The media quality here really is not all that great. It has a lot to due with the length of the videos, you cant have hour long videos at 4 MBit/s. The site design is not all the special either, the videos are a pain to download.
Yeah, the $30.00 was worth it, because between the two sites you get over 300 exclusive, well-shot, easy to download videos. Before I joined, I had the same fear of getting ripped off, but I was highly impressed.
If you like what you see in the previews, you will be more than pleased. I have several gigs of their stuff from my membership a few months back, and I plan on joining again.
Great review...
just been off-line for a couple of weeks - and back looking for new stuff. Not that this site is new, but Catalina Cruz is a doll - and this review wets the appetite - so, after reading this - thinking of joining...
Hey Cybertoad, now that is a great review! I haven't seen this site, I do know of Catalina, but didn't know she had her own site until you mentioned it and I also see that Jessica Jaymes is on that network, and I have always liked her. Not to mention Sienna. I will check this out, I'm always looking for a new site or network to join.
I just noticed this review after you mentioning for me to comment on your reviews. Does the site have zips for pictures? That is a big selling point. How big are the pictures, the resolution? What resolution and bitrate are the videos? When you mention the older videos are not as good, you say the format isn't as good. What format are they? Is it the resolution or bitrate or both that is bad on the old videos?
Most of all though, you say this isn't the best site of this network, which is the Brazzers network, but in your reviews, it is the highest rated by you, which site from the network is better?
My best advice to you is to stop trying to talk down to me. "Thats how this stuff works" and "Comments are not supposed to become a debating issue."
According to the site, "What's the intention of replies? #4 says, "Engage in a related conversation or debate." When you question something I put in a review, it is my right to explain and if need be, debate my point. It is one of the rules of what the comments are for. I've been here since the site started, I know how the site works. Also, I noticed in one of your reviews that you talked about not being able to edit a review that you wished you had scored lower. From my own experiences, you can click "edit review" and change the score. I've done it on several sites that were not as good after the initial thought that a site was great. Try it and see.
I don't know what we are agreeing to disagree about. I glanced at your reviews, you gave Rachel Aziani's solo site a 91, it doesn't have half the content of Eve's site that I reviewed. And it only updates once per week, so it isn't going to get near Eve's amount of content anytime soon. So, I don't know why you would mention content vs. cost.
You think getting a negative review for giving a high score is bad? I took 20 points off a site's score because they had a 10 GB monthly download limit. I put in the review clearly that if the limit wasn't there, I would have gave the site a 90, instead of a 70. The site actually went back and removed their download limit and made it unlimited and I went back and added the 20 points back to the score, the negative review is still there though.
You said, "I tend to be picky and honest" the review is 100% honest, I tell that there is no new Eve content coming out, the amount of content, the quality of that content and so on, nothing dishonest there.
You don't seem to follow my concept of Eve not being involved anymore when you say the model should be involved in updates and should do a name change. There are 200+ videos of EVE, 200+ picture sets of EVE that are still there for download, why would they change the name? Also, about the name change, that isn't something for me to say. I think they should make it clear that they don't have any new Eve content, but why change the name of a site when more than half of the content there is of Eve Angel? That wouldn't make much sense.
Last, I do put the cons I can find, but I don't see why a con would stop a site from getting a 90+ score. If you look at the TBP reviews, the sites with 90+ have cons in the reviews. Also, if you look at solo models in the TBP reviews, you will see that Eve's site is listed as the #3 solo site by the TBP reviewers by score. At one time, it was #1. I do think that you agree that these are individual views, but then again, you are telling me how YOU would do a review or what you think should happen with the site name. If you ever need a site to join, try Eve's out, it is cheap at $15 and download all of her content off there. Like I said earlier, if we put these on DVDs there would be 30 four hour DVDs or 60 two hour DVDs worth of content with Eve in all of the scenes. Surely not having a daily update would be offset by getting what is equal to 25 cent two hour DVDs?
Few things on your comment. First, there is way too much emphasis put on current updates on all sites. Let me give you an example.
Lets say site A opened last month and has daily updates of Eve Angel content. By the time your month was up, you would have access to maybe 10 GB of content. This site has over 80 GB of Eve movies and around 30 GB of her pictures.
Each month, content of her on this site ranged between 3-8 new GB of content, when you look at the total number which is one of the largest sites of a solo model, it still has more content than the next 10 sites combined, that feature Eve. Going by that, the daily update isn't a big deal to me.
If you also notice, I reviewed it as a one month join site. It would take a month to download all of the content on the site, unless you downloaded it for 24 hours a day.
What I'm saying, which is worth more 3-8 new GBs of content per month or around 120 GB?
As for the updates, it still updates, the friends content is new to the site, the Eve content is old content they are recycling. And my main point is still, this is an Eve Angel site, for fans of her, 120 GB of just Eve for $15 is the best deal on the internet. That would be like getting 30 full length DVDs of her for $15.
The only way that the no new updates is a con is if you have all the content already on the site. If you have none of it, there are over 200 movies and 200 picture sets of Eve, you could just download one video and one photo set per day and say those were daily updates. See what I mean?
Last, I didn't take it as sarcastic, and can understand why you would question a score, but keep in mind that all of us are different in our tastes, in our understanding or in the concept of numbers, so the number I give the site shouldn't be the first thing you look at. Instead, look at the facts in the review, 400 video/pic sets of Eve Angel, that to me is near perfect.
If the toad says it works it must be true; but it might be best only when you're off the wagon. As an aside, there's a post for your in the forum under the thread "Your Avatar".
Oh my! I wish I only had spent the money on 5 hard drives. Even that can be expensive though, especial when you factor in the cost of the websites for material and the charge for internet access. It all gets pretty expensive in a hurry!
I have spent thousands on hard drives alone. I am sure I would shit my self if I actually sat down and figured out exactly what porn has cost me over the past few years.
Thanks for the reply. I do understand that your review is independent and I understand you had us at an 87 but you reviewed down 10 points. my reply to that was it should have been reviewed up 10 points thus a 97. There are numerous points that I believed you may have missed (formats, speed, etc.). It is also important to note that to get these various formats (although you wont get them all) at any other site will cost you at least 18.00+ per month while we offer them all for pocket change.
Regardless of your geographic location 17 minutes to download a 300mb file is extremely good. Our server does not max out your download capability your own line does which is what I was referring too.
We currently have over 6,300 dvds for our members (some streaming and some available for download).
We update 3x daily. That is a guarantee we give and I know it happens every single day because I watch every new movie that comes in and have purchased them personally.
Also I do agree that an 83 is good for a start up site and I am glad to see that it is where you feel it is justified as honesty is the best policy :)
I hope to see us hit 97 one of these days with all of the other sites we have in store. The "network" is what I like to refer to it as.
I would like the opportunity to respond to your review. First we update with 3 new dvds daily. Everyday. Over the last few weeks we have been preparing to launch our streaming iphone service.
The members area has been redone to allow more functionality. We are on one of the fastest servers in North America so when downloading it maybe your line. 5m/sec and taking an HD file 17 minutes to download is pretty good. If you are on a cable modem it could easily be bogged down by traffic on your connection.
We did not offer a full movie to download in wmv's because that would be "overkill." When you can download the scenes to make a movie.
I do feel your drop in score is unjustified and not aware of all the site changes. Do other sites allow xbox, windows media center downloads, ipod downloads, and streaming iphone? The answer is no they do not.
I am not aware that you knew what "options" we are working on. I would invite you to relook at the site and notice that it has improved to a 97 not a 77.
Also we have over 6,300 dvds.
Thank you again for your review but I think it is important for you to relook at the site and see the improvements.
Curious, are you still am member there? If so please tell me more about the site. I would love to join, but at this point I am having a hard time swallowing the idea of a 2 GB download limit. I really want to know what they are doing that keeps people there so I know if it is worth me trying out.
Can you post a new review and have it overwrite that one? I cant believe they will not take it down though? Oh well.
I agree completely though. My first several reviews sucked ass! I left out good information and made them pretty short. I was able to change them though because it was in the first month.
Your reviews now days are pretty good. I especial like the Rachel Aziani review, I think it is better than mine. You have my trust vote! I was just hoping you would be willing to update the review since it was from when you first started and bring it up to par with your newer ones, but I am now not sure if you are able to.
We're currently working on a policy change that will allow you to go back even late after the fact to update your earlier reviews. Can't say more just yet.
Come one man, you can't give a site a 100 when it has a download limit, especially one so low as 2 GB. I am really surprised you have not caught a bunch of hell around here for this review score.
Granted it is a site I would love to join, but not for 2 GB a day. It is a simply scam to force people to stay members for a very long time.
I know some people cry about 100s and say they should never be given. Personally I have no issue with them so long as the reviewer can give some very good reasons. So please tell us a bunch more about this place, and be very specific on my it deserves such a high mark. Many say a site can have no cons period to be a 100, I do not subscribe to that completely. However, I believe download limits are a major con that can not be overlooked.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
