| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
That's what I thought the question referred to. I have quite a lot in my PU Favorites list.
I also have a few (perhaps 5 or 6) free sites that I guess I should blow off. Don't look at them very often.
|
10-21-14 03:42pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yes but wouldn't those women be more inclined to get the real thing as opposed to using a hand or a toy?
|
10-04-14 09:22am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
As I join a site only after I've gone through all PU reviews and comments, I'm generally ready to attack the site for the content that drew me to signing up in the first place.
So my answer is "it depends."
|
07-27-14 11:48am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from LPee23:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
My issue with DDF and their old content is slightly different than yours. At this point, since I've already come out talking about this issue in vague terms, I think it's time to get it all out and write my review. I hate to expose shortcomings of a great site, but if no one speaks up, then where is the motivation to change? I'm going to try not to slam DDF, I'd rather have them look at my review as fair and perhaps realize that there is truth in it. Look forward to it soon.
|
07-24-14 09:07am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
People keep saying that ...... but I honestly haven't had any problem with PayPal.
Now quite often a porn site will have a number of options for payments initiated by billing processors that doesn't include PayPal.
If its the pay sites who're at fault refusing to accept PayPal, then I would say there's a plausible reason ....... the first one that comes to mind is that PayPal will go all-out ....(on behalf of it's members) addressing conflicts to initiate a successful resolution for those issues that are ignored or go unattended by pay-sites.
This naturally could rub the pornographer the wrong way ....
Because now he might have to get up off his dead-ass and do his damned job.
|
07-21-14 09:14pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LPee23:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I have my own issue with DDF's old content, which I may bring to attention some day. They make new content that is second to none, but their handling of old content has deeper failings than what you refer to here. I've held off on writing a review on DDF for several months, because I am honestly way too conflicted to know how to score them. I don't know how I can take a site with such strong positives as DDF, reconcile those with some of the strongest negatives, and produce a review that I would want to post. It could potentially be one of my best reviews, I could write volumes, but I like DDF too much to call them out right now. Maybe when I feel able to write a more unbiased review of DDF, I will post it one day.
|
07-21-14 04:06pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
As you know, we often re-run past poll questions. This one was originally submitted in early June, 2012
The poll has run several times before:
Jun 9, 2012
May 27, 2013
hope that helps
|
06-01-14 09:26am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I suppose I was too late getting in my reply ...made answerable to your comment on this poll.....
.hence its expiration and like hood you won't be reading my time-consuming response.
therefore I'm writing this and pushing the buttons to hopefully bring it back for your viewing. lol..... for what it's worth!
|
05-24-14 01:00am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hell Yeah CT!!
|
05-22-14 04:42pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Surgery involving those "other lips" usually means reduction not enlargement. And even that I find totally unnecessary and one of the penultimate results of societal ignorance over female anatomy. Big labia are not the result of "too much" sex or masturbation--a common myth that's easy enough to exploit by practicing surgeons, and a stereotype that seems to epitomize our cultural obsession with virginal women. The same way possessing a giant penis is no guarantee of being some sort of sexual dynamo--no offense to all the burdened PU'ers. ;-)
What exactly is so attractive about unnaturally enhanced (facial) lips that make people go in for injections? It just looks like someone went a little wild with the lip gloss or got attacked by a swarm of bees, neither of which I find attractive.
And what is so unattractive about big pussy lips? Every person is unique, especially with regards to their body, and I wouldn't hold the body a woman was born with against her. I will even go so far as to say I like them, just as a "fuck you" to all the asshats who are so swamped with sexual advances from women that they can turn away and shame all those they deem inferior because of bigger labia.
|
05-18-14 06:32pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Oh, sure. And then I'd be getting, "You're kidding me. I've never seen them get their pussy lips done!"
BTW, I noticed recently that one of my favorite models/pornstars had hers done, and it really kind of upset me. I won't say who it is, but, again, wasn't needed!
|
05-18-14 01:17pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Agree.
Lip jobs are totally unnecessary in my opinion. Most boob jobs are spoilers as well and, for me, lip jobs and boob jobs cause me to move on.
|
05-18-14 12:13pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from LPee23:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I should add that the place where this happens the most is on the amateur sites with user generated photos and videos, although that's not what I had in mind when I wrote the poll. While most of the stuff on this type of site like amateuralbum.net isn't high quality, there are occasionally great sets of really hot amateurs that get posted. I check frequently, because it's not uncommon for the users there to delete their own photos after a week or two, and many users delete their entire profile within a few years.
Models that have been removed by DDF include Jenny Noel and Julie Silver, as well as about 16 more that I can't name.
There are a small number of models from Abby Winters who have bought back their own shoots for removal. I don't want to dwell on that site too much here, because the topic of these models has already been beat to death on member forums, and Abby Winters is an excellent site despite this, but I will post their names just so that you guys can recognize it if you have one of these rarities. Alana, Jasmin, Jules, Kate, Louise, Mikaela (killed in terrorist attack in Bali), Nikita, Tammy, and Verity. You can't fault Abby Winters for this, they do try hard to keep their content up, and they are coming out with lots of great new stuff.
There was also Ember from ALS as I said before. I think there was a thread started on her topic, and people came out in supports of ALS's decision.
|
04-20-14 05:00am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from turboshaft:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
A part of me hopes that Hillary Clinton stays away from the 2016 presidential race, if just to get Joe Biden to run instead and hear some more of his priceless gaffes. He's like that uncle at Thanksgiving who's had a little too much to drink...except he's the Vice President.
"Big fucking deal" indeed! :-)
|
04-05-14 07:46pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from careylowell:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Lincoln just a single term congressman before he was elected.
|
04-05-14 06:55pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Cybertoad said it all.
|
03-11-14 10:57am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from yote78:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Nah.
I wouldn't worry about that happening, EVER. Sexual gratification is too strong a force in the human psyche for porn to go away, and the internet is by far the most efficient and egalitarian means of mass distribution of that gratification.
Yes, there are parts of the world where porn is suppressed, sometimes brutally. But it doesn't take a very in-depth look at those countries to see what kind of society is created by the suppression of such basic human needs.
There will probably always be some places in the world where sexual gratification/porn and other basic human desires are suppressed. But I believe the general trend is leading towards more freedom of thought and self-determination, despite some occasional setbacks.
|
01-31-14 08:11am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Nice explanations, and one would take it that you have extensive experience with a device as such, but the follow up questions (I didn't read all of your replies so I may have missed an answer - sorry if I did) are:
What brand do you use;
and, What is the cost;
and, What do you personally like about your choice?
|
01-29-14 09:18am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Just yanking'ya chain, CT ..like the others' response, I didn't have a clue what you was asking us about..
I just threw the John & hooker bit in for some light humor.. But the idea probably deflated in quick order because it drew enneadic response.
I did a through thread on genital toys for men about two years ago, with special emphasis on visual-electro stimulation.
My motivation for bringing this up was because of the simplicity of jumping on this undertaking until the source's goal meets fruition, wherein, via connecting you/me with a configuration (probably head gear), sending and receiving real-time erotic sensations with our favorite porn star, progressively creating visually identical sensations to actual foreplay, followed by intercourse and culminating into mind-blowing orgasm.
This, my friend, leaves no doubt in my mind this process is already waiting in the wings to make its appearance anytime. ..... if, indeed, it already hasn't.
Oh yeah, CT ...... I brought up the fact sensation from vibrators, as well as other sundry high assortment of mechanically operable masturbating devices, do far exceed the existing, antiquated but magically equipped five-fingered marvel that's served us for so long.
But guess what? the "attachment" is so strong, I was shouted down and run out of town
|
01-28-14 10:09pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Monahan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
OK, CT, OK.
You're, of course, right. There are a few (very few) babes who fooled with Mother Nature where the enhancements still worked (Madison Ivy, Dayna Vendetta & Memphis Monroe are three examples) but tan lines on those three would not be a problem.
|
01-21-14 02:14pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
CT, "i have never seen fake boobs looks good with tan lines"
Agree. In fact I've never seen fake boobs that look good. Period. Tan lines or not.
|
01-20-14 10:09pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Thedebilman666:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
If I was forced to choose a color, it would be pink on the right model.
|
09-20-13 11:26am
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Really?
If I read you or Pat right, assuming we're primarily talking about blotting out gentiles, I have to say The stuff I've seen in Asian porn, although there's some blocking-out, but for the most part has liberally displayed the entire gentiles.
|
08-23-13 04:31pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I've tried for two hours to find some way to answer your request.
Opened my paypal account but could find nothing that could help you with.
I can only suggest you call them .... I have every reason to believe they'll answer any questions you have.
Their number .....1-402-9357733
BTW ...... on most sites you want to inquire about .... you have to go all the way to the point just before summiting your order to join. to where they post the payment options. All use their logo ... just click on the paypal logo ( if the site uses them)
I suspect You must create an account with Paypal in order to use their services, of course
Good luck
|
08-21-13 02:58pm
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Sorry, 'ol buddie .....can't remember.
Their contacts includes a phone number where you can ask ...... any search engine should bring it up.
If the site uses them, their logo along side the other processors will appear on sites.
|
08-20-13 12:06pm
|
