| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
901
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from lk2fireone:
I like the review of Old Spunkers. Clean, easy to understand, lots of details.
What I don't understand is the score. I have a hard time figuring out how to score a site. I've only done 3 site reviews. 2 of the sites I scored at 75, and I like the sites, think they are worthwhile joining, even if you only join for a month to download whatever files you want to keep (Domai and Glamdeluxe).
One site I scored 97, because its got massive content, lots of great models, lots of quality photosets, and a low annual price of $99 (Metart). That's the best value I've seen for softcore teen.
But you give a score of 68 to a junk site.
What counts is the overall impression of the site, which you make clear. But I wonder how useful these scores are, even as a general guide. People really need to read the complete review of a site, and not just look at the score as a major factor.
I wish I had a more objective way of scoring a site, because I don't think a score means very much.
On the other hand, I'm also glad we can score any way we want, because I wouldn't like to be bound by some formula that Pornusers developed for scoring.
|
11-20-08 04:01pm
|
Reply
902
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from TheRizzo:
(messmer's Reply)
Yeah Toby can be frustrating as his sets have their own look but but not as crisp as I would like. Its like he wants to look amateurish or something. At least they made him pull back a bit and shoot more full body shots instead of all closeups like he used to do. And you are right he does get some of the best models. I'd love to see a few other photographers shoot the same girls just for comparison.
|
11-15-08 09:55am
|
Reply
903
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from TheRizzo:
(messmer's Reply)
The everlasting quest for the older ladies is damn near impossible to find. If All Over 30 can't find them I doubt these other sites will. But we can hope to get more options and variety one day!
BTW you see AO30 has a few newer girls late 40's and early 50's and I see they got a new girl Sandra who is 64.
|
11-14-08 08:55pm
|
Reply
904
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Monahan:
Great review, as always, Messmer. It's efforts like this that make Porn Users so far superior to any other porn review sites.
|
11-14-08 01:22pm
|
Reply
905
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from mbaya:
Very good and complete review. I hate to add to the problems, but adultfriendfinder is notorious for leaving spyware counters on your computer. That alone makes me uncomfortable about the site.
|
11-14-08 01:15pm
|
Reply
906
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from WeeWillyWinky:
(messmer's Reply)
Top-notch review, messmer.
In regard to the site's title: I would never even wind up at the welcome page of a site with a name like that. I ended up subscribing at one site, or network, more correctly, with a real dud of a name because of a rewiew here. It's called Monster Pimps. The network is very docile and tame and is mostly about softcore shots of cheerleaders, with a few mild HC sites. Monster Pimps sounds like the EXACT opposite of that. Old Spunkers makes me think of gray-haired retirees at a Pinocle table suddenly feeling an itch in the diapers.
**No dis-respect to aged persons intended.
|
11-14-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
907
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from TheRizzo:
Great review with good details so that I can make a good informed decision about this site. And based on how you feel about All Over 30 I know we have similar tastes in older women.
I will stay away from this one.
|
11-14-08 11:09am
|
Reply
908
|
Old Young Lesbian Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from dracken:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks for the quick reply. I keep meaning to re-join this network, it sounds better and better each time I read about it :)
Also thanks for the additions, I think this makes my decision for this network a lot easier.
|
11-01-10 08:57pm
|
Reply
909
|
Old Young Lesbian Love
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from dracken:
Very nice review, mature women are not really my cup of tea, but what caught my eyes was your comment that most scenes have a feeling of next door neighbor. I am constantly searching for scenes that feel amateurish...which kinda brings me to a question I have, how are the scenes set up? do we get a quick interview or a story line or is it just BAM two girls having sex... Also from the tour I see there is a lot of strap-on action, is that the norm, any anal?
Thanks,
|
11-01-10 07:04pm
|
Reply
910
|
Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from TheRizzo:
Aunt Judy's used to me my home as well when their was no other choice. I agree it seemed things never improved. Photo and video quality never got better. And yet it was really the only site of its kind.
Thankfully we got new options with All Over 30 and Karups Older Women that use the same kinda model but blow it out of the water. I am not sure I'd ever be willing to try Aunt Judy's or their clone site out again to be honest. I suppose if they really revamped and a few people gave it killer reviews but short of that.
I see you said in this site the photos are crisper so thats a start in the right direction.
|
06-11-08 02:37pm
|
Reply
911
|
Older Women Club
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from lk2fireone:
(I'm putting this in a separate reply, because I passed the time limit for editing my first reply.)
I looked at the reply of the webmaster you mentioned in a previous comment. The webmaster is supposed to be from IL. But I still wonder if English is his primary language. The English he uses in his reply is OK, but would not pass in an English class in high school. But that's common in today's internet usage.
He states there is no leased content. But if you downloaded many of these videos from another site, and some PU members mention some of these videos are at other sites, I would assume those videos were legally at the other sites. So the content at this site is definitely not entirely exclusive.
|
09-17-11 09:08pm
|
Reply
912
|
Older Women Club
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Regarding all the videos have the site logo: I assume it's fairly easy for a site to put its logo on a video or set of photos. That doesn't mean much beyond implying that the video or photos are part of their content or inventory. But that content could also be at other sites as well, with a different logo.
A lot of site webmasters do not have English as their primary language. So when you say the webmaster states the content is exclusively theirs, he might not be understanding clearly what you were asking. That's just a thought.
What logo do the videos you downloaded previously, that are also at this site, have? Do they have this site's logo? A different logo? Or no logo?
There are different types of leases, with different rights to that content. I'm not in the porn business, but I would assume that some leases might give the holder exclusive right to that content for a specified period of time.
Or someone could buy the content outright. Which would give them exclusive rights.
But what the facts are in this specific case, you would need a clear dialog with the webmaster/site owner. And like I said, some of these gentlemen have only a rudimentary understanding of English.
|
09-17-11 08:54pm
|
Reply
913
|
Older Women Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(messmer's Reply)
Interesting response, I did not notice the VOD thing. Any info you may gather let me know but I think I may pass on this after hearing the sites, Videobox, VideoZ, and so on lol...just not my kind of content personally. Thanks for the reply!
|
12-19-10 12:39pm
|
Reply
914
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(messmer's Reply)
Hey messmer - well, I thought so too - but none of them are included as bonus-sites (my loing/password didn't work at any of them) - so I put "no bonus-sites" in cons...
|
06-03-09 05:43am
|
Reply
915
|
Only Bush
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from mathieuy:
I got membership and had been scamed. The content is very low quality and not exlusive at all.
|
05-16-10 01:36am
|
Reply
916
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Little harsh?
The site just is not to your personal tastes.
"Severely ripped off"? They are still pushing out genuinely new exclusive updates each day that a great many people enjoy.
Don't like the current day's update? Then download the next day's update! This site does allow you to do that, you know.
|
10-19-10 11:39pm
|
Reply
917
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Capn:
I know I have been banging on about this for years, but this site would be sooo much better if they consistently proceeded to full nudity in each set.
They have great outfits & models, and I appreciate that some won't do nude, but there are plenty that would & do.
A tease is no good without the pay off for me.
They have a very shaky definition of nude too, as some of the sets they claim to be nude aren't.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-19-10 10:06am
|
Reply
918
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks for the quick reply and the helpful information. You told me everything I need. I will give this site a skip, as you suggested.
|
10-18-10 03:32pm
|
Reply
919
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from lk2fireone:
I've never joined this site.
What percentage complete nudity (including photos with lingerie that shows all the good bits) is there in the photoshoots? A wild guess is fine by me.
What is the name of your "real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos"? Or is she part of your private stash?
Also, why would a recently posted video (August 2010) be of such low quality? Is this a file they dug up from their unused historical trash? Most sites that post updates use files that are their average quality or above average quality. Why would a site post a below average quality file, unless it had some historical or collector interest?
Wild guesses on my part, because I have no knowledge of this site, except for its name. :)
But unless there is a significant amount of nudity, I doubt I would be interested in joining. I like softcore, but I still want to see the "good" bits. (Bits is a British term, you understand. LOL.)
Edit01: I just looked up "bits". I want to see everything interesting, not just the cunny.
|
10-18-10 02:48pm
|
Reply
920
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from WeeWillyWinky:
(messmer's Reply)
Hi messmer,
I think I said "no download options", meaning you can only DL one way. That's my fault, bad wording there.
All videos (and there are over a thousand now) average about five minutes and are each downloadble in a single mpeg file. The quality is excellent and they have been moving into hi-def over the past few months. I can't even watch the new ones because my pc can't handle it and the replay is all choppy. Even the oldest vids are high quality and look great fullscreen on my 22" monitor, though I have to mention I'm not an afficianado in technical matters. This is the best panty-video site I know of. Bear in mind, this is a British site and the Brits tend to be old school (full-backs) when it comes to knickers, though the emphasis is not on cotton. Also very few thongs or boyshorts here. There is no graphic nudity though the girls do get into their birthday suits from time to time and bare breasts abound. There is some masturbation and lesbian content but the emphasis is heavily on solo tease.
|
07-18-08 02:51pm
|
Reply
921
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(messmer's Reply)
It is a shame that hardcore has taken a stronger hold on certain sites, as if we have to have more of it everywhere.
Good news: I've come upon a new softcore site that I'm reviewing right now. It has its flaws, but I'm glad I joined it just the same. Will post within the week.
|
06-22-10 10:01am
|
Reply
922
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(messmer's Reply)
We're not alone - thanks for that fine reply/input - or rather those fine words, ol' friend....I agree and never doubt your taste....
|
08-01-11 10:09am
|
Reply
923
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BradlyH:
(messmer's Reply)
Hi Messmer, thanks for the comment. I really do appreciate comments that are constructed well like yours, It's refreshing to get a well put disagree comment with understanding.
As for the lingerie- When did you join the site exactly ? i know since i joined last November that there has been extensive content added ( including lingerie sets.) but i also found quite a few sets that i enjoyed back then with Lingerie.
Like mentioned in the review, with the owner of the site in partnership with a exclusive lingerie company i can see that in the future Lingerie sets might be more prominent.
Although i think there are quite a few Lingerie sets maybe my words are misleading, i have a habit of grouping bra and panties within the
lingerie category (some sets of underwear on there can be arguably lingerie)
|
05-22-11 08:06pm
|
Reply
924
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
I'm sure it isn't just you.
I know I am late on this, but comparing recent reviews on this & a couple of goes around the public area, I am more inclined to agree with you, M.
It seems to be struggling for an identity.
Too many artsy pretentious sets for me by the look.
Just stick to one formula & refine it.
Too many flaws in too many areas.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-15-11 04:38am
|
Reply
925
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from jamy:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks Messmer,
I understand perfectly your point of view, being a member myself of some websites for my personal pleasure, I know for sure that I don't agree all the time with the favorite models, favorite sets, and favorite pictures of other members.
I guess we also have divergences about what one's find erotic /or not. I read with interest some of your best rated reviews, and visit the websites, and it's obvious that my content is not fitting your expectations.
That said, I just want to congratulate you for your implication in the forum and reviews of PU, it's always appreciated, as a webmaster, to have members enough interested in their content to take time to write reviews and inform others. I appreciate a lot more a not_so_good_rated review about my work rather than no review at all ! Criticisms are always welcome, as far as they are fair.
(thanks for putting back the old score btw :)
|
05-11-11 06:20am
|
