| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from messmer:
Thanks for another great review, mbaya. And every boyfriend, fiance, husband will have nodded in agreement and roared with laughter at your remark:
"Does every scene have to be in the same room, from the same part of the room? In ten years he could have moved the couch to another wall. Obviously he doesn't have a steady girlfriend as she would have moved the couch at least once a year."
This comment deserves a place in Wittyguy's Hall of Fame.
|
06-24-09 01:18pm
|
Reply
777
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Denner:
Very much agree about cons here - was a member some months ago:
Though the girls here are mostly great looking and rarely (or NOT seen elsewhere), the style, the lack of full body views, the too annoying talk and the repetition in the scenes makes this site a bit boring.
And I think mbaya is generous in a positive way with a 70-score here..
What I really wonder is how great it could be, if some better producers got hold of some of those beautifull models - it could be a dream come through...
|
06-24-09 11:38am
|
Reply
778
|
Men In Pain
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nostromo:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks mbaya. I'm lost when it comes to technological issues.
|
06-24-09 10:13am
|
Reply
779
|
Shibari Dolls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from CM4286:
(mbaya's Reply)
There is quite a lot of graphic sexual content: the sex tends to be quite rough and very male dominant (of course) but as is the case with content from Japan, the performers' genitals are pixelated. Contextually it didn't detract much for me, because the larger act contains many elements of sadistic treatment; there was still plenty to enjoy.
|
06-22-09 10:21am
|
Reply
780
|
Only Blowjob
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Goldfish:
I joined Only Blowjob about a year and a half ago. The concept is good but I ultimately didn't end up keeping much of the content and with the price and relatively low amount of content I don't think I'd ever join again.
|
06-20-09 06:15pm
|
Reply
781
|
CL Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from ace of aces:
funny funny, how i hate that non nude content. should think about making a site with holiday pictures and sell it monthly for 34,95 $ :)
every commercial of sexnumbers is more interesting then such sites LOL
however beeing trapped means, having money wasted. that`s a pitty
|
06-19-09 08:57am
|
Reply
782
|
CL Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(mbaya's Reply)
My brain started to short out from trying to figure out the difference between porn, eroticism, a shoe catalog, and this pay site.
I would need a new brain before I started to think about PU/TBP standards. Though I am sure the PU/TBP standards are exceedingly high. (I don't want the PU staff kicking me off the site because I am not showing sufficient respect for their high moral standards and whatnot.)
Personally, I am not into shoe catalogs. But I don't mind looking at photographic books of movie stars. That is not erotic(I don't think), but the older movie stars had some great-looking women. Head shots, wearing lovely dresses, or even casual, they had glamor, an aura, just beautiful to look at.
|
06-18-09 09:57am
|
Reply
783
|
CL Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(mbaya's Reply)
mbaya said: "However it is listed on TBP. This makes me wonder what standards TBP has regarding non nude sites being listed."
Perhaps you missed it, we made an announcement back in May of 07 that we started listing non-adult sites
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4133
|
06-18-09 09:54am
|
Reply
784
|
CL Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Since the site is non-nude, maybe it qualifies as some sort of fetish. But does it qualify as porn?
Some people have a fetish about shoes, but I would not classify a shoe catalog from some retail store as porn, even though a shoe fetishist might use the catalog to excite himself/herself.
From Wikipedia, which is not a dictionary but an encyclopedia:
"Pornography or porn is the depiction of explicit sexual subject matter for the purpose of sexually exciting the viewer. Pornography makes no claim to artistic merit, unlike erotica which does."
This site is non-nude, and I assume there is no "depiction of explicit sexual subject matter". So why would it be considered porn?
Or maybe the site is supposed to be erotic.
But if a book store had a photographic book with pictures from this site, I doubt they would classify the book as either pornographic or erotic.
|
06-18-09 08:53am
|
Reply
785
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(mbaya's Reply)
I would suspect that she does anal in more than one scene. I think that Amber is an amazing performer and not affraid to do extreme stuff. I would still like a few different faces or asses to be featured doing anal.
|
06-17-09 05:16pm
|
Reply
786
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Goldfish:
(mbaya's Reply)
You know what mbaya? I've never given a 100 because I'd like to reserve that score for that mythical perfect site but I don't think it's so unrealistic to give Brain Pass a 100. It's a good site with a lot of content and maybe it is perfection for pffer.
|
06-16-09 07:25pm
|
Reply
787
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from pat362:
Thanks mbaya. This is one of the sites that I keep track of but I've never joined. The wrestling aspect seems interesting but it's more the girl on girl action that would be the selling point. I notice that you mention an increase in anal between the girls nad that would be right down my alley. Is it always the same perforemr or is there a good mixture?
|
06-16-09 06:21pm
|
Reply
788
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(mbaya's Reply)
Not bad. Thanks mbaya.
|
06-16-09 01:10pm
|
Reply
789
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from james4096:
Could they be more obvious?
A message to SPAMMY, shameless, self-promoting webmasters and their sycophants:
You'll never fool the mighty Porn Users!
|
06-16-09 10:25am
|
Reply
790
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Denner:
92 and 97 for this site - with that kind and amount of content - strange.
And ok, we all got different taste, but to name Kedra "one of the most beautiful, sensual and sexy women you will ever see"........?
At first hand I'd like to get pissed and think: friends and/or relatives of siteowers - but then again - just take it with a LOL.
Good point/input here, mbaya!
|
06-16-09 08:37am
|
Reply
791
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I have to admit that I've been searching for a paysite with elegant design with ease of navigation, but I'd also like a bit of great content to go along with it. So I'm afraid that I'll have to keep searching.
|
06-16-09 03:32am
|
Reply
792
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from badandy400:
Can you tell when the HD videos started posting. I was a member a while back and enjoyed the site. But if they have been doing HD stuff I might have to go back for some more.
|
06-16-09 01:25am
|
Reply
793
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Well, mbaya, let me remind you that though it doesn't have hardly any content, it does have
- Elegant design with ease of navigation
So there you go!
|
06-15-09 10:39pm
|
Reply
794
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(mbaya's Reply)
I totally agree. Another excellent review by Trash Man. The network looked very promising when going onto the preview site, but thanks to Trash Man;s review it's clear that the majority of the "bonus sites" are just archived old stuff.
I'm seeing how this is becoming a more prevalant practice...advertising a big network that turns out to be a collection of dormant sites, usually with crappy quality.
|
06-15-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
795
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
Some PU members will not agree with my opinion on the models at Femjoy needing more makeup, because it's a matter of individual taste. They view Femjoy as a special, almost rare site that features a very natural look of very little make-up, little photoshopping. But I personally don't mind some make-up or photoshopping, as long as it's not overdone. Until I got a comment about that, I always thought I was the one who wanted minimal makeup and photoshopping, but no matter where you stand, there are always people further out on both sides of any issue than you are. Lol.
|
06-15-09 06:16am
|
Reply
796
|
Pantyhose Lane
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from roseman:
thanks for the info!
|
06-09-09 01:03am
|
Reply
797
|
Naked Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from atrapat:
Glad that you gave the site a try despite my somewhat harsh review; perhaps it ended up being more discouraging than I intended.
I still think Naked Movie has a lot of room for improvement, although it might be simply a budget issue. I believe girls don't get more non-sex screen time for purely economical reasons: an hour of a female porn star is much more expensive than half a day of your buddy improvising in front of a camera. In the end, I'd rather see a one-minute intro with the girl than a 15-minute one filled with not so funny guys.
|
06-07-09 10:23am
|
Reply
798
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from MargulisAZ:
Good review, I agree with this pretty much. If you've never been a member and join now you'll be floored by how much content there is. You can throw probably at least a third of it out due to disgusting models but that still leaves a ton of quality content. The new huge strap on lesbian site is great too.
|
06-04-09 10:21pm
|
Reply
799
|
Interracial TGirl Sex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from james4096:
(mbaya's Reply)
thanks a lot mbaya. If I have bonus access to a site and nobody else has written a review I feel like it is my duty to write a detailed accurate review. This place has helped me out a lot, so I want to help others too.
|
06-04-09 04:53pm
|
Reply
800
|
G18 HDTV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(mbaya's Reply)
Heh, I never figured out much of anything on the site! I ended up leaving the site after the 3rd day of the 5 day membership and not going back. The content I downloaded is pretty good, some of the girls are really cute, most are Brazilian and the quality is excellent, but there are some really softcore shoots too. Nothing more frustrating than downloading a 1 GB file that is a girl rolling around on a bed for 15 minutes! What I think the big problem is, the site/network is trying to be too many things at once. Some of it looks artsy, some of it is raw hardcore, some of it is trying to be very erotic, and so on. Its like they need to find a happy medium and at least make that the basis the sites are built on. The pictures are a waste, no zips, and that is a shame since they do have nice coloring and feel to some of the picture sets. Reminds me a bit of the 21st Sextury sites quality of photos, they have a warmness to them. Oh and some of the videos, hardcore b/g especially seem to end before they are supposed to. No cumshot of any kind. Add to this that these models are mostly unknowns, making the search feature pointless since we don't know their names.
I will say this for them. After reading through their forum, if nothing else, they are trying very hard. I don't know if they are doing it yet or not, but they had a thread that talked about if guests would join their forum, they would give them 4 full length clips to sample. They really know their video quality is that good and it is. Just seems to be production problems stop the quality from really showing. Also the language barrier. I speak pretty fluent Spanish, my wife's native language is Spanish as well, but some of the girls are speaking Portuguese. I remember that some part of Rio, maybe half of it speaks Portuguese instead of Spanish, so that hurts too. Ending with, the girls are still very cute ha ha.
|
05-29-09 11:15pm
|
