| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1401
|
Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from The Collector:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Well before you do, i have many reviews that are coming out here in the next week including Nubiles.net. I may be new to PU but not new to the porn hobby. I take a lot of time deciding what sites to spend money on and explore a site fully then judge it. and I'll be giving very detailed and fair reviews so hang tight if its not too late. here is a list of sites i will be reviewing and was a member to in the last 4 months.
Playboy Girls network, Hanna Hilton and the bonus sites, Aziani, Real Peachez, Wild Natalie, Errotica Archives, Twistys, Watch 4 Beauty, Ariel's Blog, Hungarian Honeys, Bree Olson, Fantasy Girl Pass network, Club Kayden and bonus sites, Met Art, and of course Nubiles.net
|
06-16-11 10:20am
|
Reply
1402
|
HD Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Drooler:
Great review!
|
06-14-11 09:05am
|
Reply
1403
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I had initially credited Massage Creep to Brazzers, but caught it last week when I submitted the review. I had been on another Massage site, the one on the Teen Mega World network and thought Massage Creep was way better than it. You do get the feeling that most of their sites are genuinely trying to put a fun plot into their scenes, which is good to see. Kind of reminds me of the late 90s Vivid scenes I loved. The worst part for me on the fake cum/dick sites is the use of great models. Since I download by model, instead of by site, I ended up seeing some of my favorite models on these gallons of cum sites and thought, "what a waste".
Jurassic Cock is a fun one. I get some kind of kick out of watching Ron Jeremy work his charm and the girls seem really into him and the little skinny old guy too. I believe the network has more potential to go up as they start adding more to these better sites. What I didn't understand, on Public Violations, I downloaded a few videos from it that said 27-42 minutes on each one, then they were only 2-3 minutes. Maybe it was another of those download glitches and only downloaded a section of a full scene?
|
06-13-11 07:34pm
|
Reply
1404
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from mbaya:
I agree completely. A great review of a great site that is one of my alltime favorites.
|
06-09-11 08:00pm
|
Reply
1405
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from RustyJ:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
As I already commented elsewhere on this site, 21Sextury.com actually seems to have a 19.95$ offer for both SexAndSubmission and PublicDisgrace which is nice since those two are ones I'm interested in. From there I guess I can evetually hop to the remainging interesting ones.
|
05-29-11 09:52pm
|
Reply
1406
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Jay G:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Reminds me of the old saying, "Why do so many women hate prostitution?"
Answer, "It lowers the price."
|
05-29-11 06:05am
|
Reply
1407
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from RustyJ:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I know what you mean about those past sites. Repeatedly giving me "special offers" that are actually higher prices than the TBP price I paid when subscribing. They should at least check what a person paid before offering supposed bargains :D
|
05-27-11 08:54am
|
Reply
1408
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RustyJ:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for your reply.
Regarding their costs, you must be right. As that Acworth guy actually bought that castle like building in the middle of San Francisco, their expenses must be quite high. From what I've understood, they are throwing all kinds of parties there with Acworth also "acting" in those scenes and members being able to join. I have nothing against that kind of community activity or the people behind it having their share of fun but I just cannot help the feeling that other customers are subsidizing quite a lot of that community action for locals.
Still, I'm a 100% guaranteed future member of their sites. It's not really about money but I'm just bit overwhelmed by other stuff at the moment. Thanks for the tip about joining and waiting for offers ;)
|
05-26-11 09:30am
|
Reply
1409
|
Hogtied
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from RustyJ:
I understand the pricing issue very well. I've read many comment on claims of too high price that the quality is worth it but in my opinion that is very subjective. To me it looks like (based on previews) that much of the content on this site is quite repetitive and shot mainly in dark basement. The fact that it costs three times as much per month as 21Sextury subscription (after you get the loyalty bonus) that has two weekly updated 1080p bondage sites that are very high quality in my opininon makes these sites very expensive in comparison. Of course I have strong preference for European actresses and cannot stand too much dirty talk in English so I am biased.
Still I'm strongly considering some other Kink.com sites as they appear excellent in their own niche. Can you tell me, if I join one, is there a way to skip onto other one for cheaper price from inside and cancel the membership of the previous one? That way one would be able to have almost a network subsription by changing one's subscription.
|
05-26-11 04:46am
|
Reply
1410
|
Bikini Dream
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from Capn:
Sounds like you are having a frustrating time with this one.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-23-11 03:51pm
|
Reply
1411
|
Massage Creep
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I think the main problem with all networked sites, to a greater or lesser extent is the blunderbuss approach.
Fire shots covering all niches & hope that some hit.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-23-11 03:50pm
|
Reply
1412
|
Pamela Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from graymane:
I saw your thread where you got zapped by a virus.
I dearly hope by mentioning a tube-site that I didn't have anything to do with it.
|
05-18-11 05:17pm
|
Reply
1413
|
Pamela Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from graymane:
Just thought it might interest you to know, I found this Pamela Spice on SkinVideo -- a site to which I've maintained a long standing membership.
Assuming this is the same girl (Latina) -- and she appears to have all the features you discribe, braces and all -- some clips at SkinVideo she goes under the name of Pamela Lain.
And she wasn't the least bit shy about doing hardcore.
I'm not a fan of tube-sights, but it's my guess that's where one would find her doing hardcore.... either under the name of Spice or Lain.
|
05-18-11 12:08pm
|
Reply
1414
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I think I'm going to have to stay up late every night from now on, because that special glow of having 100% agreement with my first response opinion is indeed gratifying. Even when I have to flog my brain to come up with an opinion on some of these indelicate polls.
|
05-18-11 06:49am
|
Reply
1415
|
Massage Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from slutty:
Nice review man,
I was also impressed with this network, perhaps more so as I was expecting it to be a BangBros-style crapfest. Still don't get the ridiculous fake penis thing on the one site, and not even sure why they have the real ex-girlfriends site (as they are clearly all pros) - they could probably just throw those scenes in anywhere else, as I doubt anyone is buying it.
|
05-17-11 10:15pm
|
Reply
1416
|
Pamela Spice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I don't think anything was removed since our numbers are the same. Maybe I had one more video, my folder for the site shows 109 videos. The thing is, I had been a member of Pacino's Adventures, his flagship site several times and had never even paid any attention to Pamela's content. For one, Pacino did get a little too cutesy with her in some content with the dress-up/costume, make her look as young as possible outfits. Where I did find a good scene though was with the model Karen. She has several videos with Karen including one that is outdoors, looks like maybe at a hotel, not really for sure, but there is a bridge not too far behind them and they are using a strap-on with each other with as many as 5-6 people, mostly men, standing in one spot staring at them from the bridge.
There also could be a difference if you see the scenes without subtitles, but don't know the language. My wife is Spanish, so I've learned enough Spanish and Portuguese to at least have an idea of what is being said. Some of the scenes with exhibitionism in them may not look like it at first. I seem to discover ones I hadn't noticed each time I watch her videos. The most recent one, a public outdoor shower used to wash salt, chlorine off after swimming and she decides all of her needs the water!
It could also say something for her content since it was readily available for me, but I hadn't downloaded any of it until my 3rd membership at Pacino's Adventures. Pamela's site is a bonus site to it. A few others of note, there is one in the backseat of a car. While not directly out in the public, it is a small car, looks like maybe a Dodge Neon or Toyota Corolla and several times they pull up beside the tour buses which are very high. I think a big part of me liking her content is the playfulness she has. Her legs are mostly closed while they're sitting beside the bus and she says something about "if you see me close my legs it's because people are looking at me". You can see in the background, a very tall bus filled with people, but the playfulness there. Right as she says it, she opens her legs even more and touches herself. The taxi scene adds to the exhibitionism, not for sure how believable it is, but with a little imagination it is really good. Those are a few that wouldn't stand out as exhibitionism unless you watch through them.
I'm actually originally from the LA area and lived there for 30 years, but still hadn't joined that site just because it's LA and honestly, seeing women half naked, naked, flashing in LA isn't that out of the norm. And didn't mean for any of that previous one to be negative. I just wondered if maybe some of Pamela's content had slipped by like it had by me and still does.
|
05-17-11 12:18pm
|
Reply
1417
|
Pamela Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from exotics4me:
I was surprised to see the word exhibitionism-lite. I actually looked back to see my review of a public/exhibitionist site, Public Flash, from back 4 years ago. Then noticed your much newer review of it. To me, Pamela does as much as the models I saw on Public Flash. I'm not an overly-critical person of any genre except exhibitionism. To me, this site's exhibitionism is as believable as any I've seen and includes ass, pussy, boobs. More and more sites these days are selling themselves as public/exhibitionism, but take Money Talks on Reality Kings as example, they actually show their guys paying restaurant owners to let them film in the restaurant after closing hours. Which kills any believability for me. One of the things I look for in exhibitionism videos is frustration. And you see that a lot in Pamela's scenes. Maybe I'm just reading the "lite" part wrong, but I would take that as not showing everything.
|
05-16-11 11:31pm
|
Reply
1418
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from MisterMark:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Actually, most of the reviews are from memory. I usually do the same, back the stuff up and then have access later. I will try a new site this week, just not sure which one right now.
|
05-16-11 06:13pm
|
Reply
1419
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from MisterMark:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
It's hard to find honest reviews these days and this place seems to have earned credibility. I have at least 6-8 more reviews coming and look forward to hearing about sites I may want to join. Hopefully, I can earn more trust.
|
05-16-11 02:17pm
|
Reply
1420
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from MisterMark:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for the welcome!
|
05-16-11 10:18am
|
Reply
1421
|
Pamela Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from graymane:
Well written review, admirial. One can see it was done with meticulous thought, and certainly with empthsis on detail.
I'm with you, I like girls who (certainly of legal age) who look forbiddingly young.
I too had a subscription to Little April's site, but although she had a great body and legs, she wasn't convincing enough to wet my appitite.
This one looks good, but I'm turned off completely with girl-girl action. She'd have to be good at pleasuring herself.....and me, of course.
|
05-15-11 06:12pm
|
Reply
1422
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Denner:
Certainly this is a niche.....and not any niche.
rearadmiral does a fine service to interested PUs: take your ti9me and read that bottom line...thumbs up!
|
05-15-11 10:33am
|
Reply
1423
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Drooler:
Nice writing! I especially enjoyed the commentary about the role of the experienced "geezers."
Kudos to a review of high standards!
|
05-15-11 03:19am
|
Reply
1424
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from RustyJ:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
In porn categorizing anything is possible though. B/G/G is not usually considered bisexual while a single male is enough to label content as gay.
|
05-14-11 05:05am
|
Reply
1425
|
The Upper Floor
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I've been a big fan of Kink.com since they first started and have belonged to most of their sites. When you belong to one of their sites and are browsing other Kink sites, if you go to the "join" of the second site they often (but not always) offer a $19.95/mo special deal.
I belong to "Everything Butt" and was checking out the other sites when I found an offer for $19.95 for the upper floor. I couldn't resist the "deal" so that's why I joined a site that had seemed too expensive for a long time.
I'm positive I'll be joining Bound Gangbangs soon since just looking at its previews turns me on. I'm a dominant bi-sexual and have to admit dominating a willing woman with a few male friends turns me on.
|
05-12-11 04:17am
|
