| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Denner:
(messmer's Reply)
I would not mind to have my stash on my external drives protected - after all.
You mention True Crypt - tried to Google it - but how do you go about protecting especially those external drives?
|
10-27-09 08:45am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(messmer's Reply)
Here, here! And your sentence checked out OK by me.
|
09-17-09 04:07pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
That is exactly the gentlemanly behaviour I would have expected.
A very considerate action! :0)
|
09-17-09 03:20pm
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from dracken:
(messmer's Reply)
Good answer :) Women are gorgeous regardless of hair color
|
09-06-09 04:13pm
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from dracken:
(messmer's Reply)
Maybe it's the fact that both my bosses are redheads with a more freckles than white skin..but that kind of girl was always a turn-off for me. Blonds and brunettes, especially with green eyes mmm...now there's something.
|
09-06-09 04:01pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
I think it will come down to money. If you offer a star 20 million$ to get a full body scan. Then you offer her royalties for any and all movies that her computer generated alter-ego apppears in. She could make millions without ever having to put on or lose weight. She wouldn't have to wear full body makeup or do dangerous stunts.
|
07-24-09 06:41pm
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
I think that it will be so real that we won't be able to belive it isn't. I think the technology is already here but is so expensive that no one can afford it. I've seen enough commercials with animals performing specific trick to know that they are not real.
|
07-24-09 06:25pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from badandy400:
(messmer's Reply)
In other words OnlyTease my not be for you. They are very hit and miss on which girls will strip to nothing. Many times the girl will only go to panties and 75% of the scene is fully clothed. They have it backwards a bit. I like 25% clothed and 75% full nude give or take.
I am not much into the seemingly popular gonzo style. I find this to be lazy porn. I really like to see a woman in cloths as well as nude. After all in real life here when with a woman 98% of the time she is clothed. That 2% might even be a stretch for some. So it is very important that a woman looks good clothed. Knowing a woman in porn looks god in cloths as well as out really adds to the fantasy.
|
06-27-09 06:06pm
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from turboshaft:
(messmer's Reply)
Interesting point, though I would not go so far as to say that by subscribing we are "helping financially to ruin someone else's future." I think the majority of us here prefer sites that are more than just video and photos submitted by amateurs, as the poll asks. Plus, all these amateurs have made that first step that most of those replying here have said they would not do; that is, actually submitting them in the first place.
Aside from the various celebrity sex tapes, which are released without the person's consent, the normal amateur stuff we drool over is done by people who agree to have the material released, and are probably at least somewhat aware that it will "forever be on the net," as Wittyguy put it. No, I don't think all these girls are really thinking of the long term consequences, or at least existence, of their work, but they do it anyway.
I think the bigger question is why do we put so much weight on something like nude modeling or porn work in someone's past? If you look at from the perspective that it was a way for someone to legally earn money, then what exactly is the problem? "I saw her nude online, so I can't trust her around the office anymore." It's bullshit, and very likely legally unsound as wll, but of course it happens anyway and people continue to just think from their guts instead of their heads.
|
06-26-09 12:31pm
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
I'm with wittyguy and messmer on this one. I want More quality of everything. I don't believe there is sucha surplus of great sites. If there is then I've missed them.
|
06-11-09 07:02pm
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Jay G:
(messmer's Reply)
I definately agree that "None" is not a negative here.
One big improvement would be if all 4 reviewers were easily accessable (like the Porn Users reviewers) for questions and comments about sites. Because their reviews lack that feedback and interaction that Porn Users have, lots of questions go unanswered even when the reviews themselves are very good...
|
05-04-09 01:25pm
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Toadsith:
(messmer's Reply)
Yup, I'll second that - I'm rather tired of the Bottle Blondes.
Natural Scandinavian Blondes on the other hand... that I can appreciate.
|
02-05-09 11:13am
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from williamj:
(messmer's Reply)
Well said... They have the original video and they did the Hi-rez pics why the poor video? CHEAP...
|
01-15-09 05:25pm
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from turboshaft:
(messmer's Reply)
Two? Probably a lot more, unfortunately. I would consider the lifestyle, or lack thereof, that Playboy has tried to effect -- from the breasts, to the materialism, and beyond -- all worse than the "harder" porn that I enjoy over their magazine.
I lived in Germany for a few years as well, and saw quite a bit of nudity displayed: billboards, weekly magazines, TV, film. But it was almost always for the purpose of selling some product or another, so it wasn't really sexual, just purely commercial.
Here we use sex, implied or otherwise, to sell just about everything, all without the benefit of full nudity. It gets ridiculous how we will be up in arms, in a sort of Puritan way, about how something goes a little too far with the sex or the nudity. No one cares about being enslaved to a product or company, but hint at a little nudity and suddenly the apocalypse is nigh!
|
01-08-09 04:06pm
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
Hi Messmer. Strangely most of them are or were under contract, but I didn't mean to say that they were using that to get out of their contract. What mean is that most studios or directors prefer their stars to have small tattoos and that by getting these large ones they simply makes themselves unbookable. They can't consciously quit porn by themselves so they create a situation where they can't get a job and have to quit porn. It does sound weird, but other than that I can't figure why a beautiful girl who in her 20's and with no prior past with any tattoos would get a full sleeve.
|
12-22-08 06:22pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Monahan:
(messmer's Reply)
You left out another set of lame questions...
When did you first have sex?
Fourteen
Who was it with?
My boyfriend.
How was it
It was fun
If they would, just once, have followups.
Q. When did you first have sex?
A. Fourteen
Q. Who was it with?
A. My boyfriend.
Q. How old was he?
A. Twenty two
Q. Hang on a second. Operator, please put me in touch with the police.
Q. Police? I'd like to report a statutory rape.
Q. Yes, I have the victim right here.
|
12-16-08 04:31pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Monahan:
(messmer's Reply)
I'm not that young and I agree with your 2 minutes as an absolute maximum for any activity. Given the impatience of the younger folks these days, I doubt they would differ from a 2 minute benchmark except perhaps to say it should be closer to a minute or so.
It kinda reminds me of the good old days a quarter century ago sitting in the local Pussycat Theater, bored to tears, while Serena, Seka, Aunt Peg or John Leslie would act out a set up scene to create a "plot." Then finally, Leslie yanks out his sausage and a babe would wrap her lips around it and go to work. By and large the porn directors back in those days were smart enough to limit the action but the new guys, I guess, figure that, if a girl takes 15 minutes to get off with a toy, if he has to wait, so do we. ;)
|
12-15-08 01:06pm
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(messmer's Reply)
"I especially hate it when I hear the cameraman give whispered instructions. Three cheers for pictures! :-)"
You said it. Pics don't come with a soundtrack, and maybe that's just as well ...
For fun, I suppose one could cue a vid to the worst background blabbering, then open a photoset in a viewer on top of the vid, and "enjoy."
|
12-15-08 08:09am
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#78
from Pinche Kankun:
(messmer's Reply)
I am not done yet! I got 3 more to go!! Fuck this shit!! :(
|
12-10-08 06:48pm
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#65
from Pinche Kankun:
(messmer's Reply)
Messmer, Why I joked like this?!! I just wasn't thinking right, man!! :( I know that I say a lot on this website, but if I didn't, then I would be as fake as dentures:
Homemade Uncensored - Subscription ID # 208342701000000889 Signup Date: 12/07/08 CCBILL ICQ MAIL
Little Liana - Subscription ID # 208305501000009792 Signup Date: 10/31/08 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Little Lupe - Subscription ID # 107265601000014297 Signup Date: 09/22/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Raven Riley - Subscription ID # 107241301000002418 Signup Date: 08/29/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Pacino's Adventures - Subscription ID # 108271601000039085 Signup Date: 09/27/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Nubiles - Subscription ID # 108202701000003673 Signup Date: 07/20/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Best Teens.com - Subscription ID # 107147701000005429 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
8th Street Latinas - Subscription ID # 107147701000002410 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Exploited College Girls - Subscription ID # 107131501000001937 Signup Date: 05/11/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Night Invasion - Member ID # 1267666873 Order Date: 11/22/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Manila Amateurs - Member ID # 1270044479 Order Date: 12/05/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Real Ex Girlfriends, Nasty Angels and Karup's Hometown Amateurs might have changed their billing provider, HOWEVER WILL FIND OUT MY INFORMATION AND YOU WILL SEE!!
(KHAN, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS INFORMATION!! I MUST DO THIS!! THIS IS IMPORTANT!!) >:D
|
12-10-08 12:41pm
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#33
from IKnoPorn:
(messmer's Reply)
I totally agree that "Rogue Members" are an extremely bad thing for all of us. Fake reviews might lead someone to waste their hard earned cash, but much, much worse, undermines the whole purpose of this site.
I got a knot in my stomach reading this.
Pinche, I sincerely hope you were kidding. If so, then it was a very bad, bad joke. Didn't you ever read the "Boy who cried wolf" or heard the phrase "Once bitten, twice shy" ? I know they are cliche however they are quite relevant nonetheless.
Now that you have "joked", then said you were kidding, it will be difficult to trust you further. Your honor and character are not things to throw around like so much used toilet paper.
It's sad really, trust is something that can take months or even years to build, yet an instant to throw away.
Again, sorry for the melodramatic cliches, but that "joke" really sucked Pinche.
|
12-08-08 09:47pm
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from Monahan:
(messmer's Reply)
The raw numbers (at this time) are 31 replies, 27 said never and 4 said they did or might. While that's 4 too many, it may also be 4 who are honest, so read reviews carefully. It may have been written by a rogue member.
|
12-08-08 04:22pm
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from WeeWillyWinky:
(messmer's Reply)
messmer, you and I think alike, at least a good deal of the time.
I HATE toys. I hate the sight of them. The most erotic masturbation vid I ever saw was of a girl with the corner of a glass table. The runner up was a woman on the arm of a sofa.
That being said, I can be objective and realize that there might be something wrong with me, since the vast majority of guys like watching women with toys. It bores me to no end.
|
12-05-08 03:27pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from lk2fireone:
(messmer's Reply)
My vote goes to messmer for best reply:
"My Christmas wish list: no toys, no silicone, no tattoos, no piercing, no talking camera men."
I wish to add really gorgeous models, high quality pix and vids, good, unobtrusive sound track, good lighting, natural skin tones, good acting or believable emotions.
|
12-05-08 11:38am
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Cybertoad:
(messmer's Reply)
And yours as well couldnt agree more.
|
12-05-08 08:03am
|
