| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
Pin-Up Wow
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(mbaya's Reply)
OK thanks for the info.
A shame that.
Another one close but not there! :0/
|
07-25-10 03:13am
|
Reply
552
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(mbaya's Reply)
I didn't get access to those sites. They've altered the sites you
get with your membership. I think the last time I was a member you had those sites but not anymore. Of the ones that I got. I would say that only nasty little facials is still updating regularly with actual new content and not leased material.
I took a look at the 3 sites you mentioned and I don't recognize any of these girls so I can't say if they are new. I can say that none of the ones I looked at have had a bigger porn career beyond these sites.
|
07-24-10 08:12pm
|
Reply
553
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Ed2009:
(mbaya's Reply)
I try my best but it's hard to be comprehensive and very difficult indeed to predict how comments will be interpreted. It's so easy for anything typed in a forum system to be misconstrued.
Thank you for taking the time to reply.
|
07-24-10 05:01pm
|
Reply
554
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Ed2009:
(mbaya's Reply)
That's not exactly what I said. I am trying to persuade new members to go for a recurring membership (it's a MUCH better deal). I'm trying to encourage people away from signing up 2 or 3 times per year so those on recurring memberships miss out. All the videos remain available in the members area in lower quality (currently 720x576) - it's only the highest quality version which is removed after a couple of months.
With the current setup members who maintain a continuous membership get more benefits than those who only sign up occasionally. It works better, it's better for the site and it's fairer for recurring members.
To answer your review point, so far I have only linked to reviews by those are employed to do so. If I start linking to every amateur review or summary out there opens up a lot of work for me and risks as they are often not regulated to the same high level. Having said that I do need to get a lot of reviews updated and update my reviews page accordingly.
I have linked to the SGC review on TheBestPorn.com and I believe that your view is visible/accessible there?
|
07-20-10 02:45pm
|
Reply
555
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(mbaya's Reply)
Hey, mbaya, from what I've downloaded so far the older woman / younger guy or girl angle is heavily favored. I would say the age difference is usually at least twenty years or even more. I might have to correct myself once I've looked at all the videos but somehow don't think so.
|
07-06-10 03:16pm
|
Reply
556
|
Girls For Matures
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(mbaya's Reply)
Me too, friend. I truly wish the site lived up to its name. :-(
|
07-06-10 03:08pm
|
Reply
557
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Sevrin:
That's a pity. I hadn't known about this site until now and discovered a couple of my favourite models from Hegre, Amandine and Marlène. Still may check it out at some point for those two alone. ^_^
|
07-02-10 06:19am
|
Reply
558
|
Pantyhose Lane
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(mbaya's Reply)
Many thanks for the extra info.
I feel it will probably not hit the spot for me, but I will give it a whirl at some point. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-28-10 03:59pm
|
Reply
559
|
Pantyhose Lane
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Capn:
A very interesting review.
So do all photosets start off fully clothed, please?
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-28-10 09:14am
|
Reply
560
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
mbaya - JayG's review is accurate. This is an AMAZING site for a really specific niche - it's all about anal play, not anal sex. And being part of the Kink network guarantees quality. I assume that there are some free samples available and this may help you decide whether the site is for you or not.
|
06-22-10 03:24pm
|
Reply
561
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(mbaya's Reply)
Depends on the "quality over quantity" issue, as well as what you like best.
I'm not that into solo stuff and I prefer M/F action over strict lesbian stuff. There are a few dozen really good butt-centric boy/girl scenes that might make it worthwhile for you even if you're like me and don't care as much for solo and lesbian stuff.
|
06-22-10 08:40am
|
Reply
562
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(mbaya's Reply)
I missed that exotics review - but, your're right about more reviews on the same site from different PUs.
Still, I think it's also swell - reason: Most of us have different preferences.
- and to other PUs - reading two, three or even more reviews of the same site can give different aspects - it does to me, anyway..
But again: you rely on some fellow PUs more than others - it's only natural.
Thanks again!
|
06-07-10 06:42am
|
Reply
563
|
Old And Young Gangbang
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(mbaya's Reply)
Oh, mbaya - not yet. Been using my 'porntime' lately browsing for vintage erotica (1980-1990) - a lot of goodies out there, if your're into that.
But the site in question is on my list, for sure.
Be back
Cheers!
Denner
|
06-07-10 05:38am
|
Reply
564
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Denner:
This is ALSO what this PU is about.
Not really my choice at first hand - BUT after going through mbayas review - I start thinking: why not - something new, something different.
Thanks to mbaya for another thorough review which adds a lot of help to any PU who have not been at this site (this user included) - or not knowns about it - certainly serious thumbs up here!!!
|
06-06-10 07:57am
|
Reply
565
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from FuckingGambler:
Thank you very much for your report. I also want to thank you for the reporting of the minor glitches to us, it helps us to make our site better and we really appreciate it.
A few answers to the questions you have raised. About simulator - to make it 100% dynamic, we will likely need to use Mo-Cap and map it to 3D models; while it should be feasible to do, it will need special expertise in these fields and we do not have currently experts within our team. On the other hand, if anybody reading this has such expertise and is willing to help, please don't hesitate to e-mail support@fuckinggamble.com .
On condensed version: thanks for the comment. We will try to implement it, though exact implementation is still TBD (it might fit nicely into another project we're currently researching and which we hope will be appreciated by our members; it should also be able to provide 'condensed' version as an option).
We definitely appreciate you mentioning potential of our site for couples and I just want to add that couples can also use our profiles and game generator to play a game themselves, with their own game being tailored to their specific sexual preferences (specified in their own profiles). We hope it might be useful for some couples to spice up their real sexual life a bit (with or without swninging). One of upcoming games (Game40) will show the process of creating and playing such game in detail.
|
06-03-10 08:54pm
|
Reply
566
|
Nuru Massage
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks brother, that is a very gracious comment. You are not to shabby yourself lol :) I've been lurking around lately, usually stalking down the next site I can join because my funds are limited and I'm looking for a lil' variation without getting burned :) Glad to see that you are still around and I really do appreciate the comment, that was an extremely polite thing to do!
|
06-01-10 08:00pm
|
Reply
567
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from FuckingGambler:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks in advance, we're looking forward to see your review :). And BTW, within our policy to award "Points" to members reporting bugs, if you could drop an e-mail to support@fuckinggamble.com (so we know your e-mail address), we will credit your account with 200 "Points" (worth about 6 days of free access) for reporting this issue with DL limit wording.
|
05-28-10 08:00am
|
Reply
568
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from FuckingGambler:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thank you very much for bringing it to our attention. In short: despite this unfortunate wording, we do NOT have DL limits for our full month users. I apologize for this confusion, and we will fix this wording ASAP.
Elaborating on it a bit longer: while we do indeed keep database field named "download limit", and it is indeed calculated down from 60G for our full-month users, we do NOT enforce it in any way for our full-month users, so it can easily go down to negative values (and we do have users with as much as "-251G" in this field). As such, any wording about "DL limits" for our full-month users is merely an unfortunate artifact, which we will remove as soon as we know about it. BTW, is this warning the only place where you've seen reference to the "DL limit" or are there any others, so we should fix them too?
|
05-27-10 09:02pm
|
Reply
569
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from FuckingGambler:
(mbaya's Reply)
With your position here on PornUsers (both rank and trust), it is we who should be honored if/when you write your review :). Thank you very much in advance.
|
05-24-10 10:57pm
|
Reply
570
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from FuckingGambler:
(mbaya's Reply)
If it is within PornUsers policies, and as "trial" on our site is "full" (except for download limit), we would really appreciate if you could spare a few moments and write a review.
About shorter version - could you advise what exactly would you like to have in it? Simply pieces starting at each "action card" and until the action associated with the card ends (cutting off all the gameplay), or something more sophisticated?
|
05-23-10 11:08pm
|
Reply
571
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from badandy400:
(mbaya's Reply)
That is funny, I was actually thinking exactly that! :)
|
05-16-10 05:44pm
|
Reply
572
|
American Kittens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks, Mbaya. It took me awhile. ;) I've been slowing down some, but I made it.
|
05-16-10 10:34am
|
Reply
573
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from John7777:
(mbaya's Reply)
Didn't mean for it to come off as almost the same thing as your review but this came from my own personal experience. I try not to look at the other reviews before writing one. I agree he videos are great but the business sucks.
|
05-16-10 10:12am
|
Reply
574
|
Asian American Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from knave69:
Just signed up at the current TBP discounted price of $17.99, and I am not disappointed. Everything Mbaya says is still true with a couple of exceptions:
1. There is some vaginal boy/girl sex, although you have to hunt for it. Every scene I've looked at has penetration, so it isn't a softcore site at all, even if most scenes are solo girl masturbation. You don't get to see Nicole Oring sticking her fingers inside very often, but they have it here!
2. I disagree about the girls not being attractive. There are a few dogs for sure, but most of the unknowns have that "something" going for them. The fact that they are different from each other makes this far more interesting than the Japanese-style asian websites (well, except that Japanese porn does have some intriguing plot lines!).
The video quality is better than I expected (and better than the previews on the website), yet the file sizes are reasonable. A good compromise, I think.
Thumbs up, from my point of view.
|
05-11-10 08:12pm
|
Reply
575
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Gazette Risque:
(mbaya's Reply)
Didn't really find it appropriate to mention other websites in a review.
But there's oldfartsyoungtarts.com for example. Which does use fairly old men.
The biggest difference between these sites is mainly just the age of the men and the teenage girls. Well, mostly the men.
Also, most of the girls aren't that well known in the industry on that website. So most of the time you really don't know her age as compared to well known models, of which you might know her age. And chances are she's not a teen or even in her twenties while they do advertise with teens most of the time.
I'm not a fan of ageism. But when you advertise with teenage girls, don't use women which are obviously in their thirties.
All websites lie about this but with JurassicCock it's just obvious sometimes because you might know the girl.
Other websites which use real older men are grandpasfuckteens.com, oldje.com and teensloveoldmen.com. There are more but I can't think of them right now.
Hope this helped :)
|
05-09-10 02:31pm
|
