it 100% dynamic, we will likely need to use Mo-Cap and map it to 3D models; while it should be feasible to do, it will need special expertise in these fields and we do not have currently experts within our team. On the other hand, if anybody reading this has such expertise and is willing to help, please don't hesitate to e-mail support@fuckinggamble.com .
On condensed version: thanks for the comment. We will try to implement it, though exact implementation is still TBD (it might fit nicely into another project we're currently researching and which we hope will be appreciated by our members; it should also be able to provide 'condensed' version as an option).
We definitely appreciate you mentioning potential of our site for couples and I just want to add that couples can also use our profiles and game generator to play a game themselves, with their own game being tailored to their specific sexual preferences (specified in their own profiles). We hope it might be useful for some couples to spice up their real sexual life a bit (with or without swninging). One of upcoming games (Game40) will show the process of creating and playing such game in detail.
|
06-03-10 08:54pm
|
Reply
410
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from FuckingGambler:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks in advance, we're looking forward to see your review :). And BTW, within our policy to award "Points" to members reporting bugs, if you could drop an e-mail to support@fuckinggamble.com (so we know your e-mail address), we will credit your account with 200 "Points" (worth about 6 days of free access) for reporting this issue with DL limit wording.
|
05-28-10 08:00am
|
Reply
411
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from FuckingGambler:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thank you very much for bringing it to our attention. In short: despite this unfortunate wording, we do NOT have DL limits for our full month users. I apologize for this confusion, and we will fix this wording ASAP.
Elaborating on it a bit longer: while we do indeed keep database field named "download limit", and it is indeed calculated down from 60G for our full-month users, we do NOT enforce it in any way for our full-month users, so it can easily go down to negative values (and we do have users with as much as "-251G" in this field). As such, any wording about "DL limits" for our full-month users is merely an unfortunate artifact, which we will remove as soon as we know about it. BTW, is this warning the only place where you've seen reference to the "DL limit" or are there any others, so we should fix them too?
|
05-27-10 09:02pm
|
Reply
412
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from FuckingGambler:
(mbaya's Reply)
With your position here on PornUsers (both rank and trust), it is we who should be honored if/when you write your review :). Thank you very much in advance.
|
05-24-10 10:57pm
|
Reply
413
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from FuckingGambler:
(mbaya's Reply)
If it is within PornUsers policies, and as "trial" on our site is "full" (except for download limit), we would really appreciate if you could spare a few moments and write a review.
About shorter version - could you advise what exactly would you like to have in it? Simply pieces starting at each "action card" and until the action associated with the card ends (cutting off all the gameplay), or something more sophisticated?
|
05-23-10 11:08pm
|
Reply
414
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Torn4do:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks for the compliments! I really did try to rather give a feel for what's going on in the site instead of listing a bunch of facts; I'm glad to hear I didn't (at least completely) fail. :-)
|
04-23-10 03:48pm
|
Reply
415
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Pyrenees:
A great review.
I enjoy the variety of machines used.
If I had a gripe it would be there is no plot to most of these scenes and they are typically short. Also solo girl is typically not my thing. But there is plenty of machine double penetration, huge insertion and orgasms to make me happy. This site has a lot of top models. I much prefer Ultimate Surrender because I love watching two or more girls going at each other sweaty getting off with strapon's.
You made a point about female pornstars being jaded and not having real orgasms. This is partially true. Most female pornstars suck and that is why they have short careers. Also some of them try to fake orgasms that we would see as ideal. But a LOT of pornstars have orgasms that are removed in editing at the request of the female pornstar. They do not usually like to kiss, have their nipples sucked or show true orgasms. Now this has gotten a LOT better this last decade. I will give you an example. In the porn community a female pornstar who has a orgasm used to be looked down on as a dirty whore. Hence the word Whoregasm. If you go to JM Productions (Or on Hotmovies) there are two great scenes. Porn's most outrageous outtakes #2 scene 5 and #5 scene 1. In the first example the woman breaks down and cries after having a orgasm during a DP. In the second example the woman has a orgasm every five minutes of anal penetration. There is a lot of real female orgasm porn out there but only recently has the stigma of a Whoregasm lifted some. I enjoy a lot of Sweet Sinner scenes because of their real orgasms.
I would like to finish by saying I am a huge fan of kink and highly suggest getting a membership to Kink archives for access to 90% of all of their shoots.
|
08-26-15 12:30am
|
Reply
416
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from LPee23:
Nice review!
I'd also add that there are hundreds of squirting scenes on the site, and some are truly spectacular.
The photos used to be downloadable as zips, I guess they took away that option to save space on their servers.
As a photo fan, it is too bad that some sites feel photos (or downloadable zips) are not worth their space on a server.
|
08-23-15 10:37am
|
Reply
417
|
G18 HDTV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(mbaya's Reply)
Heh, I never figured out much of anything on the site! I ended up leaving the site after the 3rd day of the 5 day membership and not going back. The content I downloaded is pretty good, some of the girls are really cute, most are Brazilian and the quality is excellent, but there are some really softcore shoots too. Nothing more frustrating than downloading a 1 GB file that is a girl rolling around on a bed for 15 minutes! What I think the big problem is, the site/network is trying to be too many things at once. Some of it looks artsy, some of it is raw hardcore, some of it is trying to be very erotic, and so on. Its like they need to find a happy medium and at least make that the basis the sites are built on. The pictures are a waste, no zips, and that is a shame since they do have nice coloring and feel to some of the picture sets. Reminds me a bit of the 21st Sextury sites quality of photos, they have a warmness to them. Oh and some of the videos, hardcore b/g especially seem to end before they are supposed to. No cumshot of any kind. Add to this that these models are mostly unknowns, making the search feature pointless since we don't know their names.
I will say this for them. After reading through their forum, if nothing else, they are trying very hard. I don't know if they are doing it yet or not, but they had a thread that talked about if guests would join their forum, they would give them 4 full length clips to sample. They really know their video quality is that good and it is. Just seems to be production problems stop the quality from really showing. Also the language barrier. I speak pretty fluent Spanish, my wife's native language is Spanish as well, but some of the girls are speaking Portuguese. I remember that some part of Rio, maybe half of it speaks Portuguese instead of Spanish, so that hurts too. Ending with, the girls are still very cute ha ha.
|
05-29-09 11:15pm
|
Reply
418
|
Gag Factor
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
Agreed. JM had the best bukkake and gokkun on the market. I really wish someone would take that up again.
|
10-03-16 01:33pm
|
Reply
419
|
Gag Factor
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from rearadmiral:
It's nice to see that they're up to their old tricks. I was a member there a long time ago and they were recycling then too. It's too bad because JM Productions had some of the best porn on the market. i really wish someone would restart the American Bukkake and American Gokkun series' again.
|
09-20-16 05:40am
|
Reply
420
|
Gag Factor
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from jberryl69:
Great reveiw Mbaya - Have had an interest in this site but the price + quality vids make it unreasonable. Not so much the archiving if the vids were watchable. Wasn't this a Brandon Irons joint?
|
04-30-13 07:08am
|
Reply
421
|
Gag Factor
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from dracken:
Great review, but I am unsure as to why you didn't mention some of the stuff from the bottom line in the cons (non-exclusive for example)
Either way, great insight. Thanks for sharing
|
10-30-09 02:30pm
|
Reply
422
|
Gag Factor
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from jd1961:
More "amateurs"?
You can't expect a girl to go through that ordeal for free!
|
10-28-09 01:57pm
|
Reply
423
|
Gag Factor
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(mbaya's Reply)
I see what you're saying. The price displayed is not the actual price. Will hope customer service gets back to you soon. In the meantime, I'll ask our editors to take a look.
Thx for the heads up.
|
10-22-09 05:07am
|
Reply
424
|
Gag Factor
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Khan:
I just checked and it looks like it's still showing the $29.95 USD for me. You might try clearing your cache (and any cookies for that site) and revisiting directly from our link.
Hope that helps.
|
10-21-09 08:45pm
|
Reply
425
|
Gangbang Creampie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
Not to mention that I need to write more reviews or you'll be taking over the #2 spot here soon! :-)
|
12-17-16 05:24am
|
