| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
Yeah, I can't imagine that this site could be 'real' and not attract unwanted legal attention.
I'll look forward to your Assylum review. Unfortunately, my membership ran out a week or so before Rebel's gangbang was uploaded. Of the two Rebel scenes I have, one of them is easily the roughest Assylum scene I've ever seen - and for that site that's saying a lot!
|
01-20-20 04:52pm
|
Reply
352
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
One thing that intrigues me about the site is that there are many models who make repeated appearances. That leads me to think that the whole over-the-top misogyny is just an act. Then again, there are some models who are known as fetish-only. When I was a member at Assylum a few months back I was struck by a new model I hadn't seen before named Rebel Rhyder. She had one of the roughest scenes I've ever scene at Assylum and I see that she's back for another one and has done a scene for Slave Mouth as well. The reason I mention her is because she has three scenes at Facial Abuse and those are much harder than even those guys usually have. Rebel is definitely good looking and could easily do more mainstream hardcore but I've never seen her on any mainstream sites. She must really be wired to like that level of rough sex.
I know this won't win me any friends, but I didn't download as much from Facial Abuse as I would in other sites. That isn't because I found them too rough but it's because I find some of the models to be quite unattractive.
|
01-19-20 12:51pm
|
Reply
353
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Roberto281:
(mbaya's Reply)
The two extra sites were Ghetto Doorway and Hardcore Doorway.
|
08-11-19 05:15pm
|
Reply
354
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(mbaya's Reply)
My biggest issue is not so much the sites I got with my membership because I knew that ahead of time. It's the way they treat the girls and frankly I can't stand their style of BJ. I don't enjoy watching vomit in anything and that goes double for porn. Vomit=deadwood.
|
07-26-10 08:04pm
|
Reply
355
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(mbaya's Reply)
I didn't get access to those sites. They've altered the sites you
get with your membership. I think the last time I was a member you had those sites but not anymore. Of the ones that I got. I would say that only nasty little facials is still updating regularly with actual new content and not leased material.
I took a look at the 3 sites you mentioned and I don't recognize any of these girls so I can't say if they are new. I can say that none of the ones I looked at have had a bigger porn career beyond these sites.
|
07-24-10 08:12pm
|
Reply
356
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from alexmedia:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thx for your answer. I like facial but probably it's too extreme for me.
|
10-16-09 01:53am
|
Reply
357
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from malikstarks:
(mbaya's Reply)
My comment was not really meant to criticize your review. I think it is a good review and you make a lot of good points. There are just a number of comments in general about the extreme nature of the site, but I don't think it's as bad as some are making it. I don't disagree that many of girls get in over their head, and I didn't realize they did all the shoots the same day. That said I'd have to think that most of them at least have viewed some of the video's from other girls prior to shooting. Many of these girls have made the rounds on other websites (some are hardcore vets). As for the first timers, based on at least some of the stories, they are the ones who contacted the producers (some are referrals from other girls). Also I HAVE seen them back off a bit when it get's to be too much.
I don't know, maybe I'm on the wrong side of it, and I don't want to come across as advocating for abuse. I just think there are a far more girls that go for this stuff than many might believe (and it shows in some of the interviews).For me this site is one that I join maybe a few times a year and only download a handful of scenes, so you may know better than I do.
|
10-15-09 10:16pm
|
Reply
358
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from WeeWillyWinky:
Judging only by your review, it seems to me that this material is NOT about sex, but is about violence and abuse.
None for me, thanks.
|
10-14-09 09:40pm
|
Reply
359
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from pat362:
I was a member about 2yrs ago and even then I found the content too extreme for my taste. They seem to have taken Max's stuff and made it even worse. Which is saying a lot. Are they updating with new content regularly. It's very hard to tell by navigating through the preview pages. They often list very old scenes in the newer section. I also get many offers to rejoin but I will never join again due to content.
|
10-14-09 07:21pm
|
Reply
360
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jamona:
(mbaya's Reply)
I've been a more or less regular member for years until they started updating with reruns a few months ago. Then it just wasn't worth it, and I canceled. I was thinking about re-joining sometime in the near future, but just to clarify: does this new 29 day rule for downloads mean that 640x480 will be the highest quality available, period, or is that when the downloadable HD video goes online? And are ANY of the older 1280x720 and 1920x1080 HD videos still available for download, or are they streaming only?
|
10-07-09 09:37pm
|
Reply
361
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcus99:
(mbaya's Reply)
Well, I checked back today and you are right. There now are download options - they did not exist for almost all movies added since mid August 09 at the time I posted my remark.
However, the "new" download only offers 640x480 resolution (while streaming options for same movie are up to 1280x720 and 1920x1080 - exactly same resolutions as previously available for download). IMHO, movie downloads at 640x480 is no longer state of the art. Hence, I still hold my opinion that there has been a (informal) change of posting policy.
BTW, the statement below is the answer I received from adultdoorway support team on 9/30:
"Streaming video is the most requested option, and decided to go with streaming on the new videos only. So once a new video is updated, the one you see with streaming now, will be available for download at some point in time :)
Kiana "
|
10-05-09 05:01am
|
Reply
362
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from vouivre62:
(mbaya's Reply)
absolutely "zoie and cheyenne" have been already posted and i note an another update already posted in "ghetto gaggers"= alanna moore posted 01/27/2009 and confirm too for the videos removed more of 10 for latina abuse and for facial abuse and ghetto gaggers too (valerie for facial abuse or other examples).
|
07-29-09 10:12am
|
Reply
363
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(mbaya's Reply)
I joined Facial Abuse early last year and wasn't too impressed. I don't mind the extreme porn, but their stuff is more along the line of degrading the female performer. I know there was one fisting scene in the Facial abuse section.
|
01-29-09 06:32pm
|
Reply
364
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(mbaya's Reply)
Really'
Sounds like they are growing significantly faster than the last time I was a member a few months ago. Thanks for this update.
|
01-29-09 11:40am
|
Reply
365
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from badandy400:
Agreed, their stuff is pretty rough. A lot of slapping and other degrading acts.
The video quality is very good, as you mentioned. This is a group of sites that would be worth frequently joining if only they would follow an update schedule. I went about a year without being a member and returned only to find a handful of updates.
|
01-29-09 08:49am
|
Reply
366
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Loki:
I originally scored Adult Time a 99. I lowered the score after quitting due to a few post-membership factors (they're much more expensive to rejoin than initially join) and the fact that they have advertised gay content and didn't have much (or any).
|
07-08-19 08:52pm
|
Reply
367
|
Fantasy Female Fights
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from S A Web:
(mbaya's Reply)
Yes, we are working on that right now and should expect to see 1080 x 1920 on our network of sites in the near future. This will probably only apply to new videos though.
Cheers
John
Varietas Services BV
|
05-13-11 08:18am
|
Reply
368
|
Fantasy Female Fights
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from S A Web:
Thanks for taking the time to review this mbaya.
The site has recently be redesigned so has a few more options available but still only WMV downloads.
We are looking at adding MPEG / IPOD options to our entire network of sites in the future.
Thanks again
John
Varietas Services BV
|
05-13-11 08:03am
|
Reply
369
|
Fantasy Female Fights
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Denner:
Another fine/great/nice review from mbaya....
Not my kind of of fetish - still it looks like this site (finally) do some full body vids - and the UK-deal does not make it worse - and if I had all the money in the world, I might join here - will probably prefer to use my money elsewhere...........but it's certainly not uninteresting...
|
12-23-10 07:54am
|
Reply
370
|
Fantasy Massage
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from LKLK:
(mbaya's Reply)
I think all 3 reviews (exotics4me, mbaya, and LKLK) gave a good to excellent review of the channel, as well as the importance of the Adult Time network.
So any casual reader of the reviews should have gained a good overview of what the channel offers. Which should be one of the main reasons for a review.
Except that lately, my reviews have taken a slightly different approach. I'm like a travel writer sampling sites instead of giving a more disciplined approach. So I tend to throw a lot of random thoughts into my reviews.
Which could be distracting.
The PU staff does allow freedom of expression, which I do appreciate.
Otherwise, I would have to follow a more formulaic approach, which gets boring after writing so many reviews.
|
12-17-19 10:17am
|
Reply
371
|
Fantasy Massage
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review, as usual.
I agree that Adult Time is one of the best deals for online porn, because of the massive amount of content, most of which is excellent quality, and the low membership price, especially during holiday discounts.
I also like all the specific details you gave on the Fantasy Massage network.
In my mind, I haven't decided how to view what used to be the older networks like Fantasy Massage or the Devils Film network: since they, and other fine networks, are now included in the Adult Time network, should these older networks be considered networks any longer, or just sites (or channels) in the Adult Time network?
For marketing purposes, or better yet, from membership purposes, you can join Fantasy Massage or Devils Film directly, or you can join the Adult Time network directly, and whichever way you join, you still get the same access to the Adult Time network.
But I also think, from the PU viewpoint, these old sites/networks still exist, even if the membership you join is basically through the Adult Time network, since those old network have been folded into the Adult Time network.
OK.
I'm rambling.
Good review.
Gives a clear view of the Fantasy Massage network.
And explains that Adult Time can be considered a bonus in the Fantasy Massage network.
Or better still, that Adult Time is the main value, and that Fantasy Massage is a small part of that value.
|
05-30-19 12:33am
|
Reply
372
|
Female Hard Body
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi mbaya. Thanks for the comments. I saw that you also emailed me about this. I've replied to you asking for your member info so I can look into this for you. :)
|
08-31-17 07:20am
|
Reply
373
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
Some PU members will not agree with my opinion on the models at Femjoy needing more makeup, because it's a matter of individual taste. They view Femjoy as a special, almost rare site that features a very natural look of very little make-up, little photoshopping. But I personally don't mind some make-up or photoshopping, as long as it's not overdone. Until I got a comment about that, I always thought I was the one who wanted minimal makeup and photoshopping, but no matter where you stand, there are always people further out on both sides of any issue than you are. Lol.
|
06-15-09 06:16am
|
Reply
374
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from propaGhandi:
(mbaya's Reply)
It's okey to compare MA with FJ because both play in the same niché.
MA = 83 points / FJ = 81 points - all we're going to face right now is just my personal taste.
Both sites offer so many contents that anybody can find a girl he or she adores. The only reasonable comparison can be made in the overall packaging and or quantity of contents.
MA is part of internet-history, came along a long run and is still on the stampete. FJ instead is a bit more flexible and has benefitted from the envelopement and the new technologies of the web-evolution.
I personally would stay with the tradition of MA. *I am oldschool and like to get my expectations fullfilled :D
The higher update frequency justifies the price and raises the chance on getting my taste hit more then on FJ.
|
01-28-09 12:04pm
|
Reply
375
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Wraith0711:
You had better luck than I did my friend. I was locked out even after they sent me a new password for 24 hours.
|
03-12-20 01:44pm
|
