| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
876
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from hodayathink:
(messmer's Reply)
To me, the main difference between the two companies is that one company (Brazzers) seems to only shoot models with large (and usually fake) breasts to the point of excluding popular models with real breasts. The other company (Naughty America) doesn't care about the breast size of the model, and just shoots who they think fits the theme/who the members want. And, from having been around for a long time, I can tell you that generally, the models with fake breasts tend to get requested more than the models with real breasts. I feel like they still make a concerted effort to bring natural women around (usually at least one per day on the Live shows, and at least 3-4 scenes per week). Could the ratio be better? Honestly, I do think so. But, judging by the general reaction on their forums, this seems to be what the members want. And I'm not gonna begrudge them for giving the members what they want.
|
02-24-10 07:45pm
|
Reply
877
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from PinkPanther:
(messmer's Reply)
Lauren says what Lauren thinks. To expect Lauren to say what you want her to say, well that's not very fair. If you want to do Live With Messner, you should say what you think about fake boobs.
Lauren's also interviewing porn babes and I think she wants to pump them up - when she's not showing off how much smarter she is than they are - lol - she likes to kind of torture them a bit that way.
Does NA promote the whole big-boobed thing? Yeah, they do. Could they go against the grain and say "We're sick of fake boobs and we're not having porn babes with fake boobs on our site?" I suppose, but I doubt that they would be as commercially successful a site.
I've heard Lauren express pro-natural-boob sentiments when she's reviewing scenes, but she's probably as conflicted as I am - I like natural boobs - but confronted with a babe who looks smoking hot with enhanced ones, I'm gonna tell her that she looks fantastic and I'll definitely want my hands and mouth on them. I love Lauren's delight when she gets to get her hands on nice boobs - like a little girl that just got a ride on a pony.
|
02-23-10 09:11pm
|
Reply
878
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
I could understand them wanting to edit if it was a tirade that all their models are ugly and stupid but since that's not what it was.
Good for NA to have gone back on what was a bad business decision.
I'm with you. Let's hope more models chose to do like Jenna Haze.
If that girl can be super popular after many years and still have her original equipment then there is no excuse for saying that you need them to get jobs.
|
02-23-10 06:15pm
|
Reply
879
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from hodayathink:
http://tour.naughtyamerica.com/scenes/raquel-sieb/7619/?&nats=MTI1NDIzOjQ6OA,0,0,0,0
I have no clue if that is the scene you commented on, but that should answer anyone's questions as to whether they consistently censor negative comments/reviews.
|
02-23-10 02:49am
|
Reply
880
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from pat362:
I would hope that a site would keep both the positive and negative comments on their forum but maybe the negatives one should have an even bigger meaning. Afterall a site usually knows what they are doin g right but may not always know where they could use some improvements. If a comment is insighfull and inteligent then the fact thatit's negative or positive should have no bearing on whether it gets removed or kept.
|
02-22-10 06:20pm
|
Reply
881
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Whether or not there are NA staff here, there are people in this forum that are VERY active NA members - at many/most of the live shows, active in the forum, etc. I've had people make comments to me - helpful ones - in NA live shows based on comments that I have made in this forum.
So it may be a case of a comment "dropping off" that forum and reappearing, or it may be a case of a helpful NA/PU member e-mailing an NA mod and saying, "you know, it might be a cooler thing to do to just let that comment stay".
I dunno, but it's a possibility.
NA's a site that deserves the positivity, in my opinion. They are trying to have a very good site, they are very good to their members in many ways, such as hiring active members' faves to do live shows on their birthday.
But sites that are cool sites are going to stumble too - just like people who are cool are likely to fuck up once in a while. That's just human beings, you know?
|
02-22-10 05:47pm
|
Reply
882
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(messmer's Reply)
Right on! Right on! There's enough plastic crap in this world already. Why go to the extreme of sticking it in a woman's woo-woo?
|
02-22-10 03:25pm
|
Reply
883
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from hodayathink:
That happens sometimes. Really, comments on scenes going missing and coming back isn't a new thing. And it happens with good and bad ones (I only make positive comments, and I've had it happen to me). If there's one definite fly in the ointment there, it's the tech issues that have been popping up over the last few months. None of them are deal-breaking, per se, but you do notice them, and they can get to be annoying.
|
02-22-10 10:28am
|
Reply
884
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(messmer's Reply)
Attractiveness is most definitely a matter of taste. But it can't hurt to ask for better looking models. If you don't ask you have no one to blame but yourself. I know the webmaster reads our input and there is room for improvement in the site.
|
02-21-10 10:06am
|
Reply
885
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Ray O:
(messmer's Reply)
Ideally each set should start out clothed and lead to nudity. I am ok with a 25% : 75% clothed to nude ratio, but I agree that at least some pictures should be clothed. In my opinion, slutty, overdone make-up and glam-style shots are a waste of my time.
Also, poses are important and different angles. Lighting and background too. That is why I have my favorite photographers - Sean R.; Riley Williams, Toby Mayes, and some of Wanton (BMB) stuff. The rest is usually poorly done. Most of the poor stuff I see is due to poor poses and the inability of photographers to shoot the goodies. I'd estimate that of the 7 or so daily updates, three are from overexposed models, two are from crappy photographers and maybe two are top-notch sets.
I don't need to see a whole set of some chick's feet covered with fruit. I also don't need to see a bunch of male ACTORS painting fake cum on the models. There is plenty of cheap porn like that on the web. ATK used to have higher standards, though they are slipping.
The high recycle rate of models and standard porn shoots are definitely signs that they are letting their tight standards go in favor of some quick cash and expansion into mainstream porn.
|
02-17-10 08:25am
|
Reply
886
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from kkman112:
(messmer's Reply)
That is my major beef with ATK, it is now 2010 and they only recently upgraded their video res... still less than DVD quality. Yes, they have a lot of content, but it really is time for an upgrade. More sites are starting to move to HD and I think that will soon become a standard for most sites.
|
02-12-10 11:48am
|
Reply
887
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from kkman112:
Hm, thanks for the info and review. I had not seen this site yet. Looks much better than ATK and some models I noticed are/were models on ATK. Might be one to try...
|
02-11-10 03:11pm
|
Reply
888
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
He likes constructive feedback, which your comment is. :0)
|
02-10-10 03:03pm
|
Reply
889
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Capn:
I am sure Basil will take note! ;0)
|
02-10-10 02:59pm
|
Reply
890
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from uscue:
(messmer's Reply)
Ah thanks. This is one site I was always interested in but don't know about it due to all the negative reviews. I'll stick with VideoBox and BrainPass
|
02-10-10 12:41pm
|
Reply
891
|
Porn.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from uscue:
How did cancellation go? And was it easy to cancel or do they make it difficult?
|
02-10-10 12:34pm
|
Reply
892
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from Jay G:
(messmer's Reply)
They already call me a "burn-out." :)
|
02-08-10 02:22am
|
Reply
893
|
Mason Wyler
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Allicide:
(messmer's Reply)
It wasn't specifically directed toward Spencer. Perhaps I should let him know. I just noticed that most of the primary reviews on here for gay sites are done by females or straight men. Don't get me wrong I'm a writer. I believe any good writer can be objective but there is a difference in writing an article and reviewing. It isn't that I think sexual orientation should limit a person's ability to review the site but as a primary review I would think the reviewer should have an interest in the material. You might ask someone who knows nothing of baseball to cover the game but the coverage will be missing the essential element of interest. I notice that your favorite sites are straight sites. I would ask you are you more likely to trust a review posted by a gay man or by a straight man with similiar taste? Again it isn't a slight to Spencer's review but he does essentially say that he guesses the content is what is expected. I think he did a fine job. I just think the primary review should be done by someone with interest toward which the site is based. I wouldn't trust a food critic with no sense of taste to tell me if the food was good in a resturant. They might give an accurate review of the ambience and service but the important element is going to be lacking through no fault of their own.
|
02-07-10 11:59pm
|
Reply
894
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Jay G:
(messmer's Reply)
Yes, porn is getting to be a circus, and they really should give us a better quality of garbage.......and some more mature clowns, for that matter.
I missed the circus act with the stunt cocks, though. Do they jump through fiery hoops? :)
|
02-07-10 02:21pm
|
Reply
895
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Jay G:
(messmer's Reply)
I'm the kind of guy who drinks hot sauce, so I'm not a good judge of "too much."
|
02-07-10 02:15pm
|
Reply
896
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Drooler:
(messmer's Reply)
Good idea! I like pics 'cause I can set my own pace and make up my own stories, usually "on the fly," if you'll pardon the expression.
|
02-07-10 10:54am
|
Reply
897
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(messmer's Reply)
20 minutes of belly-down-flat backdoor fucking for 30 minutes would be fine with me! I think the longest I've ever seen that was about 6 minutes, though.
But otherwise, no.
|
02-06-10 09:52pm
|
Reply
898
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Basil:
(messmer's Reply)
We'll continue to offer a good mix of EU/US models and we'll focus more on undressing process - just give us some time and you'll see the results pretty soon.
Cheers,
Basil
|
02-06-10 02:07pm
|
Reply
899
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Basil:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks for your review and such high score! We'll keep trying our best to build up the content base so hopefully in a years time we'll have more content available to our members ;) We're also focusing on finding more US models and we'll have more of them soon
Sorry about that custom zip bug - had a minor glitch in code, it was fixed and now everything working smoothly.
Once again, thanks for choosing WeAreHairy.com and your review!
Basil
|
02-06-10 01:44pm
|
Reply
900
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
You are very welcome.
It wasn't you, my friend.
There was a target error that has now been rectified.
I tried it today. It works well now.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-06-10 01:06pm
|
