| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Ace DDF:
Yes, this is correct.
The memberships sold in August are all non-recurring. So after they run out, they won't rebill!
Have fun with the network memberships! :)
Best regards,
Endre
DDF Productions
|
08-10-09 04:46am
|
Reply
427
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Ace DDF:
(Monahan's Reply)
If you buy a 1 month membership now, yes.
But we also sell 2-month, 3-month network memberships!
Best regards,
Endre
DDF Productions
|
08-10-09 04:44am
|
Reply
428
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from polacrilex:
(Monahan's Reply)
If you have never joined then you will be pleased. You will stay busy downloading for about a week, but you could get it all in that time. And that is exactly what I do. Join once a year and then download all the updates. But like I said if they had more in their updates I would join more often because the quality of the material really is that good.
|
07-13-09 05:04pm
|
Reply
429
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from polacrilex:
(Monahan's Reply)
No they do update that much, but you only get 1 set of pictures of 1 to 2 videos and they alternate between the two. while both are high quality, I waited a year to rejoin (from last July) and I was able to download all the updates in one day. So it is the amount of updates that I wish would increase. They have a feedback form and one of options is "more updates" so I am pretty sure this is a common complaint. Hey when you get content this good you can never get enough!
|
07-13-09 06:50am
|
Reply
430
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jd1961:
(Monahan's Reply)
You can find those all over the internet.
|
07-12-09 02:00am
|
Reply
431
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
It continuously surprises me how much personal tastes can differ.
I was thinking the models of the last year were not up the the previous standards of attractiveness. There were a good percentage of lovely young girls in the past, and I've found very few that I really liked this past year.
We agree on the videos, though, but I don't know what they can do, since Met-art is strictly softcore. I find that Femjoy videos are more watchable than Met-art videos, but not by much.
If the videos went very high-definition, that might help a little. Better music background would help a little. But the main problem is the girls don't do much of anything: they walk, they sit, they lay down, stand up. If there was some story to the video, that would help, but these girls are not actresses. And the photo people are not writers that would be able to write a short plot that makes sense and holds interest.
|
07-09-09 01:52am
|
Reply
432
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
I think that a site that offers a lot of possible tease in the form of wet t-shirts or lingerie is fine. I'd even say that it's great, but at some point I do want to see the model nude. Tease is like having someone bring you different plates of food and only letting you smell it. At some point you want to tasre that food.
|
07-06-09 06:50pm
|
Reply
433
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(Monahan's Reply)
Man, it's been awhile since I was a member but I know there was a search engine that was quite comprehensive as far as tags goes. Meaning, I do believe you can do searches including breast size, hair color, location, and so on. Hopefully a current member can give you more insight.
|
06-22-09 11:16pm
|
Reply
434
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from wiild1:
(Monahan's Reply)
Below is the offer I got today: I'm in euroland, good to see that they are not discriminating!
Today's Special!
Sign me up for another subscription to PornstarNetwork at a price of €0,76 for 3 days (trial) then €26,45 recurring every 30 days.
|
06-09-09 01:12pm
|
Reply
435
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from careylowell:
(Monahan's Reply)
Visa charged me one buck foreign transaction fee for each monthly tab. Just another excuse for more $. I'm glad ya enjoyed the review. FistingInAction.com and PowerOfFeet.com have been added since my most recent m'ship.
|
06-06-09 11:40am
|
Reply
436
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Jay G:
(Monahan's Reply)
Totally agree.My porn bill for a year is less than I used to spend in a few weeks sometimes.
|
05-31-09 05:59pm
|
Reply
437
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from james4096:
This sounds cool. I like the, "blurry widescreen scenes with an HD logo stamped on the corner really isn`t...." part.
But I hope they still keep the quality they have now. Some people's computers can't handle HD or their internet connection is too slow. Even if their stuff is going to be HD, I hate downloading 1.2 gig movies that are just "okay."
|
05-30-09 01:31am
|
Reply
438
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from badandy400:
SHIT! That is great! They finally got a clue.
While I do not think they should be rid of lower qualities, some people still prefer than for downloading, I am thrilled about the new HD stuff. I will have to renew the membership that I just allowed to run out.
Thanks for the great news!
I do not sound excited do I? :)
|
05-29-09 11:38pm
|
Reply
439
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Jay G:
(Monahan's Reply)
3-D smell-o-vision....that sounds heavenly!
|
05-25-09 12:01am
|
Reply
440
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from turboshaft:
(Monahan's Reply)
Smell-o-vision or 3-D sound cool, but if you think about how they would apply to a lot of porn you might wish otherwise. There have been quite a few videos where I thought "it's probably good I can't smell the action, only see and hear it."
3D is making its way into some big Hollywood blockbusters but it is still a gimmick designed to generate a bigger profit with every ticket sold, not a genuine attempt to increase quality.
It would be nice if they tried to eventually increase quality beyond HD (higher definition? super high definition?) but people would probably have to own bigger displays and possess strong vision in order to even tell the difference.
|
05-24-09 11:48am
|
Reply
441
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(Monahan's Reply)
Hey Monahan,
It wasn't so much that I disagreed with the score as it was that I noticed a few things that are odd.
Naughty America made a big move in Fall 2007, they merged their tier 1 sites with tier 2 sites and removed the DL limit. My review of the site in October 2007 talks about no download limit, since it had been a big deal up until then and had stopped me from joining. So, at least by October 2007, the DL limit was removed.
Now, look at the top where it says "how long have you been a member" the review says, "More than 3 months". In the review, the reviewer says, "I THINK there is a daily download limit? There was about 6 months ago when I was last a member". So, which is it? Reviewer is a current member for the last 3 months or hasn't been a member in 6 months?
October 2007 would be 18 months ago and there was no DL limit then either. DL limit is right up there with DRM when it comes to making or breaking a site. I just found the inconsistencies to make the review a little questionable.
|
05-23-09 04:37pm
|
Reply
442
|
Stunners
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Monahan's Reply)
Hey Monahan
Please see my reply to Drooler about this site ... before you spend your money..(still considering the price the site could - for this user - easily go for maybe an 85 - but not sure yet - gotta have some more time before a too hasty review)
|
05-18-09 05:13am
|
Reply
443
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from zzzins:
(Monahan's Reply)
Totally agree Monahan. I'm a video guy too but joined MetArt because the photos are just so damn good. I see the video content on MetArt as a bit of a bonus really - not why I joined but occasionally nice to have a vid of a girl you've been admiring the photos of. Uma B was a good example for me - major hot babe with about 5 photo sets and all of a suddden 2 or 3 vids appeared - a nice addition.
I agree with you regarding the model names but at least the names are unique. I'm currently writing a database/website to act as a central model "lookup" for as many popular websites as possible and will let the PU community know as soon as I have a beta sit ready to test.
|
05-11-09 02:05am
|
Reply
444
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Monahan's Reply)
I joined it last July. Here are the notes I made about it: "MOSTLY non-exclusive. Exclusive girls MOSTLY big titted slags. NO ZIPS. EXPENSIVE. NO MORE."
Oh, and you can read reply #1 I'd made to Ace.
|
05-11-09 01:05am
|
Reply
445
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yep - all true. If you enjoy softer nude stuff well-presented with gorgeous babes - updated daily, this sites's pretty awesome.
If you're looking for boy/girl stuff or harder solo stuff, this site will frustrate the hell out of you.
I would highly recommend Nubiles.net for people that are frustrated by Met Art but like the type of girls that they post. Nubiles.net also has multiple updates a day, lots of great HQ masturbations vids, some boy/girl vids - and you can be delighted to find girls that went on to be notable porn babes who did great stuff here early in their careers.
|
05-10-09 06:04pm
|
Reply
446
|
Whale Tail 'N
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from atrapat:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yes, I meant that even though you can join the network through this site, Whale Tail 'N specific content (thongs and jeans) is scarce. You can see Porn.com, All Adult Pass or Mega Site Pass as a humongous bonus for Whale Tail 'N or Whale Tail 'N as a tiny no-longer-updating part of Porn.com, All Adult Pass or Mega Site Pass.
Thanks for the info on your download speeds. If I had gotten those speeds, I'd probably stayed longer than I did.
|
04-28-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
447
|
More Gonzo
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from exotics4me:
Hey Monahan,
Last I checked Give Me Pink also had stopped releasing new updates, believe that was in February as well. Hard to say if it is a permanent move, I wouldn't expect it to be permanent though. I have noticed over the last few years that some of the very exclusive sites are doing their shooting in the spring months, so that could be it, but maybe they have decided to pull back for awhile. I would imagine that considering the quality of their content 1920 high end video, completely exclusive content, that with most of the world experiencing financial problems that they could just disappear for awhile.
One bit of good news, when I was last a member at Give Me Pink, they were allowing a member to switch the remainder of their membership to one of their other sites at any time.
For example, when I canceled my Give Me Pink membership, there was a few weeks left on the subscription. It gave me the option at anytime during those remaining weeks, to switch the remaining time left to any of their sites and as far as I know, you could then do it again and again to each of their sites until your month was up. I thought that was one of the best ideas I had seen.
|
04-27-09 08:48pm
|
Reply
448
|
Whale Tail 'N
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from atrapat:
Isn't this site part of Porn.com or Mega Site Pass? Some PUs have been complaining about download speeds from this company (myself included).
What I remember from when I was a member recently is that Whale Tail 'N had around 20 scenes only and about half of them were available in any major DVD site. Site was no longer updating.
|
04-27-09 02:47pm
|
Reply
449
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment from Monahan:
UPDATE - 4 eamils to support so far, and only autoreplies promising a reply in 1 to 3 days. It's now 6 days with no replies from the support desk.
There's still time left in my month so let's see if there really is a support function for MOFO's.
|
04-18-09 09:21am
|
Reply
450
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from atrapat:
JFYI, they've added the Avy Scott scene this week. It's a scene with Lexington Steele at Milfs Like It Black. Looks like they create the pornstar profile too early before the scene gets released.
|
04-18-09 04:26am
|
