| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(RLane's Reply)
I would save you the money and heartache when you join a solo model site hoping to get some intimate stuff and some exclusif content. Only to discover that there is neither and what there is isn't worth the money you paid.
I got burned so badly when I first started surfing the net that I had no choice but to avoid all solo model sites. Luckily it's not as bad now (in large part because of TBP/PU) but it's still wise to ask before you take out your credit card.
|
02-24-13 10:21am
|
Reply
27
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Capn:
Beautiful as the models are, I like to see progression from fully clothed to full nudity in a set. The journey is as important as the destination for me.
It looks like they are nude from photo one in most sets?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-24-13 03:22am
|
Reply
28
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from otoh:
I've not joined Sex Art, but have been a member both at X Art and at Joymii. They are very, very similar sites, so if you liked X Art, you should like this. But for my money, I prefer Joymii - the difference is subtle, but the photography just seems better - the sets, colours, angles are a bit different, a bit more interesting.
|
02-24-13 01:12am
|
Reply
29
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from KET924aab:
It is kinda odd RLane, almost like they must be piggybacking on the end of someone else's photo shoot, but they only have the time to do one vid and one photo set. It would definitely be nice to see multiple photo sets and vids from them, as they do have a unique style.
|
02-23-13 09:22pm
|
Reply
30
|
Tegan Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
If you haven't read my comments for Lela Star then do so because they apply to her site as well. The one thing that may be different here is that you do get access to a network of porn performers so $18 is not be such a bad deal. Be advised that a percentage of the performers on the network are no longer active in porn so content is likely to be older and there won't be any addition.
|
02-23-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
31
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
My rule of thumb with all solo model sites is that unless you know exactly what you are getting inside the members area then it means that there isn't anything of value. If you have visted her site then you already know that you can't see the content so she falls under the avoiud like the plague.
I'd also like to add that she hasn't posted anything on her Twitter accout since last July and she wasn't really active as a performer a long time before that so you are certainly won't be getting anything recent.
|
02-23-13 06:16pm
|
Reply
32
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from philfromusa:
I think the size thing was recently changed, as images from Amateur "Holly Jean" in "SERENE DESIRE" are at 3840 on the small side & 5760 on the long side.
|
01-02-13 09:50am
|
Reply
33
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Mikey24:
(RLane's Reply)
In your experience, which sites come close to Playboy in terms of model quality but also offers truly hi-res photo sets? I think Digital Desire comes close with certain models.
|
11-30-12 02:08pm
|
Reply
34
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Mikey24:
Hmm so even the newer photo sets have a max resolution of 1920x1280? That's quite disappointing considering most other sites have avg. 3000pixels on the long side.
|
11-29-12 11:49pm
|
Reply
35
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Capn:
I really don't mean to sound negative, but there are so many, glam artsy photo sites that they tend to get pretty anonymous.
( Actually, Met art is a prime example of that.
It is so formulaic that each set blends into another ).
If he is going to be successful in this venture, he needs to find a good angle on the content.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-22-12 04:19pm
|
Reply
36
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from elephant:
Yeah I did notice this photographer had gone solo now with his own site, its good for him I guess as he/she gets to showcase their work only and get more recognition but would have to remain at a lower end subscription fee till it has a good amount of models. Sometimes Metart though does seem a little intimidating with its vastness and you need lots of time to get through it, maybe a smaller site is a good idea if you really their photos.
|
11-22-12 09:45am
|
Reply
37
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Denner:
Ahm - still a rather limited amount of material - and especially vids. Looks fine in general, ok - but I'll put it on hold....and wait for more content.
|
11-22-12 07:30am
|
Reply
38
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Claypaws:
I was a member about two months ago. They do not really have a download limit (unless it is larger than I would ever hit). But they make accessing and downloading difficult with irritating timeouts. If you click a download link (for a zip), you have to begin downloading it within about 2 minutes or the link times out. You cannot use a download manager but DownThemAll in Firefox works provided you start the download within under two minutes. So you cannot queue them.
Links from thumbnails to photos also time out in a few minutes. If you have had the thumbnail page for a photo set on display for more than about five minutes, then clicking a thumbnail just gives you the black bar that you describe. You have to return to the model's main page, open the photo set again from that page and then you can click thumbnails again successfully for the next five minutes. It is happy with opening in a new tab but only if you work within those timings.
Your entire login times out after a while. I cannot remember how long but I think it was somewhere between one and two hours. If your login has timed out, you cannot access anything until you restart the browser and then log in again.
They have a forum but they ignore all criticism and suggestions. They respond quickly to reports of definite faults though, such as blind links or missing images. Occasionally, they respond to praise of individual photo sets or models. Disrespectful comments are removed, which is fair enough. But they do themselves no favours by ignoring all constructive criticism.
|
05-16-12 05:36am
|
Reply
39
|
Dirty Ashlyn
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
She certainly looks different here, I don't think I've seen her with the blonde hair before. Think I preferred her more as a natural brunette than a fake breasted blonde. Only 2 days ago I discovered some nice pre boob job photo shoots of her at My Glamour Site.
|
05-13-12 01:17am
|
Reply
40
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Abel Semen:
Not a member, but it seems to be the *tiniest* bit harder than Met-Art now. Models actually kiss each other, lick their lips and otherwise act overtly erotic, but its still only softcore as far as I can tell from the free portion of the site. Not nearly as big a difference as between Met-Art and Sexart, for example.
|
04-18-12 12:00am
|
Reply
41
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from PinkPanther:
As a long-time member, I've got to say that their regular price of $59.95/3 months, recurring at $54.95/3 months is a great deal itself, given the quality and quantity of their updates.
|
03-16-12 05:23pm
|
Reply
42
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Sarah:
ALS Scan rarely has any discounts and when we do they are generally offered only to current or past members.
But you can email webmaster@s2.alsscan.com to see if any are currently being offered.
|
03-14-12 01:05pm
|
Reply
43
|
Natasha Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
There might be someone but I rather doubt it so here is what I think you should do. You should stay far away from this site. That is unless you have 25$ dollars that's buring a hole in your pocket and you really don't know what to do with it and even then I think you could find a lot better things to invest in then this site. This is your typical solo model site with a few clothed, semi-nude or all nude photos and videos and not much else. Now that might just be what you want but I still think you can find better. I'm including a link to a another members review of the other site owned by the same company. You'll see that the site didn't get avery good score and i don't think her's will be any better.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=64579
You could start a thread in the forum on what you are looking for and if you are looking for a model that looks like Natasha then reference her site so that people get an idea of what type of model you like.
|
03-13-12 07:22pm
|
Reply
44
|
Artfemme
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Drooler:
August, 2006 was the only time I joined. Max size was 1200 pixels. I took a few other notes, too: very slow server, links to 3,000 pixel images that didn't exist anyway.
And: NO ZIPS.
Well, once was enough. Their "recent updates" are from 2006, too, so go figure.
|
01-27-12 11:16am
|
Reply
45
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
I think the revamp and renaming of the site is an attempt to give the site its own individual identity. Under the name Met Models I think most people had the impression that it was just the smaller inferior sister site of Met Art where they dumped the content that didn't make the grade to be showcased on Met Art.
From the tour it looks like they are using the exact same site layout i've just encountered at the other Met sister site The Life Erotic which is a big improvement as they have addressed some of the cons i mentioned in my review of last year such as the lack of a decent model index. I also notice from the tour that they have doubled the update rate to 2 per day from 19th January so i guess that would be their justification for the price increase.
|
01-26-12 03:41am
|
Reply
46
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from BradlyH:
(RLane's Reply)
Glad to hear you like that sort of set but there are very few that are along that tone so it might just give you a taste.
I liked clothes sets, there are some very sexy ones on petites-parisiennes that i have found. BUT unlike BT there is a bit of a tease, a flash or something to set an erotica tone.
Sets that show nothing but a smiling beauty in nice clothing do nothing for me. I need something to give it a erotica kick. I may as well flip through a sears catalog if not :)
I think BT should be on every ones list. Looking back now i underscored this site slightly.
|
12-26-11 08:50am
|
Reply
47
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Thanks for the heads-up - much appreciated. This is the first sale price that I can remember this site offering - the limit to their generosity is one month, however - after the first month, the price goes to $29.95/month.
|
12-23-11 07:14am
|
Reply
48
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Drooler:
I second what Tangub said about joining. I also missed out on the holiday special by signing up for a half year a little too early, but I have to say that the photography is simply outstanding. Really, MPL is setting the gold standard for quality photography of "artistic" nudes.
The approach is tasteful, creative, and sexy, without getting too "artsy" about it. They show there's a lot that can be done with those ideas in mind.
And the women are simply amazingly beautiful.
|
12-22-11 05:50am
|
Reply
49
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
Damn....that's just typical after i went and paid $35 for a membership a few months ago. Times must be tough with all these sites clamouring for our christmas porn budget. I'm already sorted though after taking the thanksgiving half price offer at Met Art and as its my first time there i think it could keep me busy for up to 6 months trawling through their huge archives. Anyway I'd highly recommend MPL at that price to anyone who has not been there before.
|
12-20-11 11:07pm
|
Reply
50
|
Club Capri Anderson
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
Did you by any chance try to reach the site? If you did then you noticed that the link takes you to glamour models gone bad and not her site so that means her site no longer exist.
Mind you that's not a major problem because the site was probably not worth the cost. Performers that don't do a lot of porn rarely have a site where they'll do more. Capri's claim to fame is that she was one of Charlie Sheen's escort when he went ape shit. She was able to milk this for her 15 minutes of fame and has disapeared back in the escort business where she probably makes huge amounts of money.
|
12-15-11 11:35am
|
