| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Melissa Ashley
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from turboshaft:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
If only it were true...but I am afraid not. Her shoot with ALS was back sometime in the fall of last year; I don't remember the exact date, but it was in the fall. Her recent announcement concerning her health is dated April 8th of this year. :(
I only hope that she just hasn't updated her site with some good news since then.
|
07-03-09 10:15pm
|
Reply
152
|
Mouth Target
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Drooler:
Isn't it amazing how bad a site can be? I don't know how many times I've thought, "OK, now I've seen every fuckup possible," but this site sounds like something beyond my experience in the annals of pure incompetence.
Thanks to your comment, it will stay that way (at least as far as this site's concerned).
|
08-12-08 02:33pm
|
Reply
153
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
from TheRizzo:
I really hate sites with a ton of ads. I am more willing to accept them if the membership price was lower than usual, but if paying near full price, I want the bare minimum of upsell ads.
|
11-09-09 09:45pm
|
Reply
154
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from anyonebutme:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
That's not quite true. The top models do a lot to earn the money they take in, it's just not always evident to a viewer exactly why a given tip was sent. Every tip is sent for a reason, and a reason why it went to one person and not another.
But I do agree it's damn difficult for a new girl to start into it.
|
12-22-16 08:46am
|
Reply
155
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from skippy:
I hate to admit it, but I've been lurking around MFC and I know what you mean. There are a handful of girls who are basically naked all the time in the top couple of rows and they get money thrown at them, often without doing much of anything else. The new girls, who probably think in terms of a traditional one-on-one private experience, are at the very bottom of the list and when you peek into their rooms, they are just sitting there.
I also have to wonder if there is some Amazon.com-like marketing model where the models on the top row are paying extra to stay in those slots. That model works great for those top-row girls and for MFC, but not so much for the new models who aren't yet making enough money to buy a higher position. So they quit.
In the end, the psychology of it is very similar to stripping. Some girls try it, some girls enjoy the money for a while, but very few girls have the emotional fortitude or psychological make-up to stick with it and really excel.
OK, I'm headed over to Chaturbate now. :-)
|
12-14-16 10:30pm
|
Reply
156
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from pat362:
I dislike anything to do with camming but have you checked out cam soda? I only ask because I've noticed that a couple of performers have been advertising their cam soda appearances on their twitter feed.
|
12-13-16 05:29pm
|
Reply
157
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from elephant:
For me I find the site really hard to find things and reminds me of a website from the 90s myspace era. I prefer chaturbate for its easier to surf and find stuff. models from porn though tend to be more on MFC so I do occasionally go back there to see if they are live.
|
12-10-16 01:01am
|
Reply
158
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from skippy:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Thanks for the info. I tried POVlive a couple times and that seems like a pretty straightforward buy a chatroom site. Also tried the Met Art live site, metcams. Metcams was a decent site, but they kept telling me my account had been hacked and cutting me off. I think many of these sites are all run by the same parent company/master website, but I can't think of the name.
|
10-23-16 07:23pm
|
Reply
159
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from manholelover:
Obviously, i'm more into the male cams, but Cam4.com is the cam site I keep returning to. Although some models (and they're mainly women) will only do stuff for tips, the vast majority, certainly of men, are amateurs who will perform for free. Anyone who visits this site will see action without having to pay. Of course, for that 1-1 experience, then tipping is recommended.
|
08-06-11 11:39am
|
Reply
160
|
MyFreeCams
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from lk2fireone:
It's been many, many years since I've been to a topless bar. But it seems like it would be cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private cam show.
|
08-05-11 01:10am
|
Reply
161
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment from MargulisAZ:
Thanks for the info everyone. Doesn't really make a lot of sense to me to have so many sites in the network without different types of content. Oh well.
|
09-01-08 11:56am
|
Reply
162
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from elonlybuster:
Hate to be the barer of bad news but this is basically your typical hard core site. There are a few girl-girl-guy vids, but that's as close as you're gonna get in terms of girl on girl action. And also no solo content at all.
|
09-01-08 09:46am
|
Reply
163
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from exotics4me:
MargulisAZ,
I don't know about solo content, I don't think there is any, from what I remember from a few months ago. There is lesbian content though, it is scattered throughout the network. I know there is some on the "My First Sex Teacher" which is a MILF site where the MILF teaches a younger woman about lesbian sex, not the whole site, but there is some. Also, there was at least a few on the Naughty Athletics site that is included, mostly girls in showers together and in locker rooms.
If I were to put an estimation, just based on memory, I would say maybe 15% is lesbian content, if lucky, might be closer to 10%. Still don't remember any solo content though.
|
08-31-08 09:41am
|
Reply
164
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from roseman:
I was a member of Naughty America few months ago.
Content is mostly hardcore, I didn't see any solo scenes, not sure if they own girl / girl scenes as well.
|
08-31-08 05:36am
|
Reply
165
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Nubiles Captain:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
One thing that actually hurt us is that a long time ago members where complaining about the amount of toys being used in photos and in the videos. We asked producers to lesson the amount of toys. But naturally so many girls can get off better with the toys. Not an excuse but it plays some part.
But yes we talked to all producers and already seeing better results.
|
12-21-16 11:14pm
|
Reply
166
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Nubiles Captain:
Thanks for the question. We have a few photographers that we are not going to use anymore because you are right, some of the girls (definitely not all of them) are not getting the best masturbation when they can do so much more. No they are not intentionally doing it, the photographers get lazy sometimes because often these girls will do the least amount of work to get by. But I can promise you we won't be putting up with that.
Thanks
Captain
|
12-14-16 09:25am
|
Reply
167
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from TheRizzo:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
I do agree there seems to be an effort to at least try and level the balance some. The girls are still gorgeous though :)
|
09-11-08 07:37pm
|
Reply
168
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Monahan:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Thanks. Your comments really help. I've been trying to decide whether to switch or to continue to find as much good stuff as I can on FTV before I switch. With FTV I can always skip past the boring stuff, but I totally hate lousy and unprofessional camera work that fucks up a great scene with a gorgeous babe.
I think I'll stay with FTV for another month before I switch.
|
08-30-08 09:00pm
|
Reply
169
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Denner:
What's really annoying is the lack of regular updates - and the fact that it is hidden (conned, not sure what the rigt word in english is) in recycled material - letting the costumer think it's NEW. A bit like 1ByDay's more recent way of doing things...
Those deals seem to be popular among siteowners/webmaster these days.
|
12-07-09 11:13am
|
Reply
170
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Drooler:
I noticed the same thing, and non-exclusive stuff, too.
|
12-07-09 12:05am
|
Reply
171
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
from williamj:
Good review lots of details. I rated it an 87, they would have to get a bit more XXX hardcore for a rating of 90 for me. I thought I paid $29.95 for both Onlycuties and Hanna's Honeypot? I highly recommend all their sister sites too...
|
03-02-08 06:02am
|
Reply
172
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Hey, man...
Did not have the problem with movie/video-downloads that did not finish before entire downloading - but the site/webmaster or whoever suddenly blocked my access to download at all. Never found out why!
Very annoying for any member who recently joined!
But ok - I mailed the site - and got an answer within something like 24 hours - and they set it straight. With an apology - but NO extra time for the missed period of no access - If I'd been a webmaster of such a site, I'b have offered the member something extra - like a few more days or whatever.....
But like Serge A. Storm says in Tim Dorseys novels: "Life is not that fair...."
|
03-01-08 04:35pm
|
Reply
173
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Drooler:
I joined recently for the 3-day trial. I had joined once previously in 2006 for the full price.
What I found was that the content by date, going reverse chronologically, went back no further than Dec. 2007, stopping at page 108 with 20 entries per page.
Yes, this took a while. But I saw content with 2008 dates which I had picked up in 2006. So yes, there is rotation.
Some of the content posted for 2008 is very old. There are photosets of Jana Cova back when she was really not that good looking, and which I've seen plenty of times before. The jpegs seem as though they've been used so much that they've lost a considerable amount of data. Really, they look like hell. This is one of many examples.
But on the positive side, there were new photosets that looked great and which I'd never seen before. Some of them even went up to 1600 px. And the zip downloads were OK at about over 500 mbps.
I'm glad I had another look at the site, but I know I wouldn't have if that full trial wasn't available. I didn't get that much stuff from it, but it was OK for the trial price.
|
11-09-08 05:07pm
|
Reply
174
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from paulmarkham:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Interesting post and here is a question for all those who are confused about any sites rotation policy.
1. Do you want 2 sites with 410 videos and no rotation. As we now have over 1000 we would have a 3rd site at a lower price with the remaining content. How we split the content would be decided later.
2. A site with all the content for twice the price?
3. A site twice the size for the same price?
4. Or a site with 410 videos and rotating so over the month you see 530 and in your second month you see the other 530. All for $29.95?
We would make more money with option 1, but I felt it was not fair. Option 2 is a non starter because few would pay $59.90 for a month. Option 3 is great for the surfer, and I would like to get twice as much for my money as well. Not going to make anymore money and could lose us money with todays connections and downloaders.
Option 4 we feel is the fairest. By no means the best value for money site on the net, just the best we can do for the money. The members pay and we need to keep the site open.
530 for $29.95 = 5.6 cents a scene. OK so you only like half 11 cents a scene. Kill me for it. LOL
|
04-06-08 03:34am
|
Reply
175
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Khan:
OFFICIAL PORNUSER.com NOTICE
==============================
Please note that User daveboy has been discovered as using the same computer as the WebMaster Paul Markham. Thus, that account (daveboy) has been SUSPENDED.
We are leaving the remarks from that account here since to delete them would leave "holes" in the threads. However, we feel compelled to let readers know the true situation.
|
02-19-08 09:57am
|
