| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from gaypornolover:
Was curious to read a review of yours, and the 99 rating and the site attracted me. You do a good job of justifying the high score in a well-written review. I love humiliation in BDSM and I have looked at this site in the past as I've joined the gay versions of kink.com sites.
Even I found the previews hot so they must be doing something right! The gay version, Bound in Public, is hot but somehow just a little too polished and not quite as daring or sleazy feeling - I guess to be fair they're all filmed in the US and the gay element makes it even riskier.
Great review of a great site.
|
08-01-11 02:14pm
|
Reply
1077
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yes, that's what I really like about this site, that, despite its BDSM theme the obvious willingness of the models to test their limits (or to give in to their natural inclinations) puts them in control, even though they may play (or be) submissives. Kink is far removed from Max Hardcore in that respect.
|
04-23-10 01:43pm
|
Reply
1078
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
All's well, rearadmiral. I got in very quickly just a few minutes ago, and moving around within the site was a breeze, and I can tell you already from having watched one full episode last night that this site indeed deserved your praise. Technically and otherwise the scenes are very well done.
I only have one small personal complaint: I wish they would do away with the initial interview with the model before the action starts, I feel this takes away from the fantasy. The interview upon conclusion is fine because it gives you the assurance that everything shown was consensual.
|
04-23-10 08:53am
|
Reply
1079
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Just a quick inquiry. Do you have any difficulties today getting into and navigate within the site itself? The individual pages seem to take eons to load. Downloads are quite fast and so far I am happy with the quality of the material I've downloaded but logging in and moving within the site are horrible for me while the other sites I subscribe to are moving along at their usual fast speed.
|
04-22-10 06:29pm
|
Reply
1080
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
You've come to the right person, rearadmiral, I can't help but let everyone know what I think! Give me a few days to look things over. :-)
|
04-22-10 02:29pm
|
Reply
1081
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thank you, rearadmiral! I'm about to join a Kink.com site for the first time! :-)
|
04-21-10 06:08pm
|
Reply
1082
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from messmer:
Just took the tour because of your review and because the site looks really promising but noticed that all updates have seven, or six videos listed above the update. Could you please confirm that all videos are downloadable as one complete video rather than in segments? Thanks.
|
04-20-10 06:29pm
|
Reply
1083
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from mbaya:
I was a member a while back when they had a lot less content. I have never rated a site as a 99, but for this one I can see why you would. I agree that is a fair rating for a truly great site.
|
04-06-10 08:48pm
|
Reply
1084
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Ok now that's an awsome response. You nailed all my thought and more .
Thanks for taking time to explain and nope, didnt know anything about Kink,but now I do.
Kudos. PS gave a you a trust rating thats great to see that you know the ins and out of that site very helpful. Also ppl reading thius it will help.
Have a Good One.
Cybertoad
|
10-07-08 11:30pm
|
Reply
1085
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Cybertoad:
Could you provide more details on content ? video quality, download limits stuff like that its along review but didnt help me know what the site was about, I was concerned about the site statement at http://forum.kink.com/message/57495#57495
perhaps being you are member you could shed light on that link and the statements?
Thanks
|
10-07-08 08:40am
|
Reply
1086
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for your prompt response. Even $22 for one scene is ridiculously expensive.
|
10-07-08 08:16am
|
Reply
1087
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from mbaya:
I meant to say buy.
|
10-07-08 06:35am
|
Reply
1088
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from mbaya:
How expensive is it to but individual videos?
|
10-07-08 05:08am
|
Reply
1089
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I did not care for nudeinla. It seemed so cold and sterile. It looked liked posed photoshoots.
|
12-04-10 04:13pm
|
Reply
1090
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I am glad you liked the review. I enjoyed reading yours, but I had to do something different. What good is a review if it rehashes a previous one? I definitely enjoyed the site and wish them well. Maybe at real HD 1920x1080 they will become the site I think they are capable of becoming.
|
12-03-10 07:51pm
|
Reply
1091
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Denner:
Very fine review, rearadmiral - and great to get a fresh review of a niche that to this user has become more and more positive/attractive...
A lot/some easteuro sites alike are still among the best - but this review gave me appetite to go browsing here - and now with some fine/important infos.....
|
11-25-10 06:15am
|
Reply
1092
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from RustyJ:
Very good and comprehensive review. Thank you!
|
11-25-10 02:02am
|
Reply
1093
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from mbaya:
It has been over two years since I was a member. What quality are the best videos? I see you said not up to current standards.
|
11-24-10 11:10pm
|
Reply
1094
|
Punish Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from marvin:
Hey :)
Wanted to drop a quick Thank You for reviewing our site.
We will look into the 1280x720 option and see what changes we can make.
There are about 25 episodes already shot for PT and we will be updating it once a week so hopefully we will have a nice collection for our members shortly.
Your reviews do matter so please keep them coming.
Thank you!
|
03-31-15 02:26pm
|
Reply
1095
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I would like that as well. There can be a lot of heat in a power imbalance situation.
Thanks for the compliments on my review. I know that many PUers are unfamiliar with the CFNM niche and needed an explanation as well as some convincing if they were to ever try this type of porn.
|
12-21-17 01:43pm
|
Reply
1096
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I just clicked on the link from PU to Pure Taboo.
The special price of $14.95 for 2 months is not displayed.
And the one-month price is shown as $14.95, instead of $9.95.
I don't know what happened, because these kinds of specials usually last 2 days or more (over a weekend).
Try to look around with google or whatever, to see if you can find the discounted price.
When I use different links to go the Pure Taboo site, I see one link that leads to
$9.95/month:
https://www.puretaboo.com/en/join
I don't know if that link will work for you, since we're using different computers.
I would guess that if you are good at searches, you would be able to find the $14.95 for 2 months.
But join through Pure Taboo, because that gives you streaming and downloading privileges, to Pretty Dirty (I don't know if you get access to the entire Pretty Dirty site, or limited access to that site-but you do get free downloads at Pretty Dirty with a Pure Taboo membership--while TBP says that if you join Pretty Dirty directy, you have to pay extra for downloads.
It's true the videos and photos are slightly dark, but you should have no problems with viewing the videos and photos. I think they were going for a slightly artistic effect. And I've seen other sites where the scenes were so dark it was hard to see the models. That is not the case here.
|
02-11-18 01:13pm
|
Reply
1097
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
You see the caning or waxing or whatever else is done in the videos as well as the aftermath.
|
06-04-17 10:55am
|
Reply
1098
|
Rage Story
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I notice that rage story is scheduled for review by TBP this week so they will be able to verify this for themselves. I understand why TBP might not change any info they have on their site until they have verified it themselves. I still think that TBP and PU are the 2 best porn review sites on the net. I've seen enough review sites to know the difference.
The good thing about my review is that others will not waste their money on this site.
|
06-20-11 05:53am
|
Reply
1099
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from otoh:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Well well... I knew about the fake gushing, but not about such skulduggery as passing off a dildo as the real thing. Is nothing sacred?
Still, least I'm one step closer to being a man of the world. ;)
|
07-25-11 11:11pm
|
Reply
1100
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Marcus:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I didn't try the trial unfortunately - I'm always a bit cynical towards them so rarely do.
Video quality was not bad. The aspect ratios on a lot of the videos were mucked up and I had to either/both resize manually and set VLC to crop the outside black bars. It's hard to tell sometimes what their actual size is, but they all look fine full screen.
Her blowjobs are excellent they really are. There's about 15 BJ videos on the site, but she's done a lot more that unfortunately aren't on there at the moment :(
|
05-25-13 01:51pm
|
