| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
726
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
Yes it is frustrating.
Mind you, so is 6 weeks & counting for CCBill to get their GEOIP database sorted. STILL waiting!
All a matter of scale, I suppose.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 10:30am
|
Reply
727
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
RS?
Not heard of them before.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 12:21am
|
Reply
728
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Capn:
I thought those were the billing companies they used?
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-27-11 01:32pm
|
Reply
729
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Capn:
I am pleased you are enjoying the site, my friend.
It is generally of good quality & consistent.
It is always on the list for a rejoin for me.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-11 05:21pm
|
Reply
730
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from otoh:
Agree about the recent updates - in the last year or so's material, I think they've tried to include more natural girls, and lose some of the daft outfits and cheesy settings in favour of nice clothing and natural looking sets. And I agree that there's so much material, it doesn't really make sense to worry over the bits we don't like! (BTW another reply to you under my PP review)
|
01-21-11 04:16pm
|
Reply
731
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from otoh:
Sounds like you found it much the same as I did! Perhaps something for everyone, but spread a little thinly. As you said, not much in the way of (nice) lingerie there, you know where I'll send you for that ;)
If you need a little inspiration, I found fun videos from the following models with good personalities: Darcy Tyler, Helena Handbasket, Holly West, Robbye Honeck, Kimberly, Liz, Megan
Of course, YMMV :)
|
01-20-11 10:07pm
|
Reply
732
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from WeeWillyWinky:
(messmer's Reply)
Some of us quirky fellows actually like the ho-hum, practical underwear!
|
01-20-11 06:09pm
|
Reply
733
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Capn:
A very fair assessment.
I am with you on the 'enhanced' breasts issue.
Quite often they appear to be best viewed clothed, which to be fair I suppose they would be 'designed' to look good that way.
On a few occasions there I have been mightily impressed with the clothed shots, only to be a little taken aback when they are revealed :00
Another thing that used to be an issue for me there was the preponderance of the shaved look. :0/
I agree with your score though.
A good solid MILF photo site really, just with a little too much 'enhancement.'
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-20-11 01:50pm
|
Reply
734
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from otoh:
(messmer's Reply)
Hmm... a quick tally from my admittedly inexpert eye (some are quite convincing!) makes me think probably just under half - 40-45%? - of the models here have fake boobs.
That sounds like a lot - but again, this is a big site, with hundreds of models - so you'll likely find some that you like, and there are some good strips, teasing and lingerie, followed up by showing what's underneath.
If you've joined either of the other two sites mentioned, I'm pretty sure you'll see similar content to here. For me there are just enough natural girls here to warrant a one-off subscription.
|
01-19-11 02:39pm
|
Reply
735
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from malikstarks:
(messmer's Reply)
I agree some of them are borderline, I still may give a try some time in the future though. I like the camera angles they take pretty consistently
|
11-28-09 09:17pm
|
Reply
736
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from malikstarks:
(messmer's Reply)
Hey Messmer did you ever join this site? I've been thinking about it since they seem to have more North American models it seems than All Over 30. Plus I may like some of the camera work a little better.
If so tell me what you thought.
|
11-22-09 07:58pm
|
Reply
737
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from GCode:
(messmer's Reply)
Yeah Anilos is high on my list after talking to you about it 1 or 2 months ago but you told me to wait a few months so they can gather more material because it was a smaller site being new and all at that time. So I think I may join in the next few months so I can get more material but it is definitly high on my list for some time!
|
06-25-09 12:25pm
|
Reply
738
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from GCode:
Oh and btw, 640 X 480 is so below average these days and if that's what this site is still dishing out, count me out until they can hang. Just thought I'd add this in :)
|
06-24-09 08:05pm
|
Reply
739
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(messmer's Reply)
Ah I see, I was just trying to point you in the direction to a person who just joined and could give good insight. Plus, james4096 has been very reliable in his opinions to me. I just can't believe this site would give a preview video in such shit quality for potential customers to rely upon for joining. Why would you not give your 'best of the best' in terms of quality to show off what you are producing for sales. I mean, it's borderline ridiculous and absurb IHMO. Karup's is a better known site that's been around for awhile. Plus, after reading the abbywinters thread on how much they were banking, it's honestly strange that a better known site (plus others) just can't go buy a extremely quality camera and produce quality videos these days and ages. I mean, this should just be a given and it's very disapointing. However, if you do end up joining this site, can you keep me posted on the REAL quality of the videos. I watch videos on a 42' LCD screen and I definintly am interested in this site after the shared content was posted on All Over 30 to every week to see. Take care messmer!
|
06-24-09 08:02pm
|
Reply
740
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from GCode:
james4096 just did a review on this site and I trust his judgements. Check out his review and ask him a question there, I'm sure he will give you plenty of insight as to what the site can offer in more detail if you need it. This is on my list to join ever since seeing shared content on All Over 30 when I joined.
|
06-24-09 07:32pm
|
Reply
741
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks, messmer....there is quite a good number of sets/vids with lingerie and/or just cute underwear - and scenes where items are removed gradually. Can't put a percentage on, really - but the good thing is this:
Most models have several sets and 3-4 vids (some more) and generally the girls are wearing different things in each set - and among these there is fine lingerie/or sexy bra and thongs....(and not much stripped socks, thanks you)
|
10-31-10 02:29am
|
Reply
742
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from otoh:
(messmer's Reply)
I'm a bit more egalitarian about nylons. I absolutely agree with everything you say about the allure of stockingtops and suspenders - although I enjoy porn, my first love is pinup, and if you look up eg photographer Viva Van Story and model Mosh, you'll see what I mean.
But... I also think pantyhose are a very different, but exciting kind of tease; when worn with no panties, the sheerness both hides and shows what's underneath - and specifically when a model is unshaved, I find that very appealing.
|
02-08-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
743
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from otoh:
Hey messmer... another good review, thanks. Further to your last reply, I'm a bit more lenient with nylons, I like both tights and stockings, but as a bit of a pin-up and retro fan there's no denying the allure of stockings, suspenders, girdles and the like (and I'm not even fifty!). But just a shame that the videos here don't have much tease - that's surely what this kind of thing is about.
|
02-07-12 12:40am
|
Reply
744
|
Ladies Kiss Ladies
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from bootsulike:
Thanks for the review.
Sounds similar to my experience of 'Lick Nylons', part of the same stable. Content lacked passion.
|
07-04-10 01:04pm
|
Reply
745
|
Lesby Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from dracken:
(messmer's Reply)
Just press okay without filling in anything.
|
09-29-09 08:06pm
|
Reply
746
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from FetishPack:
(messmer's Reply)
I am not attacking collectors, I am saying your review was focused on whether a collector or mass downloader would be satisfied. That represents a small fraction of users and you didn't give the rest of the groups of users such as the ones I mentioned a fair view of the site from their prespective. A fair review should target all the market groups not a small fraction of the market. I join sites too and if I see videos I like I too download them to have on my computer for later viewing. Being able to download 1 or two videos simultaneously seems sufficient.
To answer to tangub no I don't want to charge $50 for one DVD. Like I said the network offers 4,576 videos (747 hours) and a total of 252,409 photos and 72 DVDs each month all for $29.95 so that statement of yours is not accurate.
Also I am not pro streaming and anti download. All the videos are offered in both streaming and in download where I have a license to allow download. I am just against allowing my sites to be ripped fully in one day. If that was a huge issue for you again if you had emailed me I would have allowed it for you. It's a simple setting that can be changed in a few seconds. But that's what really bothered me that you made remarks and assumptions not only about my sites but about me as well without bothering to contact me first instead you publicly posted a review that calls my entire network of sites a rip off. They are not a rip off.
As to how the companies you mention manage that I don't know. I am not a big porn company, we are just two guys doing our best to offer our members a good set of sites for their viewing and still stay profitable.
|
07-29-11 10:29pm
|
Reply
747
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from tangub:
(messmer's Reply)
I find it amazing how porn producers and site owners are always pleading poverty these days. I think they would all prefer to send us back to the pre internet days when they could fleece us for $50 for a single movie on dvd or vhs.
|
07-29-11 02:45pm
|
Reply
748
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from FetishPack:
They still offer streaming at 56kb, 250kb and 512kb and the reason is the majority of users, this is all they can stream at a rate that will allow them to view something instead of waiting for buffering every other second. Once again do some research and get a clue of where the majority of users stand. They are not all as fortunate as you.
Furthermore if you had taken the time to read the members menu, which you claim is overcrowded you would have seen that there are 4 full DVD, BBW movies offered each month available in their entirety for the whole month. Then at the end of each month they are changed with 4 new ones, also available in their entirety. This is true for many of the sites on the network. There's a total of 72 full DVD films each month, all available in their entirity for the entire month. But you didn't even notice cause your concentration was on how to massively leech everything instead of noticing that the members page is overcrowded because of how much we have to offer to our viewers. We don't offer 2 links like some other sites, 1 that says pictures and 1 that says videos. We offer so much more and if you had taken then time to click the links in the members page you would have seen the massive amounts of content we offer for $29.95. Granted you can't download the 72 DVDs each month which ofcourse would make a person like you unhappy but that's the producer's decision. Some produces don't wish their hard work downloaded and kept on collectors or illegally distributing persons computers and they are right. Another thing you are clueless about is that a big chunk of subscribers are married or happen to login the sites from work computers. They by no means wish to download anything. They are very happy to see it, get their kicks off and leave no trace of it on their computer so streaming is the way they like things. Again not everyone is a site leecher like yourself.
Also what you say about content that there's not much of it. If you had clicked on the all videos link you would have seen that there's a total of 4,576 videos (747 hours) and a total of 252,409 photos and this doesn't include the streaming videos theaters, the 72 full DVDs each month and about 5,000 stories just to mention a few other items you didn't see due to your obsession with finding a way to mass download everything instead of enjoying the sites like a normal person.
I have requested the removal of this review from this site's owners as it is mostly inaccurate, targets site leechers which are a small percentage of users, and the review is rude and offensive.
|
07-29-11 04:30am
|
Reply
749
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from FetishPack:
Now onto the issue of updates are DVDs that are broken down into segments. Consider this. To purchase a license that permits posting the content on a paysite each DVD license is about $250. So if you want me to put the entire DVD up in one update then at a minimum 4 updates a month that is $1,000 just in license fees and you paid $29.95. Tell me how I will make $1,000 for the license fees and how will I pay the massive bandwidth bill that leechers like you will leave me with? And that's 3rd party content. Do you have any clue how much it costs to have good video produced exclusive for 1 site? Try $10 a minute minimum. To satisfy a person like you I would need 320 minutes of video in one month to make 4 updates of 60 minutes each so that I provide you with full DVD updates each time. At the rate of $10 a minute, 320 minutes will cost me $3,200 per month. Again you paid $29.95. Who is getting ripped off here? Also it's not as if those are the only videos you get. There are another 145 videos in place for that site. By the time you view those, the entire DVD that has been broken down to scenes will also be there. Unless once again, all you do is view porn day in day out, all day. Once again do a little research and find out how paysites work and how much they cost before you write reviews.
Now let's look at what you say about no HiDef. That is also wrong and irrelevant. First the download version of the videos is 640x480 encoded at 1250 b/s. That's considered hidef. It may not be the highest quality HD but it is HD. Look up HD, there are many dimensions of it and this is true with flat screen TVs too. You can buy a whole range of different pixel capabilities TV sets but they are all classified as HD. Further more just because you have a fast internet connection and a hidef computer monitor it doesn't mean that everyone does. Look up some statistics. The majority of the world is still on modem dialup connections. Even in the USA there are large areas, rural and not so rural that DSL isn't even offered. Also at other locations where fast internet is offered there are alot of people who can't afford it, especially in this economy. Did you know in Australia most ISPs charge but the MB downloaded and it's not unlimited? And that's a developed country with standards similar to the USA in most economic respects. You are fortunate enough to have all this but the majority of people don't and are satisfied with less quality video that they can download or stream and see. They can't possibly download or stream the quality that makes you happy. As a business owner of sites that are accessible world wide my job is to satisfy the majority of viewers. And they seem to be happy and you with the fast connection can still download hidef videos from my site and still stream at very descent speeds, even though you don't appreciate them. Look at sites like aebn who is the major provider of streaming content to pay per view users.
|
07-29-11 04:29am
|
Reply
750
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from FetishPack:
Well wow, who made you a reviewer?
Your review is wrong, inaccurate, rude and offensive in so many ways I wouldn't know where to begin with but I will try lol.
Consider this a response to the majority of your reviews not just mine. Also consider learning about the business of running adult paysites before you even write another review. If I were you I would retire from writing reviews for a long time. You have alot of studying to do first.
First off I am the webmaster and coowner of the site(s) in question and I have taken the time to read alot of your reviews and the time to respond to your posting. This is proof that not only I would have responded if you emailed me with your complaints or refund request but I would have taken care of it immediately. I have been running my sites sine 1999, and one of the things I learned is that I cannot satisfy everyone and there have been refund requests ofcourse and I have honored all of them. The rate of refunds on average over the past 12 years for all my sites combined is 0.74%. That's right, below 1%, better than most can say imo.
Now that we have cleared your lie about how I wouldn't respond to your email or refund you lets go on with some other severely wrong issues that occupy your brain.
In most of your reviews you are concerned with whether you can download massive amounts of content quickly such as downloading all pictures in zip files, and mass downloading of many videos simultaneously. This is not the behavior of the majority of people who subscribe to paysites. This is the mentality of a leecher and porn collector. And most certainly not the mentality of a pay site reviewer. Why on earth do you want to download everything we offer so quickly and so massively? The only explanation is you are a site leecher who wants to download everything within a day or two, add it to your collection and cancel your membership. FYI most users don't behave in such a way. They join and wish to view the videos one at a time just like watching TV. Do you sit in front of your TV and wish you could download all the programs from all the channels for the entire month? For what purpose? To collect them and have them? Unless you wish to jerk off every minute of your awake hours every day there's not any conceivable reason for which you wish to download everything so fast and to be able to download so many videos at once. BTW you are incorrect in another thing you say. The site allows 2 simultaneous downloads and still you can navigate the site. Once again it's beyond me why you want to download 3 or 5 or 10 videos at the same time, lol. Furthermore consider that you paid $29.95. Have you any clue what kind of bandwidth bill I will get if everyone was like you wanting to download everything immediately and then cancel? Do a little research on bandwidth costs first before you even start to think about demanding the massive downloads you describe in all your reviews.
|
07-29-11 04:28am
|
