| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1176
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from BoyWithaProblem:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Hi rearadmiral - yes rather odd to be threatened with legal action for telling the truth. Not sure that case would have got very far!
No, I correctly read you as liking petite models, and that's no problem. I wish I could too, as it's the way so many young girls want to be anyway. I just wish there were more sites capitalising on fuller figures without going for the outright huge. I'm open to suggestions.
Perhaps one of the better/more realistic I've stumbled accross has been Dirty Director, though I'd point out that it seems to have stopped updating due to the one-man pornstar/cameraman having had an accident, from which I can only hope he recovers and resumes filming.
Whilst perhaps rather too crude/raw for those seeking polished work, and having no shortage of simply huge women, it did also have quite a few fuller figure/girl nextdoor types, never seen before or since on camera, and enjoying what they did.
|
02-28-18 11:53am
|
Reply
1177
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BoyWithaProblem:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Hi rearadmiral - thanks for the positive comments and welcome!
As well as all the valuable information from frequent posters like yourself, I think this forum offers the chance for users to influence the pornsites themselves. This is very valuable. I'm guessing they probably do read what people take the time to write, I know some have replied here.
Otherwise, pornsites have only good or bad subscription figures to give them the broadest of directions on what works or doesn't. Feedback is, after all, the Breakfast of Kings.
I've seen some of your recommendations and sites I think you said you regularly join, so had guessed our tastes differ on model size. Strange, isn't it? The modern trend for slimmer girls, sometimes with almost boyish figures, just leaves me cold. Like I haven't got what I paid for.
Or maybe it's an age thing? Wasn't Marylyn Monroe's hourglass figure just the definition of sex? Has that really gone? The next stop after Slim in the porn world seems to be BBW, often meaning hugely fat, with little in between. It may also be that plump figures are more the 'girl nextdoor' look which we find subliminably attainable.
True MILFs can deliver this, but often even that word is used to cover a 30 year old model with a 20 year old's figure, hardly the point.
Perhaps I will start a thread in its own right sometime about this. As well as all seeking certain figures/features we find appealing, there is so much porn out there already that we all seek something different and more real.
|
02-27-18 11:20am
|
Reply
1178
|
Shy Angela
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I wanted to let you know that they have just posted her B/B/G scene.
It's not bad but there is not anal except for a little finger and you can forget a DP. It's only the photoset. The video will be up in August. I can't be certain but my gut feeling is that this is all the content you are going to get from this girl. At least on this site. She has done some prior stuff for teen mega world and some other sites so at least you can get some scenes with her without having to sign up for her site.
|
07-29-11 08:56am
|
Reply
1179
|
Shy Angela
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I have some good news for you because the anal scene is one of the first updates on the site. The bad news is that it's the only one.
It's a very good anal scene with a couple of different positions involves. I can guarantee you that she wasn't ana anl virgin before that scene because she has a pretty decent gape.
|
07-14-11 11:45am
|
Reply
1180
|
Simply Anal
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from BerndS:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for the welcome... And as to some other preferences, I just replied to mbaya about that.
|
02-19-18 02:57am
|
Reply
1181
|
Simply Anal
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mbaya:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I wrote a review of this site.
|
02-18-18 10:02am
|
Reply
1182
|
Sineplex
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from joekramer08:
yeah, i don't get this site either...i almost seems like the site's videos have DRM attached to them...so even if you can download them, it might not be worth the hassle of DRM. I wish they'd do a review or at least update the site facts on thebestporn.com so we could know what the download situation on this site.
|
03-03-13 09:16am
|
Reply
1183
|
Sinful XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from lk2fireone:
EXCELLENT REVIEW, AS USUAL.
A FEW THINGS I DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE SITE:
-THE PREVIEW PAGES ARE VERY LIMITED. THEY DON'T LIST THE MODELS AT THE SITE.
-THE VIDEOS SEEM TO BE VERY DARK. MAYBE THAT'S AN ARTISTIC CHOICE, BUT I PREFER TO BE ABLE TO SEE THE MODELS CLEARLY, IN FULL DETAIL.
-THERE ARE NO SAMPLE VIDEOS TO PREVIEW THE SITE CONTENTS. SOME SITES DO THIS, MOST DON'T.
I AM PUTTING THIS SITE ON MY TO-DO LIST, TO POSSIBLY JOIN SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE.
|
04-30-17 04:59pm
|
Reply
1184
|
Sinful XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from someyoungguy:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Excellent! Glad to be of service - after all, that's what this site is about. Like I said in the review, it's fairly small - but a membership won't break the bank. Hope it tickles your fancy :)
|
04-05-17 03:31am
|
Reply
1185
|
Sinnistar
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from jberryl69:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
No issues at this time - We'll see when I want to cancel.
|
01-12-13 08:12pm
|
Reply
1186
|
Sinnistar
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from jberryl69:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Well, that would be 137, but please, realize that any content Buck shot is recycled and the rest is just purchased content. If you are looking for genericly shot scenes (which is how I feel about his purchased content - you can get that anywhere) then there is quite a bit, but if you are more interested in Buck's point of view with the camera there is none. Now that last statement is not "fact" but rather a deduction based on when his models dropped out of the business.
|
01-12-13 07:35am
|
Reply
1187
|
Sinnistar
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from jberryl69:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I'm thinking you don't really want me to review this site.
|
01-09-13 07:41pm
|
Reply
1188
|
Sinnistar
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jberryl69:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I'd complain about your dam memory RA, but I'm sure mine is the same or worse. Thanks and I will post a review. It needs one anyway since it's been awhile since one was posted.
|
01-09-13 08:25am
|
Reply
1189
|
Sinnistar
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jberryl69:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I started the New Year thinking about this site again which brought up the following question - when you go looking for stuff, are the models at least linked to their videos? That might be confusing. Example: I want to go look up the scenes that Kaitlyn is in - can I do that or must I scroll through all the scenes to find hers?
|
01-08-13 12:04pm
|
Reply
1190
|
Sinnistar
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jberryl69:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Hey - thanks for the reply.
|
01-04-12 08:09pm
|
Reply
1191
|
Sinnistar
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review from rearadmiral:
An update on my review for anyone interested in particular models. I’ve reviewed the scenes on Sinnistar with known porn chicks and even some unknown to me but listed on IAFD and have a list of some exclusive scenes for anyone who collects specific models.
Keep in mind that if you are interested in any of these, when I say oral, that normally includes throat-fucking. The anal sex can be pretty rough too. Not all models do ATM, but most do.
- Anne Howe (aka Melissa Ashley) – one b/g anal scene, one oral
- Aaliyah Jolie – four scenes, one is only oral, one is a b/g/g (with ATOGM), one is pretty rough b/g oral and anal with her in bondage and one is b/g with an attempt at anal fisting.
- Amber Chase – three scenes, one b/g/g with some bondage and two b/g anal
- Amber Wild – four scenes, two b/g anal and two b/g/g anal (with ATOGM)
- Aurora Snow – one b/g anal scene (appears to be fairly early in her career)
- Jessica Right – oral only
- Liv Wilder – b/g anal (appears to be fairly early in her career)
- Mia Lina – two oral scenes
- Staci Thorn – one b/g anal
There are also some exclusive scenes with models who had very short careers or who at least have little listed at IAFD.
- Julie Ellis – one scene, oral only
- Little Lexis – two b/g anal scenes
- Katie Kross (aka Katie May) – two scenes, one b/g anal, one oral only with bondage
- Sara Sinn – one b/g anal scene
- Sophie Perez (aka Gina Lopez) – one oral scene
- Vanessa Lynn – one oral scene
I hope this information is useful to some of the members here.
|
12-31-11 06:50am
|
Reply
1192
|
Sinnistar
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from bently:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I had no problems. They seemed to have fixed.
|
03-26-11 05:21am
|
Reply
1193
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
If that is the case that strengthens my prejudice against networked sites.
I really don't understand why they have cross-sectional material on one network.
Wouldn't it make more sense to have softcore, midcore & hardcore networks?
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-17-12 03:42pm
|
Reply
1194
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks man, appreciate it. The girl/girl shoots to date are
Super Skinny Girl
Jun 17 Photoset with Jasmin called Secrets Of Bliss
Jul 21 Video the video of the same with Jasmin called Horny Lovers
Aug 11 Photoset with Dream July called Spa Amenities
Sep 19 Video of the same with Dream July called L'art Du Massage Erotique
18 Only Girls
Jul 26 Photoshoot with Jasmin in a bath called Close Acquaintance
Young Legal Porn
Aug 12 Photoset with Jasmin again, called Waves Of Passion (Duplicate of Secrets Of Bliss though)
Oct 5 Video with Dream July same as above though duplicate and called the same L'art Du Massage Erotique
Oct 13 Video with Jasmin in the bath again called Close Acquaintance
So yeah noticed there is sometimes overlaps on the sites. Hope that helps somewhat.
|
12-12-11 02:58am
|
Reply
1195
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from elephant:
Great review and really informative with all the useful info, I too dislike the name super sexy gloria would be better, she really is special and breathtaking to look at, I've never much cared for solo site girls, they have to be super hot, only ones I've liked are Jordan Capri, Lay the Kat and Nata's 2 solo sites she had. This girl kind of is the new Kat seen as that site doesn't update no more. This girl is equally as hot and mysterious, I can't wait to join as previews of her really look good. Thanks again for the review.
|
10-09-11 05:24am
|
Reply
1196
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from tangub:
Agreed Gloria is a super hot model but disappointing to learn that on a new site in 2011 most of the photo sets are only 1000 x 556. I ended up just deleting her YLP sets in that size and only kept 4 of the larger size sets. If all her photos there had been available in the higher resolution i might have been tempted to upgrade my YLP membership to the network access but i'm not sure if i'll bother with that now.
|
10-08-11 03:47pm
|
Reply
1197
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from gaypornolover:
Excellent review - you sound a little in love! I agree about her being called "skinny", that's not a compliment to me. Though I think in today's world some women do see it a compliment! I'd prefer the word "slender" or as you suggest "petite".
I tend not to do one-model sites as I prefer variety, but I have had a bit of a passion for the odd model in my time and I wouldn't probably join their site as part of a network as you suggest.
|
10-08-11 01:52pm
|
Reply
1198
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
(This is part of same reply, but line limits break this reply into 2 parts.)
Most of the site are small, don't update, and are worth very little.
The main sites with value are
18 Only Girls
Young Legal Porn
But the newest site, Skinny Super Girl, is nice and updates.
Beata Porn is also a good site.
You can join a single site, or join the network. Joining the network is usually more expensive.
The first time you join, it's probably better to join the network. That should give you access to the entire network of sites. You will quickly see the small sites that don't update, and have little value, and drop them from your list of sites to revisit.
Do not join through Super Skinny Girl for $29.99. That would only give you access to that one site, and not the network.
Instead, use the PU/TBP link to go to the Young Legal Porn site.
1) That will offer you a sign-up price of $19.99 for that single site.
2) It will also offer you a sign-up price of $29.99 for complete network access, all 14 sites in the network.
In my opinion, it's worth spending the extra $10 for network access. Once you are a member, you can then decide whether you want to stay a second month as a network member, or change to a cheaper membership for a single site, or drop your membership completely and then return some time later if you think there will be enough updates to make it worthwhile.
Some people think the best choice would be to join a single site, either 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn, as those are the two sites with the most value, and it's slightly cheaper to join just a single site.
But I think it's worth the small premium to get network access, at least the first time you join. And slutty and Drooler, on re-joining, went for network access, as I did.
|
09-28-11 01:36pm
|
Reply
1199
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
The network is called Diesel Access, or Diesel Media Online or Diesel Action. Not sure what the correct title is. I've seen the network listed in those three ways.
The network includes 14 sites:
18 Only Girls
Sasha Fucks Dasha
Ivana Fukalot
Vika Nymph
Young Legal Porn
Policeman
The Sperm Lover
Alice Wonder Bang
Beata Porn
Best 18 Girls
Lay The Kat
Natasha Shy
Sasha Blonde
Skinny Super Girl
|
09-28-11 01:35pm
|
Reply
1200
|
Slave Mouth
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from mbaya:
I see 15 scenes online as of today.
Which scene is the best so far?
|
11-19-17 02:31pm
|
