| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from MargulisAZ:
Good review, I agree with this pretty much. If you've never been a member and join now you'll be floored by how much content there is. You can throw probably at least a third of it out due to disgusting models but that still leaves a ton of quality content. The new huge strap on lesbian site is great too.
|
06-04-09 10:21pm
|
Reply
227
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from williamj:
On the preview page their showing more lezzie releases...is that correct more lezzie dildoe play?
|
04-10-09 07:37am
|
Reply
228
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from ace of aces:
alway a pleasure to see the videos :) are they still updating? how often does the updates come?
|
04-02-09 11:12am
|
Reply
229
|
Bukkake Bath
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from manholelover:
A really interesting review.
Whilst i'm into gay porn, I'm also familiar with the Japanese censorship, as this is also rife in the gay market, usually the holes are blurred out. I also can find the videos just as entertaining, as for me porn isn't just about the genitals, but just as much about the attractiveness of the person, the scenario, the context and the performance, as well as the individual fetish. i haven't looked at the previews, but would be interested to know if the male genitals are also censored, and if not, what the logic is behind this.
|
06-30-11 02:25pm
|
Reply
230
|
Butt Formation
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from rearadmiral:
This is a great review, and not only because you saved me some money. I had never heard of this site before reading your review but by the name alone it is something I'd be interested in. The preview pages make it look like a great site. Based on that I'd probably join - and be dissatisfied. I regret that you had to be the Guinea Pig here, but thanks for steering me away from this site.
|
11-23-17 03:41pm
|
Reply
231
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from PinkPanther:
It looks like they changed their pricing completely from the TBP-listed pricing. The pricing stated now is:
29.95 first month - recurring at $14.95
95.50 year-long join (7.95/month)
|
04-12-09 10:47pm
|
Reply
232
|
California Beach Feet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from JakeOLantern:
(mbaya's Reply)
I weighed that myself. The fact is that although the navigation sucks and it has a DL limit, the content is so extensive and so high quality that I upped my original 55 to 70 based on that.
It's like he wins the gold on 3 criteria, but totally bombs on the other 3. It would be a 50, stragiht half if the content wasn't so HQ. Fact is that I would join again in a year just to see what great pics and vids have been put up in the past year, it would just suck that it would take me all month to get through it because of the interface and DL limits.:)
|
06-01-11 07:45pm
|
Reply
233
|
Cam Crush
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from choosy:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks for the comment - I only wish I had more time and money - I would be doing reviews everyday!
|
11-06-08 02:35am
|
Reply
234
|
Can He Score
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Khan:
I asked one of our editors to check into this one. They wrote BangBros and the site answered with good news.
Bangbros said that while they *did* have a download limit at one time, since they started adding HD vids they've did away with the limit.
We're getting our listings for the Bangbros sites updated as I write this.
Hope that helps.
|
10-12-10 09:18am
|
Reply
235
|
Can He Score
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from exotics4me:
Nearly all, if not all of the Bang Bros sites say they have a 500 MB limit on the facts pages, but I've downloaded 50 GB in a day from them without hitting it. Just be sure if you're interested in this site to join through Bang Bros Network, it has this site in it and it's $8 cheaper.
|
10-12-10 04:56am
|
Reply
236
|
Candid Street
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from xyzzy:
(mbaya's Reply)
Hi Mbaya,
Hmm, good question. I'd say for 80% of the site content, it's pretty soft, and just depends on whether you happen to find a particular girl attractive. Some of the videos are good though - of course they're all still extremely "softcore", but the voyeuristic element is great. For example, the sample video on the welcome page which has the busty girl in the purple top walking down the street..that kind of stuff. Hope that helps.
xyzzy
|
12-20-08 04:43am
|
Reply
237
|
CFNM Show
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from jook:
Most of us, including me, have run into deceptive or fraud billing practices. I generally make one attempt to resolve a problem with the site, which generally works. On those occasions when it doesn't or there's no one to contact, I dispute the charge with my bank. I've always gotten my money back. I'm confused why everyone doesn't do this.
|
06-28-16 10:31am
|
Reply
238
|
CFNM Show
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Amanda:
(mbaya's Reply)
Hi mbaya,
Thanks for your comments. There has been an uptick in reader complaints, especially since they have changed the layout of their members' area.
We have been in discussion with them about these issues and they have been quick and steadfast in providing our readers with fast customer service.
It is something we take seriously and if it wasn't for their willingness to work with us, we would have probably removed the reviews completely. We did punish them on RabbitsReviews and removed all additional scores and discounts because of this.
|
06-27-16 12:29pm
|
Reply
239
|
CFNM Show
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from rearadmiral:
There is a thread on another adult video site that seems to have been started by Bang Bros itself where they ask members to give them suggestions as to how to improve their site. I haven't read anything on the thread in a while but when I last read it there were maybe ten pages of comments and I was really surprised to see that not one reply mentioned their questionable billing practices. I've said this before, but with a network this large and the porn this good I wonder why they have these kinds of practices. I'm sure a fairly high percentage of PU members have their own stories of BB scams. I know I do...
|
06-24-16 04:37am
|
Reply
240
|
Cherry Jul
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(mbaya's Reply)
Well, not funny as in jokes, just funny in the sense that it's been left somewhere in history while it's updating again. Kind of like using that wayback machine to see old web pages. You won't find any humor there ;)
Moot point anyway as the scenes can only be browsed on the main site.
|
08-21-10 06:50am
|
Reply
241
|
Christina Model
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from james4096:
(mbaya's Reply)
The company that ran her site had about 4 similar teen modeling sites. The girls were about 16 and posed in clothing which, let's just say was not age appropriate. Totally non-nude, nothing illegal, but it was no secret that it was a beat-off site. It all seemed very slimy. Actually one site closed after being featured on the national news, and the girls parents were charged with doing something not related to the site.
Later on the models moved on to doing topless after they got too old to just be standing around in bikinis. I stayed away from these site for years. This one and maybe another are still around, but I think only Christina is the only original model left.
Its kind of disturbing, if you look at girls like Peachez 18, well she used to be "Peachez 16" and have a teen "modeling site" now she's sucking dick and fingering herself on the internet.
I can't really judge them, they are young women in their 20's and I look at women doing a lot worse, but it's just the fact that their parents helped put them on this track. I watch porn, but I would never want my daughter to do it.
|
04-15-09 06:51am
|
Reply
242
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from atrapat:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks. I guess I already said it in my review but this is the first Score site I've ever joined but I've added Scoreland to my list of sites to join in the future: it has a nice TBP discount and I believe it's the one with the most content.
|
10-17-08 09:11am
|
Reply
243
|
CL Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from ace of aces:
funny funny, how i hate that non nude content. should think about making a site with holiday pictures and sell it monthly for 34,95 $ :)
every commercial of sexnumbers is more interesting then such sites LOL
however beeing trapped means, having money wasted. that`s a pitty
|
06-19-09 08:57am
|
Reply
244
|
CL Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(mbaya's Reply)
My brain started to short out from trying to figure out the difference between porn, eroticism, a shoe catalog, and this pay site.
I would need a new brain before I started to think about PU/TBP standards. Though I am sure the PU/TBP standards are exceedingly high. (I don't want the PU staff kicking me off the site because I am not showing sufficient respect for their high moral standards and whatnot.)
Personally, I am not into shoe catalogs. But I don't mind looking at photographic books of movie stars. That is not erotic(I don't think), but the older movie stars had some great-looking women. Head shots, wearing lovely dresses, or even casual, they had glamor, an aura, just beautiful to look at.
|
06-18-09 09:57am
|
Reply
245
|
CL Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(mbaya's Reply)
mbaya said: "However it is listed on TBP. This makes me wonder what standards TBP has regarding non nude sites being listed."
Perhaps you missed it, we made an announcement back in May of 07 that we started listing non-adult sites
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4133
|
06-18-09 09:54am
|
Reply
246
|
CL Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Since the site is non-nude, maybe it qualifies as some sort of fetish. But does it qualify as porn?
Some people have a fetish about shoes, but I would not classify a shoe catalog from some retail store as porn, even though a shoe fetishist might use the catalog to excite himself/herself.
From Wikipedia, which is not a dictionary but an encyclopedia:
"Pornography or porn is the depiction of explicit sexual subject matter for the purpose of sexually exciting the viewer. Pornography makes no claim to artistic merit, unlike erotica which does."
This site is non-nude, and I assume there is no "depiction of explicit sexual subject matter". So why would it be considered porn?
Or maybe the site is supposed to be erotic.
But if a book store had a photographic book with pictures from this site, I doubt they would classify the book as either pornographic or erotic.
|
06-18-09 08:53am
|
Reply
247
|
Club Amber Rayne
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from The Clyde:
This is a comment on Amber Rayne, not the website or it's content, quality or quantity.
I find Amber Rayne pretty hot. She is not the typical beach blonde, which is sometimes nice. She seems a little hardcore with her music choices in the promo vids and she really puts alot into her scenes.
Mbaya mentioned that she wasn't much to look at, I disagree. She certainly has her appeal in both looks in performance for those looking for attitude and not your run of the mill bimbo :)
|
01-30-09 05:47am
|
Reply
248
|
Club Amber Rayne
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(mbaya's Reply)
It has been my experience that most solo model sites really suck. Maybe because the model is usually not involved in it. It's someone who buys the web name and then accumulates leased material.
I assume that you like Ambers looks. If you enjoy lesbian sex and BDSM then you might want to take a look at Chanta's Bitches. She is both a Dom and a Sub in a couple of scenes.
|
01-29-09 06:29pm
|
Reply
249
|
Club Amber Rayne
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from badandy400:
Mbaya! Congrats on the triple digits and all eight badges!
|
01-28-09 07:11pm
|
Reply
250
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Homegirl:
A really informative review that made me check this one out.
|
05-23-20 07:56am
|
