I tried it out, but not getting the offer. The only options I got besides the standard join is to join for long-term. The worst part, I never can get my card approved through their billing system so it ends up sending me to ccbill. Maybe I'll send them an email and ask what's going on with both problems. I wouldn't have ever complained about it if Angels updated more frequently. I still really like their content, but my subscriptions have dropped off since I usually prefer Angels. At one time, maybe 2007, I was joining both about every 3 months. As of right now, I don't think I've been a member this year of either. Just like Monahan's post below shows.
Yeah I guess I neverreally looked at it like that " a fly on the wall documentary style video of the the models" I guess you do see more personality from them in these vids than normal sex scenes.
Yeah as much as I like high quality vids I do like to not go above 1gb on a movie, that's good quality for me really, I don't watch them on a big tv really only on a 24" monitor. Some of the downloads on the site I'm at now Reality Kings at full 1080p ones are in excess of 2.8 gb, just don't have he hard drive space for vids this size so just downloading the smaller ones.
Yeah about scores, its all about your prefrences isn't it, if your expectations and tastes are catered for then you have to rate high, its a very personal thing scoring.
rearadmiral, terrific review, as always. I'm giving serious thought to taking the plunge on a 3 month membership to ALS Scans, especially after reading your review of ALS Scans today. The site has been on the top of my bucket list for a long time; one reason is because it had good preview stuff on Andie Valentino. (She's not in the model list right now, which means I should jump in before others disappear.
I'm tiring of the suck, fuck and jerk stuff and want to return to my real interest, looking at superbly attractive models in professionally produced videos while enjoying themselves.
One question. Can you tell from the site if ALS Angels is still available at the $9.95 add-on price and if that deal is permanent with longer term memberships?
Very good review RearAdmiral. I've been a big fan of both ALS sites for a good while. The main thing I'm going to comment on is the ALS Angels site being available for $9.95 with ALS Scan. This originally was the only major problem I had with the ALS sites.
The difference between the two. ALS Angels are models, ALS' webmaster Alex felt were "too curvy" for ALS Scan. If he has made Angels available for $9.95 to Scan members then I probably wouldn't complain too much, but for years, including up to the last membership I had, Scan was $29.95, Angels was $24.95 no matter whether you joined them both or not and it had me almost saying "scam". Various reasons for it, my favorite Euro model, Eve Angel is on Angels only, she is listed as 5'6" 115. not really for sure on what world a 115 pound woman is "too curvy". I think my most recent reviews of the two scored Angels higher than Scan just because I preferred the models, though Angels only updates 7-10 times a month, compared to Scan's much more frequent updates.
It became such a frustrating point for me that I stopped joining either site. Don't remember how I exactly worded it, either in a review or comment, but at one point, it cost nearly $55 to join both and the only bonus from joining both was receiving all the models all other sites offer for one price. This became more frustrating when I signed up for both sites with the same username/password and sure enough, they were going through the same server. I think I've even posted I would be willing to join both for $39.95 combo price, so it at least shows how much I liked the content. I'll have to make a note to join both if Alex keeps giving a discount to Angels for Scan members.
Super, detailed review, rearadmiral. I do agree with elephant when he writes: "Only thing that doesn't really do it for me is the photoshoot videos, I just can't watch these at all, I find them lacking in that fluid element you get from a normal sex video. I guess though they must have their fans though cause they wouldn't make them otherwise,"
However I loved everything else about this site and your score is eminently fair. They are exceptional in models and quality.
An excellent thorough review as usual rearadmiral. I'm not normally into the wierd insertions, gyno and fisting stuff the models get up to here but as you say the models are so hot and the quality of the photos top notch that i'm prepared to overlook those issues for this site. Not had a membership here for about two and a half years though so maybe time for a revisit soon. A shame if they've removed a lot of the pre 2007 stuff but luckily i grabbed most of that on my last visit.
Nice in depth review man, I do like the look and the models are super hot, I also love their style of lesbian video. Only thing that doesn't really do it for me is the photoshoot videos, I just can't watch these at all, I find them lacking in that fluid element you get from a normal sex video. I guess though they must have their fans though cause they wouldn't make them otherwise.
Still, good thing is they do lots of non photoshoot sex scenes its maybe due a revisit from me as it's been a while since I was last a member here.
RA - Jay has about 268 scenes on the website at this time including his (in)famous Milk Nympho's video. I'm not that much into anal, though there are some aspects that are over the top and a must see (like Alysa turning her colon out to be orally massaged is just the bomb or Logan shooting whipped cream across the room). I don't know about him personally but his visions are demented as are the models.
There are a lot of those videos that are totally uninteresting, such as the she/male ones, but honestly just about any site has it's niches, usually set up as a bonus site (such was the case with Throat Jobs - their bonus sites I never went to) so it's much the same here... just on one site.
As anyone who has followed my threads knows deep throat is my particular niche, with Jonni Darkko & Joey Silvera providing a great selection of performers doing truly deep face fucking throat.
A complaint which should have been listed in the Cons section of my is the mis-labeling of scenes by some of the directors as to performers doing deep throat but clearly not living up to my expectation of what deep throat means (Linda Lovelace is most famous for defining the true meaning).
My first review was of Throated which I gave a 90 to but they really are a bit more spotty in terms of quality performances. Think I'll go see if I can drop that a bit.
LOL, rearadmiral..."technical dimwitted" - dig that one /and still laughing) - and that's some of us are. Look forward to some advise from BadMrFrosty on this one... to the benefit of all here
Was curious to read a review of yours, and the 99 rating and the site attracted me. You do a good job of justifying the high score in a well-written review. I love humiliation in BDSM and I have looked at this site in the past as I've joined the gay versions of kink.com sites.
Even I found the previews hot so they must be doing something right! The gay version, Bound in Public, is hot but somehow just a little too polished and not quite as daring or sleazy feeling - I guess to be fair they're all filmed in the US and the gay element makes it even riskier.
Hey rearadmirsal yeah it shocked me too! I did actually write about that in my review but I ran out of space so I had to edit that part out.
I had no idea when I joined it was streaming-only as I had no idea such sites existed! They didn't pretend to be fair, nothing on the preview says you can download, I just kind of assumed you could! I've since found out there are other streaming-only sites so I'm extra careful now to avoid them.
Like you say I like to have something to show for my money! I guess people who only watch something once and never agsin would say it was like renting a DVD instead of buying one, but I like to keep my favourite scenes. Besides, streaming sites often only seem a little cheaper or not cheaper at all, so it's hard to see the benefit.
Thanks for what you say about the gay community, I didn't find it patronising at all! I wish there were more gay reviews on the site but hey I'm part of the community so if we want something we've got to do it for ourselves, just hope more gay people will join the site - hopefully the more gay reviews the more of them will join and it'll grow like that.
The main themes for the 21sextury sites are mostly teens, anal, DP, and lesbian. There are still plenty of milf's the majority of the girls are under 30 and many are below 22.
It used to be very confusing but I they have finally found a way to make it easier to understand. You have the networks 21sextury and 21 sextreme. Joining either network gives you access to a list of sites only availble through that network. You can preview the content on the other network but that's all. The only decision to make is which has the most content you like. There are a couple of nice sites on 21sextreme but it doesn't compare to the number on 21sextury for the type of porn I like.
The unfortunate part is that I rank DDFProd and 21Sextury as the two top sites and have been a member of both for an extended period.
However, since the day I was dumped by DDFProd, I'm finding even more treasures on 21Sextury.com because I have time to dig in deeper. It's truly an amazing site.
If DDFProd.com restores the $29.95 price, though, I'm back with them for sure.
Honestly, if I were just trying out this stuff I would recommend a Thai ladyboy site such as Shemale.asia (Ladyboy 69) or Ladyboy Ladyboy. Like Messmer said, the asian shemales tend to look more feminine and they are my favorite. This site, Franks, has a nice mix of models so it's a good place to get your toes wet. But, if you are looking for less asian or less of a mix in ethnicity, I would think Shemale Club or Brazilian Transsexuals would be better. Just like sites without shemales, it's all about what u like...solo or hardcore, mix, type of models, yadda yadda...you know the drill :)
If you or anyone is interested in more sites, you or they can always drop me an email...I don't mind :)
I still have quite a few reviews to post and I'm sure I'll post some but I'm getting tired of not having any fun reviews where the score is high because it was that good. All I seem to have these days are lemons. I really like lemonade but I can't help but wish that it was something sweeter.
Yes, I am very selective about what i ultimately will download and save. Her site has some good content but man it's frustarting for a video guy to have to download parts to make a whole scene.
I wanted to let you know that they have just posted her B/B/G scene.
It's not bad but there is not anal except for a little finger and you can forget a DP. It's only the photoset. The video will be up in August. I can't be certain but my gut feeling is that this is all the content you are going to get from this girl. At least on this site. She has done some prior stuff for teen mega world and some other sites so at least you can get some scenes with her without having to sign up for her site.
REPLY TO
#2
from mystery111:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for replying to my review. I'll try and justify my score of 65. I was originally going to give it a 70, however based on PU rating definitions, my rating fits the description which I think suits my criticism; hence this site "Needs Work" and I also give it a "low recommendation." If my buddy had 32$ to spend, I'd tell him to go elsewhere. This site has to many issues.
Furthermore, I believe you misunderstood me; or rather I perhaps didn't explain it properly.. I have no issues with the quality of the camera equipment (as in megapixels). I mean the actual photo-shoot. A picture set which is engaging, with flair, which really showcases the girls. It's the photographers job to take a woman and make her a superstar. I find the photographers here lack this flair.
I didn't download one set, therefore I have nothing to comment about download speed. However, as I browse through the site (just browsing - therefore 1 click at a time, 1 photo at a time, or 1 set of thumbnails at a time), these servers are slow by today's standards. I don't want to wait 10 seconds (you heard right, sometimes it's 10 seconds) for a set of thumbnails to load. Let's not hide it, when you find a nice set you're ready to jack-off too, what a massive disappointment to have to wait for the pics to load. This is basic I would assume.
Befittingly you share the same opinion as me about the site navigation and search engine. "Needs work!" So I don't need to get into this topic.
I will however give credit when credit is due; the girls are gorgeous here. But many porn sites showcase gorgeous natural beauties. So to me, it is not enough to warrant the price considering all the issues. This brings about the issue of value.
So I think it is fitting (in my opinion) that this site "Needs work" and therefore a score in the 60's is accurate given the PU's rating definition.
I do appreciate criticism; I don't take it as negative. As long as people remain objective and non-personal, I'll respect your views opinions.
I agree - the site was always primarily a photosite but half-heartedly did add some videos later. Even then though they kept the photos, so even if you hated videos why would you demand they be removed as long as the photos remained?
To stop doing videos right in the middle of a series is particularly annoying and unfair to paying customers.
The irony is I never thought their photos were that great anyway - clear enough but hardly the big sizes you'd expect from a photo-only site.
All very disappointing. Even if they reversed this decision it puts me off rejoining the site because they seem to think nothing of reversing decisions on a whim, so who says they wouldn't do it again?
So many sites have great content wrecked by this awful attitude to customner service, sadly this is one of them!
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I think you are right that you are better off looking for a different site to join. That's just my opinion. I've seen the Massage Creep videos. Yes, the setup for each Message Creep video is similar, but there is far more variation in the sex at Message Creep than at Try Teens. And the videos are better quality: the lighting and camera-work at Message Creep is really excellent. The lighting and camera-work at Try Teens is good, but not as good as at Message Creep. And there is what appears to be real heat in at least some of the Massage Creep videos. You don't get the same feeling of heat at Try Teens: it's a boy and girl fucking, on camera, it's real, but it's not hot sex. The sex is scripted, most videos closely follow the same script, and it gets almost boring after watching a few of the similar videos. And the noises the stunt cock makes are truly annoying. The noises are meant to show excitement, satisfaction, show the stunt cock is a "real" man giving it to this cute teen, but I found it really annoying.
The videos at Massage Creep provide a much better experience than the videos at Try Teens. There are many attractive girls at Massage Creep, they are presented looking "natural", not glamorized, but they come across as more attractive than the cute girls at Try Teens, who could look really nice but it just doesn't come across at Try Teens.
I'm not saying the Massage Creep videos are great, but I think they are better quality and more effective than the Try Teens videos.
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I believe 100% of the scenes have at least some anal sex in them. The basic plot, as I said, is blow job, vaginal, anal, blowjob with the guy coming on the girl's face or mouth or cheeks. (They follow that script on at least a few of their bonus sites).
Personally, I don't see all that big a difference between vaginal or anal. Maybe for the girl it feels different, but visually, there is little difference in watching the two types of action. Maybe there's a mental kick because of what used to be the "forbidden" element.
Also, with anal, they often pull out, at least briefly, and show the enlarged anus, before putting the penis back inside the anus, before putting the penis into the girl's mouth.
As far as a long period before the site timeout, I haven't really measured it. Sometimes you get good download speeds for videos, sometimes not. My fastest download speed is about 630 KB/s, for my DSL connection. Sometimes I can get that, but sometimes the speed can drop to 20-60 KB/s, which means many hours to download a single video, which can run from 400-800 MB in size. Using DownThemAll download manager does not increase my download speed for this site, in fact, it actually appears to slow down the download speed. Not sure why, this is unusual. And I am talking about downloading a single video, not downloading multiple videos at the same time.
So if you are downloading a video, and then want to download a different one after the first one finished, if the time is over an hour or so, sometimes you have to re-log-in. No big thing, just enter the username, password, and captcha. Or if you saved the username and password, which I recommend, then you just need to enter the captcha.
Each membership comes with a number of bonus sites. To enter any site, you have to enter your username, password, and captcha. Some networks lets you transfer between different bonus sites without having to go through the separate log-in process, but not this one.
There are lot of cute girls at this site, many of which you probably have not seen before. But I find the sex very repetitious, almost boring, and the stunt cocks annoying because of the stupid grunting noises they make. The cute girls are real teens, with firm natural bodies, few tattoos or piercings.
But some PU members apparently don't mind the repetitious sex plot, or the stupid grunting noises of the stunt cocks, and enjoy these sites for the cute girls and the hardcore sex (not rough sex, just bread-and-butter fuck sex).
Boy, can I ramble. Lol.
07-26-1106:37pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
