| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from daveboy:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Hi Bigalaz, just had another one of my blinding observations. If you have stayed long enough to see the same scenes coming back and pissed off enough to complain rather than leave and go to a new site and get all new scenes. You must really love what Paul does. Otherwise you would just move on. Bigalaz loves this site so much he's stayed three months and upset he can't stay longer.
Can't recommend a site higher than that.
|
02-17-08 12:20am
|
Reply
177
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from daveboy:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
The site is not made for 3 day trial members, not with a 3 month rotation plan. So please change that and make it spot on right.
Also I have just thought to myself. How many members stay 4 months on any sites? Are most sites 50 to 100 videos then trying to sell us another site because we stay 6 months or 2 months, on average. Not what you and me do it's what the average is. I know for a fact on lots of sites I stay 1-2 months max. It's only on a very few I stay longer than 3 months. I just get bored with a site and move on to pastures green. LOL
Also members who want to do a 3 day trial and want to download everything in 3 days. What's the point of them putting up sites with 400 videos if we download them on a trial join?
|
02-16-08 11:48pm
|
Reply
178
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from daveboy:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
No you said the site was only worth three days and that is wrong. My response was after over two months I had not seen scenes I had seen before. After two months I had not even seen all the scenes on the site, rotated or not.
Reading Paul's reply, wish more webmasters would get involved here, he points out that the rotation is over three months. So 3 days or 3 months?
He also points out that he's adding new content every week. 400 videos, he's shooting new content all the time and he's rotating content most of us have not seen. Maybe you are right and he should stop rotating the content. so what should he do, put 1000 on the site for the same price or open another site that members have to pay for again? If you want twice as many for the same price then think about all the sites you joined who gave you 40 to 100 videos for $30. Or sites that were filled with scenes shot to a menu, where 1000 scenes were really 100 because they repeated the same thing time after time. The sites that give us members under 100 scenes or repeat the same scene over and over again are so many I'm not going to complain about Paul's site. He's doing a great job and even though some of the scenes I did not like there are many there I love.
There are sites better than Paul's. Sapphic, Alsscan and the DDF sites. But there are 1000s worse. Don't tell people it's only worth three days when it's worth three months and as you said you have belonged. I feel you just want twice as much for the same price.
|
02-15-08 10:10pm
|
Reply
179
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from paulmarkham:
Thanks for replying Bigalaz1, sorry if I mistook what you said. I did get the impression you were saying the site was only worth joining for 3 days and it surprised me. A site with 410 videos adding and rotating 4-5 a day is only worth $3. What do you want for $30?
Yes I went the route of adding and rotating and frankly financially I think for us it was the wrong move. For members I still think it's excellent value. Let me explain why some sites go other routes.
With 900 videos we could of split it into 5 sites of 180 and sent traffic to each one of the sites and from the sites sold memberships to the other 4 sites. This would of made us more money and 180 videos for $30 is not such a bad deal. 16 cents a scene. Yes there are better deals and there are worse. Most sites choose to give members less and sell them to other sites they own.
We chose not to go the exclusive route in the belief that this will lead to a site of 1/10 of the size and if you have seen some of the scenes many members have not. Scenes that you have not seen some other members have seen. Swings and roundabouts.
Do we add new content?
Yes, last year we shot 100 new videos never seen by anyone. They went on the site before anyone else had them. Today I have two editors converting scenes as fast as they can. Should be up to 5 never seen before videos scenes a week. We will add 300 new videos this year.
Yes I got the wrong impression you thought all this was only worth $3. My mistake.
As for your login on the site and my own forum, it's so close to the one you use here it was easy to find. I checked the email you use and came up with the same info. Sorry if I got it wrong.
|
02-15-08 02:36am
|
Reply
180
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from daveboy:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
This is what you said.
"This site is made for the trial member, because if you stay monthly you will just see the same old videos disappear and then reappear as new releases over and over and over. Some of the content is good, but there needs to be more new material and the content rotation must stop."
So you are a member who has been there longer than 3 days, you must like it then.
|
02-14-08 10:54pm
|
Reply
181
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from paulmarkham:
Just out of curiosity I looked up this guys account, very interesting and shows why you need to think about the comments here.
Login: bigalaz1
Created: 2006-01-11
Last login: 2006-02-06
So it seems his comments are based on what he saw 2 years ago.
Thanks for the comments on what people think the site is like today.
|
02-13-08 01:35am
|
Reply
182
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from paulmarkham:
I gave you a lengthy reply on my forum and thanks for posting there. Will just mention a few things here. You are wrong about seeing the same scenes after 30 days, more like after 90 days.
I have gone back to 4 videos and 4 sets a day. Yes some of it is rotated and some of it is new. Because you have seen it does not mean everyone has seen every scene. If I took out the scenes anyone had seen the site would be 50 scenes large. So 410 with 120 updates is 530 videos scenes in a month. You don't get the 120 new ones in 3 days.
530 videos and some seen before, so forget them and imagine it's a site with only 400 videos. That's over 10 a day for a month. We have put a throttle on the site. Some people thought they could sign up and grab all 410 videos for $3. Sorry the other members don't want to pay for this.
More new material would be nice and we shoot all the girls that we find who are suitable.
|
02-11-08 03:44am
|
Reply
183
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from daveboy:
Abbsolute rubbish, I'm a member and the site has hundreds of videos and adds and takes out 5 a day. All of the five I have not seen, only been a member for 2 months. I think by looking at it that some of the content is older stuff but so far I have not seen anything twice on this site. Seen some of the movies on other sites but not a lot. Member of a lot of teen sites. What is good are the Ipod videos that play on my iphone. And the new English movies, I say new as they were shot 15 to 20 years ago and just being put on the net. Don't understand why Bigalaz1 said what he did but he's not being true. Might be another site owner.
|
02-08-08 09:51pm
|
Reply
184
|
Perfect Gonzo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Hey MargulisAZ,
I didn't even realize this network existed until last week. I ended up having to contact Epoch. The network itself kept saying it had refreshed my login, but it never worked. Epoch contacted me back and said they had it refreshed. Sure enough, it worked. I do think Sapphic bought Give Me Pink and Fistflush, I didn't realize I had spam email from Sapphic about adding both of those sites to their monthly membership to Sapphic Erotica.
|
04-17-17 06:47pm
|
Reply
185
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Marcus:
Christ on a bike, that's a woeful policy.
Surely the best way of getting people to return to a site is to keep them engaged, keep them on the site and maintain their excitement. I'd never join a site with such a unrealistic download cap, let alone one that actually LIES on the preview pages like that.
|
07-17-13 11:21pm
|
Reply
186
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
Joke is a major understatement.
Is there any mention of that policy in their terms of service?
|
07-17-13 11:19pm
|
Reply
187
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
I was a subscriber about three years ago, but would never return because of this policy. They will kill themselves (hopefully).
|
07-17-13 11:29am
|
Reply
188
|
Pinky Lounge
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from guhe:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
i agree, one of the best fisting sites in the web...shame.
|
09-13-09 12:25am
|
Reply
189
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Pussyinsider:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
There seems to have been a significant uptick in fisting videos there lately which have proven universally popular among members.
|
11-14-18 04:36am
|
Reply
190
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pjgirls:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
You have some very good points and observations. Could you please contact me directly at: marketing (a) pjgirls.com? I would like to tap your knowledge on the lesbian fisting niche.
|
01-04-17 06:39am
|
Reply
191
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pjgirls:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Nothing to do with us if that's what you're suggesting. We certainly didn't encourage anybody to write - our members don't know about this discussion at all. Also we would never write reviews for our own websites - my colleague doesn't speak English and I'm not a native speaker either so it would be pretty easy to tell.
Strange coincidence... but it's always nice to receive a good review. Even though it recommends us to hire older hair women (which is NOT going to be our direction).
|
07-25-16 05:38am
|
Reply
192
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pjgirls:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Yes, most of the dislikes were at the lesbian scenes. But even if you browse comments in the past month, you can see negative comments (from multiple users, not the same 2-3 people) whenever there's ANYTHING obstructing the view. People claim they want to see the pussy & cervix clearly. They don't want any speculums, dildos, fingers, anything. We even had to explain that fingers are necessary to spread the pussy and fingers of another girl are often needed too because not many girls are able to spread their own pussy wide. People are often "experts" in thinking how things could be theoretically done but the reality is different.
I have to admit I'm still not very comfortable with the tone of your posts, you're basically blaming us for the type of content that we decided to have on OUR website. Sometimes I wonder why people don't launch their own website if things are that simple. I'll be honest with you - it took us two years before we got from red numbers - yes, for two years we had to pay for owning this website. The good old times of highly profitable adult websites are gone and these days we have to deliver perfect content, do some marketing, think very carefully about the content and listen to the feedback of our members to survive on the market. We would never change the type of content if we didn't think think it's a good idea. (Although I agree with you that this is valid mainly for the lesbian scenes - the fisting scenes were so rare that they probably made only little difference for people who didn't like them).
As for a fisting-only site... fisting is quite difficult because it requires more expenses and specific girls to do it. I wonder what the demand is... maybe we could do it but I really can't imagine having daily updates with such an expensive activity. And I'm not sure people would be paying $30 per month if there was just (for example) one video and one gallery weekly. What's your opinion? Are there any fisting communities, discussion forums etc.? I'm not the one who makes decisions but I could discuss this idea with my colleague.
|
07-20-16 12:21am
|
Reply
193
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from pjgirls:
You are totally wrong in your statement that the fisting or lesbian scenes were popular. They were not and the results of the big spring survey have confirmed that.
We've always been a pussy (gaping) site with mostly solo models. It's basically up to our members' wishes what they want to see and (unlike other adult sites) we are always trying to listen to their feedback and deliver what they want. It's our job, right? So we don't care if we publish gaping, fisting, masturbation or lesbian scenes. We just want to please our members and deliver the best possible quality.
About three months ago there was a heated (and neverending) discussion between two selfish groups of members. One selfish group requested lesbian and fisting videos, the other selfish group insisted that a true gaping site must have solo girls only. In the end we agreed on sort of a compromise that there would still be girl-girl scenes but we would limit the lesbian scenes to minimum as clearly a majority of people didn't want them.
You are saying that 2-3 bitchy people destroyed the fun for some others. While I agree with you in this point (everybody should tolerate other members' preferences) I also have to add that also 2-3 other bitchy people kept flooding us with requests for a type of videos that you would like to see - but almost nobody else wanted to see. So it was a situation we couldn't win in. We had to disappoint one of the groups and we decided to disappoint the far smaller group and film videos for the much bigger group of members. We didn't really have any other choice...
Every member seems to think that we have to deliver a type of videos that HE likes. But we are forced to make compromises and we're often blamed even though we just try to please everybody. But that is not possible. You like fisting - why not, I like fisting too. But members of our site don't want to see fisting, they want to see the inside of the pussy without any hands. They want to see the cervix, the pee hole and not any fingers. It may sound stupid to other people but this is their fetish and we have to respect it.
|
07-19-16 06:11am
|
Reply
194
|
Playful Coeds
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review from MargulisAZ:
After taking into consideration the two comments to this review, I have updated it and changed the score as well. I was perhaps a bit harsh originally, and have since rewritten it to be as objective as possible.
|
03-07-08 05:50pm
|
Reply
195
|
Playful Coeds
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
from imagexxx:
I will admit that some of the girls on the site are not top notch models but I bet a ton of you would bang them after a few beers and we are a brand new site that has all original content and we have priced our site to reflect that with a discounted 14.95 recurring instead of the 19.99 or 24.95 else where on the net. And the videos are home videos of these girls after the bar or after we met them and talked them into it and these girls are not paid models like else where. Our girls are REAL amateurs who have volunteered to get dirty on video. A couple of our girls are smoking hot like Traci, Phoebe and Lacey. I guess it all comes down to personal taste and expectations. If you expect Fake boobs and hot models then this is not the site for you. We are a real amateur site that features real midwest college girls who are willing to take facial and do anal gang bangs so these are different girls than on the girls gone wild type sites. We have dedicated ourselves to improving the quality of content and our newer vidoes are a million times better than our older stuff but some of our older stuff was taken on vhs and cell phones. This is not a studio production site. We have girls giving head in the woods and in public and shoot the content with what ever we have on us. We just happen to get the girls to say "playfulcoeds" so it seems really planned but these are just shot by the seat of our pants.
|
02-27-08 07:39am
|
Reply
196
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Wraith0711:
I know your comment is over a year old but I agree with you that they need to stop that crap. They photoshop tattoos out too! All of one of my favorite stars at the moment Holly Hendrix has all her tattoos airbrushed out. Total bullshit!
|
11-09-19 08:51am
|
Reply
197
|
Prolapsequeen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from rearadmiral:
Good catch. I joined a sister site to this, hotkinkyjo, back almost four years ago and was disappointed to see that it was streaming only. What bugged me most was that the site and the terms of service were vague and could have reasonably been interpreted as allowing downloads. I put a comment up here at PU warning prospective members and the webmaster sent a series of pretty nasty emails to me which culminated in his threatening to sue me. I'll be interested to hear if anything like that happens to you. We could be the only two guys here who have been threatened by the Russian mob!
If you're interested in this niche check out Roxy Raye. She has a lot of similar (but slightly less extreme) stuff and her site allows downloads, or at least it did the last time I joined.
(To make this worse, I avoid piracy sites but I've checked and most of the hotkinkyjo material is available there. As a paying customer, all i wanted was to be able to download the material. The webmaster's motive was avoiding piracy but he failed at that and succeeded in losing a customer.)
|
04-18-16 03:33pm
|
Reply
198
|
Prolapsequeen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from pat362:
Although it requires possible customers to read that downloads aren't allowed. In their defense they at least have written in the section prior to the join page. That doesn't mean that some eager beaver isn't going to be sorely disappointed once he or she has paid her 30$ and discovers that their money is only going to be good for one month.
|
04-18-16 03:27pm
|
Reply
199
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from KET924aab:
Marqulis, any guess as to what percent of the most recent stuff looks non-exclusive? I've been a member at both sites, both over 2 years ago. I prefered Sapphic Erotica. There was too much anal at Lez Cuties for my liking--no doubt they were jumping on the anal bandwagon that has worked its way into most porn. I'd rather see the girls making out and licking each others pussies. I liked how most of the girls at both sites really seemed to be into girls and appeared to enjoy making their videos--Sapphic Erotica had the edge with this. Last time I checked the free tour, Sapphic Errotica had a lot of new scenes I wanted to download--that was at least 6 months ago. If a lot of new content is not in the original Sapphic Erotica style that would be a bummer.
|
01-17-13 04:56am
|
Reply
200
|
Sapphic Harem
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Davit:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Thanks man, appreciate that.
As you'll see from what I wrote on my profile, I believe we should have a lot more of these negative reviews where appropriate, as they are just as important as the positive ones. We've all been ripped off, or bitterly disappointed before by substandard content that doesn't live up to the tour, so by writing about our bad experiences we can save others from doing the same!
There are too many review sites out there (not TBP) that consistently give high scores regardless. We need to give some balance to that!
|
03-01-08 01:59pm
|
