| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Davit:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
OK, keep your hair on! I wasn't taking a serious shot at you. I knew exactly what your original comment meant, and was basically saying "Yes, obviously that's the case" - because, to be blunt, you were stating the obvious. Take a chill pill!
|
09-06-08 05:20am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from pat362:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Your best bet is "The Violation of" series by JM Production, or material from Skeeter Kerkove while he was with Mayhem. There are quite a few fisting scenes on those movies. Take a look at either Corruption or Uplaod from Sex-Z-Pictures? I know Corruption had a Kylie Ireland vaginal and a partial anal fisting scene. These aren't even on an easter egg but in the movie itself. Kylie isn't a newbie to anal fisting because I remember a scene with Bridgette Kerkove where they are back to back anal fisting each others at the same time. It is quite hard to find fisting material in the US because studios are deadly affraid to get brought up on charges of indecency.
|
08-17-08 08:06pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from badandy400:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
I will check it out. I had not seen that posting yet.
|
08-12-08 04:36pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from badandy400:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Gotcha. I do have some scenes that I do not think I will ever get into, but the "collector" in me just will not let me hit the delete button. On the other hand, I do have some that I would never delete if for some reason I could only keep so much. I really do not see that happening any time soon though. Hard drives are getting cheaper and bigger. My real fear is losing a drive before I back it up and losing some of those "magical" scenes.
|
08-11-08 07:29pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from badandy400:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
MAN!!! I could not imagine pushing the delete key. That is all most evil in my eyes. Actually i do delete only the absolute worst, but most things I end up keeping around. To me 100 GB is pocket change, unfortunately it costs more than pocket change. I have the attitude that you never know when you will want to see that scene again. Because it does not interest me now does not mean it never will in the future. Thus, I keep pretty much everything.
|
08-11-08 06:45pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from badandy400:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
I download and watch porn even during a school semester. Actually, I have a final exam tomorrow and here I am talking to another addict. Kinda like holding an AA meeting at a bar.
I used to love telling people how many pictures and videos I had. My last count was 1,200,000 all together, and most people would drop their jaw when they seen that. This was about 2 years ago, I would love to see them now. Actually I do not even know how much I actually have. It is too disorganized still, but getting better. All that is the collector side of me showing.
It really does keep me a little too occupied though. If I would spend half as much time studying as I do with porn I would be able to add a good point to my GPA!!
|
08-11-08 05:44pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Ditto that, MarquilisAZ. The "celebs" who have made porn aren't all that great. The great ones are unlikely to permit any photos or videos of their coital activity.
|
08-04-08 12:32am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Davit:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Appreciate the honesty, Margulis. I'm addicted too. I need porn like I need food, and get hungry for it when I've not seen it for a while.
I do personally think it's probably not a healthy thing - it creates a desire for something that can only ever be obtained in the virtual world, never in real life (unless you're a male porn star).
But, as I said before: whada-ya-gonna-do.
|
03-19-08 02:41pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Drooler:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
I have the same experience, but with my "B" list sites. It also really sucks when you stay away for several months and find that most of the new content isn't to your liking, or that the site has unexpected problems (less frequent updates, broken links, etc.) in spite of your checking at PU and TBP for more recent comments and reviews before returning to it.
With my really favorite sites, I tend to get longer-term memberships just to keep things flowing. I figure for a site I can pretty much depend on, spending under $15 a month for a year is worth it. But that's also risky because sometimes the site will change in unwelcome ways, to my tastes anyway.
|
03-19-08 02:38am
|
Reply
10
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from sparks:
I totally agree. They used to have lots of new great sets but sadly now most are recycled. I wouldn't mind so much but I feel the recent sets are much better in many ways.
For those of you who have their sets take a look at the "Date Picture Taken" property in Explore. I was looking at the last few months and it seemed that around 90% were recycled from as far back as 7 years ago (sets which I already had).
|
11-10-08 08:23am
|
Reply
11
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Drooler:
And another thing: They can't even keep the names straight. They have an upcoming hardcore set with Julie Silver but they've got her named Sandra de Marco! (It's another redux, btw. Just thought I'd mention it.)
|
08-15-08 04:04am
|
Reply
12
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Drooler:
Another thing thing they do is sit on their butts with the Sunday "casting" updates. It's happened again and again, and it happened this morning, too. (They "post" new updates 4 a.m. my time.)
But, as usual, they hadn't put up the thumbs and the zips don't work, either! (Error msg) I checked at 5:30 a.m. They cheerfully suggest that I check back later. Hmmph.
"Yo, if you're going to post something as updated, make sure it is!"
P-R-O-F-E-S-S-I-O-N-A-L-I-S-M (Thought I'd just spell it out for 'em.)
|
08-03-08 02:56am
|
Reply
13
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
's right!! I just looked at the Sandra Kalerman "Blue Couch" set (with color uncoordinated green toy) and sure enough, deja vu all over again!
|
08-01-08 01:18am
|
Reply
14
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Wittyguy:
I recently finished a membership at Handsonhardcore and noticed that there was a lot of "remastering" going on there as well. I think it's due in part to the fact that most porn surfers haven't been around all that long and will think it's new and in part saving production money while keeping the updates flowing.
|
07-31-08 11:44am
|
Reply
15
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Denner:
Thanks to Drooler - AGAIN - for stating things af they are...(and of course to MargulisAZ for bringing this up about 1 By Day).
Damn, Drooler and quite a few other PUs - I envy you - because it's a problem for this user: the native language compared to english - like some scandinavian writer just said:
"All the fine language details is lost when you have to speculate about translation" (something like that, anyway).
Well, ok, that's the deal here at this site - so bottom line: I keep working on it..
And yes, I've had the same speculations as Drooler - about 1 By Day:
Has something changed radically - It would be a shame for this once great site - and for us. And foremost: Where are the new girls? The NEW girls/the NEW stuff that is so importend for most serious PUs
1 By Day used to be among the best in that field...
|
07-31-08 07:08am
|
Reply
16
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Drooler:
This hasn't been lost on me, either. If you look carefully at the little kind of white oval shaped thing on the thumb, it does say "Reloaded" but it isn't nearly as noticeable as the former "Once upon a time, on (insert date here) ..." they were putting on them.
Thing is, there are members from way back in 2002. We've seen every single update since then. And some of us are members of PU. And we know which porn stars are current and which aren't, so put it all together and those who get "reloaded" aren't usually hard to spot.
I look forward to seeing Sandra (blue couch) again tomorrow morning. That one's not even labelled "reloaded" but I think it is. Why? I have photos of the same scene, and when I moused over one, it said it was taken in 2002. Also, the older photos were taken before she got that (completely unneeded) boob job.
I enjoy and appreciate the reloaded stuff because it looks better than the original (usually) and the pic sizes are sometimes MUCH bigger than they were before.
But what I don't like is this shift to labelling content as if it's "new" when it's not. Once someone starts trying to pull it over on you, you never know what they'll do next.
And I wonder what's happened to DDF. We haven't heard from Bela in a while (the webmaster). I get a feeling that something's changed. Are they still hiring new girls? I've been wondering about that, too.
|
07-31-08 04:05am
|
Reply
17
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Denner:
Agree....
Just ended this term and had that feeling "sneaky".
Been member on and off have quite some years now - and recognize more and more older stuff - It's okay with some remastered stuff with a little better looking videos.
But they overdoing this old stuff - and yes: without clear info.
|
07-31-08 03:33am
|
Reply
18
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
This is true. I put that in my review. The other two sites that come in the package - Picking Up Pussy and TNA Tryouts do have the higher definition downloads, but not 18Eighteen. Don't know why.
|
04-18-11 06:32pm
|
Reply
19
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Referring to the public preview page:
I agree, some girls in the thumbnails do appear to be shown twice or more in separate thumbnails.
It's hard to be certain how many of the thumbnails are of each model.
Partially because many of the models are similar in appearance.
If you join the site or network, each site listing of the individual videos gives a better thumbnail of each model, as well as her name.
That gives a better indication of what the site contains.
I agree that the public preview is very poor.
They should have a public preview page showing all their models.
|
01-12-17 07:58pm
|
Reply
20
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
I believe there are currently 487 scenes/videos at the site.
I believe the videos are exclusive.
However, after watching a number of the videos, it's hard to tell them apart.
Maybe it's porn burn-out for me, but the videos start to get repetitious after a while.
In spite of the attractive girls.
So there is a lot of content at this one site.
And you also get network access, which means you get a boatload of porn videos.
The basic network gives you over 3,000 videos (without upgrading to premium status).
I see no need to pay the $70 to upgrade to premium status.
I don't believe the preview page is a mashup.
It's just that the thumbnails reflect that the videos are so similar.
And that's why you think it's a jumbled mashup.
It isn't a jumbled mashup.
It just that the thumbnails, which show different videos, seem so similar to each other, that it seems like a jumbled mess.
And that's what your brain seems to see, after watching many of these videos. An overpowering mess of attractive naked teens, which loses its allure because of the repetitiousness of the videos.
|
01-12-17 03:47am
|
Reply
21
|
8Teens World
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from ace of aces:
if you joined that site, it would be also worth knowing it :) please tell me youre experience
|
06-19-09 08:58am
|
Reply
22
|
All My Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
I find that to be a lazy scam! Updates should be new, unique material, not something pulled out of the recycle bin!
|
03-23-08 07:40pm
|
Reply
23
|
All My Models
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
from badandy400:
What are the other girls the ones they wish they could get or something?!?! That is a terrible thing to do, right along with cherry picking for the preview pages and promising no download limits than booting me off after a day. Thanks for the warning, and nice catch.
|
03-20-08 09:06pm
|
Reply
24
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(MargulisAZ's Reply)
Looks like corporate-style conformity is winning the day in the Met-Art empire.
I used to like the way photos were named at Errotica-Archives (one of the subject feifdoms): an "m" was tacked onto the end if it was "medium" size, and an "l" or and "e" if it was, respectively, "large" or "extra-large."
But now, as so often happens in times imperial, a singular convention has prevailed, so if I want to mix medium- and large-sized pictures in file number order, I can't just chuck out an "m" and put the "l" in its place, now that those attributes have to appear before the file number.
Petty, I know. But only if you're a fan of the content ... and there's plenty of that.
|
09-06-14 11:02am
|
Reply
25
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
from PinkPanther:
Considering what Alex announced about the HUGE leap in content being released at ALS Scan - a complete photo set being released each day, while one complete photo set is being released per week at ALS Angels - they are really going to have to adjust the pricing.
They have already been sending out offers to past members of 1 month of ALS Angels when rejoining ALS Scan for 90 days. It will be interesting to see if they continue to develop ways to give ALS Angels memberships away as various types of bonuses.
|
03-05-08 06:10pm
|
