| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from SnowDude:
(Jay G's Reply)
Thanks for the comments Jay. I was really on the fence here since I always have more to say, but I certainly don't think it should be unlimited. At least we get to have our say!
|
06-26-07 08:27pm
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(Jay G's Reply)
Definitely true: mistrust is hardly the same thing has having different tastes. Still, it could be possible for someone to "merge" the two concepts, mistaken though that would be.
There's even the possibly that someone might accidentally click "No" when they meant to click "Yes," and then jump right back into "soak brains with porn" mode without even realizing it. Dumber things than that have been done before.
|
06-16-07 02:23am
|
Reply
153
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(Jay G's Reply)
Is the problem really anonymous trust ratings, or only the negative ones? If you had only positive anonymous trust ratings, would you mind?
I've seen negative trust ratings applied to me just around the time I was having a disagreement with certain people. But then we worked things out, and the ratings went positive. Still, I can't say whether it was them or someone else, as they were anonymous.
Anyway, I take the negative ones with a grain of salt. If a member even has 50% "No" ratings, I wonder if it really matters or not. The quality of the reviews and comments have more weight than the trust ratings do, anyway, IMHO.
One drawback of requiring member identification is "payback": X dissed me, so I'll diss X. But I don't think it's a good reason to rate someone negatively. We can put ourselves above that level of smallness and rate members on the quality of their reviews. But of course, we can't guarantee that everyone on this site is up to that. That's why I think anonymous trust ratings are OK; they make that kind of "payback" harder to do.
|
06-15-07 02:02am
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Pinche Kankun:
(Jay G's Reply)
Excellent!! You must stay having intercourse with this woman of yours!! You know, when a man feels over-sexed, maybe he needs to exercise even more than he currently does!! When I feel over-sexed, I'll take me some sexual enhancement tablets after a full course meal, and have a gallon of water right next to me!! I cannot allow my body to feel over-sexed, especially when I have me a hella fine woman with me in life... I HAVE TO KEEP IT GOING!!
Don't trip, I have those wild fantasies, too!! Just not the bondage, anal, or gangbang type of shit!!
Also... Porn is important because there are pyschopaths in the world that just can't get any that they have to go out and rape women... So my suggestion to them is this: GRAB YOU SOME PORN AND WACK OFF, LEAVE INNOCENT WOMEN ALONE!!
|
05-28-07 10:30am
|
Reply
155
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Jay G's Reply)
Thanks, Jay. Glad someone else likes to look at "over the hill" ladies now and then! Actually they are never over the hill for me even though I described them as such. :-)
|
10-30-10 10:27am
|
Reply
156
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(Jay G's Reply)
I flatly refuse to join any "streaming only" site, JayG. To me it's the same as DRM. They forget that most of us are collectors and that we don't want to be tied to any site with the umbilical cord of having to stay subscribed in order to enjoy the contents.
|
02-14-11 10:21am
|
Reply
157
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from LKLK:
I can't argue that sites that do not give a sample of their wares (photo + video) are showing a poor face to potential customers.
However, there are a couple of ways you can get some idea of the site:
1. There are reviews of the site at PU and also a review at TBP.
(I've written 2 reviews of the site, at PU, and the second review caused a reaction because it was submitted a few days before the 6-month waiting period requirement for a re-review.)
Anyway, I gave the site a high score: the videos are clear and crisp, with high professional quality (except for my criticism of when they try to shoot a model who is dancing).
You can also read a different review at PU by a different member, who also gave the site a high score.
The site is lesbian: if that doesn't interest you, you can skip the rest.
2. There is a tube site, free, called PornDoe.com, that seems to be run by the same people that run the LetsDoeIt network. (The LetsDoeIt network changed its name from PornDoePremium to LetsDoeIt around December 2018).
Note: I just checked the PornDoe.com site, and it seems to have changed. It used to be a free tube site that held many of the videos from the LetsDoeIt network, including the A Girl Knows site.
But now the site seems changed from what I remember:
The site now has shortened clips (running around 10 -12 minutes) from many prime sites: Blacked, Tushy, Vixen, Nubiles Porn, The White Boxxx (part of the LetsDoeIt network which contains A Girl Knows), and many other fine sites.
This is a great source of condensed videos, for free, as far as I can tell, although they show an option to upgrade.
But the Porndoe.com site has videos from A Girl Knows, if you want to check the quality of the site content. The videos are the condensed 10-12 minute version.
And like I say, this is a great site for watching videos from many fine porn sites, that should give you a clear idea of the quality of the site's videos.
Note: the PornDoe.com site contains a huge number of sites, that seem to have contributed condensed videos as samples.
I've said that the AdultTime network is probably the best bargain in porn, especially if you can get a reduced holiday special price.
But the PornDoe.com site is free, with a huge number of sites contributing condensed videos. So that might be an even bigger bargain, for those people on a tight budget.
|
08-22-19 06:27am
|
Reply
158
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from Loki:
I don't like to join a site without a clear idea of what's inside. That pretty much means if the Preview button takes me to the Sign Up page, I just leave the site and ignore it.
Is it me, or is this phenomenon becoming more common?
|
08-22-19 02:05am
|
Reply
159
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Jay G's Reply)
YOU'RE impressed? I'm impressed with myself! I've had to write so many negative reviews lately that I didn't think I would ever give a site anywhere near a hundred. I'm really pleased that I could do so with a clear conscience.
|
07-27-11 09:15am
|
Reply
160
|
Adam And Eve TV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from haagar:
(Jay G's Reply)
It's genuine explicite hardcore alright... with above average production quality and fancy music :)
|
11-15-14 05:33pm
|
Reply
161
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(Jay G's Reply)
Yeah, but as we know, real spanking is a specialist thing. On the other hand they do have some good Black Mirror stuff. I think they have a better selection of fetish per video than any of the bigger dvd download sites.
|
03-09-09 10:44am
|
Reply
162
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
There are a few of us here who really love this site, not least because of its great customer service. The difference between American Vice, and the big sites who really couldn't care less about customer service, as they probably consider themselves far too big to worry about customers, is enormous. The great customer service, along with the variety and quality of videos, makes it one of my favourites.
|
03-09-09 10:28am
|
Reply
163
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from messmer:
I started with the five free tokens myself but after having a good look at what the site had to offer I said, what the heck, and subscribed to get my unlimited download. The video aficionado will find all kinds of DVDs here that the other sites don't offer. Great site to complement your collection. Great site for those who are tired of cookie cutter porn.
|
03-09-09 09:32am
|
Reply
164
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from Peter01:
Hi, what resolution are the images. The site advertises high res galleries for every scene. Are the images in the 5 megapixel range or are they low sub MP range.
|
12-28-10 01:56pm
|
Reply
165
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(Jay G's Reply)
I know what you mean. I dislike having to wait 1-2 weeks to get my dvd's in the mail. My internet provider has now put a limit on how I can download per month before being overcharged. With many sites going the Hi-Def route, I'll soon be delegated to downloading only a few scenes per month.
|
06-11-08 06:23pm
|
Reply
166
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Jay G's Reply)
Thanks You Very Much for the info. I'll have to take a much closer look at their content, since what they offer is scenes taken from their dvds. I've got a few of these, and I'd hate to spend the money for stuff that I currently have on a dvd in my house, but on the other hand I'm not against downloading the ones that I don't.
|
06-09-08 06:57pm
|
Reply
167
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from pat362:
Hi Jay G. Are you able to download all the material from the 21 Evil Angels sites? If yes, what are the movie formats available?
|
06-08-08 05:01am
|
Reply
168
|
Anal Lick Fest
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Jay G's Reply)
Amen Brother. PU and TBP have managed to save me a lot of money over the last few years with all the reviews of sites that I was seriously thinking of joining. There are some sites that seem to be good from the outside but are so awful once you pay your membership that many people get taken in. It's up to guys like you, me and all the other PU/TBP reviewers to warn others.
|
07-02-11 06:14am
|
Reply
169
|
Anal Lick Fest
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Jay G's Reply)
Just look at Pink Visual. If there was ever a porn company that has mastered the ability to screw customer it's this one. I'm quite sure there are many others that do the same thing but somehow few are as big as PV. As far as I can tell they haven't really filmed new content in a long time. Most of their updates are either leased material of much oldeer scnes that have been remastered. Add the fact that many of these can be found elsewhere like Videobox.
|
07-01-11 07:06pm
|
Reply
170
|
Anal Lick Fest
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from pat362:
The only theory I can come up with is that since they don't really update with new content then they must be losing members and not gaining too many more to replace them so those willing to join must pay more for they to still make the same kind of money as before.
|
07-01-11 10:24am
|
Reply
171
|
Anal Nippon
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mbaya:
(Jay G's Reply)
I haven't gone through all the sites yet. So far this is the only one that is uncensored. On this iste there are some group bukkake scenes as well as a few blowbang group scenes. There are few that are orgies involving multiple men and multiple women. No game shows or contests though.
|
09-10-10 11:31am
|
Reply
172
|
Asia Movie Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from CaliFornicator:
(Jay G's Reply)
your welcome!
|
07-17-08 08:16pm
|
Reply
173
|
Asia Movie Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from CaliFornicator:
(Jay G's Reply)
Hey JayG,
In the members area they have a section that is totally uncensored, no mosaics at all, i was a little surprised when I saw it, Im not sure how they get that content but... yeah its totally 100% uncensored...That being said there are only like 20 or so fully uncensored dvds, the rest are mosaiced out...Which never made any sense to me, because its ok to show girls getting cum, pissed , and shit on but don't show them naked... hope that helps
|
07-16-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
174
|
Ass Teen Mouth
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from martyboy:
agree qith all of above
main gripes are:
re-entering of passwords
no zips for photos
download speed is not great.
pluses are quality of girls , photos.
no dates on updates , but there is more than enough material for a months membership
|
06-29-12 12:16pm
|
Reply
175
|
Ass Teen Mouth
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Jay G's Reply)
All technical. The updates on the sites that are still active have been few and far between. I know that many fans have complained that some video links don't work, videos are incomplete or download speeds are very bad.
|
03-02-11 06:25pm
|
