Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Easy Elders
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(little rabbit's Reply)
I assume that English is not your first language. Are you saying that PU reviews and comments are subjective? Well, by nature they would be, everyone writes as HE/SHE sees it but no one is making an attempt to deceive.
When it comes to the site you're referring to I must say, that even though I was disappointed with Easy Elders, there was no attempt on their part to rip me off. I subscribed through Epoch, paid my ten dollars and unsubscribed through Epoch shortly thereafter without any problem. I would still be very much interested to know what you were charged for above and beyond the $9.95. It could be a good warning to other Porn Users and that's what we are all here for, aren't we?
|
09-14-08 09:43am
|
Reply
2
|
Easy Elders
(0)
|
Reply of
little rabbit's Review
from mr smut:
I tried the alternate processor and would have been charged the right amount for this site/offer. As usual with some you have to be careful because there's a special offer for another site (a total of $23.07 for one month) that's already activated.
How come that you think you've been charged for 46 single sites? If this should be true for you I keep my fingers crossed that you can claim back your money.
|
09-09-08 05:58am
|
Reply
3
|
Easy Elders
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(little rabbit's Reply)
For the record ...
Your remarks were NOT censored. You were instructed that your remarks did not meet the minimum requirements for submission as a REVIEW. Your were further invited to resubmit your remarks as a COMMENT.
As an aside ...
Had you read our past polls, you may have had a clue that the $1 trial you were tempted by might have been less than above board.
See "What do you think of "Free Trials" or "$1 Trials" for more insight into this matter.
|
09-08-08 06:16am
|
Reply
4
|
Easy Elders
(0)
|
Reply of
little rabbit's Review
from messmer:
I agree that the site isn't very good but I don't understand the extra charges. I was charged around ten dollars for a month by Epoch, cancelled after 1 day because I wasn't impressed even at that low price and that was it. By the time the month is up I expect to have received 10 dollars worth even though I agree with many of your sentiments.
|
09-07-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
5
|
Mature Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
little rabbit's Review
from messmer:
Forget the above. Now I know! :-)
|
12-13-08 08:44am
|
Reply
6
|
Mature Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
little rabbit's Review
from messmer:
If you're still around, lr, could you tell me if their picture sets are zipped now? I wrote to the webmaster but got no reply which probably means that they are not.
|
12-11-08 10:28am
|
Reply
7
|
Mature Mega Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
little rabbit's Review from little rabbit:
"you seem to contradict yourself a bit".
When I see some known mature sites with a rating of 87, I have to rate this one with a 90.
It's not so complicate, just a necessary consistency.
And as I also list all the pro / cons I see, and also why I give such a rate, everybody can consider about.
Just have to read all what I wrote.
|
01-18-08 04:30am
|
Reply
8
|
Mature Mega Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RagingBuddhist:
(little rabbit's Reply)
The further explanations do make it clearer why you would rate this a better than average site but, at least to me, you seem to contradict yourself a bit. In your original review you said it was repetitive: "the "screennplay" is really too repetitive : fucking, fucking and fucking". Now you're mentioning at least some variety, with lesbian and solo scenes.
I guess it's just a case of differing opinions when it comes to what makes a site rate higher. To me, even daily updates of women I find attractive will grow stale very quickly when there's very little "chemistry", as you put it. If too many of the models on a site are doing the same thing as the next, I don't know that I could put that site in the excellent category. A good example would be my re-review of ifeelmyself.com. It still has it's charm to me because they update daily and it's still very amateurish, but it's becoming so... damn... repetitive. Kind of like if I were eating roast beef sandwiches everyday for a month - I think I'd start to hate roast beef.
|
01-17-08 06:30pm
|
Reply
9
|
Mature Mega Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
little rabbit's Review from little rabbit:
Why I gave a 90 ?
It's very easy to understand : at mature.nl, the models look really like amateurs mature models.
With all other mature sites, the models have a monotonous looking.
Just take a look at allover30.com, for instance, to see what they will offer for the 2 next weeks....
And silicone chemistry, for one half of the models.
The videos are always with the same screenplay : a boring interview, and after this, 3 videos with a dildo, lying for 10 minutes on her back.
2 or 3 stagged crapelos, and : "Next One".....
Totally boring.
At least, at mature.nl, there are a little of lesbian show, and some good ones solo show.
And the most part of the models are not looking like a Playmate being past her prime.
The best could be a site with the AbbyWinters.com chemistry, and models from 40 to 60.
THis surely will come, but it's a dream, now.
|
01-17-08 04:06am
|
Reply
10
|
Mature Mega Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
little rabbit's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
If I've read you right, you've compared this site to other mature sites, they seemed popular, so that somehow means this site deserves a high rating? I'm just not too clear why you would give a site a 90 when you find it so boring, repetitive and lackluster.
Also, unless you join only sites with models, like MetArt or Femjoy, or masturbation or lesbian sites, I think you'll be sadly disappointed with most sites you might have a look at - I think it'd be safe to say that most hardcore sites will have at LEAST one guy for every woman.
|
01-16-08 10:28pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
