Network updates were almost daily, there would just be some occasional days where there would be no updates. An update though could just be 1 pic set or 1 part of a 2 part vid.
Catalina Cruz recently won the web starlet of the year award 2009 at the AVN. Winning that will have probably made the network more high profile and more likely to further improve IMO.
LOL. There is no question that Cathy and hubby enjoy the swinging life style, Monahan. They even have material inside where some of those "tested" members got a chance to sample this lusty housewife.
But I really feel that in recent years the whole thing has become a bit routine for the couple. They seem no longer wholeheartedly into the life style. But that's just my impression. And that's all I have to go on when I do a review! :-)
BTW, still talking about gangbangs. There is one guy (plump,always wears a t-shirt) in just about every one, whom I have seen previously as one of the "husbands" in the "Take My Wife" series downloaded from Videobox, which leads me to believe that some of those male "amateurs" might be hired guns.
They're continuing to upgrade older content. Their new vids have a download option of 1920 X 1080 HD WM. There's nothing that gets worse at this site, in my opinion. It continues to be my favorite site. You can learn a lot about what's there by using their tour, which is pretty detailed & extensive.
I genuinely thank you for your response. I was more than a bit hesitant to post my review because so many have scored the site so high. I can't say the site is weak, but I feel it is very far from the ratings I see.
I must admit, I did notice that (about some star listings that are blank, lacking any movies/scenes). I really didn't care much about it though. My only thought about it was that movies previously on the site were removed while their references to stars were not. I've seen it before (APornArchive(.com) on Adult Bouncer). I usually like to believe that this is related to a loss of license rather than a blatant move to upset users. While it would be nice to see them physically remove the affected stars it is important to say that if you are looking at a site's potential based on a few stars, Adult.com lets you see everything you want before you join as the tour page is an exact mirror of the members page (sans the lack of the search engine). So if something is a deal breaker (e.g. lack of a particular star, or a listing with no entries) it is something you can see before you join (as opposed to say finding this out only after you join).
See, that's the problem with having different tastes...referring to the fact that I like a certain set of stars and you like others. It lets us see different sides of the story. And on my side I didn't seem to find any problems with the girls I like while there seems to have been a problem (be it exclusion from the cast list, or the victim of a poor tag job, etc.) with yours. This is certainly a good thing as far as reviews go - more reviews with different pros/cons. I just hope the problems weren't a super deal breaker in the end.
True, screencaps are small, but they are sufficient enough (and more than a lot of sites on the site) to make a decision on whether i want to download or not. See, mind you I download movies based on their star power (i.e. i like certain girls more than others).
Actually, of all the DVD sites I think Adult.com is one of the best if not THE best. Yes I do comment in my reviews of sites like Naughty America or Brazzers that they are excellent in their search capabilities and actress tagging, but reality network sites are in a different league than DVD sites. The responsibilities pertaining actress tagging on DVD sites are much greater than on reality sites - in that at lot less work is required on reality sites so there lower probability of an incorrect name or such (mostly because DVD sites are adding numerous scenes at a time while reality network sites are doing one at a time). DVD sites, especially when it comes to the XPLOR Media Homegrown Video series, require a lot more work and responsibility, and when you get sites (like VideosZ or VideoBox) which just add massive numbers of DVD's, and whose focus is to do such, accuracy with actress tagging takes a back seat.
The difference with VideosZ/VideoBox and Adult.com seems to be the focus. The former seems to focus on adding a lot of movies while latter seems to be more focused on the actress/pornstar directory. With that said, the accuracy is excellent in getting actresses in the search on Adult.com, the problem is that there are not many results (if there are any). So I search for a girl, get excited to see a result, but get disappointed in the NUMBER of results.
So far, if I had to rank the DVD sites out of 10 based on categories:
1) the existence of tagging (VideosZ lacks actress tags on a LOT of movies)
2) correct spelling (e.g. spelling Ann Marie Rios "Ann Marie Rios" not "Anne Marie Rios", or Brodi Kennedy as "Brodi Kennedy" not "Broadi Kennedy", etc.) - this category also includes the act of not having two listings for one girl because of misspellings or lack of last name
3) scene tagging (not only putting names associated with the DVD, but also with each scene, and getting them correct)
Mind you with Adult.com i have not YET found anything to decrease the 10 rating in the three category
#1) Adult.com (10/10/10)
#2) MovieRoom (10/10/10 (I give Adult.com the edge because of the more completeness of headshots. If you are going to put headshots try to be as thorough as possible)
#3) Pornstar.com (8/10/10) (they always seem to forget a name here and there)
#4) VideoBox (10/8/8)
#5) DVDBox (9/9/8)
#6) Ten.com (9/7/7)
#7) PlatinumClub (9/5/8) (there are way too many duplicate listings for girls because of misspellings)
#8) VideosZ (8/7/6) (their old content is very bad and makes up too much of the site)
#9) MovieBox (8/5/7) (way too many tags lack last names and are mashed up into the generic first name)
#10) AdultMovieClub (7/7/6)
#11) Vidz (5/7/5) (they are pretty bad)
#12) Vixeo (4/7/4) (they are very bad. The funny thing is that AdultBouncer leases their content and they do a better job of tagging it)
I skipped all studio sites (Diabolic, Devils Film) because they can obviously excel in this field because they OWN the films.
I just updated the first bullet in my review. I forgot a couple words...namely "ZIP". I meant to say "ZIP DOWNLOADS". So if that makes any changes in your decision, my bad.
Yup, Monahan - join for a single month and take it all - that'd be my recommendation - been a member a couple of times, but only for that one month at a time - and then returned after a while to see whats new - and again wait till there's a certain amount of new stuff...."the economic way" for us PUs....
Agree on everything. Problem is that there is a very strict character limit on each section, so I can only write so much. The fact that I ran out of characters is a testament to the amount of PROS there are as well as the numerous CONS to the site. That said, they are still one of the top sites on the net...at least when compared to the dreck that is out there. It has a long way to go until it can be put in the same ball park as NA/Braz.
Agree especially with their Real/Fake info. I'd say they are maybe...80% accurate? Megan Jones has like the most obvious fake tits, and every single update on the site is with her post-boob job, yet it says her tits are "real". Yes, her tits for the first half of her career were in fact real, but since the boob job (2005? 2006?) they are definitely not "real".
Monahan - yes, bro - first of all I guess it's a one month site ONLY - the updates seems really slow, so..
The quality of videos are VERY different throughout the site - I've not been through all yet - first I go for my favorites. But compared to some "top-sites" you got to be prepared for some videos in average/low quality, alas.
Still I rate it the 80 because of a handfull of more fine videos with those "old timers" - but again: compared to "better sites" the quality is very much unstable - I'd say half is fine/ok...
But finally from one Fiona Cooper-fan to another: You get the girls/models from that time - and man, some of those videos of the models mentioned in my review is a revival - not crisp in viewing quality, but you can live with it...for most of them.
And oh, btw - the photo-deal is very slim (14 sets) and not worth much...
Hey, I'm a member of NA at the moment and for what it's worth, I tried searching for the model you mentioned through their main site and her scene came up, both while logged in and when I logged out. So it works for me at least. :)
Impeccable. NA does an impeccable job. They make it very easy to find content from the girl you like.
So lets just take Gianna Michaels for example.
If you start typing in G-I-A-N... into the search box you get a menu of names, one of which is Gianna Michaels. After you click it you get Gianna's directory listing. Click that and you get all her movies.
Moreover, when you get new updates, let just say from Gianna Michaels, and you click it, the page for the update has a list of all other Gianna updates, so you NEVER have to 1) search for Gianna after you are on one of her updates, 2) click her name to get to her directory page to see more updates.
Another thing worth noting is that I have not seen them fail to give last names to an update. E.g. if the girl is Gianna Michaels, they don't tag the name "Gianna", it is always "Gianna Michaels".
After using the site some more I have found that the search doesnt work all that well. Like I will search for a girl and movies which they are tagged dont even show. Then add in the fact that they sometimes misspell names, or forget the, and it makes for a poor searching experience.
The only positive you can take out of the site that its only Diabolic movies, and Diabolic's library is not that big, so you will be hard pressed not to locate all the movies you want. What I suggest is doing research before you sign up because the tour page is the exact same as the members page, and it allows you to see every movie they have. So just write up a list of all the movies you want before you join and then download them right after you join, there is no download quota from what I can see. Again, there are only 350 some movies, and they have already maxed out most of their series...e.g. there are only 28 volumes of "2 on 1" and all 28 are on there (the last one was produced in 2007). If you need help just goto IAFD, they do a good job of getting the cast lists right.
I also enjoy creampies because at least it makes sense from a sex point of view. I have no problem with a blow job that results in ejacalation, but it must remain in the mouth. She doesn't have to swallow, but there can't be any pulling out and the guy shooting all over the place. That is one of the reasons why I much prefer older movies to most of todays stuff.
My horry story: Was denied access when I first trying logging in. Roughly 30 minutes had passed since signing up for a month. I called the tech line and they stated new accounts can take up to 48 hours to appear. Kiss my black ass! Its 2009, not 1991. I sent three emails over the space of two hrs, by the end of which, I could log into my account.
Thanks for the trust vote, by the way. To answer your questions:
1. The site tends towards the real much more than silicone enhancement, although I do recall a few phonies in the mix. I can't stand fake breasts either. That being said, this is anything but an "all natural, girl-next-door" kind of site. The models are high-end all the way, are heavily made-up, and dressed to kill. Or undressed to kill.
2. Yes, the price is high, and yes, I do think it's worth the money, considering all the dough I've wasted on sites that have crappy content and no user-friendly features. which caused me to waste time as well as money. It all depends on your tastes. Normally, glamour and polish isn't my cup of tea, but I still enjoyed the site. There's a lot of hardcore here as well. I don't even look at that and yet I found the site worthwhile.
I wouldn't do the three months myself, because the site isn't huge.
3. No network, and I don't recall any bonus sites.
I'm glad to hear you liked the site and my review. In my opinion Karina has some of the best natural tits out there and she's stunning, I hope more people will read my review and join the site just like you, thanks
Maybe a lawyer should answer this topic, but I would guess that you could be cited for reading a porn magazine in a bar. In some areas you could be cited for smoking in a bar. You do drugs in a bar, you could be cited.
I don't think you could be cited for driving a SUV to a bar, unless you broke some law while driving.
I also don't think you could be cited for wearing a "Jesus Saves" jacket in a bar.
Those are my opinions, but I am not a lawyer.
So when you say that porn is socially tolerated, you are speaking very broadly. Porn is not socially or legally tolerated in many public areas.
In terms of Customer Service responsiveness, I've got to say that I've found Danni.com to be quite responsive - 5-10 minutes after filling out a form on their site, I had a response.
01-11-0909:18pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
