| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I got an offer through my email. I was member there before. I posted here on PU, but I believe it had to be deleted because it seemed it would not work of anyone else. You might try emailing their customer service and asking if they would give you that deal. Worst they could do is say no.
|
10-12-08 05:34pm
|
Reply
277
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
The videos look they would be no easier to get with a download manager.. But I usually would queue that up manually. It would only take 15 minutes to grab a good number of them.
If you join I could go over the method I used previously to grab the zips I did get. I got about 20% of them automatically, but it did take some work to get to that point, but much less than actually clicking around.
I do not usually use site grabber, I find them to be very unreliable. They skip stuff and double on others.
The videos can be downloaded in one piece now. I believe that is what you were asking, they are not in chunks, so that part is easier. Really by the time you got a manager set up to search for the videos you could just click them by hand, they are easy to get to.
The only problem is that the videos are not named consistantly. Some are named with the models name while others are labeled "HDV 2" for example.
The zips are named fairly nicely, although, I wish they had used spaces or something between the words. Amy Ried Red Dress reads "amyriedreddress" which is descriptive but a little hard to read when there are 4000 of them all together!
|
10-12-08 05:32pm
|
Reply
278
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Cybertoad.
There is a lot of content, but I have just been having a little trouble downloading it. They have been posting 4 videos per week and they are pretty good quality.
They have been posting photos daily. They quality has gotten fairly good. The lasted set has a resolution of 1334 × 2000.
They definitely have a good amount of girls here, and you will not find too many ugly ones.
I am having issues with downloading the zips from the site. I found a way to automate it and it work nicely, once. Now I cant seem to get it to work right again and have put it aside for now as I have been extremely busy and trying to rush another site that cost $35 per month rather than the $10 I am paying for this one.
To download the sips you have to go to load the gallery then go at another page. From there it says it is putting the zip file together, then a few seconds later the link shows up. This plays tricks on some download managers and make it a pain to queue stuff up. One good thing is that the links do not expire, so you can queue up 3 days of zips if you want and do not have to worry about them expiring on you.
I will write a full review for this one, I just have not been focusing on this site lately.
Of course, if there is anything else you would like to know...
|
10-12-08 04:20pm
|
Reply
279
|
I Am Peeing
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BrockLion:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I said "some of the material is posted elsewhere."
|
12-14-11 09:20am
|
Reply
280
|
I Cum Alone
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ace of aces:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
have to w8 also..and i think a while..because a new site never has plenty videos :)
|
07-23-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
281
|
I Cum Alone
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
it`s very expansive, but did you join that site already? price could be ok if it has a lot to give ;)
|
07-23-08 02:29am
|
Reply
282
|
I Love Female Muscle
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Jay G:
They do make trannies and regular guys look like sissies, don't they?
|
11-27-12 10:05am
|
Reply
283
|
I Love Female Muscle
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Capn:
I have to say 'No' & never would.
I don't mind a bit of muscle definition, but a lot of that just looks like testosterone to me.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-26-12 03:40pm
|
Reply
284
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from dracken:
I know I'm paranoid about this but maybe your password got hacked that would result in way to many downloads (happened to me once ever since I change my pass very often)
Just throwing my 2 cents in. Change passwords frequently!
|
09-23-09 02:29pm
|
Reply
285
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Denner:
Agree with williamj - though the motherload-sites of the company Final Whistle Ltd - Only Cuties, Sapphic Erotica and In Focus Girls are topscores at TBP it could be time for new reviews - at TBP.
These sites are - just as williamj and cybertoad indicates going downhill.
The content is slacking, the memberservice is poor, the downloadspeed/use of DL manager a problem and so on. Remember just half a year ago or so things were much better - I like the price of $19.95 and not $ 29.95, but it's not enough anymore...
|
12-02-08 03:01pm
|
Reply
286
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
He said it only updated 3 or 4 times a week, which wasn't often enough for his tastes. The every day updates might not be often enough for his tastes either - some sites give multiple updates a day, but I was responding to the incorrect info in the review - I should note that the review has now been edited - so if anybody else comes along and says, "Where does he say it only updates 3 or 4 times a week?", well it no longer does.
|
10-31-08 12:43pm
|
Reply
287
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from williamj:
Final Whistle has really slipped. I now recommend avoiding their sites if you where a member when they where good. Too many negative things from trust reviewers. Its a shame they had it going when they where good.
|
10-24-08 08:26am
|
Reply
288
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Gazette Risque:
Spot on review, CT!
Especially the fact it's repetitive.
Great site but it does get boring sometimes.
|
03-17-12 12:04pm
|
Reply
289
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from rearadmiral:
Excellent review. One of these days I'm going to have to rely on all of the PU members here who reviewed this site favourably and join it. I was complaining on a recent forum thread that not enough photographers give any attention to a woman's ass, and particularly here anus. This site looks like it doesn't suffer from that issue.
Thanks for the great review.
|
03-10-12 12:12pm
|
Reply
290
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from exotics4me:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Don't worry about that at all Cybertoad. I think the more reviews and different or similar perspectives are important.
|
03-09-12 05:32pm
|
Reply
291
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Capn:
Can I take it that this is really a video site?
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-09-12 01:15pm
|
Reply
292
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from lk2fireone:
The site preview seems kind of short. I see that there are some sample photos and videos, but I usually like to see a list of all the models at the site, with thumbnails of those models.
|
03-09-12 01:03pm
|
Reply
293
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Denner:
I understand the 93 from CT - in score.
And respect that.
Still: This user got some primary negative inputs about a site which in many ways do it so well - many ways:
1)Top,top,top quality vids/pixsets.
2)Fine selection of models.
3)Generally fine editing.
Still this user got some serious downers on this site after being here several times as a member:
I like, like it a lot: Full body views in vids.
But ITC pays less attention compared to earlier times. The full body scenes are now being downgraded compared to the meaning of the site: In The Crack - ok, but it's not a good development - compared to the past not good: Just look at the older vids of Lola/Dido Angel - her vids at the pool is just great - and the some years older Lexa vids walking around that swell and sunny place in the nude...
So please, give me back that ol' In The Crack deals...
Apart from the above: They still got that damn regional pricing!!!!
|
03-09-12 07:57am
|
Reply
294
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Gazette Risque:
The fact that someone else recently did a review on the same site shouldn't keep you from doing your own review, so kudos! :)
If the same problems are addressed is multiple reviews, maybe the site owners will start to notice and perhaps think about changing.
But what is even better is when someone reads multiple reviews and reads that more people noticed something good or bad or had a good or bad experience.
Anyway, I certainly agree with you on the issue of lack of different backgrounds and too many close ups.
Great review!
|
03-09-12 04:27am
|
Reply
295
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from atrapat:
Follow-up to my previous comment: turns out Savana Ginger is Havana Ginger's real-life sister. No wonder why they look so similar.
|
01-01-09 05:08am
|
Reply
296
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from atrapat:
It's not part of the main Reality Kings network but its new sister network Muffia. I got access to Muffia as a cross-sale from Reality Kings.
Scenes usually involve some prosthetics (double-dicked guy, three-titted woman, four-nipple woman, two-vagina girl, extremely hairy bushes, bifid tongue and so on) but there are a couple scenes which are, in fact, real (big real tits, mainly). Except for a couple, models are probably American but unknown to me.
There's a scene with a model with huge areolae. Funny thing is they name the model "Savana Ginger" and she physically reminds quite a bit of "Havana Ginger", a porn star who does have similar huge areolae.
Currently, there are 17 scenes and the schedule says they update once a month.
|
12-28-08 09:17am
|
Reply
297
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from uscue:
Wow I just ran across this site today. Looks like we've been looking around the same places. Yeah the Network looks interesting, wondering what the word is.
|
11-26-08 09:47am
|
Reply
298
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Marcus:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thank you both for your kind words :)
|
03-22-13 08:28am
|
Reply
299
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
She's a hot looking woman but her site isn't. I agree that 5$ would be a decent price to join because you would get your money back with buying just one movie and come out a winner with anything above that.
|
03-07-13 06:12pm
|
Reply
300
|
Jessica Jaymes XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
My pleasure. Her site is 30$ and I don't think that a single one of the other performers in the network are actually still active.
|
10-18-12 07:47am
|
