| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from gaypornolover:
Yes I agree - I don't like to see ordinary passers-by reactions, it's not fair to them and certainly not sexy. If you're doing exhibitionism, then the exhibitionists should be surrounded by voyeurs who want to be there and find it sexy.
|
10-08-11 01:59pm
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from otoh:
(Jay G's Reply)
Thanks - I didn't really mean it in the sense of a complete substitute for the real thing, but I guess you didn't either.
I think more I meant that browsing for and looking at smut is a fun pastime; I don't spend too much money or time on it, but when I do look at porn, I enjoy it and wish I'd been able to admit that to myself sooner.
It sounds a bit odd - perverse, even - to put it this way, but I see porn as good clean fun :)
|
09-30-11 06:28am
|
Reply
153
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Cybertoad:
(Jay G's Reply)
Was it a Coppertone ad ? I think I recall it.
|
09-25-11 12:21pm
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from rearadmiral:
(Jay G's Reply)
I've caught myself referring to "the good old days" sometimes, but there is no evidence that those days were so good for many things. Just a few examples (besides porn, because those definitely were NOT the good old days...)
- food: when I grew up you only got certain vegetables and fruit in season. There was no economical means to get bananas, oranges or corn from the southern U.S. to where I lived. You made do with frozen or none at all.
- cars: screw the idea that the mid to late sixties was the best time for cars. I could afford to buy a Ford compact car or even a V6 pickup that would run rings around the performance cars from when I was a kid. And I'm safer and burn a lot less fuel doing it too.
- TV: remember when all you had was ABC, CBS and NBC. We had CBC in Canada, which was pretty good, but TV is much better thanks to networks like HBO.
|
09-23-11 04:05pm
|
Reply
155
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(Jay G's Reply)
That comment brings back some memories! I remember back in the early 1980s hardcore porn videos were illegal where I lived. That, obviously, made them hard to get. I got a tip that a local shop sold pirated VHS movies under the counter and that turned out to be correct. They were terrible quality, probably being a dub of a dub of a dub, and I paid $60 for two of them. I have no idea what that would translate into in today's dollars, but it was a lot for a kid with a just-above-minimum-wage job. That was probably the first money I ever spent on hardcore porn.
|
09-21-11 09:09am
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Back in the day when Danni Ashe ran her site she had the Boob Bowl on live during the Super Bowl. It was pretty much as you suggested with delicious mammaries bouncing all over the field.
I haven't been on that site in years (after the sale of the site by Danni) so I don't know if they still do that.
|
08-25-11 10:11am
|
Reply
157
|
Fried Rice Fuckers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Jay G's Reply)
I found the expression rather derogatory toward asians but this is porn so not that unusual. In any case. The site is just not worth it.
|
08-21-11 05:40pm
|
Reply
158
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Also ditto. The best way to attract members from PU is to participate in the discussion.
Just the fact that the webmaster responded quickly and the high score review just posted have made me very interested in dropping a few bucks on this site.
|
08-20-11 10:49am
|
Reply
159
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I've been a member of this network several times. But I did get stuck with the trial offer once, because I was not careful enough and didn't uncheck the pre-checked trial offer box. So your warning is a useful one.
|
08-14-11 04:26pm
|
Reply
160
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Jay G's Reply)
YOU'RE impressed? I'm impressed with myself! I've had to write so many negative reviews lately that I didn't think I would ever give a site anywhere near a hundred. I'm really pleased that I could do so with a clear conscience.
|
07-27-11 09:15am
|
Reply
161
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Jay G's Reply)
There's no sense in me writing my opinion on this issue. Jay G nailed it exactly.
|
07-15-11 04:52am
|
Reply
162
|
Anal Lick Fest
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Jay G's Reply)
Amen Brother. PU and TBP have managed to save me a lot of money over the last few years with all the reviews of sites that I was seriously thinking of joining. There are some sites that seem to be good from the outside but are so awful once you pay your membership that many people get taken in. It's up to guys like you, me and all the other PU/TBP reviewers to warn others.
|
07-02-11 06:14am
|
Reply
163
|
Anal Lick Fest
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Jay G's Reply)
Just look at Pink Visual. If there was ever a porn company that has mastered the ability to screw customer it's this one. I'm quite sure there are many others that do the same thing but somehow few are as big as PV. As far as I can tell they haven't really filmed new content in a long time. Most of their updates are either leased material of much oldeer scnes that have been remastered. Add the fact that many of these can be found elsewhere like Videobox.
|
07-01-11 07:06pm
|
Reply
164
|
Anal Lick Fest
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from pat362:
The only theory I can come up with is that since they don't really update with new content then they must be losing members and not gaining too many more to replace them so those willing to join must pay more for they to still make the same kind of money as before.
|
07-01-11 10:24am
|
Reply
165
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from manholelover:
Interesting to read your review. Kink.com have got their concept covering all bases as their gay sites use exactly the same concepts and site format, and I find them equally hot.
|
06-20-11 03:21pm
|
Reply
166
|
Spank Christina
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Yes I've had trouble with inet-cash a few months ago. I ordered a clip then found my credit card had been charged again, then it looked like it was going to be charged again. I was told by the bank that on their system I was down as a monthly debit.
I tried to contact them, which they ignored, so I had to cancel my credit card. They replied after my second email telling them that I had to cancel my credit card. They said there was a fault in the system, and they refunded most of the money. It was a little short because of their exchange rate system which always seem to favour them rather than us.
I would now be rather hesitant to use their services but the spanking sites seem to like them. I haven't had trouble with them before.
|
06-20-11 10:47am
|
Reply
167
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from RustyJ:
Thanks for the review of a new site! Looks interesting though I can imagine how bondage and gangbang might get sometimes in the way of each other. Agree about the price, it's higher than on many old Kink sites with lots of interesting looking material.
|
06-16-11 10:37pm
|
Reply
168
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Jay G's Reply)
Did you see Creature from the Black Lagoon and House of Wax in the original runs back in the 1950s?
I dimly recall seeing Creature from the Black Lagoon at the movies back in the 1950s, but I didn't remember it was in 3D.
I think I only saw House of Wax on TV, so that wasn't in 3D when I saw it.
I remember 3D glasses back then were made of paper with plastic to see through. The glasses seemed different from today's 3D glasses. I don't remember any eye-strain effect back in the 1950s. They even had 3D comic books. I had a 3D comic book of the 3 Stooges back then.
|
06-09-11 09:36am
|
Reply
169
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(Jay G's Reply)
Agreed. And it usually raises the quality too. Being a guy just makes things so much easier...
|
05-29-11 07:40am
|
Reply
170
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from RustyJ:
(Jay G's Reply)
Thanks for the info. 19.95$ doesn't seem bad at all and basically joining 4-5 sites one after another is pretty much a "network membership" there for me as I don't really care about more than half of their sites.
|
05-27-11 04:29am
|
Reply
171
|
Oriental Orgy
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
That is one of the things that has always irritated me. I have never considered two males and two females to be an orgy.
|
05-22-11 04:30pm
|
Reply
172
|
Oriental Orgy
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
from lk2fireone:
That's what I gave for my answer to a recent poll question on whether a girl with two guys could be considered a gang-bang. My answer was sure, why not? If there can be an Army of one (a recent motto for the US Army), there could be a gangbang of one. But where the girl fits is not always clear. Lol.
Sometimes you have to move with the times, even if it doesn't make sense at first. I'm still trying to accept the bald pussy look. I grew up with the idea that a female's pubic hair was erotic, and the bald look doesn't impress me much.
|
05-22-11 01:20pm
|
Reply
173
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(Jay G's Reply)
Ditto that.
Back in the day I created hundreds of dubbed over videotapes of scenes from rented videos. Cost? $2.99 per rental. 2 or 3 scenes copied per tape. Blank tapes cost $1.25 per and the dubs always lost fidelity because of the copy process.
Now I get much better definition, many more scenes and much more efficient storage processes.
CD's were not capable of being copied and too expensive to buy so I have very few in my stash.
The last CD I bought was about 3 years ago and was one I still have not found on the web.
|
05-20-11 11:59pm
|
Reply
174
|
The Upper Floor
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from mbaya:
Due to a mistake that they made, kink.com gave me credits to buy one scene. I chose this site and found what I thought would be the most interesting. I have had my eye on this site for some time, but the high price kept me away. I was so disappointed with so little sex and that the women were so heavily tattooed. I am interested in boundgangbangs, but at the moment it is far too small at ten scenes to justify $39.99.
|
05-13-11 08:11am
|
Reply
175
|
The Upper Floor
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Review
from rearadmiral:
Thanks for the review. I'm a huge fan of the Kink network but I've never been a member of this site. It interests me, and I've considered it, but I just haven't done it. I might have to join you in giving it a try.
BTW - I got an email about a new Kink site that just went live. It is called Bound Gangbangs, or something to that effect. It looks pretty good though it is still pretty small.
|
05-11-11 05:08pm
|
