Interesting looking site, I just took the tour and like the look of many of the models and the fact they seem to dress in sexy lingerie a lot...think i'll add this to my short list. Thanks for the review.
I agree. There were a couple of older women in these sites and I for one would have loved it if they had some decent to average content. Ah well! At least others will save their hard earned money.
Thanks messmer, I do appreciate the comments, especially coming from one of the original regulars. Sadly, no middle aged women for you on this one though, and not a lot of stripping.
Navigation is perhaps my main complaint for most (almost all) sites.
Usually, the free tour has good photos and video samples; members' area only some ridiculous thumbnails.
If the tour itself has no video samples, they are making a big mistake. Many of us shall not pay the cake without previously tasting it somehow.
But in this particular case, if you know the network, you already know the kind of russian teen videos to expect. In practice, you can hardly differentiate between the sites. Same girls, same production.
No samples worth considering, but at least they have "Nastya" of a couple of "Nastya and Tosha" scenes there. Nastya is also at TeenDreams and a few other sites now. She's really sexy!
I agree that the site preview is terrible, in that it does not show short clips of at least some of the site videos or photos.
The preview area states you get full access to over 25 bonus sites, but does not name any of the bonus sites.
I would give the preview a rating of "shit" or "shitty", which would have been a failing grade back in the day.
However, if you haven't been a member of this site or any of the Royal Cash sites, and if you are into teens, you might want to join for a 1-month membership. The network is primarily a teen video site. There are photosets, but the photosets are low-quality pictures that are basically screen-caps of the videos.
There are about 4 sites in the Royal Cash group that have hot teen videos that are the main attraction of a membership: fresh young girls, most models you have not seen elsewhere, in straight-fuck videos with little to no storyline. Straight-fuck means no story, but there is bj, anal, vaginal, whatever, mainly boy-girl, but some girl-girl, some threesome, at the different sites.
Thank you for your welcome messmer :o) I have to admit that it was kind of fun to write a review as I have never done that before. Maybe more will follow ;o) I will have a look into to the forum as well as you mentioned :o)
Yeah, I think it stinks.
Strangely enough it's practically only CCBill that keep those high prices regarding difference in currency.
Epoch do not - a couple of times or more I've written to the webmaster about the CCBill-price, and - man, they send me a link to join via Epoch at the price stated at TBP....in US-dollars!
they surely do. There's a lot of services available for geo location based on the ip address you have (fixed) or get (using dial-in to a pool of ip addresses your provider owns) when going online. Like for instance http://www.ip2location.com/ or http://www.geobytes.com/ipLocator.htm
I had trouble with some sites one of them actually didn't know that this feature was active for them. After letting them know they urged their billing company to turn that off a.s.a.p. :-)
Listed price at the site is: $29.95 US for 30 days recurring.
Listed price at the site is: $39.95 US for 30 days non-recurring.
TheBestPorn lists price as $24.94 US for 30 days recurring.
But TheBestPorn price is not a discounted price (at least no indication that price is discounted).
So the price might have changed since it was listed at TBP.
The prices at many of these sites change a lot, and you really need a dynamic link to keep up with the price changes, if you want to stay current (and then you need to list the discounted price from TBP as well, if there is one).
As far as model Stefany, she looks way past her teenage years. But many sites advertise "teens" that are way past that age. These sites sell youth, not truth. We all know that, even if we don't like admitting it to ourselves.
She has plenty of legit movies, and they link to a few of her other movies where you can buy the DVD. When they list the star's catalog, anything they don't have sends you to a place you can buy their DVD releases.
If you are looking for sluts with their legs wide open, then go drink that cup of tea.
I don't need to see the pussy to get off when I have these amazingly gorgeous girls with big tits and hot rumps showing off for me. The Photography here is superb (better than Playboy in my opinion) and women are both sexy and classy.
If glamour photography and gorgeous models are your thing, this is a great site. If you are looking for hardcore pussy pounding whores, plenty of other sites out there to suit your tastes!
Sorry you were disappointed, Mes. I feel guilty because I gushed over the site in reply to a comment of yours here.
I agree with most of what you say, although I find myself enjoying some of the pictures here more than those at any other site I've joined thus far. Why that is I can't exactly say. There are things going on at a subconscious level that we aren't quite aware of and maybe don't understand. It could just be that I love the all-fours shots, and this site gives you every conceivable angle of that view, as if you are actually there behind the model.
That being said, yes, a site like this, which is 99 percent photo-driven, absolutely needs zipfiles. Especially when the photo sets contain numerous pictures from the exact same perspective. The man behind the site needs to do a LOT more editing of sets, and he needs to get more creative. The sets are repetitive, as you said, and could be cropped by seventy percent in a lot of cases. Furthermore, the pics are not named uniquely, and saving them becomes even more of a chore.
As far as navigation goes, yes, it needs a lot of work.
I am, by turns, very pleased and very displeased with my experiences here thus far. I was wowed at first, but that feeling has waned, except for the moments when something really resonates with me.
Just had a look at LV Panty's preview. Looks like he is branching out a bit and featuring more modern, skimpy-type undies. My memory of the models was a bit fuzzy as well. They are indeed beautiful, but there are plenty of girl-next-door types we well.
First, there are quite a few more models over the age of thirty at True Amateur Models than I originally thought. The guy behind the site doesn't seem to care about age. One model is in her fiftees. He doesn't care much about looks, either. I did notice some portrait style pics in older sets, but far and away his preference is landscape. As I said, the four full sets I took so far are landscape in their entirety: no portrait shots at all.
About LVPanty: I'm glad you're thinking of joining. It's been a while since I was there, but picture-wise it is second to none in the panty-genre, if you take in all factors such as fidelity to niche, pic size, and quality. **I don't recall if the sets at LVPanty are zipped**. You might want to contact the webmaster about that. I don't remember zips there, and I have none on file. My memory is shot, however. The video section is nothing to rave about either.
Also, bear in mind LVPanty is old-school. Full-sized, and predominantly full-backed, undies are the order of the day. There is not a fixation on cotton, which I know you don't like, but there is quite a bit; but even so there is nothing teeny-bopperish whatsoever. The variety of fabrics and styles is wide. The models are beautiful. It's not an amateur site. I believe you can see a few sample pics on the preview. I know you're cautious about which sites to join and I'd hate for you to think you blew your money.
A blend of LVPanty and True Amateur Models, with a vid section on par with Panty Amateur, would be a perfect site for me and I'd stay with it permanently!
Interesting, me finding your comment here, since I gave you a passing thought almost as soon as I joined. Why? Because every single picture is in landscape format! All of 'em, at least the ones I've seen thus far, and that's four full sets with over a hundred pics each. I joined last night after seeing some dazzling pics at a TGP.
Latest pics are big, at 1500x1126, and they look great on my 22 inch monitor, even though they don't completely fill it.
BUT: **no zips**. My arm is still hurting from all the clicking I did last night. The models here run the gamut from dead plain to cute as hell. Most of them are average to nice looking young ladies you'd see anywhere: true amateurs. This site gives you a real sense of intimacy with the models, even though there are hardly any videos. I'm not a photography buff at all and I can't judge these pictures in a technical or artistic context, but they certainly are stimulating. I found myself being truly, physically turned-on, which hardly ever happens to me at an adult site anymore. I had all but given up hope! My pic collecting has for a long time been mostly a spirit-lifting hobby, without much lift anywhere else, if you get my drift.
Each to his own, they say, and this site won't be for everyone. I'm a panty-lingerie nut but there is hardly any of that here; and yet these pics still work for me, in the way that naughty pictures are supposed to work. ;)
Not many mature models, but there are a few. I will do a full review after a bit of time here. I am very happy I joined, though it is a lot of work without zips.
01-15-0910:10pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
