| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from anyonebutme:
(Jay G's Reply)
"Isn't it interesting that they can show a woman being murdered, bisected, or sawed apart on the big screen but can't show sexual penetration?"
What you see in movies, murder, mutilation, etc., is not actually happening to the person. What you see in porno movies, is taking place. And the psychological impacts the scenes have on the people, is vastly different between the two.
|
12-20-09 09:47am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Jay G's Reply)
I certainly agree - good point Jay G
BTW: In the US and/or Mexico they once had a thing called (I think): 'snuff-movies' (maybe wrong word) with a horrible content of women actually being molested or even killed in those scenes - was that freely invented stories or...? (those romours just spread to Europe)
|
12-20-09 08:43am
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from turboshaft:
(Jay G's Reply)
Some Muslim countries don't even allow women to drive or show any part of their bodies beyond their eyes -- including the U.S.'s good 'ol ally Saudia Arabia -- so I doubt any porn would be legal in these places, unless it involved arresting women and then stoning them to death for looking at another man.
My biggest fear would not be legality (which is pretty a constant fear with porn no matter who's involved) but safety. You hear about these gangbang contests some female stars do for video and they do indeed include hardcore fans, though maybe not all fans, and blood tests can sometimes become problematic. The industry is largely unregulated in terms of hazards and safety, and what is done is purely self-regulation that is mostly voluntary. In other words, not the most ideal situation in which to 'act' with your favorite star.
If you had nothing but disposable income then maybe making a one-on-one video with your favorite star would be possible, and a lot safer.
|
11-12-09 01:12pm
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Ditto that.
My issue is that, once I'm off line, I barely think about it, but when I'm on line, I seem to always go to my favorites to check out some site or other.
|
11-10-09 08:55am
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(Jay G's Reply)
I can't say I like coffee, but sex on the other hand...
Of course, porn and coffee (such as Starbucks) always seem to be doing good business, so I think people get over any initial bad tastes rather quickly.
By the way, where's the choice for tried it and enjoyed it, but am now single, so not currently doing it?
|
06-23-09 09:00am
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(Jay G's Reply)
> Cock....oh, I guess that's poultry, Huh?
:-))
|
06-01-09 05:38am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from asmith12:
(Jay G's Reply)
Oh, I see. Well, maybe it's a right time to start fearing ;-).
|
05-30-09 05:22am
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Jay G said, "Storage is incredibly cheap and the numbers, I agree, don't always mean quality, but I am sure getting pickier and pickier about a "quality look" to videos. Old stuff is seldom good enough for a spoiled kid like me."
That's me. Exactly. Three or four years ago I was ok with almost anything just so long as it displayed what I wanted...plenty of PTA*.
Now, however, where the quality is so good even a gynecologist would be happy, and with a brand new Seagate 1.5 Tb hard drive ($129.99 + tax) joining my 640Gb, and two 500Gb hard drives, I'm like Jay, am totally spoiled. When I watch some of the older stuff that I used to watch over and over, I only wish it could be upgraded in quality.
The real question is, what's next? I can't imagine better quality than is now available. Maybe smell-o-vision or a form of 3-D?
*PTA - Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
05-24-09 10:12am
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Ditto everything that Jay said. I agree with him completely.
|
05-04-09 09:25pm
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from lk2fireone:
(Jay G's Reply)
I read an opinion piece recently. The writer said that our Republican representatives in Congress and the Senate who were secretly gay but strongly anti-gay rights were not hypocrites. They recognized that homosexuality was wrong, and they were fighting that evil not just in society but also in themselves. The fact that some of them have been exposed for their homosexual activity means they are only human.
What I got from the piece was that any position could be defended. That's what lawyers are for.
|
04-27-09 08:39am
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from james4096:
(Jay G's Reply)
I guess you have a point there.
|
04-26-09 10:38am
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Wittyguy:
(Jay G's Reply)
Hunting in the jungle is fine ... so long as you don't have to listen to Axel Rose sing about it the same time you're doing it ;)
|
04-23-09 05:32pm
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(Jay G's Reply)
I like Jay G's thing with:
"Brazil is wild and crazy, but the quality is still not up to par with USA."
Guess thats it - also. Just took a new look at Pacinos Adventures - and wauw, some latin dolls there and some fine previews for the site.
BUT: damn, the quality of those videos are STILL "milky-white" and somewhat blurred - too bad!
If a site like Pacinos could do really crisp videos. this user would not hesitate to join - again!
But alas!
|
03-19-09 08:25am
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(Jay G's Reply)
And it's the pause that refreshes ...
|
03-13-09 12:10pm
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from TrashMan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Yeah, ive done the whole "download everything" task. Its way too much porn.
I was on a site a while ago (2006?) and decided to download everything. It was over 12GB of content...not much when compared to VideoBox, but if you start doing that for every site you join you will be out of space faster than you know it.
|
02-16-09 08:59am
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from ramscrota:
(Jay G's Reply)
I totally agree, Jay G.
Once when I updated IE, I found that this annoying bar remained at the top, like a bad smell, when I pressed F11. It cuts into the top of the pic download, and annoys the fuck out of me. And then I found I couldn't revert to the old one. Wne I complained to IE, they fobbed me off with some bullshit.
|
02-14-09 10:45pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(Jay G's Reply)
Agree with Jay G: "The fun is the hunt"
And this user too sometimes (or mostly) gets bored after a few weeks of membership of most sites (because after that period you've been through most - maybe except sites like Videobox)....and oh, yes: quite a few of us are spoiled - and then again: they (paysites)want our money and in order to deliver, the sites got to do the same...
BTW: Good pol, Monahan.
|
01-24-09 07:35am
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Correct. Long threads that become longer are difficult to read and, because the tangents are hard to change, usually don't attract a lot of interest.
If a thread is truly redundant it's no big deal for someone to post a link to the old one...or post a comment in the old one that pushes the old one back up to the top,
|
12-17-08 08:51am
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#29
from Pinche Kankun:
(Jay G's Reply)
YEAH!! That's something that porn is trying to make obsolete cause porn is too busy concentrating on the guy's dick!! >:( >:(
|
12-06-08 01:14am
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Cybertoad:
(Jay G's Reply)
Jay I couldnt have said it better.
|
12-05-08 08:02am
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from elonlybuster:
(Jay G's Reply)
thanks for the info, but because I live in a dry county there's not much to really do unless you want to drive 20 minutes to the next county to get hard liquor. Really annoying
|
12-04-08 03:51am
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(Jay G's Reply)
Your examples make the point very clearly: One moment of bare breast is far more taboo than countless hours of the most brutal and graphic violence.
Makes me think of that old Woody Allen movie, "Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Sex," with that big boob bouncing its way through the countryside. That thing would scare Freddie and Jason shitless.
|
10-26-08 07:47am
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(Jay G's Reply)
I do agree with both you and toadsith. It was a lame joke! :-)
|
09-05-08 01:12pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from MargulisAZ:
(Jay G's Reply)
I agree, I can't stand it when a girl just starts yelling and screaming a bunch of ridiculous crap. Case in point, I recently watched "overstuffed 6" and the first model is sitting there using some monster toy on herself just screaming the most ridiculous stuff NON-STOP throughout the whole scene. ugh.
|
08-30-08 07:38pm
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from exotics4me:
(Jay G's Reply)
I saw a fairly interesting gangbang DVD recently, think it was called gangbang 2000 on videobox. I don't know how many guys ended up being with the woman but it was shot over a 2 day period and 90% of the guys were very normal guys, older, some fat, some very skinny. It wasn't bad since the woman was hot and they had another porn star interviewing her during the shoot that was also hot, and by the end of it, she was naked too.
|
08-10-08 12:30am
|
