| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from Collins:
I've only once successfully downloaded a video this way, every other time it stops part way through with a download error.
|
08-12-24 05:34pm
|
Reply
277
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from Jeffrey99:
I agree with almost all that you said, when asked on limits on forum webmaster said "all sites have download limits", which we know is a lie. But even at that 10 on a VR sites is ridiculous.
I will admit I haven't really had any problem with their navigation. Even though no favorites is a stupid thing.
|
01-18-20 05:46am
|
Reply
278
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from tangub:
Download limits suck especially when sites don't declare them before you signed up. Last Sunday I signed up to a site as a result of an email promo offering a Black Friday/Cyber Monday half price deal and within 10 minutes of logging in I had hit a download limit after downloading only 11 photo zips despite the sign up page advertising "unrestricted downloads".
|
12-06-19 07:04am
|
Reply
279
|
Waitress POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Yeah, I hear you... I've also joined some sites just to get one or two scenes I really wanted.
|
07-29-20 11:18am
|
Reply
280
|
Waitress POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Good to know! I agree with you that no one is monitoring downloads 24/7. If you've hit a limit then there has to be an automatic one.
It'll probably be at least a month before I'm able to join. I'm in the process of closing a sale on my house and moving so I don't want porn memberships recurring during that time.
I know I haven't been active here but I have been lurking. I've reached a point where I cycle through the same sites over and over (probably at least 25-30 of them) so it doesn't make sense for me to write reviews of sites I've already reviewed if nothing has changed.
But I am still around!
|
07-28-20 12:32pm
|
Reply
281
|
Waitress POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from rearadmiral:
I get why you scored this site/network low but based partly on your review I think I'll rejoin soon. Waitress POV seems like a site I'll like and it wasn't part of the Fetish Network back when I last joined.
I appreciate the warning on the download limit. I don't recall a limit being in place last time so that may be new. I normally download 1080p scenes so I won't face the same frustrations as you with 4K and hitting the limit after two or three files. I'm generally okay with reasonably limits but I also think that what's reasonable changes as resolutions go up and so do file sizes.
|
07-28-20 03:54am
|
Reply
282
|
Waitress POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from LKLK:
I'm being nit-picky.
So please excuse the objection, if you want to.
You write "This network was a complete ripoff."
I think you meant to write the "site" was a complete ripoff.
Because you gave the network (Team Skeet) a score of 95, and previously wrote that Team Skeet is one of your favorite networks.
But it's obvious that this part of the Team Skeet network is poor.
And has lots of problems that need to be fixed.
Which are useful objections.
Broken links, non-exclusive content, download limits that are troubling for 4K users, cancellation problems.
So a score of 60 is fair.
And the review serves a worthwhile purpose in pointing out the site problems.
|
07-28-20 03:07am
|
Reply
283
|
Wankz VR
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from lk2fireone:
"Freakin huge file sizes(average is around 7-9 gb), some in excess of 19gb"
I'm not into VR.
Don't have the equipment for it.
But even if I did have the VR equipment, you would also need a fast net connection.
And loads of disk space to store the files.
So, a huge investment, that requires lots of money.
But the review is excellent, for pointing out details for VR fans and not-fans.
|
04-21-19 09:54am
|
Reply
284
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Sir, thanks for checking up on me
My health hasn't been very good lately, so I have been spending a lot less time at the PU site. Getting old, I guess. I'm close to 80.
But a pretty girl is still able to make my heart beat faster.
LOL.
Take care of yourself.
You don't appreciate how important good health is, until it starts to go away.
But I hope I have a few good years left for me, to enjoy the world of porn.
|
05-08-24 06:03pm
|
Reply
285
|
Web Young
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
As I wrote in my review, I think Web Young is a good site.
But the owners/manager of the Adult Time network need to make it clear on their individual websites whether you are getting the Adult Time network for free with a membership.
Because I would feel cheated, or at least disappointed, if I joined one of their network sites, and did not get free access to the Adult Time network.
But I'm glad you got Adult Time for free with your Web Young membership.
There is a huge amount of sites and content to explore with Adult Time.
And you should be able to find a lot of content that you enjoy, if you take the time to explore what is available.
|
05-09-19 04:47pm
|
Reply
286
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
If you look at the Beata Undine page at Indexxx.com (a free database of porn stars), you will find that Beata has been featured in a large number of porn sites.
https://www.indexxx.com/m/beata-undine
If you want to find additional material for her, it should be very easy.
The indexxx.com page shows the sites she has be featured at, as well as the number of appearances at each site.
|
03-16-20 03:02pm
|
Reply
287
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Diamond status refers to the old system of membership, where there were different levels of membership.
If you had diamond status, you had access to the three sites:
All Fine Girls
Wow Girls
Wow Porn
Under the current system, you are automatically given access to those three sites, if you join any one of the sites.
As far as I know, there is no natashashy.com archive.
The All Fine Girls site was created by using the 18 Only Girls site, plus a small amount of content from some other sites. Most of the content from the other sites was dropped, and the site names were dropped/ended as well.
That happened several years ago.
As far as I know, there are no archive sites in the 3 sites I mentioned.
However, there are non-member sites that hold some photosets and videos from the 3 sites, that might hold some other content that was dropped.
You can also find some of the 3 sites' content on tube sites.
|
03-15-20 12:22pm
|
Reply
288
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from Dguru:
So true, i have found few contents to be found in flyflv.om, with no original sources...
Desperatelylooking for beataporn, skinnysupergirls, other archive files, any idra where i can find them??
|
02-11-20 08:01pm
|
Reply
289
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I AGREE THAT SOME OF THE OLDER, DELETED CONTENT WAS INTERESTING.
I ASSUME THEY DELETED IT TO SAVE MONEY, AND TO MAKE THE CURRENT SITE MORE FOCUSED ON HIGHER QUALITY CONTENT.
I DOUBT THEY WILL OPEN AN ARCHIVE SITE, OR AN ARCHIVE SECTION.
MAYBE YOU CAN SEND AN EMAIL ABOUT THIS ISSUE TO THE WEBMASTER, AND SEE IF YOU GET A RESPONSE?
|
02-26-17 08:51pm
|
Reply
290
|
X Virtual
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from skippy:
Thanks for the review! I've never seen this site but from the previews it looks pretty specialized. As I'm sure you know "monster sex" is an odd but growing niche in the animation world so I guess it was only a matter of time before somebody adapted it into this format. There a few other very good cosplay VR sites and one or two pretty good BDSM VR sites, but I have to say this is the first time I've ever seen VR fuck-an-alien porn. Um. Eww. It is also probably worth mentioning that although this is VR, it is not all POV. Anyway, thanks for letting us know about this site!
|
01-20-19 09:42am
|
Reply
291
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
X-Art was around for a very long time. It used to be strictly softcore glamcore. Then it was taken over by new management, and they started introducing hardcore, but still with an emphasis on glamcore and on lovely young models.
The colette site was started much later, with many of the same models from X-Art, but with the same glamcore-hardcore style.
There were evidently some questionable practices by the owners/managers of the X-Art site, by suing people for downloading X-Art content. I didn't follow the details on what was happening with that. I thought that X-Art, for many years, was one of the best glamcore sites on the internet, whether it was softcore or hardcore, because of how lovely the models were, and how they were photographed so exquisitely.
A shame the site ran into problems.
The backlog of photos (and videos) should be worth something, but it will probably go into internet dust.
|
09-29-23 11:14am
|
Reply
292
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Often it's the artistic image the person creating the content wants the final video to look like, crispness, lighting, etc. Bandwidth is also actually quite an expense for sites to provide. And personally, I don't like sites that give only the options of either crappy SD or super-ultra-large-file-size-HD that has only very marginal at best improvement over HD videos half the filesize.
I'd rather have 20 good quality 720p videos saved off from a site than have just 3 super-mega-high-quality HD videos taking up the same hard drive space.
|
01-31-16 11:53am
|
Reply
293
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from badandy400:
What you are seeing is the difference between a 12,000 kbit video vs a 8,500 kbit video.
Xart 610 MB for 9:42 at 1920x1088 (yes 1088)
Brazzers 3,220 MB for 36:36 at 1920x1080
In watching a very samples of each I can tell that Brazzers has some better looking videos in regards to sharpness. Xart does not look like SD, or what I would call low definition at this point.
|
01-17-16 05:58pm
|
Reply
294
|
Yes Girlz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from benmar51:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Hi Wraith - Just tried D/L'ing a scene, and was able to (with IDM d/l manager) Too bad it is not good enough to keep, LOL.
|
01-18-24 05:08pm
|
Reply
295
|
Zenra.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from exotics4me:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
I am guessing the broken infrastructure of the site stops even a review counter being added. The one way one can still see the experience is click on "browse users". It lists the users in order of amount of reviews. I would wonder if they could maybe put a star system beside our names that would be a way to show the reviewer's experience. I have been running forums for 17 years and can say once the software is becoming hard to work with it's very difficult to find workarounds. The main forum I have right now has been reset and started over 4 times this year just because of buggy software. Most of the forum software being used today was programmed 15+ years ago. It would be like trying to run a new high-end computer on Windows 95. The funny thing is I have almost no formal training in programming and neither did Khan, the original administrator here at PU. We used to joke around about being "trial and error" programmers. We would try something, look at the result, if it didn't look right we would remove what we programmed in and try something else until it worked. The downside of that is you rarely remembered what you did to make it work!
|
09-02-20 11:10pm
|
Reply
296
|
Zenra.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from marcdc1:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
1st off great review. I’m seriously considering joining even though this is totally not my normal perfected content. To me this is the perfect example of what makes PU so good. The brazzers, wickeds, kinks, and gamma sites are always gonna break through and be noticed. I would have NEVER even seen this site, let alone thought of joining it if it wasn’t for your review (and hard earned reputation). Bravo sir!
I made this a reply to Wrath because I think you raise an excellent point (that maybe should be suggested in the forums?). I see why the staff eliminated the point system (I disagree with it, but I understand it). Having a “sites reviewed” tally noted with your review would be an important bit of context.
|
08-11-20 06:18pm
|
