| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from RagingBuddhist:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks, CT. I try! :cheesy grin:
|
04-01-13 09:52am
|
Reply
102
|
Cuckold My Husband
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I hate being so negative on a site, but there was just nothing good about this one. :(
|
04-01-13 08:16am
|
Reply
103
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Dracula:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks. Very true. I'm still searching for the best.
|
03-24-13 12:49pm
|
Reply
104
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Marcus:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thank you both for your kind words :)
|
03-22-13 08:28am
|
Reply
105
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from GUY22:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
The guy uses WMV codec instead of H.264/MP4 codec
It's not as crisp and sharp as most HD videos that I've seen.
More HDV than HD. I guess I might be nitpicking a bit here.
Most of the newer videos are in 1280x720 resolution though.
The older ones are DVD quality.
The site claims 374 video and 42483 pictures.
And that sounds about right.
Hope that helps.
|
03-21-13 07:30pm
|
Reply
106
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Monahan:
I booted the site after experiencing a lot of frustration with their lousy, bordering on fraudulent, business practices. When I signed up there was only the one network and the longer you stayed a member you could access more sites in the network. Then they split into two networks and they picked the sites. In my case they were sites I seldom visited.
When I complained I was told, in so many words, buzz off. So that's what I did.
I loved the excellent quality of the content and of the range of talent they had but like you I really found the lousy search function to be very annoying.
I miss the good stuff but don't miss the folks that run the site.
|
03-18-13 09:02am
|
Reply
107
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hi CT, just read your review. I'm glad i'm not the only one frustrated by the navigation on this site. After reading all the other glowing reviews I was beginning to think it must be me doing something wrong lol.
|
03-17-13 10:02am
|
Reply
108
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from tangub:
Good review CT, I agree with everything you wrote here. Regarding the navigation I can honestly say this is the worst site I've ever seen, it's an absolute mess. Like you it also annoys the hell out of me having to hover my mouse pointer over every single model and scene to find out who and what it is. At times i've been so frustrated with this site I've felt like giving up and throwing my computer out the window. Hopefully I'll get my own review of it written up in the next week or so.
|
03-17-13 09:57am
|
Reply
109
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Dracula:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yes it does!
|
03-12-13 03:30pm
|
Reply
110
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from tangub:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Exactly my view CT, would like to join but no zips = no join, right click save as 52,000 times...no way!
|
03-12-13 01:33am
|
Reply
111
|
Bella Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Marcus:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I think the webmaster, James, has explained that the lack of zips is to discourage file sharing which is understandable, but yes, it's a shame and does make saving things very hard. With a site like this I normally cherry-pick my favourite photos from sets I'm less keen on, and save zips for the few that I love - with the amount of content it's quite overwhelming!
|
03-11-13 01:21pm
|
Reply
112
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
The magazine and internet site Playboy Plus is softcore. But what surprises me is that the company is heavily into hardcore.
From Wikipedia:
Sales of Playboy magazine peaked in 1972 at over 7 million copies.[2] The company now derives only one-third of its revenues from Playboy magazine, with the other two-thirds from the dissemination of adult content in electronic form, such as television, the internet and DVDs.[3] Much of this electronic revenue comes not from the soft nude imagery which made the magazine famous, but from hardcore pornography connected with the company's ownership of Spice Digital Networks,[4] Club Jenna,[5] and Adult.com [6]
|
03-11-13 09:43am
|
Reply
113
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
She's a hot looking woman but her site isn't. I agree that 5$ would be a decent price to join because you would get your money back with buying just one movie and come out a winner with anything above that.
|
03-07-13 06:12pm
|
Reply
114
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I agree that the price is on the high side but hopefully they use a lot of their profits to find more movies to add to their library. It is a pretty nice library but there are so many greta movies that srtill need to be discovered.
|
03-07-13 06:10pm
|
Reply
115
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from gaypornolover:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks will check it out!
|
03-07-13 09:45am
|
Reply
116
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from gaypornolover:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks.... incidentally, did the guys in the videos wear masks? Because that's one good thing about this site I forgot to mention - have to add it to my review - most of the guys do show their faces, though a couple are filmed so you can't.
Whilst I can understand it, I think it ruins a scene when the face isn't shown.
|
03-07-13 06:16am
|
Reply
117
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from gaypornolover:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Heh there's certainly every kind of porn out there you can imagine isn't there? I found this site more of a novelty but I am kind of into humiliation so it kind of turned me on watching some of the guys! I might have to try and find the site you mentioned now!
|
03-07-13 06:12am
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#30
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks.
|
03-03-13 02:31pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#27
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Magnesium? How much and do you take it on an empty stomach - which is what the sildenafil citrate tablets says to do.
|
03-03-13 08:11am
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
lol - I really wasn't worried about you Cybertoad - and it's true, this typing remove the inflection and nuance of the words, though honestly, even speaking in person isn't all that easy.
|
03-03-13 08:09am
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Whoa bigboy - now's who's over reacting? I wasn't upset at all or being defense though perhaps you took it that way. Everything was, is and will always be cool!!
|
03-02-13 08:16pm
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Well sir, even though I'll admit I use it, who in this group would question my manhood? or why? We all get older and our bodies change - I've discussed this on other threads so what's the big deal?
|
03-02-13 01:47pm
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Being a person of no boundaries, I really give a shit what other people think - I take it cause it's keeps it hard. I don't take it all the time, but am not unhappy when I do and other than stopping up my nasal passages, no side effects.
|
03-02-13 12:18pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
+1 for me. They remind me of my days in the 80s when I was a young lad just discovering porn.
|
02-26-13 03:03pm
|
Reply
125
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks for the comments.
|
02-26-13 03:01pm
|
