| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from otoh:
(messmer's Reply)
Hmm... a quick tally from my admittedly inexpert eye (some are quite convincing!) makes me think probably just under half - 40-45%? - of the models here have fake boobs.
That sounds like a lot - but again, this is a big site, with hundreds of models - so you'll likely find some that you like, and there are some good strips, teasing and lingerie, followed up by showing what's underneath.
If you've joined either of the other two sites mentioned, I'm pretty sure you'll see similar content to here. For me there are just enough natural girls here to warrant a one-off subscription.
|
01-19-11 02:39pm
|
Reply
627
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from otoh:
(messmer's Reply)
You'll see a few girls eg waking up in plainer panties, but generally, the photographer is definitely a lingerie fetishist and almost all models have sets and videos focusing specifically on it! Also plenty of shower scenes, some with wet sheer clingy things :) This site really works for me; I hope it will for you when you get a chance to look at it.
|
01-17-11 01:14am
|
Reply
628
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Mort:
Good review, thanks Messmer.
Just a warning about this one.
I just noticed when looking to subscribe that this has one of those annoying subscription pages that includes an already ticked box saying that you want a 3 day paid trial that automatically converts to a full subscription to a very expensive garbage site you have never heard of. And it is in faint gray text on a gray background.
Beware if considering subscribing!
On another note, there is a link they make available in emails to previous subscribers that gets you a cheaper subscription deal. Are such things appropriate to share here?
|
01-09-11 07:28pm
|
Reply
629
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Tom22:
Messmer
Everybody is having the same problem. The webmaster replied to one of the complaints about it about a week ago and I replied back ... I think last Sunday saying I thought they had fixed it because I had no problems that day. But I'm downloading again today and the very first download I tried .... DROPPED.
So they still have not fixed it.
|
01-05-11 03:58pm
|
Reply
630
|
Thai Girls Wild
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from DpornGuy:
(messmer's Reply)
That's messed up, and agreed, these guys aren't into providing a decent service for customers i think. Poorly run network..
|
01-05-11 04:44am
|
Reply
631
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from brotherlove:
I'm just wondering why it seems no one every mentions the lack of customer support in their reviews. For me personally they've never responded to any problems I've submitted since I joined more then 6 months ago and they're mostly simple problems, like broken links/missing content. I think customer support should factor into a review and be worth at least 5% of the score, maybe 10%.
|
01-04-11 08:30pm
|
Reply
632
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from nadiencendia:
Same here. I don't have so many problems with downloads, but it pisses me off to see sets that are anounced and never published (2 of the last 5 scenes in Sweet Sophie Moone don't exist, you can't get anything but the 'promo pic', no pictures, no videos, nothing).
I also experienced their lack of customer support when I sent them a web message explaining my problem with streaming videos on their website. I got the automatic message ("you will receive an answer in less than 24 hours") and then, nothing.
All this, and the lack of updates in other very promising websites (I am thinking mainly of Blue Angel Live) are making me reconsider my membership to 21sextury...
|
01-04-11 03:23am
|
Reply
633
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from PeterV:
Messmer you are not alone, I have the same problems video downloads that end up corrupted. And there support is a big joke.
When you use there web-support all you get then is a automated message and nothing more after that.
When you use the help button on the homepage of there website then if you are lucking you get a message back saying thanks for reporting and we are aware and working on the problem.
If that was true then they are working on it for over 6 months due to this I'm saying they are ignoring it because they can't do anything about it but of course they will never admit to that.
BTW. this help button is the most user unfriendly system i ever seen it can only be opened on the homepage of there site. But whatever help/support system they install is useless if everything thats reported is ignored.
It's very frustrating to see that there content is allover the web (just google and you'll see) It seems that some people (regions) get or are able to download the videos without any problems.
Maybe buy a 1host-click account instead of a 21sextury subscription
|
01-03-11 02:02am
|
Reply
634
|
60 Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from csbadger49:
As with his review of 50plusmilfs, messmer has it right on. A great site and truly attractive 60+ women. All seem to enjoy fucking for the camera. A recommended must for us lovers of older women. A 1-month subscription allowed me to download all the content here and on 50plus milfs. I could only download one file at at time
|
01-02-11 03:34pm
|
Reply
635
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from csbadger49:
I just finished a 1 month subscription to both 50plus and 60plusmilfs. I agree with all of messmer's points. I too could only download 1 video at a time. Overall all great content and recommended, as messmer says, "for lovers of truly older woment."
I'd rate the site an 85.
|
01-02-11 03:30pm
|
Reply
636
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Ray O:
Good review. I agree with most of your points. I was a long-time subscriber to ATK N&H - over ten years consecutive. In fact, I gave them an outstanding review only a year or two ago.
I quit in 2010, probably for good. They really made a lot of changes to the way they operate, and almost all of them degraded the site.
1) Too many repeats of the same models
2) A reduction of their stable of photographers. They have only about two left that are any good.
3) Hardcore porn videos. SLick, over-produced sets and format.
4) Using pro porn stars. They are fake in every way except no silicone.
5) Not really trying to find real amateurs and natural GND gals and not willing to pay to get them.
There is more, but do you really care? They basically drove me away - I guess in favor of some other type of customer. I bet they will be out of business in a year or two.
|
01-02-11 08:32am
|
Reply
637
|
Older Women Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(messmer's Reply)
Interesting response, I did not notice the VOD thing. Any info you may gather let me know but I think I may pass on this after hearing the sites, Videobox, VideoZ, and so on lol...just not my kind of content personally. Thanks for the reply!
|
12-19-10 12:39pm
|
Reply
638
|
Alta Heels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from otoh:
(messmer's Reply)
To be honest, I'm new to this lark, so haven't actually subscribed anywhere yet - have just been checking out video samples etc but no call yet for download a complete set of pics. Sometime in the next few days I'll decide what my poison is and sign up to a couple of sites - will let you know how I get on with dTa, and hopefully put a review or two up!
|
12-15-10 01:11pm
|
Reply
639
|
Alta Heels
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from otoh:
Thanks for picking up on this - this is my kind of material, and although the no zips I could live with (hopefully the download manager would take care of that) the 2gig limit is harsh - especially with a 24hr ban when you reach it.
2gig is, what, 3 HD video clips?
Hope the webmaster is listening...
|
12-15-10 08:09am
|
Reply
640
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from graymane:
Nice review, sir messmer....but then I wouldn't expect otherwise from one so accomplished at writing them.
I'm finding our porning taste and interest in stuff coming down the pike now-a-days are becoming somewhat more narrow..meaning we're agreeing more on "what's hot an' what's not."
I wouldn't classify "hairy" ,though, as making a dramatic comeback, but I'm pleased with the recent release of more and more showing up.
|
12-07-10 05:33pm
|
Reply
641
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Denner:
Another great messmer review - but I'll never be a (new) hairy fan: except from those vintage materials - in those times shaved pussies were not much in style - and the "natural" pussy was great - like some of those US models like Barbii, Stephanie Rage, Blondie, Racquel Darrian ect. Love that time...and keep material from then - though not the best quality, for sure - as a precious treasure.
But for newer porn it's 'shaved pussy' for this user - so one difference in taste there, messmer.....
|
12-07-10 08:30am
|
Reply
642
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
I agree that they won't get accused of coming up with an original scenario. I think that some of the scenarios might have been more interesting if I understood some Russian but not by much. I think I downloaded about 20 to 30 videos but I haven't watched many yet so the jury is still out on whether any make the cut.
The one thing that they have is that I don't recognize most of their models so it's quite possible that most are exclusive to this network. I know that many of them have more than one video and on more than one site.
|
12-06-10 02:50pm
|
Reply
643
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from PnP Media:
(messmer's Reply)
I'm glad to see you joined for all the right reasons! ;o)
The search is being changed, and the new version will first appear on the new upgrade of Pantyhosed4u.com in the next couple weeks.
For the set you seek, if you use the free search box, enter flashing or outside and it will appear in the results. Hope that helps, it was a fun set to shoot in the back streets of south London!
You are welcome to contact me, as is any member, via the site ticket system, you will find I respond quickly.
|
12-06-10 12:22pm
|
Reply
644
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(messmer's Reply)
Another:
BTW, messmer - do not know if Michelle Thorne is your cup of tea or not (I think she's got that old-time-dirty about her) - BUT really like that vid: "Perfect Tease" and the/her audio/talk that goes with it. (the quality for this particular vid is not the best, still.......)
|
12-06-10 10:44am
|
Reply
645
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(messmer's Reply)
Messmer - we got to admit it - times are changing - things are not what it used to be - and la,la,la...
Still I think you hit it right: The photographers/video ditto - I get a feeling some of the newer onces lack that touch of what is erotic and what is just plain simple....
|
12-06-10 09:36am
|
Reply
646
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Denner:
First, messmer - as I took the risk to recommend the site to you - sorry to hear about that very annoying download situations.
Maybe and maybe not it's got something to do with North America/Canada - do not know. But I never had that problem when a member.
Still I'm glad, that in spite you're somewhat content with the material - I got quite a collection of - what I think - fine vids from the site..
BTW: Oh, yes - we all seems to have that question about full nude in the last part of the vids - but here I think the deal is generally just fine - well, at least I really like my collection - HOPE you will too, amigo!!!!
|
12-06-10 09:22am
|
Reply
647
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from lk2fireone:
messmer, if you are into lingerie, there is a site that might interest you.
Art-Lingerie
The models are teen/early 20s. Many of them very attractive/pretty.
I'm not a member, but I have seen a couple of photosets from the site.
The photos are not as good as what you get at met-art or mplstudios.
The poses are very similar/repetitive.
You get a series of photos of a girl who is almost entirely naked except for wearing nylons (and maybe a tiny brief/panties).
The monthly price is not bad: $19.95/month.
You don't get strip-tease or any kind of tease. Just a bunch of photos of a single girl who is wearing nylons.
If nylons (and a garter belt) are your thing, the site might have limited value.
But I thought the quality of the photos was slightly less than what you get at met-art and mplstudios.
And there is too much similarity in the poses. Which is boring.
Only if you really like nylons (and good-looking young women) would you like this site.
But I am glad you found a site you thoroughly enjoy, even if you could not give it the magic score of 100. :)
|
12-05-10 10:15pm
|
Reply
648
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from mbaya:
I am glad to hear that the site has improved. I thought it had potential.
|
12-05-10 09:46pm
|
Reply
649
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from PnP Media:
Hi!
As owner of this site and the linked in bonus sites, just wanted to make a couple comments.
I. These sites are are hosted in the US, with one of the most respected adult hosts, and very high spec server. Downloads should not be an issue. I will bring this up with my hosting company, but their tests usually show very good results, so I'm frustated as this reviwer was with the reported download speed he suffered.
2. All the three main sites, are nylon/lingerie/heels fetish first of all, and then split into seperate sub niches. Unless you are into nylons, lingerie and 'dressing up' to 'dress down', ie: strip, you will miss the point of my sites. Full nudity, is absolutely NOT the point, and most sets end with masturbation with the model in nylons and heels.
Vintageflash updates every 5 days, the others weekly, all updates on these are a full video and matching image set. 16 nylon fetish sets added a month...plus the Vintageflash archive mini updates, overall around 26 updates/month in total.
3.Dialog is a key to the videos, it's a fantasy site, you have to like a story line, albeit maybe cliched, our members really like this.
4. If members have a problem, (like download speed), I respond via the sites ticket system as promptly as possible, and help and inform them as required.
5.The search is yes, truly awful, I agree. On the sites next rebuild early 2011, it will be 100& what is needed.
Have your say, thats what I want, and we all help things improve where needed..but full nudity? Check the site name.
|
12-05-10 07:37pm
|
Reply
650
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(messmer's Reply)
I'm easy going when it comes to language because I'd rather hear a Foreign language spoken than nothing at all so the Russian wasn't a problem. There is a lot of content but it's so hard to get and time consumming that it's almost not worth bothering. Once you add the awful navigation then you have a mess of a network.
There's so much work involve in fixing what's wrong with the network that I don't think they'll be able to do it and that's of course if they feel they should. All I hope with this review is that no one else waste their money on this network.
|
12-05-10 07:17pm
|
