| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yes.... I can watch those showtime & cinemax shows for about 35 seconds before I'm totally bored. Like watching a football game where all the touchdowns & field goals are removed.
|
10-10-14 01:13pm
|
Reply
377
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jeffrey99:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I never had any problems downloading movies with Firefox. I'd say there is 1-2 movies available for each model, depending of rather she's a Cyber Girl of the Month or Week or a Casting Call model, etc. Some are in quicktime or windows HD, others are just one or the other. Older ones are just widescreen/decent quality. It's not till you get to the real old ones that quality looks bad.
|
11-06-08 08:05am
|
Reply
378
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Sadly there are many performers with implants but I don't think they pick them because of it but rather because that's what is currently available.
|
05-20-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
379
|
Porn Sluts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Not a one point review.
|
02-06-19 12:58pm
|
Reply
380
|
Porn Sluts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
No way is this a one point review.
|
02-06-19 12:56pm
|
Reply
381
|
Pornotopia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pornotopia:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hello and Thank you for writing in your question. It has, indeed, been 2 1/2 years since our last full feature DVD release, PornoMation2 and we still have several months yet to finish PornoMation3.
In fact, it will take a full studio house up to a year to execute 30 minutes of finished 3d animation. Pornotopia.com is Sagemonn and myself pulling off a whole 90 minute production on our own. I'd be glad to explain all the complexities involved if anyone cares to know.
I have to admit to not having known the best way to communicate about this. We took on an ambitious project and severely miscalculated our ETA. It has been embarrassing to extend promises we are not sure of. We are to date about 70 - 75% finished. We will post the good news at Pornotopia.com as soon as it is available.
Thanks to all who have supported us and have so VERY patiently hung in there for us!
Sincerely,
Karynna
|
10-16-08 07:16am
|
Reply
382
|
POV XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from IKnoPorn:
I've never joined, but I've had this on my list of "possible join" sites for about 2 years now (being a Sarah Blake, as well as POV, fan).
One cautionary note, and I just checked in again, is that every time I've checked the site, they have exactly the same preview content (believe me, I remember that Sarah Blake preview!)
So while the site might be updating, the preview content certainly has not, which I consider a warning sign, the site may be just a collection of videos without any support staff or updates. And the price tag is a little high (IMHO) to take a chance on it.
|
11-17-08 08:37pm
|
Reply
383
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pr0n addict:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
highest resolution is 1920x1080
i woulden't even bother downloading any other size cause you dont get any detail in it, if you know what i mean?
i didn't include any of the resolutions in my review because the person below and before me who reviewed it also wrote it down on there review. i was just adding to their review or reinterating the good and bad points aswell. :)
|
10-26-08 11:50am
|
Reply
384
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks Cybertoad. My thoughts are that this site works for all of us so if I don't give enough detail or assumed to much then it works well for all of us when that's pointed out so I can correct it.
Thanks for the trust rating.
|
10-08-08 02:42pm
|
Reply
385
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Sorry for the lack of detail Cybertoad. I guess I assumed that a lot of people would be familiar with Kink stuff, and that probably just isn't the case. To answer your questions:
Content details: The Eastern European scenes start with a scantily clothed woman in some sort of bondage and often with a ball gag. She is paraded around in public and made to do humiliating things like drink from a dog bowl or let people touch her. The scenes then shift to sex in some outdoor and public location. The U.S. scenes are more like a gangbang scene with bondage and Kink props used. There are several scenes in each shoot using a different bondage or prop setup. In the U.S. scenes the 'public' element is a little strained in that it is shot inside for obvious reasons, but the trade off is that the models are more widely known.
The humiliation level in both the European and U.S scenes is fairly high.
Video quality: decent. I'm not a techie so I don't know what is objectively good. The bitrate is 2140kbps and the dimensions are 960x540.
Other stuff: There are no dowmload limits that I'm aware of on any Kink site. If there was one, I'd have surely run into it on their other sites. There is no DRM either.
As for the thread where people are complaining about it being too tame, I can understand that but I don't really agree. It's a subjective thing. I read the thread and many people seem to want to see specific things, especially more humiliation. I like the balance they have now, though if they added more humiliation I wouldn't complain.
Another complaint that I do agree with is that the shoots in the U.S are a lot like other Kink stuff, but just with a gangbang thrown in. It looks a lot like Training of O or Sex and Submission.
If there is a valid complaint in the thread it might be that the site seems to advertise more humiliation and less sex, when what you get is less humiliation and more sex. I don't necessarily agree with that since I think having a woman tied up and fucked outside while people watch is pretty humiliating. But I won't complain if they ramp it up.
I also note on the forum link that you posted that there is only one thread that has anything negative, so for the most part people seem satisfied.
I hope I've answered your questions. If you need more info or more detail post a reply to this and I'll be happy to answer.
|
10-07-08 02:51pm
|
Reply
386
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Look, I am 23 and I love the look of nice tight teens with ripe, firm racks.
BUT...something about this woman really does the trick. I wish more women looked like her as they aged. She really does have an amazing ability to age....or perhaps an anti-aging machine! :)
A 50 will not hold much merit here with out a lot of logical, intelligent argument to why it deserves to be knock off. Which hopefully we will see.
But as it stands right now it does not matter much to scoring.
Oh and yes, gotta love those shapely naturals.
|
12-02-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
387
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hi Sir,
I think it's a great discrepancy between objective pros and cons and the explanation that should normally be given in the bottom line by Zack. I see about 2 1/2 pros and 1 1/2 maybe 2 cons with the rest not being explained in the conclusion of the review.
B.t.w. I can see the shape of her boobies in the preview and have to say that these are nice natural ones. I personally like what I see :-)
Cheers,
Smut
|
12-02-08 11:57am
|
Reply
388
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I would not get to rough on him though. He is right after all. I found that to be an extremely annoying part of this set of sites. Granted though it is worth the hassle to get the content. Besides, we were all "one post wonders" until we posted again. I am sure people thought the same of me when I made a big stink with my 100 score for Videobox, and look now, I have something like 300 posts. Gotta give people a chance, especially when they are right. Just do not be too blinded by the fact that you love a site to ignore flaws that other people might think is a big deal. I have been very irritated by things before and wanted to knock a site for it. I can understand him being mad because this site really does screw up download managers.
At the same time you guys are right as well. It is not something worth causing someone to overlook the site over. I loved the site and it is on my permanent rejoin list!
|
07-07-08 06:17pm
|
Reply
389
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I was setting several up as well, but if it took a while sometimes they would time out and end would have to start over! No resuming here.
|
07-03-08 01:09pm
|
Reply
390
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from badandy400:
I agree. The woman is worth a little hassle for. But, they do need to reconsider the timeout and frequent relog in. As I have mentioned in my reviews, this is pretty annoying and screws up download managers.
|
07-02-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
391
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from ace of aces:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
only criticism without any positiv to mention is RUBBISH :)..how i like such viewers like lurifax (0) ;)
|
07-02-08 10:04am
|
Reply
392
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from TheRizzo:
I am not much of a solo girl site, but she is absolutely stunning so I may make an exception and give it a try this month. Love those tits.
|
07-01-08 10:17pm
|
Reply
393
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from ace of aces:
yeah, she`s gorgeous :)
|
07-01-08 10:38am
|
Reply
394
|
Real Black Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I gave you a positive rating on August 27th. You have some very high quality reviews. I hope you also like this site.
|
11-05-08 12:12pm
|
Reply
395
|
Real Black Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thank you for your nice words. I don't see your rating yet.
|
11-05-08 12:04pm
|
Reply
396
|
Real Life Cam
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from theviv:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
The only thing that makes the site a porn site is the 24/7 voyeur ability that access gives you. Basically when you sign up you get access to bathrooms and bedrooms.changing,bathing and showering is not censored.
|
11-17-12 05:55pm
|
Reply
397
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Toadsith:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Agreed! The prices once you start buying multi-month packages from any of the MindGeek networks are so cheap. You quickly start entering Netflix pricing territory.
|
11-04-16 07:49pm
|
Reply
398
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Toadsith:
FYI: To stream their movies at full 1080p, click the little settings button (an icon of three interlocking gears) to the right of the "Download" button. It has four bitrates: TrueLife HD 1080p, HD 720p, SD High 480p, SD Low 360p.
Not sure if that earns them the 1 point to enter the 90s, but I figured I'd point out that streaming isn't necessarily a con. On the flip side, the whole not being able to view a photo at full res without downloading the entire set drives me insane. The entire meta-network (Brazzers, et. al.) does the same thing. So irritating.
|
11-03-16 09:42pm
|
Reply
399
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from BubbaGump:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hello. Thanks. I tried to be fair and objective about it. never reviewed a porn site before.
|
01-12-12 03:43pm
|
Reply
400
|
Rebecca's Office
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lazarus:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
First,
Thank you for your feedback.
I'm sorry I was not clear on why I found her website lacking.
First, her photo sets have all of the same poses, just different outfits and locations.
Second, her videos are of fair to poor quality.
Why ? because they were filmed in poorly lit rooms of which I asked her why.
Her reply was that the men she has sex with don't want to be recognized yet for more money you can purchase dvd's from her where the lighting is much better.
Sounds like a way to get more money out of her fans.
If you like MILF who is a true amateur that is attractive like Rebecca you might be able to look past the shortcommings I listed.
|
12-08-11 11:04am
|
