Hi rearadmiral, we do share the same taste in lots of sites, its certainly a very stand out site for what he does, its not without its flaws but so is all sites. As a whole its got lots going for it when you look at its history, some absolute knockout girls. Yeah I don't see any option of discounted price for WUNF just something about being member for months - OR - if you have bought enough credits with a table of reward rank, the lowest rank is steel with 3 months being a member of WCX. Its all a bit complicated when I'm sure he'd have miles more joins if it was simple one price one site another price all three and ditch the credit and reward idea.
I think the reason why Pierre mentioned the gangbang is because he thought the girl was interested in doing that. He tends to stay away from the more insane girls.
great piece of work, RA.... thumbs up.
A Little late but I jumped on this one because I've long had a fascination for this balding, portly and anything but sexually appealing Lothario.
It slightly bothers me that he (an not me) tirelessly continues to bring in to his den-of-iniquity an endless parade of some of the finest young beauties that parade the net.
The interview and breaking down any resistance of these tender nu biles simply stirs the juices even more. Once he gets them in bed, his sexual moves are rather routine. But he's good at it, an has developed a very popular show thats doing quite well.
If I weren't getting ample clips from a site to which I'm a permanent member -- one that draws content from uploads from others, I might've went for Woodmen .... but now having learned it's gonna tag me for near $40 ...... well, might've been but now isn't.
Thanks for good read, rear-guy. Keep those fine reviews a'rollin'.
Nice review and I've often considered joining but put off by the price and navigation. If you got the WUNF site as a bonus site I maybe would join for the $40 but its too expensive for me at the moment. Also not into the one man camera angles, one of my pet hate is cameras not changing position and focusing in and out proper.
Anyway its interesting to read the review and get a lowdown.
I don't know if you are aware but Pierre has a forum where he is an active participant. His English is not the greatest but I've never had any problems understanding what he meant to write.
I checked out what was written in the forum on Leylou. There is a lot of back and forth between him and the different poster and the most recent info is that she is a sex slave to a bunch of lesbians and that he will never work for her.
Excellent review. I agree about the camerawork being one of the negatives. It's a shame about it being a one man show, as this material would be vastly improved with people behind the camera, and having better lighting and angles.
Another excellent review full of pertinent information. I don't know if you noticed but Pierre has been adding scenes of his WUNF to this site. Now I don't know if this is because he wants to increase the traffic to this site and/or improve interest in wake up n fuck. I hope it's that because one of my fears is that he is slowly starting to run out of new stuff and is using the WUNF stuff as filler. I really hope that I'm wrong because it will be a sad day when Pierre stops making porn. His movies made Private the company that it once was.
Hi, Yeah update, I think its just certain movies that have this slow glitch thing, certainly not all which is a relief, some times I come across a slow 720 and it would take 40 mins to download then try the 1080 and it would take 2 mins, so seems quite random, 90% though are fast and support say they are trying to fix it.
Thank you rearadmiral! WowNetwork and DieselAccess are two different entitles indeed, though both of them run by us. WOW is completely different brand.
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I agree that the Diesel Access network and the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites are solid offerings.
It would be nice if they added the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites to the Diesel Access network, to lower the membership fees. Because as far as I can see, Wow Girls and Wow Porn would fit in easily.
The problem is that it's a marketing decision, and obviously, if you market the sites individually, you will probably make more money.
But at least the Diesel Access network, and the two Wow sites, are updating with good quality content. And some of the models are truly lovely.
By the way, tangub posted a comment that he received an email offer yesterday to join Wow Girls and Wow Porn together for $9.99. You might check your email boxes to see if you got the same offer.
I checked mine, but didn't see that offer. So I cancelled my subscription to Wow Girls (and Wow Porn), and will wait for a similar offer before rejoining.
Thanks RA. It certainly is odd. I have queried Diesel's customer support answer and referred them to this thread too.
I agree about PU not getting referrals but perhaps they need to renegotiate their rates. After all, the billers' sites are publicly available, all above board, and the direct prices are often the cheapest by a mile.
If the PU discount price for the network were to include wowgirls, it would be good value but not otherwise. Too much of wowgirls content would sit just as happily in the sites that are in the network.
I really struggle to understand the diesel network. There is some good stuff in it, some original, some from a content provider but it is all jumbled up between the sites with absolutely no logic.
Well, following your comment here and your reply in joekramer08's review of 18onlygirls, I thought I would give dieselaccess another try, specially as it "includes wowgirls"???? I know there's lots of hardcore there but there seems to be some softcore too which has no obvious reason to be there instead of 18onlygirls or younglegalporn except to make us pay another membership. So including it in the network would be good. If only!
On the signup page for wowgirls, there is no mention of including dieselaccess and no box you can tick to include it and it is $29.97 for wowgirls alone.
So I signed up to dieselaccess from ccbill instead (much cheaper from ccbill's own site). wowgirls is not in it. I tried the dieselaccess login in wowgirls just in case it would work but it does not.
So I opened a support ticket and got this reply:
"...thank you for your email! WowGirls.Com is not part of DieselAccess network. It is a separate site and has separate membership plans....Best Regards,
[name removed]
Customer Support
"
So what is going on here? First not included, then briefly included and now not included again?
Once more, I feel rather let down by this network.
Yes very informative review and great to see someones review of this exciting new site. I'm a total fan of their other site so think I'm gonna enjoy this one, would love to of seen it as part of the network, maybe for $34.99 and included all sites. Still its very up my street with the models included so I'm going to like it I think.
Another huge Gloria fan too, she is something else, very catwalk model like which I love, the kind of stunner you see and go oh wow she is unique and beautiful, often the really cute models have a very unique look and Gloria is one of them and her bod is perfection to say the least, has to have one of the hottest pussies too that she seem to love to be playing with, love to see her in more girl/girl material.
Only other 2 models that are in her league that I brand ultra models (they have to of had their own solo site) are Nata (who was around a while back now but had this real endearing quality to her and stood out as a nude model) and the other one Kat from lay the Kat, she was so myseterious and I just loved her, she had a real beauty sparkle about her. There is not many that are ultra models around but its great when I find a new one. Gloria ticks all the boxes for me.
Gloria (as Kylie) has been a favourite of mine since I first saw her on MET about two and a half years ago. I still think her best photo sets are on what used to be MET Models, now called Erotic Beauty but I also love her photos on Averotica. Diesel seems to be the only source of extensive video of her. I think she is just about perfect too. I love that body type, but, above all, I adore her face and expressions.
The easiest way to turn off java and flash is to use Firefox and download a very useful addon from the addons.mozilla.org site. The addon is called PrefBar. It is simpler and easier to use than the much more comprehensive NoScript addon. When you have installed PrefBar, you get a PB icon in the toolbar (next to home and refresh etc). PB has check toggles for java, javascript, flash, animation and a few other things. Turning on and off is as easy as clicking them. I haven't checked if you already use Firefox but no porn user should be using IE!
Thank you for replying so thoroughly to my comment and question. A careful review deserves careful reading :-) The review was very useful to me. And it is interesting how a well written and very favourable review can give me the information I need to conclude that a site is not to my taste.
I think your answer to my question should not get anyone's back up. It helps to make clear who might enjoy the site and who might not. It would seem that the site is not for me but the review and your supplementary answer make it clear that it does very well indeed in its own niche and that those who enjoy that niche would be very satisfied. I had hoped this could be another site with Gloria material that pleases me but I feared this was unlikely. Your answer confirms my fears.
I am also a multiple tab man. On some sites, java that executes on pages can slow things down a lot in multiple tabs and if the site will work with java (not javascript) turned off, this can sometimes speed things up. I usually turn off both java and flash unless there is some significant feature that needs either of those.
Excellent review which makes it clear from what standpoint it is written too. Very balanced and comprehensive and a great job done.
I wonder if the 317 pages of updates in the preview are in fact the preview for Diesel Network + WOW Girls combined. That would clearly be a mistake. I agree they should include some more samples in the preview as it gives not a lot of indication as to what is in the site.
On the matter of exclusivity, I regard content as exclusive if those particular photos or videos are unique to the site. It does not matter that the models are not exclusive. Many models appear on multiple sites but any site can have exclusive content of a non-exclusive model. I could easily go through their model directory and identify the models I have seen on other sites and probably list their alias names too. But it would still be true that this site's content is exclusive provided the photos and videos on this site do not appear elsewhere.
You mention the big thumbnails. When I was a member of the Diesel Network, there was a slider on the thumbnail page. You could use it to reduce the thumbnail size to a more manageable one that loaded much faster. Perhaps WOW Girls could have a similar feature.
If you are still with me, I have a question. If you were to remove from this site all the videos, all the gg, bg, peeing, toys, masturbation, behind-the-scenes, photos shot as part of a video shoot, and any content duplicated from sites in the Diesel Network, how much would remain?
I ask because I do like their girls but I am not interested in any of the type of content I mention in that list. My question does not in any way detract from your great review or from your score.
Nice review rearadmiral, sounds like a place to keep an eye on. I just wish these guys gave a more in depth preview, as I am curious how much overlap there is - not that I don't trust deiselman, I'd just like to see for myself.
It is sort of troublesome that they show on the scenes preview page 317 pages of scenes (which one could extrapalote to over 7000 scenes given the number shown). Perhaps just an error.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
