| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from The Captain:
(messmer's Reply)
Here are their real birthdays from my db (I just subtracted 2011 from their bday without looking at the date of production, so I could be off 1 year)
Tacori Blu - 38
Jena Jackson - 40
Alexander Silk - 48
Tara Holiday - 44
Ariana Carmine - 36
Josie - 41
Mindy - 33
Cascade - 51
Average age for 8 models is 41 years.
We dont make the models look older or younger, we don't use makeup artists because they try to make them look like pornstars, we ask the women to do their makeup like they are going to a formal night out.
I took a real hard look at August updates. Tacori Blu in her one thumb she looks low 30s so I can see that but to be honest I am just not seeing what you saying. I think the small size of the thumbnails do not show off what the full size looks like because of the crop. I would really like to hear if you have the same opinion after seeing the full size images of these sets.
Jena Jackson looks spot on to me. Look at her face!
Cascade, there is no way she looks under 45, she looks closer to 55 then 50.
I don't know, maybe I am not a good judge of age.
|
08-11-11 10:25pm
|
Reply
427
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from The Captain:
Can you tell me a few girls as examples so I can see what you are talking about?
|
08-10-11 08:12pm
|
Reply
428
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(messmer's Reply)
I resent that messmer! ;-) I'll go toe to toe with any pervert here!
But... my love of BDSM and stuff like that is usually over-ruled by my love of petite young lasses doing nasty things for my viewing pleasure. So 21Sextury it is.
The $9.95 rate after three months is pretty tempting. I maintained a Videobox membership for more than three years because it was so inexpensive. That might be the case once I join 21Sextury too.
|
08-09-11 03:39am
|
Reply
429
|
21 Sextreme
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review. Based on reviews here I've been thinking of finally taking the plunge. I must be the last PU to never have had a membership to either 21Sextury or 21Sextreme. The biggest reason I've had for that was the price structure. Can you confirm that for the membership fee you got access to the full network without having to wait for two months? Thanks!
I suspect that when I do take the plunge it'll be on 21Sextury. I have nothing against most fetish stuff, I just think the more mainstream stuff on the main network will be a better place for me to start.
|
08-08-11 05:13pm
|
Reply
430
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from Divinx:
Navigation is perhaps my main complaint for most (almost all) sites.
Usually, the free tour has good photos and video samples; members' area only some ridiculous thumbnails.
If the tour itself has no video samples, they are making a big mistake. Many of us shall not pay the cake without previously tasting it somehow.
But in this particular case, if you know the network, you already know the kind of russian teen videos to expect. In practice, you can hardly differentiate between the sites. Same girls, same production.
|
08-08-11 05:06am
|
Reply
431
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from graymane:
Well, Pardner, you sold me.
I can't begin to sing enough praises to a site that's finally provided you with a complete and satisfactory offering.... being so powerful as to seize front and center from your " love of older women and fine lingerie."
A score of 100????? Boy! I gotta go for this one!
Webmaster ought to take you and family out to dinner, cuz this'll produce a windfall they'll unlikely forget.
I just opted for a three month sub. to Figure girl. The price is right and the content might also be right down your alley.
You might want to catch some recent reviews on this site.
|
08-07-11 11:31pm
|
Reply
432
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(messmer's Reply)
No worries, I didn't even realize I had asked a question! :-)
I sort of knew the answer anyway as I think Alex had mentioned on ALS' blog that they wouldn't allow members to actually choose the models. I think we've also discussed it here in the reviews or in the forum somewhere that ALS doesn't do this, and basically no site lets its members make hiring decisions.
The only "voting" that goes on is in e-mail correspondence, and possibly sites like this as well, where a model is popular enough to come back for a second shoot. Of course, in ALS' case they can all come back!
|
08-07-11 07:10pm
|
Reply
433
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks messmer! As I said to elephant, while I can understand that some people would have no interest in the photo shoot videos, they work for me. I can't really say why, but they do. I downloaded more of those than masturbation scenes.
And thanks for supporting the high score. Based on the scoring criteria here, I think it is justified and I hope that anyone reading the review will see why I scored it so high. They may not agree, but as long as they see where I'm coming from.
|
08-07-11 01:14pm
|
Reply
434
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
No idea, I'm afraid.
Last time I looked it was mostly gyno & toyplay.
Cap'n. :0(
|
08-07-11 01:02pm
|
Reply
435
|
Daily Sex Dose
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Sandstone:
(messmer's Reply)
Hello Guys,
I'm happy to announce that Old-Young Lesbian Love will start again soon. It will be updated twice per month (on every even weeks), alongside with Grandpas Fuck Teens, which is updated every odd weeks.
Lusty Grandmas remain on the same schedule with its weekly update.
So altogether there will be two mature updates per week, ergo eight mature updates per month.
The first fresh material will arrive on 18th August according to our current plans, and will start with Grandpas Fuck Teens. Please keep in mind that the date is not carved into stone, please handle it according to that.
As for the Daily Sex Dose, we have suspended the updates for now. We will decide about its fate in the future.
Happy surfing,
Sandstone
|
08-03-11 05:55am
|
Reply
436
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(messmer's Reply)
No, you're getting MUCH more than that. I click on Latest Updates, Upskirts and Panties and I see 12 NEW Galleries. The Movie Gallery dated 8/01/11 shows 7 NEW vids. This past Sunday's Coeds With Toys Gallery shows 12 NEW Galleries, etc. It's kind of amazing how much this site updates. There isn't another site that I'm aware of that gives this quantity of updates.
|
08-02-11 08:49pm
|
Reply
437
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(messmer's Reply)
We're not alone - thanks for that fine reply/input - or rather those fine words, ol' friend....I agree and never doubt your taste....
|
08-01-11 10:09am
|
Reply
438
|
Frank's TGirl World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from GCode:
(messmer's Reply)
Yes you did! I have to admit my favorite models come from Thailand and Japan when it comes to TS models. The aggressor thing u speak of is called a 'top' in the gay or TS world. It basically means they only give sex and do not receive. I find that most Thai models tend to be 'bottoms' (receive sex) but American and South American seem to have more tops. I mean this when it comes to TS and a male having sex. I'm not really a huge fan of any hardcore TS porn involving a Transsexual and a male. No way if the TS is giving it to the male and even if the TS is receiving from the male. I've just never really liked it. I'm really just in to the solo stuff..I guess you could say I'm the same way as it feels different for me...I don't want to say 'wrong' cause that's the wrong word (no pun intended). I just can't think of a term to describe the feeling. I've always considered TS material as a fetish for me, I really cannot see myself in real life going through with a sexual encounter with one and I still find myself attracted to females and their figures. I guess you could say my favorite TS models are 'ultra-feminine' looking ones, so I guess that plays a part of my heterosexuality. I still cannot explain it though when it goes 'downstairs though'...It's too difficult to explain!
Anyways, if you are still interested in delving in to some TS material, I can try to sway u in a direction..I know it may have just been a brief moment interest but I am definitely surprised you enjoyed any material in this realm :O It's cool though, like you say, us humans can really surprise anyone and themselves when it comes to things they are attracted to sexually... :)
|
07-30-11 11:45pm
|
Reply
439
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from otoh:
(messmer's Reply)
Many thanks, sir messmer, for the direction :) Much appreciated - still undecided but one or other will reach the top of my list soon!
|
07-30-11 12:25am
|
Reply
440
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from FetishPack:
(messmer's Reply)
I am not attacking collectors, I am saying your review was focused on whether a collector or mass downloader would be satisfied. That represents a small fraction of users and you didn't give the rest of the groups of users such as the ones I mentioned a fair view of the site from their prespective. A fair review should target all the market groups not a small fraction of the market. I join sites too and if I see videos I like I too download them to have on my computer for later viewing. Being able to download 1 or two videos simultaneously seems sufficient.
To answer to tangub no I don't want to charge $50 for one DVD. Like I said the network offers 4,576 videos (747 hours) and a total of 252,409 photos and 72 DVDs each month all for $29.95 so that statement of yours is not accurate.
Also I am not pro streaming and anti download. All the videos are offered in both streaming and in download where I have a license to allow download. I am just against allowing my sites to be ripped fully in one day. If that was a huge issue for you again if you had emailed me I would have allowed it for you. It's a simple setting that can be changed in a few seconds. But that's what really bothered me that you made remarks and assumptions not only about my sites but about me as well without bothering to contact me first instead you publicly posted a review that calls my entire network of sites a rip off. They are not a rip off.
As to how the companies you mention manage that I don't know. I am not a big porn company, we are just two guys doing our best to offer our members a good set of sites for their viewing and still stay profitable.
|
07-29-11 10:29pm
|
Reply
441
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Glad to hear, especially since I recommended them to you as a good site. I agree - it's chock full of fun stuff and a unique site besides.
|
07-29-11 08:11pm
|
Reply
442
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from tangub:
(messmer's Reply)
I find it amazing how porn producers and site owners are always pleading poverty these days. I think they would all prefer to send us back to the pre internet days when they could fleece us for $50 for a single movie on dvd or vhs.
|
07-29-11 02:45pm
|
Reply
443
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from FetishPack:
They still offer streaming at 56kb, 250kb and 512kb and the reason is the majority of users, this is all they can stream at a rate that will allow them to view something instead of waiting for buffering every other second. Once again do some research and get a clue of where the majority of users stand. They are not all as fortunate as you.
Furthermore if you had taken the time to read the members menu, which you claim is overcrowded you would have seen that there are 4 full DVD, BBW movies offered each month available in their entirety for the whole month. Then at the end of each month they are changed with 4 new ones, also available in their entirety. This is true for many of the sites on the network. There's a total of 72 full DVD films each month, all available in their entirity for the entire month. But you didn't even notice cause your concentration was on how to massively leech everything instead of noticing that the members page is overcrowded because of how much we have to offer to our viewers. We don't offer 2 links like some other sites, 1 that says pictures and 1 that says videos. We offer so much more and if you had taken then time to click the links in the members page you would have seen the massive amounts of content we offer for $29.95. Granted you can't download the 72 DVDs each month which ofcourse would make a person like you unhappy but that's the producer's decision. Some produces don't wish their hard work downloaded and kept on collectors or illegally distributing persons computers and they are right. Another thing you are clueless about is that a big chunk of subscribers are married or happen to login the sites from work computers. They by no means wish to download anything. They are very happy to see it, get their kicks off and leave no trace of it on their computer so streaming is the way they like things. Again not everyone is a site leecher like yourself.
Also what you say about content that there's not much of it. If you had clicked on the all videos link you would have seen that there's a total of 4,576 videos (747 hours) and a total of 252,409 photos and this doesn't include the streaming videos theaters, the 72 full DVDs each month and about 5,000 stories just to mention a few other items you didn't see due to your obsession with finding a way to mass download everything instead of enjoying the sites like a normal person.
I have requested the removal of this review from this site's owners as it is mostly inaccurate, targets site leechers which are a small percentage of users, and the review is rude and offensive.
|
07-29-11 04:30am
|
Reply
444
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from FetishPack:
Now onto the issue of updates are DVDs that are broken down into segments. Consider this. To purchase a license that permits posting the content on a paysite each DVD license is about $250. So if you want me to put the entire DVD up in one update then at a minimum 4 updates a month that is $1,000 just in license fees and you paid $29.95. Tell me how I will make $1,000 for the license fees and how will I pay the massive bandwidth bill that leechers like you will leave me with? And that's 3rd party content. Do you have any clue how much it costs to have good video produced exclusive for 1 site? Try $10 a minute minimum. To satisfy a person like you I would need 320 minutes of video in one month to make 4 updates of 60 minutes each so that I provide you with full DVD updates each time. At the rate of $10 a minute, 320 minutes will cost me $3,200 per month. Again you paid $29.95. Who is getting ripped off here? Also it's not as if those are the only videos you get. There are another 145 videos in place for that site. By the time you view those, the entire DVD that has been broken down to scenes will also be there. Unless once again, all you do is view porn day in day out, all day. Once again do a little research and find out how paysites work and how much they cost before you write reviews.
Now let's look at what you say about no HiDef. That is also wrong and irrelevant. First the download version of the videos is 640x480 encoded at 1250 b/s. That's considered hidef. It may not be the highest quality HD but it is HD. Look up HD, there are many dimensions of it and this is true with flat screen TVs too. You can buy a whole range of different pixel capabilities TV sets but they are all classified as HD. Further more just because you have a fast internet connection and a hidef computer monitor it doesn't mean that everyone does. Look up some statistics. The majority of the world is still on modem dialup connections. Even in the USA there are large areas, rural and not so rural that DSL isn't even offered. Also at other locations where fast internet is offered there are alot of people who can't afford it, especially in this economy. Did you know in Australia most ISPs charge but the MB downloaded and it's not unlimited? And that's a developed country with standards similar to the USA in most economic respects. You are fortunate enough to have all this but the majority of people don't and are satisfied with less quality video that they can download or stream and see. They can't possibly download or stream the quality that makes you happy. As a business owner of sites that are accessible world wide my job is to satisfy the majority of viewers. And they seem to be happy and you with the fast connection can still download hidef videos from my site and still stream at very descent speeds, even though you don't appreciate them. Look at sites like aebn who is the major provider of streaming content to pay per view users.
|
07-29-11 04:29am
|
Reply
445
|
Lingerie BBW
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from FetishPack:
Well wow, who made you a reviewer?
Your review is wrong, inaccurate, rude and offensive in so many ways I wouldn't know where to begin with but I will try lol.
Consider this a response to the majority of your reviews not just mine. Also consider learning about the business of running adult paysites before you even write another review. If I were you I would retire from writing reviews for a long time. You have alot of studying to do first.
First off I am the webmaster and coowner of the site(s) in question and I have taken the time to read alot of your reviews and the time to respond to your posting. This is proof that not only I would have responded if you emailed me with your complaints or refund request but I would have taken care of it immediately. I have been running my sites sine 1999, and one of the things I learned is that I cannot satisfy everyone and there have been refund requests ofcourse and I have honored all of them. The rate of refunds on average over the past 12 years for all my sites combined is 0.74%. That's right, below 1%, better than most can say imo.
Now that we have cleared your lie about how I wouldn't respond to your email or refund you lets go on with some other severely wrong issues that occupy your brain.
In most of your reviews you are concerned with whether you can download massive amounts of content quickly such as downloading all pictures in zip files, and mass downloading of many videos simultaneously. This is not the behavior of the majority of people who subscribe to paysites. This is the mentality of a leecher and porn collector. And most certainly not the mentality of a pay site reviewer. Why on earth do you want to download everything we offer so quickly and so massively? The only explanation is you are a site leecher who wants to download everything within a day or two, add it to your collection and cancel your membership. FYI most users don't behave in such a way. They join and wish to view the videos one at a time just like watching TV. Do you sit in front of your TV and wish you could download all the programs from all the channels for the entire month? For what purpose? To collect them and have them? Unless you wish to jerk off every minute of your awake hours every day there's not any conceivable reason for which you wish to download everything so fast and to be able to download so many videos at once. BTW you are incorrect in another thing you say. The site allows 2 simultaneous downloads and still you can navigate the site. Once again it's beyond me why you want to download 3 or 5 or 10 videos at the same time, lol. Furthermore consider that you paid $29.95. Have you any clue what kind of bandwidth bill I will get if everyone was like you wanting to download everything immediately and then cancel? Do a little research on bandwidth costs first before you even start to think about demanding the massive downloads you describe in all your reviews.
|
07-29-11 04:28am
|
Reply
446
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from williamj:
Top reviewer must have been impressed. Great review I agree its a good site if the niche is your thing. But when I saw 100 I and saw it was messmer I had to read it.
|
07-28-11 03:08pm
|
Reply
447
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from otoh:
I share everyone's previous impressed-ness with your score of 100 here, messmer :) Another site which I've been tempted by but not yet joined... although I see you've given the possibly comparable Girls Out West a high score, a while back. It possibly seems a little raunchier? I may be tempted to try it before AW.
|
07-28-11 07:32am
|
Reply
448
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Capn:
(messmer's Reply)
Perhaps it is an issue they addressed a while back then.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-27-11 09:39am
|
Reply
449
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Capn:
Have they got their lighting issues sorted?
They always used to have photosets with excessive contrast shadows.
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-27-11 09:28am
|
Reply
450
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Jay G:
From messmer a 100 really means something! I'm impressed.
|
07-27-11 05:28am
|
