| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Clit1000:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Seems the site is dealing with tricks to ripp off their users!
|
05-22-24 10:45pm
|
Reply
27
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Sir, thanks for checking up on me
My health hasn't been very good lately, so I have been spending a lot less time at the PU site. Getting old, I guess. I'm close to 80.
But a pretty girl is still able to make my heart beat faster.
LOL.
Take care of yourself.
You don't appreciate how important good health is, until it starts to go away.
But I hope I have a few good years left for me, to enjoy the world of porn.
|
05-08-24 06:03pm
|
Reply
28
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Delta 9:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Year long signups might give you downloads. I won't bother to go back to the site to verify that. It's not the end of the world but I just find stuff like this a bit annoying. With so much of their content available from the tons of online porn forums, I think it's foolish of them to shut someone out who's willing to pay for it.
|
05-02-24 12:29am
|
Reply
29
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Delta 9:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Then explain to me why the last time I signed up here you could download with a single month signup. It wasn't all that long ago, maybe 2 years.
|
05-01-24 04:27am
|
Reply
30
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from WeedLordVegeta:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
I doubt it really slows down the piracy all that much, and it ends up just feeling like a penalty to legit paying users. If they really want to have a download limit, I guess my preference would be for it to at least be spelled out in black and white (like Vixen's 25 downloads per week) rather than being a soft limit where you can't really predict when it's going to start throttling your downloads or how long it will be before you can try again.
|
04-28-24 03:23pm
|
Reply
31
|
Strap Lezz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
The PU internal email system has been broken for years.
I know for a fact that many of the emails I've sent through the PU internal email system were never delivered.
In a normal email system, if an email you sent is not delivered, you get an automatic message stating your email was not delivered.
But not for the PU internal email system.
So, unless the intended recipient responds in some way, letting you know he/she never got the email, you don't know if they ever got it.
PU needs to hire an expert to continually work on the site update it to keep it working.
But I don't think they have the money to fix the problems.
I was told years ago that the coding for the PU site was written in an old software language that not many coders use any more.
So that's part of the problem. The PU system is breaking down, and that's why all members are now listed as newbies, with 0 reviews to their name, because the software program that kept track of the number of reviews a member had accepted stopped working. Or why you can't review a site in less than a year, even though the rules say that you can review a site in 6 months after your previous review of the site.
But at least the site is still here, even though many of the fine members we used to have have vanished.
T
|
04-01-24 12:19am
|
Reply
32
|
Strap Lezz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Wraith, good to hear from you, buddy.
Seems like interest in the PU site is slowly going down, older members finding better things to do.
I think the spandex, latex, and pantyhose is just to add to the element of sophistication of the costumes. Or you can think of it as a fetish thing. Personally, I'm not into fetish spandex, latex or pantyhose, but I do think it adds slightly to the overall vibe or sophistication the site is trying to inject.
Not a big thing, in my opinion, just adding a bit of fluff to the mixture.
I'm new to the site, but plan to go over the videos and photosets when I have the time.
Many of the girls are from the Metart stable of models. But I appreciate the clear, crisp images, the vibrant colors of the sets, and the lovely models. Who seem to be putting on a great show, one that is more believable than most of the hardcore lez action at other sites, especially the teen-themed lez sites where the plots are basically silly.
At this site they appear to be trying to show the attraction between two or more models that turns into a hot, seductive scene.
But it's early days for me at this site. Maybe I will lose interest quickly, which I hope not. Because from my brief introduction, this site seems like a keeper, for me.
I do remember the old PU days fondly, where there was a real community spirit, with members constantly jumping in with new, fresh reviews, comments, ideas. But maybe that's partly because of the glamour that time presses on our memories: "Remember the old days, when things were better." But if you look closely, the better things are what's taking place today. We just don't realize it until much later.
|
03-31-24 12:54pm
|
Reply
33
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from inthecrack:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Thanks for the feedback....
"My only gripe is they photoshopped EVERY SINGLE PICTURE of Holly Hendrix, covered her tattoos. If it was that much of an issue then why even book her??!!"
Because it is near impossible to find models without tattoos any more. If we eliminate all girls with tattoos we further reduce the already small pool of talent to choose from. Consider that we already narrow the model selection to girls with a passport, that want to travel, that have a cooperative agent and that meet our required standards. By survey results most customers prefer girls without tattoos and it is at least something that we can somewhat adjust so we do what we can to cater to that.
|
02-16-24 04:33pm
|
Reply
34
|
Hustler Mega Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from redsfan3233:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
I complained to Epoch about the site not honoring the terms and conditions. Epoch replied that they set the account so it would not renew. Not good enough. I've asked Epoch for a full refund before I contact my credit card's issuer.
|
02-03-24 06:29am
|
Reply
35
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Loki:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
I will try that. Thanks for the heads-up.
|
01-27-24 03:09pm
|
Reply
36
|
Yes Girlz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from benmar51:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Hi Wraith - Just tried D/L'ing a scene, and was able to (with IDM d/l manager) Too bad it is not good enough to keep, LOL.
|
01-18-24 05:08pm
|
Reply
37
|
Blacked Raw
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Thanks I joined in the end and it says now its every 7 days
|
01-11-24 02:24am
|
Reply
38
|
Barely Legal
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from LKLK:
"May the flea's of a thousand dogs infest their crotch.............."
Outstanding quote.
May I use it in the future?
Sorry to hear about your experience.
But posting it to the PU site gives us fellow PU members a warning.
Hope you are doing well otherwise.
Best regards,
LKLK
|
12-14-23 10:44pm
|
Reply
39
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Delta 9:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Thank you. 10 minutes for one file is forever when you're used to a minute or two. Time to fill up some hard drive.
|
12-01-23 07:34am
|
Reply
40
|
Nympho
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Thanks for the info. You might want to mention it to Rabbit and the crew at TBP seeing as they are still linking to the sites.
|
10-08-23 11:02am
|
Reply
41
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
X-Art was around for a very long time. It used to be strictly softcore glamcore. Then it was taken over by new management, and they started introducing hardcore, but still with an emphasis on glamcore and on lovely young models.
The colette site was started much later, with many of the same models from X-Art, but with the same glamcore-hardcore style.
There were evidently some questionable practices by the owners/managers of the X-Art site, by suing people for downloading X-Art content. I didn't follow the details on what was happening with that. I thought that X-Art, for many years, was one of the best glamcore sites on the internet, whether it was softcore or hardcore, because of how lovely the models were, and how they were photographed so exquisitely.
A shame the site ran into problems.
The backlog of photos (and videos) should be worth something, but it will probably go into internet dust.
|
09-29-23 11:14am
|
Reply
42
|
Nympho
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
I'm sorry to hear about that but ultimately this is less about you making a mistake and more with the owner having a year long membership available in the first place. Especially when they aren't updating with new content or so rarely doing it that it doesn't justify offering any long term memberships. In fact I would argue that offering year long membership to any of Mike's site at this moment is illegal or should be.
P.S: Glad to talk to you as well.
|
09-18-23 03:39am
|
Reply
43
|
Nympho
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from pat362:
Not a member but as far as I can tell Mike more or less stopped creating content for all his sites (it includes this one) and concentrates on OF if anything at all. There was a mention on a different forum that his most recent site dirty auditions is using content that was taken from his OF account. Can't confirm but it's the only site that still dates it's content. I don't know that I would invest any money even if he were to add the odd video ( unless you really want those) because until I hear otherwise. I assume that he is retired from shooting content for his sites.
|
09-16-23 09:56pm
|
Reply
44
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from redcham:
Not a member, thought about joining, but it's streaming only.
To download a video you have to buy it for like 3-6 bucks on top of your membership fee.
If they offered video and .ZIP photosets downloads, I would join their annual plan for $100 a year when they run those sale specials.
|
09-01-23 12:52am
|
Reply
45
|
I Fucked Her Finally
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Sir, was there some reason your reviews were deleted and you only got 1 entry in yesterday's raffle?
I was surprised, and thought you deserved credit for 2 reviews.
I see that your reviews are now re-posted with today's date.
But those reviews were originally posted around June 20, and should have been eligible for yesterday's raffle.
Call me finicky about small details.
LOL.
|
07-13-23 05:22pm
|
Reply
46
|
Anal 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment from Wraith0711:
Network started out strong but petered out. Lucky to get ONE new video a week, 99% of the updates are outside studios with the mane being Lethal Hardcore.
|
06-29-23 05:44am
|
Reply
47
|
Porn Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from LKLK:
Sir, good to see you posting new reviews.
My guess is that the porn industry took a large financial hit during the Covid epidemic, and it will take years before they fully recover.
And before that, the porn industry took a huge hit during the 2008 financial crisis, when many porn sites closed.
So new or fresh updates are few and far between, for most porn sites.
If you look at the softcore sites in the Metart network, at least some of the sites are recycling old content from years ago, with models who retired years ago.
A shame. But you could also blame the tube sites for making the porn industry taking further financial hits.
Grin and bear it, as far as I can tell.
Wishing you well.
|
06-20-23 11:42am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Congrats to all the winners, including Wraith0711, for his second raffle win (I think, not sure if he won any other times).
Makes for a brighter day today. LOL.
|
06-15-23 11:23am
|
Reply
49
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from PinkPanther:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Yeah, as I said, I found 2 of the videos, 1 of which is clearly abusive, the other one it's ridiculous what the guy is talking about. I have no idea what was in the other videos since I haven't seen them and I don't trust the judgement of the guy who posted them given his mis-characterization of the Marilyn Sugar video.
|
06-06-23 06:23pm
|
Reply
50
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Took me a while to find the post you evidently were referring to about the 500 videos - Here it is here:
https://www.lustfeed.com/rocco-siffredi/ I only found a clip of 2 of the videos that this guy refers to. One of them - with Marilyn Sugar - he describes as Rocco changing the scene on her in the middle. I hear some language about that - it sounds to me that it was language they agreed on ahead of time since she's not acting in the least upset or put out or anything. The other one is an early Rocco scene that's as close to rape as anything I've ever seen in porn. I only started watching Rocco in his post- Fashionista days, haven't seen him do any such things in any of the scenes that I've watched. It's a really nasty scene, nothing good about it. One of my all-time favorite scenes, one with Rocco, Janice Griffith and Alexis Tae, is among the removed scenes. I haven't watched every second of that scene, which was about 1 hour long, but I didn't see anything abusive in it. I've chatted with Janice about that scene. She didn't mention anything abusive in that scene and she's pretty vocal about such things. And I've never seen Alexis Tae post anything negative about that scene, as she has about other scenes she's done elsewhere.
I've also got to question a guy who throws around lines like
"
@Adulttimecom
&
@EvilAngelVideo
have been monetising these abusive videos for decades."
How many years has Adult Time existed? It's like 4 or 5, I believe How can a website that has been in existence for 4 or 5 years have been monetising abusive videos for decades? I'm not sure how much longer than 10 years EvilAngel.com has existed.
|
06-05-23 08:25pm
|
