Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (0)  

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569)

Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 676-700 of 1579 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
676
Visit Gloryhole Secrets

Gloryhole Secrets
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from HardRide:

Good review! I prefer the real thing too and could never understand the purpose of fake gloryholes. The bathroom stall ones are the worst.

When I first found this site I thought it was owned by the same owners of Gloryhole Swallow but then realized it was an attempt to copy the look of that site and there's no connection.

One of the most distracting things about the videos is the camera guy coaching the girls instead of letting them suck cock. I didn't find any advantage to the second camera angle because it's just a view of the top of the girl's head and not really a POV.

I lost interest when I saw all the long shaved cocks. I don't have one of those. Even though I love watching girls swallow cum, this site is just too staged and fake for my liking.

If make performers are going to be used then I can do without the wall. They claim it's because the guys want to remain anonymous but they don't seem to have an issue remaining anonymous in POVWars. I don't get that part. I joined but cancelled the same day.


04-12-15  07:18pm

Reply
677
Visit Gloryhole Swallow

Gloryhole Swallow
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from Salvo:

Spot ON Review -

Out of the 100 plus girls, only about 10 were truly awesome. Most scenes are average with below average girls...

Would not subscribe again.


05-30-15  06:25pm

Reply
678
Visit Gloryhole Swallow

Gloryhole Swallow
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from joekramer08:

Nice review. I joined this site a while ago, but I never got around to putting up a review on here. I agree with your assessment - the realness of the scenes is what makes this site unique - the girls look and feel like real amateur girls - they don't come off as pornstars (though there are 1 or 2 porn girls on here, like Proxy Paige)...but for the most part, the girls on this site appear to be real amateurs, and that is what drew me to the site. A girl on this site named Tiffany was one of my personal favorites - not super attractive, but cute and full figured - she just seemed like a real girl you'd pass on the street who likes to get kinky on the side. You could tell she loved sucking dick and was very sensual with her technique.

Due to the fact that these girls appear to be amateurs, the quality of the scenes can vary depending on the oral skills of the girl...but when you come upon a girl on this site who's really horny and into it, and she has good oral technique, it's super hot - and I'd say there are enough of the hot scenes here to make it worth joining.


03-13-14  08:36am

Reply
679
Visit Granddadz

Granddadz
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Amanda: (rearadmiral's Reply)

No prob! I'll see if we can get a review posted on TBP sooner rather than later. :)

01-13-17  05:32am

Reply
680
Visit Granddadz

Granddadz
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment from Divinx:

At present, join page says "Full downloads and streaming". But I don't know if it's true.

01-12-17  11:16am

Reply
681
Visit Grooby Girls

Grooby Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment from PinkPanther:

Do occasional google searches on discounts for this site and you'll find one before too long.

04-14-19  04:33pm

Reply
682
Visit Group Sex Games

Group Sex Games
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from clubseventeen: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Thanks for clarifying :)

Have a good weekend!!


07-12-18  10:25pm

Reply
683
Visit Group Sex Games

Group Sex Games
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from clubseventeen:

Thank you for the great review. Good to read people enjoy the hard work.

We will keep working on improving things (download speed being one of them).

Best regards
Roald


07-10-18  01:04pm

Reply
684
Visit Group Sex Games

Group Sex Games
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from Kody:

Solid review! This site looks promising.
If the scenes are hours long, then having an update every 2 weeks is pretty good IMO. Especially considering they have to come up with another concept every time.


07-10-18  08:44am

Reply
685
Visit Hailey Young

Hailey Young
(0)
REPLY TO #7 from marcdc1: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Thanks admiral that was very helpful!

08-23-12  09:43am

Reply
686
Visit Hailey Young

Hailey Young
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from marcdc1: (rearadmiral's Reply)

It's too bad there's no anal. I'd have loved to see that!

Do you know of any sites that have her anal scenes?

Thanks


08-23-12  04:59am

Reply
687
Visit Hailey Young

Hailey Young
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from marcdc1: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Hi Admiral,

I went back and looked this morning. I can't find a single anal scene. If there is one they sure didn't advertise it.


08-15-12  07:07am

Reply
688
Visit Happy Naked Teen Girls

Happy Naked Teen Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from graymane:

Ya'know, RA .....After reading your review a second time, I can see more clearly where you're coming from.
I think I might've put too much emphasis on the girl-girl activity you dwelled on ......as well as another similar agonizing turn-off of mine you mentioned that was seemingly sprinkled about...namely Lesbos chewing up more time than I thought I needed to endure.
I guess I might've jumped to conclusions and likely over estimated.

I appreciate thee settin' me straight, 'ol buddy .....the young girls factor is makin' it look better by the minute.


12-06-14  12:38pm

Reply
689
Visit Happy Naked Teen Girls

Happy Naked Teen Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from graymane:

Do love to wrap myself visually around models presenting features depicting "beautiful and youthful attributes" > emphasis on youthful.

Don't you just love those gals sometimes featured here who're well within legal but are blessed with anatomical genes making them look deliciously below the eighteen boundary?
But, my good friend, had I been looking at this site contemplating membership ..... considering your usual well written, wall-to-wall coverage ....you've guided me again from plunging into something I might regret.


12-06-14  03:21am

Reply
690
Visit Hard X

Hard X
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from EverNight:

Thanks for the review

03-31-14  10:42am

Reply
691
Visit Hard X

Hard X
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from Tree Rodent:

Another excellent review. I wasn't aware of this one until I saw your forum post. Question is - will it grow? If they update it looks to be a great site, with professionally shot material, and one that appeals to my taste. Nice find admiral.

03-30-14  05:19pm

Reply
692
Visit Hardcore Doorway

Hardcore Doorway
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from pat362: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Very true for Max but he paid the ultimate price for his choice of content. Him and FA are definetely guilty of scaring away many young women that might have done a lot more porn if they or their agent hadn't foolishly booked them for one of those shoots.

01-05-13  10:48am

Reply
693
Visit Hardcore Doorway

Hardcore Doorway
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from pat362:

Another excellent review. There was a time when all of these sites were attached to FA but I know that they split the sites into two or more networks to make more money. I know that the last I made the mistake of joininf FA that anal recruiters was part of the sites I got access to. not that it was all that good since there weren't that many updates on that site anyway. Since I will never join FA again and by default any site connected with them then it really doesn't matter how good tese sites would be because I won't join them.

I wonder if one of the reasons why there are so few updates is that they have a hard time recruiting new talent to shoot for them. It must laready be hard for them since they aren't located in LA and word of mouth on the treatement the talent is subjected to can't help either.


01-04-13  06:18pm

Reply
694
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

The number of videos was the same before and after the down time. The total size of the videos was 221 Gb beforehand. If it's the same now, then there probably was not any editing.

11-02-14  12:49pm

Reply
695
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Did you see that hardcoregangbang.com is back up now? You should check it out!

11-01-14  06:43pm

Reply
696
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
REPLY TO #10 from Parsnip: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Well I'm afraid the self-justification simply raises a hollow laugh. I only have one experience of this site - when X-Art hired James Deen several members complained because of his violent material, so I downloaded a film to see for myself. I had no idea such repulsive violence existed. In addition to the slapping and spitting which I kind of expected, the girl was beaten repeatedly with a pool cue, swung around by her hair, punched, kicked in the face, they stamped on the back of her neck so hard I'm surprised they didn't break it, and half drowned. She ended up semi conscious. Sure, they chucked a bucket of water over her and she sat there blankly saying how wonderful it was afterwards - again, that's a legal loophole, that's all. Anyone who isn't provoked to a towering rage by such material is beyond me, and the very idea that someone could find it sexually arousing is utterly sickening. This was nothing to do with sex, it was just violence, brutality and hatred.

I guess we just have different views on the ways one human being should treat another.


01-15-14  01:20pm

Reply
697
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from stingerxxx:

Nice one rearadmiral.

I have been a member of Kink for about four years on and off. I liked Bound Gangbangs because of the bondage and that's what made it so special; for me, Hardcore Gangbang is just a gangbang site with a bit of "rough stuff" and rather passe. Many members complained about Bound Gangbangs not having enough bondage in the later scenes, which was due to the bondage-meister who did the actual rope bondage(called shibari) leaving to form his own website and hence Hardcore Gangbang appeared. Also, the earlier scenes of Bound Gangbang had many un-named male performers who were not pornstars, which really was quite different. Now it's all big-name male (and female) pornstars.

The "hard" scenes are usually the takedown in the beginning and, yes, sometimes there is some spitting and rough handling but, quite frankly, it's very unconvincing when many of the times the female is smiling or grinning.

I resubscribed to Hardcore Gangbang a few days ago to catch up on what's new (after being offered a discounted rate) but I find that many of the women aren't that appealing in the newer scenes and the price is way too high for a single site.

Also, try FuckedandBound. I have a current membership and that is bondage with rough sex done supremely well which, in my opinion, makes Hardcore Gangbang look like a Buddhist tea-party.


01-14-14  01:03am

Reply
698
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from Tree Rodent: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Yes the theme takes this one way beyond the normal review and comments. There should probably be a thread on this, but even if there isn't, I applaud you for the work you've already done. I always look out for your opinions, reviews, and well thought out comments. You're one of the top people who make the place what it is.

01-13-14  05:36pm

Reply
699
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from Tree Rodent:

Another truly excellent review admiral, and a thoroughly decent thoughtful reply by graymane.

I am reminded of some posts I received from a bdsm/spanking blogger when I noted how there are a few smug, self righteous, and intolerant people around in that scene. He remarked that they are some of the most small and narrow minded people around considering their pursuits. It appears a small minority have decided that their, and only their limits are acceptable. Anything softer than that, and anyone who disagrees with it is completely small minded, and anyone who is into anything harder is a completely disgusting pervert.

This sort of site makes you ask yourself what is acceptable and what isn't. When it comes to degradation there are some truly degrading and awful jobs around. I knew someone who couldn't stand working in a flour mill for coughing his guts out after a day's work. Any time you buy a cheap pair of shoes, or even expensive ones for that matter given the record of some well known manufacturers, you are undermining your own hard working people, and supporting slave labour.

Many jobs are just awful and make people unhappy. Almost certainly some women get drawn into porn and end up feeling degraded and suicidal. There were some on the softest of sites who were supposed to be traumatised from appearing. Many people have degrading and awful jobs where they are abused.

As a porn lover I'm not going to smugly judge what is acceptable and what isn't because the majority of society thinks all porn lovers are sickos. It's all about your own standards and your own morality. The problem is there are others who are absolutely sure their standards and their morality is righteous, and since some are on a very close personal relationship with god they are sure they are right, because they think what god thinks.

In some places, any porn, even a few bare breasts are considered highly degrading, disgusting, and should be punished very severely indeed. In our civilized world there are still many who consider any porn to be degrading to women and fire men up to be r@pists. Some consider all men to be potential r@pists. All porn can be considered abusive and degrading to women, and any men who like it can be considered to be sick perverts, who want to abuse women, indeed they enjoy the abuse of women, and hate them, even though they pretend otherwise. That is the attitude of many. As a porn lover I'm not going to try and impose my standards on others. People in glass houses.

As a viewer where do I draw my line? It's just personal, but it's where people choose to do a job, although some don't have much of a choice so it's a very fine line. I know by buying porn I am contributing to an industry that doesn't treat many of its employees very respectfully, and undeniably, because of demand, many will get drawn into an industry, where they will end up thoroughly exploited, and lead miserable, wretched, unfulfilled, and unhappy lives.


01-13-14  04:36pm

Reply
700
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from Parsnip:

The material on this site really is the worst of the worst. The little "interviews" are used by Kink to circumvent our already minimal restrictions on violence in porn and protections for the female performers. They are all that prevent the producers and male performers from being where they should be - behind bars. Viewers may rationalise (ie lie) to themselves that the interviews show that Kink are good guys but the reality is that they are taking advantage of the state of the porn business and paying the girls a minimal amount (what was paid 10 years ago for a single easy straight B/G scene) and making them agree to the most appalling abuse in order to scratch a living.

Anyone who isn't utterly repelled by this material really needs to take a long hard look into their soul. Sure, the r@pe part of it may be (just) a fantasy, but the violence, brutality, abuse, and shattering pain which the girls are suffering for your viewing pleasure are unfortunately very, very real.


01-12-14  08:48pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 676-700 of 1579 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.66 seconds.