You might check the teenburg family of sites, I know that the reality one had some scenes that sound sort of similar to that... I looked through what I kept from there and didn't see anything that looked like that specifically, but I have been trying to trim the collection lately.
While I liked the network, and I like voyeur material, I didn't find They Didn't Know very impressive the last time I was a member. I probably wouldn't join this network, if that site is your main reason for joining... Like Denner, it all looked exclusive to me.
For what it's worth from a TMW-member at the moment the They Didn't Know-material is as far as I've noticed only displayed at that site within TMW.
I have not taken much notice of the material - because of the very low quality (oh, I know that's part of some voyeur material, but this - no, after checking out most vids here - not more than 39 - (as in earlier member periods).
But I believe without being absolutely certain - that this is exclusive - would not bet on it, though....
Ok, this might get even a little more confusing due to the fact that it *looks like* one of the TBP Editors has just recently changed the part your're referencing.
But with that said ...
According to a TBP Editor, the phrase you quoted typically means that the content is found only on the site in question and *possibly* on other sites w/in the same network.
Here's a good place to remind users that on questions of exclusivity, we go by what the site claims unless we have specific info to the contrary.
For example, if a site claims their content is exclusive, our editors list it as exclusive. If later we get reliable reports from PU's that the content is not exclusive, we'll generally change the listing accordingly.
Yeah, I should have specified girl-girl or girls-only hardcore, not boy-girl hardcore--which I am not very interested in--and this site sounds like it fits that bill really well (or fit on a future credit card really well...). Can't wait to be a member, and thanks again for responding.
Exotics, I know it's been more than six months since your review but you're the latest actual reviewer, so how soft or hard is this site exactly? I was wondering because Cap'n made some comments about it being listed under softcore when it looks to be more explicit than that.
I'm just curious because I don't like stripping and posing--it's just too boring for me--so anything you can remember would help, thanks!
Exotics4me, Thanks for taking the time and effort to do this review. It's very in depth and I can tell you put your time into it. I feel it's a very fair review and once again thanks
Hey exotics
Another sweet review....
- this site caught me by surprise, too - in every way as you, BTW, states here.
One thing, though: Even if the material is exclusive, it's in most ways a repetition of all those models we see at a LOT of other places/sites - here I really miss more NEWBIES..!
And the bonus-material had - when I was a member in the late fall - some questionable quality in the videos...
In fact I only saved 6-7 videos from this site.
Still, it's a new site and has got a lot of great potential...
Hi exotics4me, Thanks for the input. I will definintely add more beef to my review to back up my score as well as patch up some of the missing holes people might who are curious about joining this website
No, I didn't rate the network because I only joined to update what I had from TeenTugs and ClubTugs which are pretty much the same site with different watermarks. On both of those sites, when I see episodes that I had years ago being touted as a new update, I see red. That alone I think warrants a low score. Calling that 480p video new? More points off. A 1990s looking layout? Still more points off. Every file named the same... yeah - more points off.
Because of your reply, I went into the other sites to see what's what. (Well... every site but CumBlastCity because the obviously fake cumshots look stupid to me) As I see it, this is just a low end Brazzers type site, with very little variation in the sites they have up. Every site in the network has the same style landing page, the same dated layout and pretty much the same resolution videos. Yes, there are 720 & 1080p videos to be found. But, as an example, the first update in Over40Handjobs is a pathetic 640x426 resolution. That's beyond ridiculous in 2020. So, even adding in the other sites, I see no reason to change my score, although I wouldn't rate it all at the same 8 I would have given TeenTugs.
As it happens, some of the "better content" I thought I'd find looks worse than the original wmv files. The file sizes on some of mp4 versions were half the size of the original wmvs and I would have had to correct the aspect ratio on most of them because they were off. I actually got better results by re-encoding the wmv files myself.
exotics4me, thanks for the response.
I was trying to tell anyone reading my review that if you have a sub to Adult Prime or one of its sites, there is no reason to have a separate sub to Teenrs.
Since Teenrs is a site in the Adult Prime network.
OOOOhhhh... okay. I didn't know that the choice was made by the women!! But then again, I did mention in one of my comments to one of these industries that regardless of where the cumshot goes, these women should always be well compensated for what they do in these videos because without them, there would not be porn or there would just be gay porn and I am not into any form, shape, size, characteristic, or adour of GAY PORN!! If you think about it, they are still being forced to take a facial in order to get paid what they are actually worth... which is not my idea of respect to that girl!!! AND BY THE LOVE OF ALL MANKIND AND ALL DUE RESPECT, FACIALS REALL SUCK HARD!! When the time comes, I would actually stop watching porn just because of that, AND I AM A BIG FAN OF PORN!!
"It's different. If you're at all interested go look at the newest scene in the preview Porno Travel Monthly Ep. 23."
I click on the hot link/thumbnail for PornoTravel Monthly Ep. 23, and it brings up the join page.
No previews.
I'm not a member. So maybe you are writing about the membership pages, where you can find previews?
Whatever.
In the public pages, they blur the faces of the stunt cocks. Not the faces or bodies of the women.
To me, that seems sexist.
Protecting the identity of the stunt cock, but not the women.
I thought That Sitcom Show site was a waste of time, because the videos were so boring.
But I also thought the videos were well made (good acting, strong plots, good production values).
So maybe someone might enjoy the videos.
If you are still a member of Nubile Films, I strongly recommend you should check out the Hot Crazy Mess site.
For one, the models are much more attractive.
For another, there is some variation in the models: although mainly slender white teens, there are some black and latina models that you might like.
And, for me at least, I found a bunch of really cute girls, and the videos were much hotter.
I didn't like the POV camera-work very much. They needed a professional on the camera, that would have been less jerky in the filming.
But cute girls plus some hot sex make for a fine site.
Like I say, if you are still have access, check the site out.
It might make up for the disappointing parody site.
Also, you were disappointed with joining the Nubile Films site.
But the site itself is well worth joining, with a lot of excellent content (videos and photosets). I think it's one of the better hardcore teen sites on the internet. There are many fine hardcore teen sites available. Which is a good thing, in my opinion.
An embarrassment of riches.
Been a member for 3 months and let it expire two days ago. I had my notes ready to write my review but yours covered all of my points plus a lot more. We agree on virtually everything except the score, which I would say is an 85.* The reason being that the number of models is far smaller than Met Art and the navigation isn't as easy as Met Art.
Also, as you said, the tag feature really sucks. It isn't great on Met Art either, but it's a whole lot better there thsn on TLE.
I would have dropped the site after 2 months but I missed the deadline.
It's on my annual consideration list. Next year I'll sign up for a month to drain off any new stuff that's worth keeping.
Agree there's no need for a long logo at the start of a scene.
But that seems to be a common practice with sites.
Maybe it's intended as a form of advertising, or to protect the content from unlicensed use?
Whatever, it can be annoying.
Just like the large logos that are on the photos of some sites, that can block parts of the photo.
I've been looking for a long, long time at hundreds of sites for a specific video of the blond curly haired Katerina on a bed - a video I lost from my HD years ago.
Just could not remember what site I got it from.
And, man...it's right here...
Strange this site has not been updated for such a long time and is "still going strong" (relativly).
But one question, buddy, 'cause you never know with a site like this:
Is that particular movie-clip still there - the one where Katerina is enjoying her self and the viewer on a bed with purple cover - the video in the preview update section?? The only reason I want to join again...
Thanks for kicking out a review on this one. I've been casually eying it but have been holding back waiting for a review. I'll probably put this one in my list.
I don't know about the one someone suggested for you, but I do know a 15 day trial means you'll eventually have to pay for it. Me? I like FREE!
You can limit the file types that FDM will download too. Go to Options > HTML Spider Default Settings > Files Tab. Check the box marked Download files from web pages. That will open the option to Switch on the download/don't download file types. Enter the extensions you want to include or exclude.
Another way is just to select everything on the page, right click and select Download All with FDM, then just highlight the files in the list you don't want, then click Remove Selected. It'll prompt you with "Are you sure?", click Yes, then Okay and you'll be on your way.
02-23-0809:32am
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
