| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
CFNM Show
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from jook:
Most of us, including me, have run into deceptive or fraud billing practices. I generally make one attempt to resolve a problem with the site, which generally works. On those occasions when it doesn't or there's no one to contact, I dispute the charge with my bank. I've always gotten my money back. I'm confused why everyone doesn't do this.
|
06-28-16 10:31am
|
Reply
327
|
CFNM Show
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Amanda:
(mbaya's Reply)
Hi mbaya,
Thanks for your comments. There has been an uptick in reader complaints, especially since they have changed the layout of their members' area.
We have been in discussion with them about these issues and they have been quick and steadfast in providing our readers with fast customer service.
It is something we take seriously and if it wasn't for their willingness to work with us, we would have probably removed the reviews completely. We did punish them on RabbitsReviews and removed all additional scores and discounts because of this.
|
06-27-16 12:29pm
|
Reply
328
|
CFNM Show
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from rearadmiral:
There is a thread on another adult video site that seems to have been started by Bang Bros itself where they ask members to give them suggestions as to how to improve their site. I haven't read anything on the thread in a while but when I last read it there were maybe ten pages of comments and I was really surprised to see that not one reply mentioned their questionable billing practices. I've said this before, but with a network this large and the porn this good I wonder why they have these kinds of practices. I'm sure a fairly high percentage of PU members have their own stories of BB scams. I know I do...
|
06-24-16 04:37am
|
Reply
329
|
Live Jasmin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(mbaya's Reply)
mbaya, I can not agree with that more. Adblock my friend.
|
06-22-16 03:23pm
|
Reply
330
|
Haze Her
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from elephant:
Hi, great review and a fair score. Yeah I loved the site so much, it was simply perfect for what lesbian porn I like the most, couldn't believe my luck when I first found the site as some of the scenes are so realistic even though lots feature porn actresses. So sad when they stopped making the movies, I remember I was a current member 2 years ago when they did quit making new ones. Seems so weird as there is simply nothing like it out there and with some better marketing it could of huge, such a shame but I will treasure some of the classics from the site.
|
06-19-16 09:56am
|
Reply
331
|
Face Fucking
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Pyrenees:
Great review and I would expect no less from you =). I found everything you said to be true. I had the same issues with the unwanted cross site pre-sale and you better believe I gave their webmaster a ear full. What are my current thoughts on this site? It is probably one of the most non-glam porn sites out there. Rumor has it they typically pay $300 for a shoot. I have seen models treated much worse (Elite Pain, Extreme associates, JM Productions) but some of these scenes are truly brutal. It is fascinating to watch women who know what is coming still go through the paces. Having watched a ton of porn documentaries I feel like they capture the breakdowns of their talent in a very interesting way. It is fair to note a good percentage of their shoots end abruptly. What are my feelings on this site currently? I feel like this kind of media is invaluable because it fulfills a fantasy release for people who if they did not get that release might act out on these fantasies. From my knowledge of kink and the BDSM world people do much worse than this to each other for each others pleasure both men and women. When pornography became available to the American public through VCR tapes instances of rape fell by 85% and has not risen since. If you like to see women crying AND having real orgasms you will probably never find a better site than this one (If you know a similar one chime in).
|
05-16-16 09:12pm
|
Reply
332
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from elephant:
Yeah I remember joining this site a few years ago with high hopes cause they seemed to have beautiful girls and I love an orgy scene but I didn't find them all too great and found them more frustrating than anything, too many girls full clothed and often the ones I wanted to see in the action. I don't think I watched too many of my downloads, don't remember any standing out. shame as it has huge potential.
|
03-27-16 09:48am
|
Reply
333
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from lk2fireone:
Bottom line:
Would you recommend this site to your enemies?
Just kidding.
An excellent review. Sorry you wasted your money, but at least you wrote a review warning us not to waste ours.
|
03-27-16 07:54am
|
Reply
334
|
Sperma Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Roberto281:
(mbaya's Reply)
Sorry, mbaya, I was referring the the TBP rating and accidentally typed 85 when I meant to type 82. Your rating was 85 years ago and it might have been realistic back then but TBP is rating is 82, in a review dated just days ago on February 5, 2016. It just doesn't make sense that a site that has primarily been re-posting the same material for years with very little new stuff would be so highly rated especially considering the site's technological limitations.
|
02-07-16 08:02pm
|
Reply
335
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(mbaya's Reply)
This is a lesson well learned by many of us here. I could not image joining a site that had no download. I would make it a mission to get everything just for the feeling of victory.
Try a program like Internet Download Manager (IDM) and see if you can grab the streams. It is a pain but it works on many sites. Sometimes you need to be a bit creative to get what you paid for.
|
01-06-16 04:38pm
|
Reply
336
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Monahan:
I can go along with a 99 because Met Art is very transparent about what they do and don't do; namely all natural young ladies displaying their lovely body parts to superb photo pros.
However the sameness becomes boring. Some days the updates look very familiar because the girls look very familiar and assume virtually the same poses.
|
12-19-15 11:23am
|
Reply
337
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheBrickster:
(mbaya's Reply)
I agree. Met Art strikes that balance perfectly well; it's seductive and sensual, but just "dirty" enough with tight close-ups.
|
12-17-15 01:38pm
|
Reply
338
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review.
I agree with almost everything you wrote.
Also, pleasantly surprised you gave Met-Art a score of 99.
Makes me feel that I am in good company. :)
|
12-13-15 02:53pm
|
Reply
339
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Amanda:
(mbaya's Reply)
I was under the impression that posting links to free tube sites was a no-no in the forum, but I figured a question in the polls couldn't hurt. If y'all don't want them appearing in the polls either, just holler at me. :)
|
11-30-15 05:25am
|
Reply
340
|
Glass Mannequin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PapaGMP:
(mbaya's Reply)
Defiantly something I'll consider. Trying to get all the bugs wrung out of the new content management system and as soon as I do, I'll get with PU and set something up.
Richard Nailder
President
Glass Mannequin Productions, LLC
Creating content for:
Glass Mannequin
Real Colorado Girls and
Bring Me Your Sister
|
11-07-15 10:44am
|
Reply
341
|
Black Stepdad
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Amanda:
(mbaya's Reply)
Fixed! Had a little glitch there. :) Thanks again!
|
11-03-15 06:24am
|
Reply
342
|
Black Stepdad
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Amanda:
(mbaya's Reply)
That's strange... I'm looking into it. Thanks for the head's up!
|
11-03-15 05:57am
|
Reply
343
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
It's the entire list plus some that has been offered for the one price. This is really unprecedented and a dream come true for a lot of fans.
|
10-28-15 03:53am
|
Reply
344
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from RustyJ:
(mbaya's Reply)
This special email offer is $29.99 for all those sites and more, combined. There have been $19.99 per site offers to past members before but at least to my knowledge, never an unlimited membership like this.
|
10-25-15 09:28pm
|
Reply
345
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(mbaya's Reply)
Yes. But still, 29.99 for all sites is huge saving compared to the fact that these sites usually cost up to 39.99 per site a month.
I just posted under Sex and Submission since there is no general site listing for kink.com
|
10-24-15 08:29am
|
Reply
346
|
1,000 Facials
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from bkreidercrhl:
(mbaya's Reply)
I would suggest that you go to the site for this detail. It is part of a network of site with differing themes. The volume of videos is very large spanning over a dozen years. Videos in recent years are in HD, while The older ones are not. That said some old ones are blistering hot and I willing accept lower video quality as an offset.
|
10-15-15 05:36am
|
Reply
347
|
Black Stepdad
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks for commenting. It appears that some or all of the scenes here are just reposts of scenes from the series My Black Stepdad by Devil's Film. If anyone really wants these scenes a membership at Devil's Film is a much better value.
|
10-13-15 03:39pm
|
Reply
348
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Roberto281:
(mbaya's Reply)
and how is it that Epoch prevents these scammers from double billing?
|
10-12-15 06:27pm
|
Reply
349
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
Maybe I'm out of line here, but I don't think that what I'm asking for is unreasonable. I'm not asking them to cancel the membership and let me walk away. I want to pay for what I intended to buy. If this were a bricks-and-mortar store this wouldn't be an issue. I'm hoping that the person on the 'support' chat this morning was just having a bad day. Heck, I'd even pay the full monthly fee and not the TBP discount price.
So I've emailed MBI Probiller and asked them for one of two things: either reconsider their unwillingness to help me or give me a contact email for the Playboy site. Every contact link on the Playboy site directs to Probiller so when Probiller tells me to take it up with Playboy that rings hollow.
Whether Probiller even responds to the email is another question though...
|
10-11-15 11:41am
|
Reply
350
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from WeeWillyWinky:
(mbaya's Reply)
A few things:
mbaya: When you say "miss tease", I don't quite understand, since what you seem to be saying is that the site is *too* long on the tease factor and too little on what you call the 'interesting action'. Was there a typo? Most likely I just didn't get what you were saying.
Yes, I certainly agree that the gyno aspect of the site is overdone, BUT - their mission statement plainly tells the prospective customer what to expect, so, it is what it is. I'm not disputing you, or trying to argue for the sake of argument (I HATE that!), just basically agreeing and reiterating things (because I like to type!).
Unfortunately, my review left a few things out, and these are big things, so I need to add:
PROS
- The male presence is virtually non-existent on this site, and even when so much as a male hand will be in the video, the customer is warned beforehand (pun intended). I think this is a cardinal virtue, and should be applauded, and copied on other sites of this nature. Since this site isn't about sex between men and women, but about the adulation and worship (literally) of the beauty and - what used to be - the mystery, of adult females, the customer is NOT interested in seeing or hearing another male. The people behind this site understand this and the total absence of the male voice and male presence is intentional and adhered to religiously.
- The absence of silly music, which I mentioned, is of UTMOST value and importance on a site of this nature. We have FIVE senses, and we can interact with the models here via TWO of those five: seeing and hearing. We can't touch, taste, or smell them (but in time we'll be able to do something like that in a "virtual" sense). Hence the utter silliness of sites that put a music track to their videos, which effectively reduces our real contact with the models by blotting out the sounds generated by the model: her footsteps, the rustle of her clothing, her breath, her utterances, and whatever other blesséd noises that come from her body. I refuse to pay even a cent for a site that offers video content of models posing and stripping if there is a music track. It almost destroys the experience for me. Music is an art. Worshipping a woman in the privacy of my cave is not an art, and I don't want art while I'm worshipping a woman.
- There is nothing but complete respect for the dignity of these models as individuals, as human beings. Yes, they are being objectified here, but they are being well-paid, and these girls know the deal. The site should be applauded and copied by other sites in that they DO NOT refer to women as sluts, bitches, whores, or any of those dehumanizing terms, and the site does not belittle the models or speak of them as anything other than the equals of the men behind the cameras and the consumers. There is a strong sense that these models are well paid, respected, and above all, SAFE, while they do their work for ITC.
- If I think of something I left out, I'll return.
|
09-15-15 06:09pm
|
