| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Robin68:
I've just joined this site and their search engine sucks. I also found the classic section is the pits also, lousy quality videos not enough of the 80 & 90's stuff just one video of Tami Ann. no marilyn chambers stuff or some of my favorites from those years. Ok its cheap and it reflects it. I'm going to bail out.
|
03-28-10 03:25am
|
Reply
952
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from yadayada321:
Ha ha ha, yeah, it's buggy but cheap fun. If you find that perfect porn site, tell everybody though :-P. I also agree about the incomplete MP4 files as well, I've seen that too... I know when it happens because when you skip through a downloaded MP4 video it freezes. It also never makes it to the end when you watch it the whole way through. Some MP4's I've dled from that site don't have those problems. That's why I don't dl the MP4s. Then again, I can't tell if they're really incomplete or not because the listed filesizes are always wrong!
|
03-23-10 12:31am
|
Reply
953
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(messmer's Reply)
A lot of the stuff is recycled. For instance the Pornstar Tryouts videos have material from 4 or 5 years back and have it down as new. The Bree Olson video has been labelled as "added yesterday." A few days ago it was supposed to be added last year. Last year I downloaded it as a clip from I think 2006 or thereabouts.
But there is still stuff that is surprisingly good. The pictures are quite good for a cheapo site too. If I ever find that perfect site you have been looking for I shall notify you immediately. You might think it would be easy to find, but it isn't!
|
03-22-10 05:08pm
|
Reply
954
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
I really like the site because the material is great value. But all that you say is what I have found too. I am willing to put up with the negatives because the price and material, when you can access it, is outstanding value.
|
03-22-10 10:55am
|
Reply
955
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from uscue:
(messmer's Reply)
Ah thanks. This is one site I was always interested in but don't know about it due to all the negative reviews. I'll stick with VideoBox and BrainPass
|
02-10-10 12:41pm
|
Reply
956
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from uscue:
How did cancellation go? And was it easy to cancel or do they make it difficult?
|
02-10-10 12:34pm
|
Reply
957
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from skippy:
Thank you SO MUCH for that HD tip in advanced search! Without that, it was like looking for a needle in a field full of haystacks.
|
02-02-13 10:54pm
|
Reply
958
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from snickelb:
I agree on the quality. Strangely the h264 seems fuzzier than the next best quality, making me wonder if they took something that was filmed in 640x480 and enlarged it, then used a different encoding scheme to either pass it off as higher quality, fuzz the graininess, or simply lessen the size.
|
11-26-12 05:58pm
|
Reply
959
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RippedOff:
(messmer's Reply)
The domain information for JACSHELP is nothing like PSN, so I doubt they are related http://whois.domaintools.com/jacshelp.com looks like a US based site, but I could be wrong since the site looks like a very similar business.
The breach of contract with the additional billing processors was really what got me. If PSN had billed me using PSNBILLING.COM for what I ordered and what I didn't order instead of creating two additional accounts with sites I had never heard of I should have at least been able to see the additional memberships when I cancelled my account in September. If I had seen them listed along with what I purchased I would have made sure to cancel them along with the other, would not have been billed for four more months, and since my cancellation was before the end of September I would have been able to complain to PSN fast enough to get a full refund for the sites I never used in June, July, or August.
|
01-17-12 02:11am
|
Reply
960
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from PornGirl:
Hello messmer,
Thank you for the feedback. The Pornstar Network Review is supposed to be a pop under and is not supposed to be a redirect. There does seem to be a problem with it in the browser IE9 and firefox 5 which we are working on fixing now. I apologize for the inconvenience.
|
07-05-11 10:47am
|
Reply
961
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from RustyJ:
Congrats on your badge! I need to join some new sites to get there too.
|
06-10-11 11:52pm
|
Reply
962
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from mbaya:
Congratulations on breaking the 100 point barrier.
|
06-09-11 03:30am
|
Reply
963
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(messmer's Reply)
These networks are strange like that. 21Sextury used to be the worst for it a couple years ago when they first started operating as a network. If you joined through one of the standalone sites you would still get access to the other sites, but pay a higher price. Not for sure why this one changed, but if you go to the Brazzers main page here on TBP and click to join it's $19.95 and has the same sites including Pornstar Punishment. Pornstar Punishment shows as $24.95 when you click to join it. It's similar to the Tony Bucks sites that lk2fireone has commented on recently where if you join through Spunky Bee, you get the same sites as joining through Teenburg for $5 or $10 less. I don't know if it's just a marketing ploy to hope some would join through the sites not offering the discount or what.
|
06-28-11 03:09pm
|
Reply
964
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review from messmer:
Sorry exotics, I signed on through Brazzers who still have the reduced price. I just realized now where the problem came in and will adjust my review accordingly.
|
06-28-11 11:47am
|
Reply
965
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from exotics4me:
I liked this site pretty well too.
I think what is happening with the price is that this site itself is showing up as $24.95, joining through Brazzers through TBP is still showing up as $19.95.
Check out Abella Anderson if you haven't had the chance. She has a couple of scenes on Brazzers, really sexy, natural young model.
|
06-27-11 06:35pm
|
Reply
966
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Lionheart:
I joined this site a few days ago, works fine every time I log on
|
06-03-10 04:21am
|
Reply
967
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Gazette Risque:
(messmer's Reply)
Good to hear! Too bad we still don't know what the problem was. But it's good to hear it's gone.
Have fun! :)
|
05-07-10 06:30pm
|
Reply
968
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Gazette Risque:
(messmer's Reply)
Can't think of anything else...
Did you try the forum on the website? Maybe you're not the only one.
You could always post your question there.
Again, good luck!
|
05-07-10 10:52am
|
Reply
969
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment from messmer:
Just wanted you to know that I tried again a few minutes ago and this time had no problem getting in! Strange!
|
05-07-10 10:48am
|
Reply
970
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Gazette Risque:
Could be due to many visitors. Have you tried to log in at a different time or is it always like this?
And have you tried a different browser?
Couldn't think of any other reasons. Personally, I have never had any issues like that with the website. Then again, I'm not a member anymore (although I likely will be again soon :P) so things might have changed in the last couple of months. But I doubt it.
Maybe you could also benefit from a web browser accelerator?
Well, good luck!
|
05-07-10 10:06am
|
Reply
971
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from rearadmiral:
(messmer's Reply)
That's also a clear theme that runs through the other Kink sites that I've had memberships in. Kink has really mastered the 'illusion' of extreme BDSM while still making it clear that the model not only consents but is also having a lot of fun. I like that about Kink.
|
04-24-10 05:34am
|
Reply
972
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(messmer's Reply)
messmer - I'm glad the site stands up to the praise and high marks I gave it. I wondered if I was just blinded by personal preference, but with you liking it too that makes my opinion a bit more objective.
I agree with you on the interview thing. The closing interview is probably sufficient. But given that Kink is really pushing some limits I suspect that they want (or have been told by their lawyer) to make everyone 100% certain that this is all consenual. Maybe if Max Hardcore had done something similar he wouldn't be a guest of the State in a prison now. Not that I think what Max did and what Kink does are really comparable... Max really tried, and usually succeeded in being degrading. With Kink, it's all part of the consenual fun.
|
04-23-10 01:06pm
|
Reply
973
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(messmer's Reply)
I'm a day later than when you posted this message, but I check just now and I have no problem with the site loading quickly. I've never experienced that problem. Maybe it was a server issue or upgrade or something. Are you still experiencing it?
|
04-23-10 04:12am
|
Reply
974
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(messmer's Reply)
I only hope that the site lives up to the praise that I've heaped on it! This (and many other Kink sites) are among the most innovative and well done sites on the internet, provided that you're into BDSM.
|
04-22-10 05:00pm
|
Reply
975
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(messmer's Reply)
Please let everyone know what you think. I'm a big fan and I hope that it meets your expectations too.
|
04-21-10 06:45pm
|
