| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Queensnake BDSM:
Dear bandandy400,
You made a refund not a cancellation - probably accidentally - that is why your account is blocked.
Of course when you cancel your subscription, your account will be alive until the date you paid for and you are not blocked instantly as you said.
So the above information is completely wrong.
If you have any issues with your subscription, I help you with pleasure, just send me a message.
Kind regards,
Queensnake
|
06-20-11 01:49am
|
Reply
377
|
Queeny Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Lionheart:
(badandy400's Reply)
I'm really trying to like this site, the movies are great and Quenny is a really hot, but I don't like how the website is treating me, I'll mess around more with the site and write a review, I'll tell you one thing I canceled my account to this site about 5 hours after joining it.
|
11-23-08 09:50am
|
Reply
378
|
Queeny Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Lionheart:
(badandy400's Reply)
ok so I tried the download manager for the site, and I can tell you it won't for this site! The site works only when if feels like it!!! I can only download one movie at a time but when I try to browse the site the site suddenly stops responding, I have to wait like 20 mins for this site to work again. When I add files for the download manger, when the site stops to respond the download manger can not connect to the file. I tired to e-mail them, but guess what i get an error message when I try to send the e-mail! Total nightmare, I think it's easier to pull teeth from a live alligator then to download the movies from this site!
|
11-23-08 01:44am
|
Reply
379
|
Queeny Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Lionheart:
(badandy400's Reply)
I'll try it out, and let you know how that works out for me for the site
|
11-23-08 01:14am
|
Reply
380
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(badandy400's Reply)
I agree, I really like this site and the network. On a related note, Microsoft lists this exact Trojan as the #1 threat right now, even over the Conficker, so I guess there is a chance that somehow it has infected their site without them noticing it. I don't know a lot about tech talk, but do know that the JS in the Trojan name means it has something to do with the Java Script. I'm hoping they get it fixed soon.
|
03-31-09 11:18pm
|
Reply
381
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mr smut:
(badandy400's Reply)
Hello Andy,
that was in a lengthy explanation what I was trying to say. I only hope that you didn't waste to much energy or let's say I do hope that Zack is able to understand what our point of view is and that he will be willing and able to make his reviews helpful for others.
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-02-08 01:13pm
|
Reply
382
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#23
from lurifax:
(badandy400's Reply)
Hello badandy400,
My disappointment with reviews in general is based on the lack of (visible) consistency or accountability in the setting of scores. TBP for example do not show on what criteria they give scores. (‘Porninspector’ does something like it, but not enough.)
On whatever grounds you use (download speed, DVD quality, HD and so on)… If a table is set up - showing the scores (0-10/10, or 0-100/100 etc.) - and the same table structure is used over the board one gets COMPATIBLE results. The AVERAGE gives the score…
Let’s look at what happens when a new factor, like HD, comes in to the valuation;
At present you have no room for manoeuvre. (You have “painted yourself into a corner”.) With a template, as suggested, you don’t have that problem as you simply add HD to the template. – That’s basics in any valuation process.
Your point about Criticising or Creating a review is taken. My reason for not doing the latter is that I have neither time nor interest for it. Besides, I leave that to you guys. You are paid for it (I hope...).
If I have to choose between Camaro and Firebird, I stick to my bike until I have enough money to by a proper car like BMW or Mercedes…
I should not have bothered with Rachel Aziani in my last posting – I had not done so before.
My visit to Rachel Aziani was just a sidekick to AZIANI.com.
My comment to ‘ace of aces’ was as a reply to his childish previous remark, and ‘13’ is the impression I got of his mental age. I do not apologise for it.
|
08-04-08 05:52pm
|
Reply
383
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#20
from lurifax:
(badandy400's Reply)
The intelligent reader would have concluded that I was not 'bitching' about Videobox, but gave an example of how reviewers manage to paint themselves into a corner.
At first I thought "Why bother?", but for your benefit I shall explore;
As I was replying to 'ace of aces' 'review' on this site...what would be the point of making a statement, or comment, to the aforementioned 'review', on the Videobox site?
I have previously declared (nearly) all and every 'problem' I have with the 'Rachel Aziani' site... Although I could add that it is a bit too repetetive, but then again, that is just how it is with all the single model sites.
If anything, I should add to my original comment to 'ace of aces' 'review': What "hardcore"? The closest to it I have seen would not even shock a religious fanatic.
As for 'bitching' about Videobox...
1. I don't really have much critisism about the site, but what I have, I shall account for when it comes to that - probably in September this year.
2. As I mentioned before, I am not happy with the inflation of points given to websites by reviewers in general. Unfortunately I have not found a proper forum, where to vent and/or discuss these matters. As it stands, the whole point system is, if anything, ridiculus.
More often than not, sites are not compatible on the same criteria - although they are given points as if they were.
As an example;
Presently I am subscribing to xmovies.com, which TBP has given a score of 86.3. (I cannot make out what the 86.3 relates to.)
In comparison with Videobox, which has a TBP score of 98.0 one is led to believe that Videobox is vastly superior to xmovies.com. I, however, do not see it in such easy terms.
Whilst Videobox is outstanding in it's quantity of videos as well as how they handle their data base, it is comparably shortcoming in other aspects, where xmovies.com excels like website speed, download speed and quality of video clips, and not least; an actual, working and polite customer service (24/7!).
Between the two, I have come to the conclusion that, for the best result, one should work the two places in tandem. AMEN!
|
08-02-08 06:44pm
|
Reply
384
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#19
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
hehe...yeah certainly it looks like it is his way of replying. i am not the only how get`s a bad reply from him ^^..but at least he can`t vote me either because he hasn`t got 5 points :)
|
07-23-08 11:14pm
|
Reply
385
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(badandy400's Reply)
Ya, to complete my DL, I setup 8 at a time DL in IE and come back.
A manager wont work for me on that site.
There is allot of good there so I am sure in time they will get it right.
|
07-02-08 11:42pm
|
Reply
386
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from ace of aces:
yeah, she is so hot *ouch*
"I am happy it was recommended to me." ^^..who was that good old boy who did that? :) ...lol
|
06-18-08 08:53am
|
Reply
387
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
hehe...i will always write reviews about the sites i have visited but mostly i am to lazy to do that :)...
|
06-13-08 12:52am
|
Reply
388
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
hi, ,it`s me again, now i am waiting for youre review of that site ^^, hope i did`n`t blinded you by my given points ;)
|
06-12-08 02:05pm
|
Reply
389
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
hm...i used the dap download manager and had no problems as i remember. but i can remember that i had to relog after a while ( arround three hours) but defenetly not after every video...i don`t download photos, so for me it wasn`t a problem that there were no zips :)...which browser do you use? maybe it`s also a problem of the browser. i use the inetexplorer.
hope that you enjoy the site anyway.
|
05-06-08 04:13am
|
Reply
390
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
let me know if my point of view was or wasn`t to subjective .
|
05-05-08 07:59am
|
Reply
391
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
uff...that`s a lot of information :)
ok the bandage of the bitrate is between 2572 and 6521 kbit/s
what bitrate is good and what not?
|
05-04-08 02:06pm
|
Reply
392
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
if you mean the download speed as bitrate, then it was pretty good. as i remember it was, while downloading 2 videos simultan, 6000 kbit/sec. (is also my fastest connection speed i have, could be therfore higher)
|
05-04-08 05:28am
|
Reply
393
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
hm..can you tell me how i can see the bitrate?
the video duration is arround 4-12 minutes...grrr..should i give a 98? :)
|
05-04-08 02:42am
|
Reply
394
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(badandy400's Reply)
I was on another site and saw an ad for Reality Kings at an 80% discount - I clicked on it to see what the offer was and it was an offer for $9.95/mo or $70 or so for 1 year - amazing offer.
So I would expect that the offer that you received is real - it's pretty clear that a bird in the hand is worth more to these sites than 12 in the bush.
|
09-19-09 12:12am
|
Reply
395
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Victorycreed:
(badandy400's Reply)
B.S. I didn't even reach the 5 gigs and they locked my out. Waste. Should've gone to bangbros or ztod.
|
12-19-08 09:20pm
|
Reply
396
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Mischif:
Gah!
Membership canceled due to this
|
10-02-08 06:09am
|
Reply
397
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from asmith12:
(badandy400's Reply)
> Besides, I am preparing for when the evil people take porn away from
> us, this way I should have enough to last me a very long time! Kinda
> like people stocking up on food and ammo just in case the shit hits the
> fan.
:-) :-).
|
05-21-08 04:13pm
|
Reply
398
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from asmith12:
(badandy400's Reply)
As I've said, they should allow you to download your 105 movies, but I'm just curious - what are you going to do with all that stuff? 105 movies even if they're 20min each is an awful lot of movies which will take 30-something hours to watch :-).
|
05-21-08 04:50am
|
Reply
399
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from asmith12:
> it is not my fault if their servers stop the download at 87%!!!
It could be your fault, or your ISP fault, or their servers, or their ISP, or any ISP in between. IMHO it doesn't matter: as they can't be 100% sure it's not their fault, they should allow to resume stopped download not counting it as "full" download.
|
05-17-08 08:20am
|
Reply
400
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Goldfish:
Teen Pink Videos does the same thing with the pausing or queuing in the download manager.
|
05-16-08 06:10pm
|
