| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Reg Berkeley:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yeah, our annual membership is $99.95 which breaks down to $8.33 per month. I wish the price sounded cooler than $8.33 :) Maybe some marketing genius will suggest something better!!!
|
06-23-09 11:31am
|
Reply
152
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Goldfish:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yeah, it really all boils down to personal preference I guess. Another person who has tastes more in line with this site and more tolerance for the video quality may love it.
|
06-22-09 04:23pm
|
Reply
153
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Toadsith:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thank you for such kind remarks - I hope to maintain this standard in all my reviews (though granted some of my earliest reviews were a bit weak).
|
11-25-08 08:20am
|
Reply
154
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from ace of aces:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
as i could download 35 videos simultan it was possible to "check" the site within 2-3 days.
i get arround 50 gb of videos right now from that site.
for the foto(pic) info read my reply above :)
|
12-01-08 10:34am
|
Reply
155
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Claypaws:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thank you CT. I learned from the many excellent reviews from all you old-timers. And the PU guidelines in the review submission form are very clear, especially the further detail provided in the guidance for "excellent" reviews. Also, I may be a newbie to PU but I have plenty of experience writing business and management reports, albeit on rather more boring subject matter! It is amazing how skills are transferable from business to porn.
When I review other atk sites, I shall sensibly use some cut and paste, which I imagine is perfectly permissible from my own review.
|
05-31-12 02:27pm
|
Reply
156
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Claypaws:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thank you CT. The hardest part for me was forming my own clear view to write it!
|
06-04-12 11:18am
|
Reply
157
|
Audrey Bitoni
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from tangub:
Thanks for this review CT, I've also been tempted by this Premium Pass network but i'm put off by not being offered an independant biller like CCBill or Epoch as well as the pre checked cross sells. Did you have any problems with download limits here as TBP site facts states there's a 1GB limit?
|
03-11-12 06:31am
|
Reply
158
|
Audrey Bitoni
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Gazette Risque:
Again, Cybertoad, great review!
Though I was left to wonder if the videos offered are exclusive or not.
Too bad they don't allow download managers, really.
|
03-09-12 04:31am
|
Reply
159
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
LOL. Well, I am glad I didn't scare you off, CT. That's always my concern because my niche is so narrow and I am always afraid that I don't do a site justice because of my subjectivity. This is truly how I like it: take what appeals to you from my reviews and give it a try yourself. As long as you never accuse me of misleading you.
|
09-24-12 12:18pm
|
Reply
160
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Nick C:
Thanks for the review, much appreciated :D
Best regards
Nick
Webmaster
|
02-20-08 08:30am
|
Reply
161
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from martinlongbow:
thanks for the review. I was planning to try this site as it is in the same network group with brazzers but now no way. brazzers really need to standardize web pages for those sites and implement some kind of quality control. it is a mess right now
|
08-17-14 06:49am
|
Reply
162
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Monahan:
This was a premium site way back when I first became an online porn user, Videos were not so hot (but back then the technology wasn't there). The photos were wonderful.
Sorry to see how they've become another POS site that sounds like they just don't give a damn.
Thanks for the great detail in your review.
|
08-05-14 01:46pm
|
Reply
163
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bestimmt:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Happy to - not sure I know exactly what you're asking for. If you have specific questions, feel free. Basically, the site updates about once a week (it seems to have been doing this for some time), just straight video, each about 20 minutes, downloadable. As others have said, each video is a carbon copy of the others, except for a new pretty face. Girl comes in under the pretense of getting a job in the "adult industry" that pays "$1000 to $5000 per day," is persuaded to take her clothes off, then is told, "producers don't just want to hire a pretty face. they need to see you take direction. so suck my cock" or some variation thereof. The interview in inane and lasts most of the video. She sucks him for as long as he can take it (usually not very long), then he lays her on on a desk (as others have pointed out, no padding, nothing), and eats her out for a bit. Then, he makes her bend over the desk (it ALWAYS follows this progression, by the way), he asks her "what's going to happen now," and she replies "I'm going to get fucked" or some variation thereof. He has sex with her doggy style for as long as he can take it, usually about 30 seconds (in a good number of the videos, he ejaculates at this point), then he pulls out, and has her lay on her back on the desk. After about 2-3 minutes of re-arranging cameras and telling her how to sit, he fucks her standing with her laying on the desk for as long as he can take it, usually no more than one minute. Then, he asks her, "do you know how porn movies end," she says "no," he says "with a facial." Then he lays her on the couch, jerks off for about as long as he can take it (usually about 20 seconds) and ejaculates. Fin.
What I find so frustrating about the site is that the sex is SO INCREDIBLY SHORT. He literally can't keep from cumming. Its amazing that a guy in the "adult industry" so long hasn't learned to hold it in for more than a minute. We all work very hard for our money, and there are lots of great porn sites out there - this is not one of them, and I cannot recommend anyone spending their hard-earned money on this garbage. Disappointing is a euphemism.
|
10-29-12 09:05pm
|
Reply
164
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Monahan:
I agree with virtually everything says. I agree totally with his score which he discounted significantly for their lousy business practices. They don't need to use subterfuge to make a few extra bucks especially when it serves only to piss of good (paying) customers.
|
10-21-16 12:05pm
|
Reply
165
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BenThruston:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hard for me to say since I don't have a VB sub to compare. If they carry the SD stuff BangBros put on dvd, it might actually be better if its not in their remastered section which may be re-encodes from dvds themselves. The HD/widescreen stuff probably better off BB, but can't compare. Depends what their source would be. Their HD stuff brief time I was there looked like BR encodes or upscales.
|
03-25-14 05:15pm
|
Reply
166
|
BangBus
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from badandy400:
The media quality here really is not all that great. It has a lot to due with the length of the videos, you cant have hour long videos at 4 MBit/s. The site design is not all the special either, the videos are a pain to download.
|
09-16-08 12:19pm
|
Reply
167
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Alder Media Gro:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
The action includes solo babes masturbating with fingers, toys and vibrators. There are also some g/g scenes.
|
04-27-10 07:27am
|
Reply
168
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
There's nary a doogie in sight, 'cept the fake plastic ones. You'll see once you pay a decent visit.
|
04-02-10 08:26pm
|
Reply
169
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Wow, I just posted it. You're a quick reader! And thanks.
|
04-02-10 08:12pm
|
Reply
170
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from tangub:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Exactly my view CT, would like to join but no zips = no join, right click save as 52,000 times...no way!
|
03-12-13 01:33am
|
Reply
171
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Marcus:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I think the webmaster, James, has explained that the lack of zips is to discourage file sharing which is understandable, but yes, it's a shame and does make saving things very hard. With a site like this I normally cherry-pick my favourite photos from sets I'm less keen on, and save zips for the few that I love - with the amount of content it's quite overwhelming!
|
03-11-13 01:21pm
|
Reply
172
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from KET924aab:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hi Cybertoad. I wish they could find a few different beaches to shoot at too. There are a number of sites out there that run $20 a month specials that are probably better than Bikini Riot, which is $25. But the material is exclusive, and the HD looks good. They had enough of my favs there that I wanted to collect the material. For me it was worth it. The free tour model page doesn't show all the models, but I think you can see one or two pics from every update on the free tour Updates page. If they didn't have so many fake boobs I would have considered it a great deal.
|
05-29-13 05:14pm
|
Reply
173
|
Blow Bob
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
It is great to hear from you. Less than half of the models are heavy, but the big ones have multiple videos and sets. Bob looks for women who love bj's and doesn't care about looks. The fact that many are heavy many or may not be intentional, but Bob surely does like his women big. With many videos being POV, you don't focus much on their bodies.
I don't care for BBW and would never consider a site that focused on them. The site is about fun and I DO like that though. It also helps that I like Black women. While there are others to be found here, it seems that is Bob's favorite type. If the women turn you off, believe me I understand. For me, performance is more important than looks. Kind of reminds me of Susan Boyle in a way. Not at all a looker, but she has a great voice.
|
05-30-12 09:54am
|
Reply
174
|
Body In Mind
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from nipplestrech:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Did not Count them exactly:
900 photo sets
15 videos
|
05-10-13 10:58am
|
Reply
175
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lagit:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
As I said I wanted to give Brazzers the benefit of the doubt. It would be incredulous (to me) for a business/site to work so hard for customer interaction on one hand and pull such business destroying tactics on the other.
One side (Brazzer's)seems determined to create a base of loyal RE-Occurring (billing) members.
The other site/sales site/business(possibly not-related) site seems set up to be devious, miss-represent and take advantage of that same trust.
So I created my perception, Brazzer's - the site itself - excellent. The other (if it is separate) is bad, bordering on illegal (IMO)
Then I went into a lot of details for you (and others) to make a determination for yourselves. If they are the same entity, then to answer your question, Yes, the score should be 50 (the lowest possible)
|
08-09-14 02:49pm
|
